AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article
*Corresponding Author: Bugaevsky KA, Department of Medical and Biological Foundations of Sports and Physical Rehabilitation, The Petro Mohyla Black Sea State University, Nikolaev, Ukraine.
Citation: Bugaevsky KA, (2024), Options forms and Types of the Bone Pelvis Female Students Who are Engaged in Physical Culture of Medical Universitet Female Students, J Clinical Research and Reports, 15(3); DOI:10.31579/2690-1919/364
Copyright: © 2024, Bugaevsky KA. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 25 March 2024 | Accepted: 05 April 2024 | Published: 10 April 2024
Keywords: female students; physical culture; bone pelvis; size; morphological index values; anthropometric indices
Annotation: The article presents the results of a study devoted to the study of individual sizes and parameters of the bone pelvis and associated morphological index values and anthropometric indices in female students engaged in physical education at the university.
The study of changes occurring in the human body under the influence of exogenous and endogenous factors, especially among female students of adolescence engaged in physical education at a university, is in demand and relevant [1-4]. Quite intense physical and psychological stress among modern students, dietary habits and regional ecology, bad habits and early onset of sexual activity, physical inactivity and reluctance to engage in physical education and sports among many of them, unfavorable premorbid background - this is not a complete list of problems that are reflected on the formation of the body of many young students, during the transition period from puberty to the first reproductive period [1-5]. In particular, this concerns issues of the formation of sexual somatotypes, the skeleton, incl. and bone pelvis of teenage female students.
This article is devoted to the study of this problem and the anatomical and morphological features of the bony pelvis and a number of anthropometric indicators in the sexual somatotypes of female students of medical universitet.
When writing this article, its author actively used such research methods as: pelvimetry, the index method, with the determination of a number of selected morphofunctional index values, the method of literary critical analysis of available sources of information on the issue under study, the method of mathematical statistics. The study was conducted in 2021-2022, with the participation of I-III year students of Zaporizhzhya State Medical University. A total of 48 teenage girls took part in the study during their physical education classes. The average age of female students was 19.29±0.23 years. All of them are classified as adolescents.
When conducting the study, we used such methods as determining anthropometric indicators (length and body weight), linear, latitudinal and girth dimensions (shoulder width, pelvic width), measuring the external dimensions of the pelvis (pelviometry), pelvic index (PI), a number of morphofunctional index values, such as the determination of the morphia index, with the determination of two values that are compared and interrelated in somatotypes - the relative shoulder width index (RSWI) and the relative pelvic width index (RPWI), or the morph-funccional index for women [6]. We also determined indicators of such morphological index values as the pelvic-brachial index (PBrI), Solovyov index (SI), Rohrer index (RI), body-mass index (BMI). In addition, regarding the indicators associated with the individual sizes of the bony pelvis of female students, we determined 3 latitudinal (distantia spinarum, d. ristarum et d. trochanterica), 1 longitudinal size (c. externa), or the so-called external conjugate [1, 6-9]. When determining the severity of pelvic contractions, we used individual values of the true conjugate (c. vera), obtained by mathematical calculations made depending on those obtained using the classical formula used in obstetrics and anthropology [1, 6-9].
Depending on the obtained values of the true conjugate (c. vera), the degrees of narrowing of the bony pelvis present in female students and its types were determined, according to modern classifications. We used the classification of A.Ya. Krassovsky – three degrees of narrowing (I – from 11 cm to 9 cm, II – less than 9 to 7.5 cm, III – less than 7.5 cm) [7; 8]. By “anatomically narrow pelvis we understood” this definition, accepted in modern obstetrics, is as follows: “Anatomically narrow is considered to be a pelvis, one or more sizes of which are reduced by 1.5–2 cm or more” [7; 8]. We determined the degree of formation of the pelvic bones and their “bone maturity” using the method proposed by N.I. Kovtyuk (2004) [1, 10].
In the studied group of female students (n=48), we obtained the following anthropological indicators: body length in the entire group corresponded to average height and amounted to 165.56±0.30 cm. The average body weight in the group was 57.45±1. 18 kg. The average BMI value was 20.94±0.42 kg/cm², which corresponds to the normal values of this index indicator [5, 6, 9]. Individual indicators of BMI values in the group were as follows: normal BMI values (from 18.5 to 24.99 kg/cm² were determined in the vast majority - 40 (83.33%) female students. In 2 (4.17%) female students, excess BMI was determined body weight (BMI from 25.0 to 29.99 kg/cm²), which we regarded as pre-obesity, in 1 (2.08%) student the BMI exceeded the value of 30.0 kg/cm² obesity of the 1st degree [5,6, 9].
Body mass deficiency, with BMI values below 18.5 to 16.0 kg/cm², was found in 4 (8.33%), and below 16.0 kg/cm² (chronic energy deficiency) was determined in 1 (2.08 %) female students from the study group. When determining weight-height relationships, we determined the Rohrer index (RI) for girls, which characterizes the harmony of the physique as the correspondence of an individual’s height to his weight and body density indicators [5, 6, 9]. The average RI value in the group was 12.67±0.25 kg/cm³, which corresponds to the average harmonious development of the individual and, accordingly, to normal body weight and density [5, 6, 9]. The distribution of the obtained IR values in the group is as follows: harmonious development was determined in 35 (72.92%) girls, body weight deficiency and a decrease in the level of development were determined in 4 (8.33%), and an increased level of development, with an increase in body weight values - in 9 (18.75%) female students. To carry out somatotyping according to J. Tanner’s classification and determine morphological and anthropological changes in the formation of the bony pelvis in girls of the study group, we determined 2 latitudinal body sizes: shoulder width and pelvic width [1, 6, 9]. The average value of shoulder width (ShW) - biacromial size among female students was 31.48 ± 0.62 cm, pelvic width (PW) - intercrestal size (distancia cristarum) - 26.67 ± 0.30 cm. Noteworthy is the fact that in the group the average sizes of the ShW significantly exceed the values of the ShW. The girls of the group have broad shoulders and a narrow pelvis - a body type characteristic of a male body type [1, 6, 9, 11, 12].
The number of students whose shoulder width exceeded the width of the pelvis in the entire study group was 42 (87.5%), and only 6 (12.5%) students with a pelvic width greater than the width of the shoulders. The index of relative shoulder width RSWI (morphia index) was determined by us as the ratio of shoulder width to body length, multiplied by 100 [1, 6, 9]. Its average value in the group was 20.27±1.00 cm, which corresponds to the values. Obtained values of RSWI in the group: dolichomorphic physique body type - 32 (66,67%) – 32 female students; mesomorphic body type -12 (25,00%) female students; brachymorphic body type – 4 (8,33%) female students.
RPWI (morphia index for women) was determined by us as the ratio of the width of the pelvis (intercrestal size) to body length, multiplied by 100 [1, 6, 9, 11, 12]. Its average value in the group was 16.11±0.19 cm, which corresponds to the values of metriopyelia (middle pelvis) [1, 9, 11, 12]. The values of IOSHT we obtained in the group: stenopyelia (narrow pelvis) – 33 (68.77%) female students; metripyelia is a transitional form, similar to the meaning of a narrow pelvis; eurypyelia \ values close to normal, physiological dimensions of the bone pelvis and even slightly larger - 3 (6.25%) of the studied female students.
Noteworthy is the fact that there were only 3 (6.25%) students with metriopyelia (normal pelvis) in the entire study group (n=48), with the overwhelming number of girls with stenopyelia (narrow pelvis). An interesting fact is that the average value of the intercrestal size of the bony pelvis of female students (d. cristarum) was 26.67±0.30 cm, with its physiological norm being 28-29 cm [1, 4, 7, 8, 13]. The number of girls with distancia cristarum sizes smaller than the physiological (anatomical and obstetric) norm was 34 (70.84%), which indirectly indicates the presence of an anatomically narrow pelvis (ANP) in these girls. Number of female students with sizes d. cristarum, corresponding to the norm of 28-29 cm [1, p. 17-23; 4, p. 56-59; 7; 8; 13, p. 132-133] was 10 (20.83%) and in 4 (8.33%) this size was 1-2 cm larger than the specified norm.
The pelvic-brachial index (PBrI) was determined using the formula: pelvic width (cm) x 100/shoulder width (cm). A PBrI value of up to 69.9 characterizes a trapezoidal body, 70.0-74.9 – a medium body, 75.0 or more – a rectangular body [1, 6, 9]. The results obtained in the group are as follows: the average PBrI value was 86.15±1.74, which corresponds to the rectangular shape of the body [1, 6, 9]. When considering the individual indicators of PBrI of female students, it was found that among them girls with a rectangular body shape predominate - 40 (83.33%), followed by 5 (10.42%) students with a trapezoidal body shape and 3 (6.25%) with an average body shape. To analyze changes in the structure and types of the bone pelvis, it seemed important to us to consider the identified changes in sexual somatotypes, according to the classification of J. Tanner [1, 6, 9, 11]. Taking into account measurements of shoulder width and pelvic width, the average value of the sexual dimorphism index (SDI) in the group was 65.32±2.61 (p<0>
We also determined such anthropometric and morphological indicators as the diameter of the wrist joint and, based on the data obtained, determined the Solovyov index (IS) - according to the method of G.A. Solovyov [1, 4, 6-9б 13]. This index is widely used both in obstetrics and anthropology [1, 4, 6-9, 13]. Normally, for women, the diameter of the circumference of the wrist joint is 14-16 cm, respectively, the IP is normally 1.4-1.6 [1, 4, 6-9, 13]. Accordingly, with a diameter of the wrist joint of less than 14 cm, we can speak of an asthenic body type, from 14 to 16 cm – of a normosthenic type, and from 16 cm and above – of a hypersthenic body type [1,4, 6-9, 13].
In the study group, the circumference of the radiocarpal joint was 14.67±0.20 cm, which corresponds to the normative values [1, 4, 6-9, 13]. Accordingly, the SI indicators on average for the group were 1.47±0.20. Normative IP indicators were determined for the vast majority of the studied female students - 34, which amounted to 70.83%. The values of circumference of the radiocarpal joint obtained in the study group: the value of the Solovyov index, within physiological values, at 14-16 cm – 34 (70.83%); Solovyov index value less than 14 cm (small bone thickness) – 11 (22.92%) female students; Solovyov index value, more than 16 cm (thick bones) – 3 (6.25%).
To determine the degree of bone maturity and the formation of flat pelvic bones in female students of the study group, we used the pelvic bone index (PBI), which has proven itself in practice, proposed by N.I. Kovtyuk (2004) [1, 10]. According to her calculations, ICT values ranging from 30 to 40 correspond to normal values of the degree of maturity of the pelvic bones [1, 10]. The average value of ICT in the group was 40.13±0.78, which corresponds to the normal values of the degree of maturity and formation of the pelvic bones in the study group. In 47 (97.92%) female students, the ICT values correspond to the norm, and only in 1 (2.08%) girl of 18 years old its value was 28, which can be regarded as an ongoing process of formation, growth and maturation of the pelvic bones [1, 10].
We also, when studying the individual characteristics of the pelvic bones of female students, determined the values of such an informative morphological index value as the pelvic index (PI), which is defined as the result of summing the indicators of the 4 external dimensions of the pelvis (cm), and normally ranges from 100 to 107 see [1, 4, 6-9, 13]. Indicators below 100 cm indicate the presence of a narrow pelvis in the subject, more than 107 cm indicate a wide pelvis [1, 4, 6-9, 13]. The average value for the group was 99.47±0.96 cm, which corresponds to the values of the narrow pelvis for the group as a whole [1, 4, 6-9, 13]. It was found that in 27 (56.25%) girls the IT values correspond to a narrow pelvis, in 16 (33.33%) the IT values correspond to standard indicators and in 5 (10.42%) girls the IT values exceed the norm.
When measuring the external dimensions of the pelvis (pelvimetry) in the entire study group, we obtained the following indicators: d. spinarum – 23.06±0.34 cm, which is less than the norm of 25-26 cm [1, 4, 6-9, 13]; d. cristarum – 26.67±0.30 cm, which is less than the norm of 28-29 cm [1, 4, 6-9, 13]. trochanterica – 30.99±0.26 cm, which corresponds to normal values of 30-31 cm [1, 4, 6-9, 13]; c. externa – 18.80±0.31 cm, which is less than the norm of 20-21 cm [1, 4, 6-9, 13]; c. vera – 10.11±0.24 cm, which is slightly less than the norm corresponding to 11 cm [1, 4, 6-9, 13].
Having analyzed the data of pelviometry performed in the study group, we obtained the following data: an anatomically narrow pelvis (ANP) was determined in the majority of female students - 39 (81.25%); transversely contracted pelvis (TCP) – in 26 (54.17%); flat-rachitic pelvis (FRP) – in 3 (6.25%); simple flat pelvis (SFP) – in 2 (4.17%); generally uniformly narrowed and wide pelvis – 1 (2.08%) student each, respectively. Normal pelvic dimensions were determined only in 3 (6.25%) female students, “mixed” or “erased” pelvic shape [1, p. 17-23; 4, p. 56-59; 6-9; 13, p. 132-133] – in 16 (33.33%) girls.
The degrees of pelvic narrowing were also determined in accordance with the classification of A.Ya. Krassovsky [14, 6-9, 13]. Pelvic contractions of the 1st degree were identified in 14 (29.17%), 2nd degree – also in 14 (29.17%) students, and 3rd degree – in 4 (8.33%) girls. The distribution of changes in the bone pelvis in sexual somatotypes is presented in Table.
| Indicator name | Gynecomorphic sexual somatotype (n=34) | Mesomorphic sexual somatotype (n=8) | Andromorphic sexual somatotype (n=6) |
| Normal pelvic sizes | 3 | – | – |
| Narrow pelvis | 31 | 6 | 6 |
| Wide pelvis | – | 1 | – |
| Anatomically narrow pelvis | 31 | 6 | 6 |
| "Mixed" pelvis | 11 | 1 | 3 |
| Transversely narrowed pelvis | 17 | 1 | 2 |
| Simple flat pelvis | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Flat-rachitic pelvis | 2 | – | – |
| Generally uniformly narrowed pelvis | 1 | – | – |
| I degree of narrowing of the pelvis | 13 | 1 | – |
| II degree of narrowing of the pelvis | 11 | 1 | 2 |
| ІІІ I degree of narrowing of the pelvis | 2 | 1 | 1 |
Changes in the pelvis of female students depending on the somatotype
From the data in the above comparative table it is clear that the greatest number of changes in the sizes and types of bone pelvises is observed in the group of gynecomorphic female students, the smallest in the group of female students with an andromorphic sexual somatotype. The values of altered pelvises in the group of female students with a mesomorphic sexual somatotype are close to the values of andromorphic female students. These two groups together account for 12 (25.00%) cases of anatomically narrow pelvis (ANP), 3 (6.25%) transversely narrowed pelvises, 4 (8.33%) each of simple flat and “mixed” pelvises, 1 pelvic narrowing of the 1st degree, 3 narrowing of the 2nd degree and 2 - 3rd degree. In these two groups, there was also 1 wide pelvis and absolutely no pelvises with normal sizes.
1. The number of students whose shoulder width exceeded the width of the pelvis in the entire study group was 42 (87.5%), and only 6 (12.5%) students with a pelvic width greater than the width of the shoulders.
2. It was found that in 27 (56.25%) girls the PI values correspond to a narrow pelvis, in 16 (33.33%) the PI values correspond to standard indicators, and in 5 (10.42%) girls the PI values exceed the norm.
3. Anatomically narrow pelvis (ANP) was determined in the majority of female students - 39 (81.25%); transversely contracted pelvis (TCP) – in 26 (54.17%); flat-rachitic pelvis (FRP) – in 3 (6.25%); simple flat pelvis (SFP) – in 2 (4.17%); generally uniformly narrowed and wide pelvis – 1 (2.08%) student each, respectively. Normal pelvic dimensions were determined only in 3 (6.25%) female students, “mixed” or “erased” pelvic shape.
4. The greatest number of changes in the sizes and types of bone pelvises is observed in the group of gynecomorphic students, the smallest - in the group of students with an andromorphic sexual somatotype.
5. It was established that in the study group there are numerous, often combined anatomical and morphological changes in almost all anthropometric indicators and morphological index values, in all sexual somatotypes according to J. Tanner’s classification, with a predominance in the group of female students with a gynecomorphic sexual somatotype.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
