AUCTORES
Research Article
*Corresponding Author: Najwa Alfarra, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & RC, Physical Rehabilitation Department, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Citation: N Alfarra, N Aldhawyan, S Alharbi and M Sheeha. (2021) Perception of Healthcare Providers in Agile Environment Imposed by the COVID-19. Clinical Research and Clinical Trials. 3(3); DOI:10.31579/2693-4779/027
Copyright: © 2021 Najwa Alfarra. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 09 February 2021 | Accepted: 28 April 2021 | Published: 30 April 2021
Keywords: COVID-19; physical therapists; adopted measures; pandemic; health professionals; orthotics/ prosthetics
BACKGROUND
Nearly nine months have passed since the emergence of the severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), which caused the rapidly spreading Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. In Saudi Arabia, unprecedented precautionary strict measures were applied to prevent virus entry to the country or to mitigate its impact when it arrives. The physical rehabilitation is the 3rd largest profession in the area of healthcare and is the most representative profession in the area of rehabilitation in Saudi Arabia. Physical rehabilitation services provide the development, maintenance, and recovery of people’s movement and functional ability, improving their quality of life. In this way, many hospitalized patients in the acute phase of COVID-19, as well as chronic patients, need physical rehabilitation services. This study aimed to determine the number of therapists/ clinicians who interrupted their services because of the COVID-19 pandemic and to verify the procedures adopted by the therapists/clinicians to continue serving and supporting their patients.
METHODS
The sample comprised 46 therapists/clinicians who worked in King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center (KFSH&RC), 19 (41.4%) males and 27 (58.6%) females. The measurement instrument was an on-line survey questionnaire applied mid-July to mid-August 2020 through email. The questionnaires consisted of four primary sections. The first section gathered information on respondents' sociodemographic characteristics. The second section assessed respondents ' years of professional experience and area of specialty. The third section assessed respondents ' work load on daily bases pre/post COVID-19 crisis. The final section of the questionnaire assessed the benefits and barriers of telehealth, therapist opinion about how was the department/organization handled this pandemic issue, and to add their recommendation to improve the service.
RESULTS
Out of the 46 therapists/clinicians, 37 (80.4%) interrupted their work activities because of the pandemic and 9 (19.6%) continue with the existing daily practice. The number of patients seen/day before pandemic decreased compare to pre pandemic by21.7%, in arrange of 15 patients/day to zero patient/day by 26.1%, that led to change the way of therapists daily practice such as seven therapists shifted their clinics to virtual clinics, and almost most of the therapists (n= 32) continue working in inpatient ward, taking in their considerations the main measures that was adopted by the organization, when they deal with the direct patient contact which included: hand washing, mask use, material disinfection and gloves. The three administrative respondents work on quality issues, managerial guidelines and research. While the four orthotics/ prosthetics clinicians shifted their work to fabricate medical supportive devices to be used for the patients. Seven therapists shift their clinics to virtual visits, and they found it very convenient to the patients.
CONCLUSIONS
Our result revealed that most of the therapists/clinicians interrupted their regular work , impact number patient seen per day and face-to-face practices because of the COVID-19 pandemic, due to several reason such as spread of infection and the patients are afraid to come and they cancelled their appointment, however, half of the respondents continue with their existing work and taking into their considerations the measured that were adapted by the organization, the others who did not follow up their patients’ treatment in person, most of them adapted to monitor their patients from a distance by using virtual visits.
In March 2020 the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the outbreak of a novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), to be a pandemic. All countries and territories of the world have reported cases of COVID-19. WHO, PAHO and public health authorities around the world are taking action to contain the spread of COVID-19 and manage its impact. Saudi Arabia was among the first countries to implement early and unprecedented precautionary measures to prevent SARS-CoV-2 introduction into the country or to mitigate its impact when it arrives; such measures were implemented early before reporting the first case in the country on March 2nd 2020. On March 8th the Saudi government shifted schools and universities to remote learning and virtual classrooms. This was accompanied by a travel ban to all affected countries and putting in place mandatory quarantine for passengers who already arrived from these countries. By March 12th all social and governmental gatherings and events were suspended or postponed including the Saudi-African and Arab-African summits. Subsequently, all international and domestic air travels, sports events, workplaces (except security and health sectors) were suspended. Digital health was quickly activated and utilized for several services such as a “my health” app that allows people to seek medical help and receive medical prescriptions without the need to visit the medical centers [1-3].
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a new coronavirus that emerged in 2019 and causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) [2, 3]. It differs from other respiratory viruses in that it appears that human-to-human transmission occurs approximately 2 to 10 days prior to the individual becoming symptomatic [3]. The virus is transmitted from person to person through respiratory secretions. Large droplets from coughing or sneezing on surfaces within 2 m of the infected person. Corona virus remains viable for at least 24 hours on hard surfaces and up to 8 hours on soft surfaces [4]. The virus is transferred to another person through hand contact on a contaminated surface followed by touching the mouth, nose or eyes. Aerosol airborne infected particles created during a sneeze or cough remain viable in the air for ≤ 3 hours. These airborne particles of COVID-19 can then be inhaled by another person or land on the mucosal membranes of the eyes.
Individuals with COVID-19 can present with an influenza-like illness and respiratory tract infection demonstrating fever (89%), cough (68%), fatigue (38%), sputum production (34%) and/or shortness of breath (19%) [5]. The spectrum of disease severity ranged from asymptomatic infection or mild upper respiratory tract illness through to severe viral pneumonia with respiratory failure and/or death. Current reports estimate that 80% of cases were asymptomatic or mild; 15% of cases were severe (infection requiring oxygen); and 5% were critical requiring ventilation and life support [3].
Many questions have arisen and adaptions made in the effort to respond to the crisis and the needs of our patients. The physical rehabilitation profession has been affected by the crisis, because the healthcare provider has direct contact with patients, which makes them susceptible to the transmission of infectious diseases. At the same time, consideration must be given to the fact that the physical rehabilitation profession plays a crucial role in the health of our society, and there are people in our communities whose health will be significantly impacted by disruptions to care. There were a few studies performed in that new field and they explained how COVID-19 impact daily work of the therapists/clinicians. The aim of the study to explore how therapists/clinicians in King Faisal specialist hospital at the physical rehabilitation department adapting their practice to continue serving and supporting their patients during COVID-19 pandemic.
Cross-sectional study, Survey questionnaires were developed by the authors in English language. On the first page of the online questionnaire, respondents were clearly informed about the background and objectives of the study. Respondents were informed that all information and opinions provided would be anonymous and confidential. Respondents understood the completion of the survey indicates their consent of participation in the research.
The studied population consisted of therapists, and clinicians, of all genders and ages. The research inclusion criteria defined therapists/clinicians who worked in Physical Rehabilitation Department at King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center (KFSH&RC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Exclusion criteria any therapists/ clinicians who did not work at King Faisal Specialist Hospital.
The measurement instrument was an on-line survey questionnaire. Data collection took place between 15th. July and 5th. August 2020. Therapists/clinicians working in the selected hospital were e-mailed with the survey questionnaires and the survey was re-sent after 2-weeks of the initial dispatch to those participants who did not respond. All those therapists/clinicians return their completed questionnaires were included in the data analysis.
The questionnaires consisted of 20 questions in four sections. The first section gathered information on respondents' sociodemographic characteristics, included: gender, education level, work discipline, and professional title. The second section assessed respondents ' years of professional experience and area of specialty. The third section assessed respondents ' work load on daily bases pre/post COVID-19 crisis, and how is the pandemic impact the load of work per day. The final section of the questionnaire assessed the benefits and barriers of telehealth, therapist opinion about how was the department/organization handled this pandemic issue, and to add their recommendation to improve the service.
Of the 20 questionnaires delivered, the sample consisted of (59) therapists /clinicians, nevertheless, only 46 respondents completed the survey: 36 physiotherapists, 4 Orthotics/Prosthetics, and 6 Occupational therapists, with 19 (41.3%) males and 27 (58.7%) females. Thirty-two of the respondents had bachelor degree, twelve had master degree, and two had doctorate of healthcare management. Regarding the professional title at the KFSH&RC three carried administrative title, 29 senior physical therapist/occupational therapists (PT/OT) therapists, nine junior PT/OT therapists, two Saudi Career Developmental Program trainers (SCDP), and three senior Orthotics/ Prosthetics. Years of practice in the profession ranged from five months to 30 years (mean+/-16 years).
Third section, analyzed respondent’s coverage areas: the majority of the respondents covering adult outpatient (n=22) 47.8%, followed by18 (39.1%) respondents’ covered adult inpatient, three (6.5%) orthotics/prosthetics outpatient respondents’ two (4.3%) pediatric inpatient , and one (2.2%) respondent pediatric outpatient (Figure 1)
Twenty of the respondents (43.5%) treated between 5-10 patients per day, while 18 respondents (39.1%) treated between 10-15 patients per day, six respondents (13%) treated from 1-5 patients per day and there are two therapists (4.4%) treated between 15-22 patients per day in the inpatient area. Compared to post pandemic 18 (39.1%) respondents treated 1-5 patients /day, ten (21.7%) respondents treated 5-10 patients /day, eight (17.5%) respondents 10-15 who worked in the inpatient area, and ten (21.7%) zero patients, because the outpatient clinics were closed and the patients were afraid to come to their visits. So 80.4% of the respondents confirmed that the pandemic affected their daily load and work while 19.6% the inpatient staff replied their work it does not affected by the pandemic.
The final section of the questionnaires about the use of telehealth with the patients before the pandemic 82.6% answered they did not use before, while 17.4% they answered yes. Out of the 46 respondents, there were only seven therapists shift their clinics to virtual visits, and they found the most salient benefits that virtual visits care offers patients is convenience. Instead of travelling to and from a hospital, or from city to another to meet the therapist, virtual visits empower people to confer with their caregivers from the comfort of their own home, makes healthcare more available, increase access of care, improve the treatment outcome, continue with the plan of care, less chance of catching any type of infection, save time, and cost-efficiency specially for the patients who lived outside Riyadh. While the therapists found that the virtual visits were very helpful in patient/family education only and difficulty to assess patients.
On the other hand, the therapists mentioned certain barriers of using the telehealth such as: therapists can only assess what they see and what the patient/sitter tells them, so it is difficult to assess range of motion and muscle power. Lack of technology or the knowledge to use it (especially in rural areas may present some challenges), lack of infrastructure, access to broadband or training in place to pivot to an online business model when the pandemic hit which will lead to longer treatment sessions, and possibly less efficient healthcare. However, it is not accessible for everyone, patients and doctor’s skepticism, patients/careers do not prefer telehealth, difficulty with communication, and uncomfortable sharing health information via telecommunication devices specially older patients might worry more about privacy.
Additionally, the study found that 89.1% of the respondents using their free time during the pandemic by attending webinars and courses online, three respondents 6.5% reported no free time at all, and 4.4% of the respondents participated in educational activities as an organizer or speaker. Moreover, 43.5%of the respondents were strongly satisfied with the way that the physical rehabilitation department/organization handled COVID-19 lockdown and the way that the department managed the patient flow, equal percentage of the respondents were satisfied, while equal number of the respondents 6.5% dissatisfied and strongly dissatisfied, without any explanation why they were not satisfied.
When the respondents asked about the area that the organization should improve in order to maximize telehealth service to the patients during the pandemic 47.8% of the respondents replied to improve the existing telehealth, followed by 30.5% increase network speed and connectivity issues, and 21.7% work on education therapist on telehealth.
The final question it was about the therapists’/clinicians experience during COVID-19 pandemic and their concerns/recommendation to the department/organization to improve the service: A total of 20 (43.5%) of the respondents had no concerns, while 8 ( 17.4%) replied by thank you, followed by 15.2% reported that the experience was difficult for their humanity, formal psychological support should be provided by the department in a form of regular meetings to discuss their uncertainties specially at the beginning of the pandemic. Moreover, some of the respondents reported that “the departmental communication could have been better”. Furthermore, 5 (10.8%) respondents reported that” nothing changed about the load of the patient during COVID-19 pandemic. The only difference was the time flexibility which helped in decrease the stress of coming to the hospital on daily basis and if we come on daily basis we do not need to stay at the hospital after we finish our work and the concentration was only on completing the daily task by treating patients not the attendance”. Moreover, 3 (6.5%) respondents would like the virtual visits to continue after the pandemic for the long term chronic conditions that may have similar outcomes and benefits without being seen in the clinic to give the chance to others who need to be physically there. One (2.2%) respondent reported there were huge decrease in number of patients due to utilizing more wards for COVID-19 patients, also due to stopping of elective admission, which reflect in work for few hours and that increase the quality of work. Also one (2.2%) of the respondents confirmed that the department and the organization strictly adhered with the PPE and hand hygiene, and 2.2% of the respondents thanked the department for their endless support.
Result of this study revealed that most therapists/ clinicians work practices were interrupted because of the COVID-19 pandemic. To minimize the impact of this public health crisis due to the new coronavirus, the physical rehabilitation department took measures, use their professional judgement to determine when, where, and how to provide care, and designed certain recommendations to assist therapist’s/clinicians workforce to plan and respond to the patient’s demand at the inpatient ward and outpatient clinics.
All inpatient staff should minimize surface contact, use of a respirator (like N95 respirator) instead of facemask during aerosol-generating procedures (non-invasive ventilation, intubation/extubation, nebulization, open suctioning of airway secretions), hand hygiene and personal protective equipment, respecting the proper sequence to dress (donning) (HH—gown—mask—goggles—gloves) and undress (doffing) (gloves—goggles—gown—mask—HH), disposing of disposable materials when their function is complete, reusable/non-disposable materials must be carefully disinfected. All the staff should have mask fit test, staff with beard were encouraged to remove facial hair to ensure good mask fit, recurrent use of shoes cover is not recommended, as repeated removal is likely to increase the risk of staff contamination. All the therapists who covered COVID-19 ward should be aware about the role of the therapists/clinicians in the management of hospital admitted patients with confirmed COVID-19 to prevent transmission of virus. It is important for the therapists/clinicians to understand the different types of isolation rooms that exist in hospital, which is used for COVID-19 patients to prevent transmission of infection by droplet or contact routes, and should be fully aware in how to use airborne PPE precautions. The assigned therapists to cover COVID-19 ward, they were not allowed to cover the regular inpatient ward.
Patients and staff safety:
All patients should be treated as potential risk for COVID-19 contact transmission, therefore staffs are instructed to deal with patients accordingly. All staff should follow the hospital policy of universal masking and the use of the proper PPEs as well as maintaining the social distancing (a minimum of 1-2 meter), practice respiratory hygiene by coughing or sneezing into bent elbow or tissue and then immediately disposing of the tissue. All scheduled outpatients will be filtered and categorized according to the acuity of their condition, their overall general health and their age. Patient who fall under the high risk patient group will be given the priority in the virtual clinics unless patient physical attendance to the clinic is highly recommended and needed. Patients with acute conditions (e.g. post-operative patients, patients with acute pain and/or exacerbation of their symptoms should be served in the clinic. Outpatient staff work should be arranged on a team’s basis where full staffing should not be all working on the same time. This should be achieved through the application of flexible working times, the utilization of telehealth and virtual clinics. If the employee has a fever, cough, and have difficulty breathing they should seek medical care and encourage them to stay at home until they are clear from their physicians.
All outpatient staff should be rotating to do actual clinics in the hospital and agile work via virtual/phone clinics from home to reduce the number of patients/staff traffic in the department. Rotating teams work arrangement will help to minimize the number of staff present in the department at any given time thus reduce the traffic in the staff designated areas (lockers, lounges charting areas). Each outpatient staff should be assigned to a specific room (clinic) which the staff will be fully responsible to clean/disinfect after each patient. Also, staff who treats their patients in the department gym will be fully responsible for cleaning/disinfecting after patient use. Floor marking and waiting areas segregation are applied and should be vigilantly reinforced to assure the practice of social distancing. Sitters/escorts presence in the clinic should be strictly limited to those patients who are in high need for them, no more than ONE sitter should be allowed to all patients under this category. Staff and patients should wear face mask at all times while in the clinic. The patient will not be accommodated if the patient did not comply with these instructions. Support staff: secretaries and other non-medical staff will be encouraged to work from home as much as possible. PCAs are working in flexible working hours to avoid the traffic. All the infection prevention and control guidelines disseminated to the staff by email, virtual staff meeting and signage in and around the clinic to encourage regular hand washing and use of PPE. The Majority of these measures were already disseminated by APT and WHO at the beginning of the pandemic [10].
The definition of digital physical therapy
Before the COVID-19 crisis, in 2017 the World Confederation for Physical Therapy (WCPT) launched a collaboration to develop initiatives to the global practice and regulations of digital physical therapy practice through a Joint WCPT/INPTRA digital physical therapy Practice Task Force (Task Force) [11]. This report published in 2019 defined digital practice as “a term used to describe health care services, support, and information provided remotely via digital communication and devices”. The purpose of this initiative was “to facilitate effective delivery of physical therapy services by improving access to care and information and managing health care resources.”[1]. However, for several physical therapists who have never had contact with this terminology, it is important to be aware that different terms are used in this field. There is still no global well-accepted term or definition for digital physical therapy among the literature industry, policymakers, and stakeholder groups. The variety of technologies that encompass this term may include tele-education, telemedicine, telemonitoring, teleassistance, mobile health, or Virtual visits among others, and each field has its subset of technologies and specificities [11].
At KFSH&RC to reduce transmission and when the outpatient clinics were forced by the higher management to close, the outpatient team decided to quickly activate digital health to continue the delivery of service. There are currently no established or recognized global standards or agreement for delivering physiotherapy care digitally [1]. However, the overall emerging evidence appears to indicate that digital technologies are providing new opportunities for the physical rehabilitation profession to deliver high- quality and acceptable care to users of their service in ways that can have benefits for all5. Some national physiotherapy organizations are welcoming the use of digital practices where it enhances the service to the patient6. To implement telemedicine at the rehabilitation department (KFHS&RC) a variety of approaches can be used such as the use of general communication tools like: email, chat/ whatsapp and virtual clinics and/or therapist’s specific platforms such as online exercise prescription tools. It is important to take into account the barriers that the therapists/patients might face as a result of using the telehealth such as difficulty to access the use of these tools may present for some patients is not accessible for everyone, patients and doctor’s skepticism, patients/careers do not prefer telehealth, the patient find difficulty with communication, and uncomfortable sharing health information via telecommunication devices especially older patients might worry more about privacy, so the therapist should provide support where required if possible. Additionally, the therapist might have lack of technology or the knowledge to use telehealth, lack of infrastructure, and training in place to pivot to an online business model when the pandemic hit which will lead to longer treatment sessions, and possibly less efficient healthcare, should be discussed with their manager to support them, and the most important obstacle that the therapists face; her/his inability to assess the patient. That goes with Galiano-Castillo N., et al, 2016 [19]. argued that the large-scale implementation of telehealth demands innovation in the technology market to improve capabilities and reduce cost to increase benefits. An important step for digital practice that will need support is data integration. As patients are remotely assessed or treated, professionals will need access to their relevant health data to provide the best care possible. That will help the healthcare providers to do the complete treatment after the assessment is measured [19].
That goes on line with Beatriz Minghelli et al [4]. Where they found that most physiotherapists had to interrupt their practice because of COVID-19. However, since they cannot follow up with their patients’ treatment in person, most physiotherapists adapted to monitor their patients from a distance using digital tools that are new to their professional activity. This was a necessary strategic measure to prevent the further spread of this pandemic. Additionally, APT, Aug.2020 added that the most important barriers are related to cost and reimbursement; legal liability, ethical issues such as confidentiality, outdated equipment, patient age and level of education; computer literacy, bandwidth range, and internet speed [10].
Furthermore, APT, Aug. 2020 [10] reported the telehealth Adoption and utilization expands prior to the pandemic, telehealth was the exception to the rule in physical therapy. Once the pandemic began changing behaviors, the number of PTs providing video consults significantly increased. However, by July only 13% of PTs providing telehealth were treating more than 10 patients per week that way, with 32% seeing fewer than one patient per week via telehealth on average. By late April, the ability for PTs to get paid for telehealth services was significantly improved, but challenges still remain: Many PTs are uncertain about payment, patient satisfaction, and outcomes. And technology challenges among patients and clinics remain a barrier to wider use. PTs should develop long-term strategies for telehealth. Telehealth has enabled PTs to treat and advise patients who otherwise might have gone without care during the public health emergency. Moving forward, PTs must ensure that they fully understand evolving regulations and best practices to ensure patient safety, privacy, and quality of care. Some patients — especially those who live in rural and remote areas and those with underlying health conditions — will rely on physical therapy services delivered via telehealth. Patient access to physical therapy via telehealth must continue beyond the public health emergency [10].
Digital physical therapy offers opportunities for users, service providers, and society, such as the expansion of access to health providers or specialists, encouragement of self-management, increase of flexibility for healthcare delivery, and decrease of sick-leave duration. Treatment efficacy and patient evaluation using digital practice were already investigated for some acute and chronic musculoskeletal conditions, cardiac conditions, neurological problems, post-surgical rehabilitation, pain management, pelvic floor conditions, and respiratory dysfunctions, they found out the digital practice will not be the solution for all the challenges that physical therapist will face, however, it is an exponential growing field, widely adopted within the virus outbreak, and with the potential to reduce costs, increase quality , and overall accessibility of modern healthcare systems [12,13,14,15,16,17,18].
The COVID-19 pandemic presents significant challenges for the physical rehabilitation services and interrupted their regular work. This study showed that almost half of the respondents continue with their existing work especially the inpatient staff and putting in their considerations the adopted measures from WHO, and APTA, while the other therapists shifted their work either to virtual visits, or administrative, research, and quality issues. The telehealth is considered to be appropriate for any Saudi healthcare professional as well as healthcare academics and students, with much of the content having international relevance. Overall, the content was perceived to be useful, meaningful and appropriate to the needs of healthcare workers. We recommend that this telehealth is distributed to all healthcare workers to supplement strategic health and wellbeing provisions for employees during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. This study showed that the telehealth has high fidelity with regards to the way of care delivery, and engagement of healthcare patients, but it needs some modification such as enable therapist to do certain assessment, by this modification this system will show high usability and practicality. Further study will be needed to measure the impact of this new service on the patients, from patient’s prospective view.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.