AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article
*Corresponding Author: Mark A Y F Pang, Middlemore Hospital, Counties Manakau District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand.
Citation: Mark A. Y. F. Pang, Nicholas J. Fischer, (2023), Pancreatic and Duodenal Injuries: Experience at A Single Trauma Centre, Journal of Clinical Surgery and Research, 4(5); DOI:10.31579/2768-2757/087
Copyright: © 2023, Mark A Y F Pang. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 24 July 2023 | Accepted: 18 August 2023 | Published: 31 August 2023
Keywords: pancreatic injury; duodenal injury; trauma
Background:
Pancreatic and duodenal injuries are uncommon due to relative protection by their posterior anatomical position and have an incidence of less than 1% of all hospital admissions for trauma. Auckland City Hospital is a tertiary referral hospital in New Zealand with Trauma and Hepatopancreatobiliary units and admits approximately 384 patients with major trauma per year, predominantly from blunt mechanisms. This study is used to assess the incidence, diagnosis and clinical management of pancreatic and duodenal injuries in trauma patients at a single trauma centre.
Method:
A retrospective study was undertaken using data from a prospectively collected trauma registry. Inpatient notes including all patients admitted from 2007 to 2020 were reviewed. Pancreatic and duodenal injuries were graded using the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) organ injury scale (OIS) grading system. Investigations including radiology and biochemistry and clinical management were noted.
Results:
A total of 45 trauma patients admitted to Auckland City Hospital had sustained pancreatic or duodenal injuries. Six patients had combined pancreaticoduodenal injuries, 16 had duodenal and 23 had pancreatic injuries. Grade I organ injuries were the most common in pancreatic (19/29) and duodenal injuries (9/22). Majority of patients underwent laparotomy (33/45) for associated haemodynamic instability. All organ specific indications for surgery occurred in Grade II and higher injuries. 10/45 patients were managed non-operatively, of which the majority had Grade I or II organ injuries (9/45). 3/45 patients died.
Conclusion:
The incidence of pancreaticoduodenal injuries is rare (45 patients in 13 years) and in keeping with trauma literature. In our series, haemodynamically stable patients with Grade I - II pancreatic and Grade I - II (non-laceration type) duodenal injuries did not require operative management. Endoscopic pancreatic stenting may facilitate selective non-operative management in some patients with pancreatic injury or complications.
Pancreatic and duodenal injuries are uncommon due to a relative protection offered by their posterior anatomical position and have an incidence of less than 1% of all hospital admissions for trauma [1]. Management of pancreatic and duodenal trauma is dependent on the severity of injury, which can be graded according to the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) organ injury scale (OIS) grading system [1]. Operative management is indicated for pancreatic trauma that involves the pancreatic duct and may require pancreatic resection (Grade III – V) [2]. Duodenal haematomas can be managed non-operatively, however duodenal lacerations require surgical repair, and the method of which depends on the size and location of the defect. Primary closure using interrupted sutures is the most common approach (55-85%) [3,4]. Duodenal diversion has been used as an adjunct to primary repair. For example, pyloric exclusion which involves primary repair of the duodenum, closure of the pylorus and formation of a gastrojejunostomy [4].
Auckland City Hospital (ACH) is a tertiary referral hospital in New Zealand with Trauma and Hepatopancreatobiliary units and admits approximately 384 patients with major trauma per year (approximately 1537 patients for all traumas per year) [5]. The aim of this study was to examine all cases of pancreatic and duodenal injuries admitted to Auckland City Hospital, and to describe the diagnosis and clinical management and any long-term sequelae following these injuries.
A retrospective observational study was performed, assessing the clinical record, laboratory data, radiology imaging and reports. Patients with pancreatic and duodenal injuries were identified from the ACH trauma registry which prospectively records all patients admitted to ACH following trauma. All patients with pancreatic or duodenal injuries from 2007 to 2020 were included. The severity of injury was assessed according to the AAST OIS for pancreatic and duodenal injuries [1]. We noted the mechanism of injury, existence of concomitant injuries, diagnosis, management and complications. Patients were followed-up to assess for pancreatic and duodenal injury related complications using the electronic clinical record, which includes all presentations and correspondence for patients in the ACH and surrounding hospital catchments. Inclusion criteria included all patients with duodenal or pancreatic injuries from 2007 to 2020 admitted to ACH following trauma – confirmed by discharge diagnosis, imaging or intraoperative findings. Exclusion criteria excluded those that were thought to be duodenal or pancreatic injuries but subsequently found to have neither injuries, those with lack of notes or information in the records and those transferred from other hospitals for subsequent rehab. Data collection and simple analysis was performed in accordance with local ethical protocols.
55 patients were initially identified as having either pancreatic and/or duodenal injuries from the trauma database. In our exclusion criteria - seven patients were found to have no injuries, two patients had poorly documented notes and difficult to obtain the required information and one patient was transferred from another hospital for rehabilitation. A total of 45 patients had pancreatic or duodenal injuries during the 13-year study period (around 3.5/year). A total 23 patients had pancreatic injuries only, 16 patients had duodenal injuries only and six had combined pancreatic/duodenal injuries. Most patients were male 31/45 (68.8%) and the median age was 36 years (15 to 74). Most injuries were grade I or II (pancreatic and duodenal) [Table 1]. 23/29 (79%) patients with pancreatic injuries had serum amylase or lipase performed, of which the majority (n = 15) had elevated levels (65%).
| AAST Grade | Injury Type – (Number of patients) | |
| Pancreas n =29 | Duodenal n = 22 | |
| I | 18 | 8 |
| II | 6 | 8 |
| III | 3 | 6 |
| IV | 1 | - |
| V | 1 | - |
Table 1
Seven patients were transferred to ACH from other hospitals. Motor vehicle crash was the most common mechanism of injury (29/45) for pancreatic and duodenal injuries (Figure1). Five patients (11%) had penetrating injuries and 40 patients (89%) had blunt injuries [Figure 1]. All patients had cross-sectional computed tomography (CT). Five patients (11.1%) had magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to ascertain if there was a pancreatic ductal injury. Four patients had an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Most patients underwent laparotomy for haemodynamic instability (33/45), followed by organ specific indications including duodenal perforation or pancreatic ductal injury. For pancreatic injuries (n = 29), the majority had grade I and II injuries (n = 26) (Table 1). In total eight patients were managed non-operatively and 21 patients had an operation. Three patients underwent distal pancreatectomy for injury involving the pancreatic duct. Two patients with pancreatic duct injuries were managed with endoscopic pancreatic duct decompression using trans-ampullary pancreatic stents. No patients received octreotide.
Figure 1: Mechanism of injury.
For duodenal injuries (n = 22), the majority (n = 16) had a grade I or II injury. Five patients were managed non-operatively, and 17 patients underwent an operation. Ten patients underwent primary closure of duodenal lacerations, of which four had pyloric exclusion with gastrojejunostomy procedures. One patient had a side-to-side duodenojejunostomy following a D2/3 injury (Table 2).
| Management | No. of patients | |
| Non-operative management | Non-operative management – ERCP | 2 |
| No intervention required | 10 | |
| Operative | Distal pancreatectomy | 3 |
| Bile ductrepair (+ subsequent AXIOS stent) | 1 | |
Primary repairof duodenal injury
| 10
| |
| Melecot catheter inserted into D3 perforation with a purse-string suture to createa controlled fistula + feeding NJ and draining NG placed | 1 | |
| Gastrostomy and repair of pancreatic laceration + stomach | 1 | |
| Multiple laparotomy + Side-wall duodenojejunostomy | 1 | |
| Exploratory laparotomy +/- repair of otherorgan injury | 18 | |
Table 2
12 patients (52%) had complications of pancreatic (Table 3) and seven (44%) had complications of duodenal injuries (Table 4). Three patients (10%) in our cohort with pancreatic injuries developed pancreatic collections which were drained. Three out of the six patients (50%) with combined injuries had complications (Table 4). In total three patients died, two patients with duodenal injuries and one patient with pancreatic injuries. Two patients died from sepsis and multiple organ failure (one pancreas and one duodenal), and one with duodenal injuries died from concomitant severe traumatic brain injury. (Table 3 + Table 5].
| Complications (Pancreatic injuries) | Management | Number of patients(%) n = 12 (23 patients in total) | |
| Post-operative complications | Post-operative collections by pancreatic bed | Percutaneous drainage | 1 (4.3%) |
| Ileus | Non-operative management – self resolved | 1 (4.3%) | |
| Pancreatic complications |
|
| 1 (4.3%) |
|
| 1 (4.3%) | |
|
| 1 (4.3%) | |
| Further surgery | Bowel obstruction | Laparotomy + devolving the small bowel volvulus | 1 (4.3%) |
| Bleeding | Laparotomy forcontrol of bleeding | 2 (8.7%) | |
| Wound dehiscence | Suture closure of the dehisced wound | 1 (4.3%) | |
| Death | Sepsis, multi-organ failure, adrenal insufficiency, DVT/PE | - | 1 (4.3%) |
| Other | Stress ulcer | Inpatient gastroscopy + proton pump inhibitor | 1 (4.3%) |
| DVT | Anticoagulation | 1 (4.3%) | |
Table 3
| Complications (Mixedinjuries) | Management | Number of patients (%) n = 3 (6 patients in total) | |
| Missedinjury | Missedtibia fracture | Open reduction and internal fixation | 1 (16.7%) |
| Furthersurgery | Bleeding | Laparotomy for control of bleeding | 1 (16.7%) |
| Missedretroperitoneal D3 injury at first laparotomy | Re-look laparotomy + primary repairof duodenal perforation with omental patch, pyloricexclusion and gastro-jejunal feeding tube and abdominal drains | 1 (16.7%) | |
Table 4
| Complications (Duodenal injuries) | Management | Number of patients (%) n = 7 (16 patients in total) | |
| Other | Iatrogenic injury from insertion of nasogastric tube –pneumothorax | Chest drain | 1 (6.3%) |
| Post-operative complications | Post-operative collections | Percutaneous drainage | 2 (12.6%) |
Non-operative management – resolved with antibiotics | 1 (6.3%) | ||
| Ileus | Non-operative management – self-resolved | 1 (6.3%) | |
| Death | Sepsis, multi-organ failure | - | 1 (6.3%) |
| Traumatic brain injury | - | 1 (6.3%) | |
Table 5
Pancreatic and duodenal injury is rare, occurring in less than 1% of all trauma admissions [1]. It has however been reported to have a high morbidity (36-60%) and mortality (18-23%) [6]. The pancreas is in retroperitoneum, shielded by the anterior abdominal wall and this is thought to be one of the reasons for low incidence of pancreatic injuries [4]. This may have implications of delayed diagnosis and is usually complicated by other intra-abdominal injuries [6-8]. Grading of pancreatic trauma is determined by the location of the injury and the presence of ductal damage [6]. Duodenal trauma is graded by injury thickness, extent of circumference of the lacerated lumen, and involvement of the common bile duct or ampulla [6].
Management of these injuries depend on the degree of injury. Clinical assessment and prompt diagnosis is important to minimise morbidity. A normal serum amylase has previously been reported to occur in up to 40% of patients with pancreatic trauma [1]. In our cohort, it was normal in 35% of patients, however this was limited by six patients that did not have a serum amylase or lipase measurement on admission. Having a baseline level for later comparison may still be of some value [1].
Cross-sectional imaging is necessary and surgical intervention may be required [1]. Contrast enhanced CT has a high specificity (90-95%) but low sensitivity for pancreatic ductal involvement (52-54%) [1]. Magnetic resonance imaging pancreatography (MRCP) can help with the diagnosis of ductal injuries [9]. Endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP) can also identify pancreatic duct injuries, however, is more invasive and has an associated risk of morbidity.
MRCP should be considered for detection of pancreatic duct injuries when a pancreatic injury is suspected on cross sectional CT imaging (sensitivity of 90-100%) [10]. ERCP has the additional benefit of allowing endoscopic treatment of a ductal injury, but this must be balanced by the associated risk of ERCP related morbidity [11]. Moreover, distal pancreatectomy is still considered the gold-standard treatment for pancreatic transection with ductal injury. ERCP and pancreatic stent placement can also be of benefit for management of complications of pancreatic injuries such as pseudocysts [11-13]. Five patients in our cohort had an MRCP to exclude ductal injuries, of which two patients were managed non-operatively after.
It should be noted that even in patients with Grade I pancreatic injuries, other organs injuries were common in our cohort. As the pancreas sits in a retroperitoneal position, other intra-abdominal injuries complicated management and recovery [6-8]. For our cohort, 12/45 were managed non-operatively. This pancreatic duct fistula (distal tail) and duct stenosis (main body) was successfully managed with an endoscopic pancreatic stent placement. Grade IV and V injuries generally require operative management, with pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple’s procedure) being indicated if there is a massive disruption of pancreatic head [12,13].
Treatment for grade I and II duodenal haematoma can be managed non-operatively, but duodenal lacerations will require surgical repair [9,10]. Duodenal obstruction may occur with large mural haematoma formation [4]. The majority of grade II lacerations can be repaired by primary repair [4] [Figure 1], which in our cohort, all were. One patient was managed with primary repair and malecot drain insertion for decompression of D3.
If the duodenum is unable to be repaired, then apancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipples’ procedure) may be indicated [4]. Weale et al noted in their retrospective study that 91 patients out of 94 had a primary repair [3]. Only three patients in their cohort had pyloric exclusion. However, the majority of patients in their series were injured from a penetrating mechanism and nearly all had AAST grade II injuries [3]. In comparison, in our series of predominantly blunt trauma, ten patients had primary closure and four of which had a pyloric exclusion, all with grade III injuries. In addition, one patient from our cohort had a side-to-side duodenojejunostomy.
Complication rates for pancreatic trauma are variable and are reported to range from 26-86%, depending on severity [12,13]. The most common complication cited is a pancreatic fistula (10-35%) [1,10] which can be managed with drains [11-13], although persistent fistulas may benefit from endoscopic pancreatic duct stenting [12]. Other complications include post-traumatic pancreatitis, intra-abdominal abscess, and pseudocyst formation [1,11-13]. Three patients (10%) in our cohort with pancreatic injuries developed pancreatic collections which were drained. Only two patients in our cohort developed pancreatic fistula (7%).
Søreide et al [10] noted the risk of mortality with grade I pancreatic injuries with no other injuries was < 5> 50% and mortality risk 20-50% [10]. Our overall mortality rate was 3 patients out of 45 (7%), and only two of these patients died as a result of complications attributable to pancreaticoduodenal injury (4%). Krig et al [2] have noted in that in their retrospective study of 473 patients – mortality rate was 15% and that deaths, whilst uncommon, occur late and due to multiorgan failure and sepsis which is in keeping with our data [2].
This study is limited by its retrospective data and that pancreatic and duodenal injuries are rare, even in trauma centres, and thus the actual number of cases were low (45 cases in 13 years). Three patients were transferred from regions outside of our ability to follow them up, thus it is possible that late complications in these three patients were missed.
Pancreatic and duodenal trauma is rare, in keeping with other current trauma literature [1]. Serum amylase/lipase may initially be normal in patients with pancreatic injuries. Based on our findings, haemodynamically stable patients with Grade I-II pancreatic and Grade I and non-laceration type Grade II duodenal injuries who have no other indication for surgical exploration can be successfully managed non-operatively. Endoscopic pancreatic stenting may facilitate selective non-operative management in some patients with pancreatic injury or complications.
ACH – Auckland City Hospital
AAST – American Association for the Surgery of Trauma
OIS - Organ injury scale
CT – Computed tomography
ERCP – Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
MRCP – Magnetic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
No ethics approval was necessary as discussed with Auckland Hospital Research office as this study is based off an audit and it did not require any ethics approval.
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests. This manuscript is not under consideration for publication elsewhere.
This manuscript did not have any sources of funding.
MP collected the data, analysed, reviewed the results and drafted the manuscript. NF designed the study, assisted with reviewing the data results and revised the draft. Both authors approved of the manuscript before submissions.
Not applicable.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
