AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article
*Corresponding Author: Enrico Maria Amadei, Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Audiology, Infermi, Hospital,Rimini,Italy
Citation: Enrico M Amadei, Fabbri C, Trebbi M . (2020) Nonrecurrent Laryngeal Nerve: A Case Report and Literature Review, Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology 2(1): Doi: 10.31579/2692-9562/005
Copyright: © 2020. Enrico Maria Amadei, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 25 March 2020 | Accepted: 05 April 2020 | Published: 17 June 2020
Keywords: Nonrecurrent Laryngeal Nerve; Thyroid Surgery; Emithyroidectomy.
we report the case of a patient submitted to a right hemithyroidectomy for a follicular adenoma, when we found a nonrecurrent laryngeal nerve. This is a really rare anatomical presentation that can seriously compromise the integrity and preservation of the inferior laryngeal nerve during thyroid surgery.
We describe how we found and managed this anatomical variant and we conduct a review of the most recent Literature about nonrecurrent laryngeal nerve.
Typically the inferior laryngeal nerves (ILN) are called recurrent (RLN). In fact these nerves embrace the aortic arch on the left and the brachiocephalic trunk on the right, after having detached from the vagus nerve. Then they ascend along the dihedral angle of the tracheo-esophageal groove, to enter the larynx at the entry point, ie the cricothyroid junction.
However we can have a nonrecurrent laryngeal nerve (NRLN) with an incidence rate of 0.3-0.8% on the right side and 0.004-0.04% on the left side [1]. This occurrence is very rare and significantly increases the risk of nerve injury due to its non-recognition by the endocrine surgeon.
In our experience of about 500 thyroid surgeries performed by the same senior surgeon during the period 2004-2019, this was our first time we found a right NRLN.
We present the case of a 58-year-old man who was submitted to a right hemithyroidectomy for a unilateral thyroid goiter.
We performed a horizontal cervical incision of about 5 centimeters in length, 2 centimeters (about 2 fingerbreadths) above the jugulum (sternal notch). We followed a skin wrinkle. Then we raised the upper and lower skin flaps. We found the median Alba line and we separated the subioid muscles, preserving them. So we exposed the tracheal axis and the right cricothyroid muscle, as landmark for the the entry-point of the ILN. We then unglued the voluminous right lobe of the thyroid and we went to look for the ILN. The latter was not found in the tracheo-esophageal groove, with an ascending vertical trend, as usual. We found it instead with a very high horizontal course, starting directly from the vagus nerve on the right. We preserved it in its entirety, recognizing its functionality through a dedicated electric neurostimulator. The nerve ran in a single trunk and it was parallel to the inferior thyroid artery [Figure 1-2]. We recognized it from its suspicious appearance and we verified its nature with the nerve stimulator.
We obviously were prepared for the occurrence of a NRLN, as the patient performed a CT
Scan of the neck before surgery. CT revealed a right arteria lusoria (lusory artery) [Figure 3-4].
However, we had never previously found a NRLN during other surgical procedures. This anatomical variant evoked surprise and concern, as this time we did not know for sure the course of the ILN and we did not know if it presented as a single-trunk or with a multiple-branched course. In fact NRLN is a rare presentation, but the risk of intraoperative damage can reach 12.9% [2].
We then performed a right loboistmectomy and we finished the surgery. At the final histological examination we found a right thyroid follicular adenoma.
The right NRLN was recognized and preserved. Its functionality was confirmed by end-of-surgery nerve stimulation and laryngoscopy postoperatively.
we performed a right hemithyroidectomy, and not a total thyroidectomy, on the advice of the Endocrinologist. We decided this for various reasons. Because the patient was not elderly; because the left thyroid lobe was healthy; because the cytological examination by fine needle aspiration citology (FNAC) was compatible with an indeterminate lesion with a low risk of malignancy (Tir-3A, according to Italian consensus for the classification and reporting of thyroid cytology 2014).
We know that in the case of thyroidectomy the main complications are of three types: 1. hemorrhage, which is potentially fatal, since it is in the cervical region [3]. 2. Temporary/ permanent loss of one or more parathyroid glands, resulting in hypocalcemia, with risk of tetanus crises and arrhythmias. 3. Finally the lesion of one or both ILN, with dysphonia (unilateral lesion) or dyspnea (bilateral lesion). The incidence rate of its monolateral lesion goes from 3 to 7% in Literature [4]. Obviously the risks are halved in case of hemithyroidectomy.
The search for ILNs by the endocrine surgeon must be systematically conducted. The best way to save the ILNs is to look for them systematically, to identify them with certainty and to follow their course up to the entry-point.
The entry point is where the ILNs penetrate into the larynx, below the crico-thyroid muscle of each side. This is the only certain passage point for ILNs, but it is also the most risky point to search for ILNs. Therefore surgeons usually search for ILNs at the tracheo-esophageal groove. From anatomical studies we know that more often on the left the ILN apperars as a single trunk, it is deep and it crosses more deeply the inferior thyroid artery. Otherwise on the right side, the ILN more easily presents an early branching, it is generally more superficial and generally it crosses the inferior thyroid artery passing through a deeper plane.
This case is very interesting for an endocrine surgeon, as it presents a rare anatomical variant related to the course of an ILN. We can typically find a NRLN on the right when an aberrant right subclavian artery is present. This artery is called "arteria lusoria". It detaches from the descending aorta and, moving towards the right, presents a more often retroesophageal (80%), or pretracheal (5%) or between trachea and esophagus (15%) course [1].
During embryogenesis the nerves develop first and then the blood vessels. Therefore with the progressive cranio-caudal lengthening of the embryo, the ILNs are stretched downwards from the aortic arch on the left and the brachiocephalic trunk on the right. Then ILNs rise up to the entry-point, where they will go to innervate all the laryngeal muscles, with the exception of the cricothyroid muscles (innervated by the upper laryngeal nerves).
The right ILN does not remain trapped around its course, when an arteria lusoria is present. So it is not dragged downwards, and therefore will not present a recurring pattern. So it will proceed directly from the vagus nerve to the entry point.
Hong et al described a classification of NRLN with four traveling pattern types: (1) descending—the nerve descends from the vagus nerve trunk; (2) vertical—the nerve runs vertically to the cricothyroid joint; (3) ascending—the nerve runs upward to the cricothyroid joint; and (4)V-shaped—the nerve takes a downward course and runs upward to the cricothyroid joint [5]. These Authors wrote about vertical trend, considering the floor-ceiling direction. Instead we are more used to considering the cranio-caudal direction as vertical. However according to their classification, in this case we found a NRLN with a vertical pattern.
The association between lusory artery and NRLN, however, is not always true. Cases of lusory artery associated with a RLN were described [6]. In fact prevalence of aberrant right subclavian artery is estimated to be around 0.5% to 2% of the population [7], while a right NRLN has a prevalence of 0.3-0.8% [1].
Therefore the presence of an aberrant right subclavian artery must alert the surgeon, as it is probable the finding of a NRLN. It will therefore require even more attention than usual, to search for, identify and preserve the ILN. However, it is still possible to find an ILN in its classical site, even in presence of a lusory artery.
The possibility of a left NRLN is also reported in Literature. This occurrence can typically be found in cases of “situs inversus” [1, 2, and 8].
The pre-operative CT study and the use of the nerve stimulator are two very useful tools for preserving the anatomical and functional integrity of the ILNs.
We always subject the patient to a CT scan before the thyroid surgery. This exam allows us to evaluate the localization of thyroid nodules, the size of the thyroid lobes and their relationship with blood vessels and the possible presence, as in this case, of the lusory artery. In other Centers the exclusive routine use of pre-operative ultrasound is described. It can well provide a pre-operative diagnosis regarding the presence of the lusory artery [9].
We use an intraoperative nerve monitoring, when performing a thyroidectomy. We routinely use a specific orotracheal tube cuff, positioning electrodes near vocal folds. We also use pulsed nerve stimulation, when it needed, in order to confirm the visual retrieval of ILNs. In Literature some Authors suspect the presence of a NRLN based on the stimulation of the vagus nerve. They suspect it when the distal stimulation of the vagus nerve does not evoke a motor response of the vocal cord, while they get the response with proximal stimulation. This can occur when there is a high ILN detachment, as happens with the NRLN [10, 11]. However we are not use to stimulating the vagus nerve to search for ILN. Therefore we did not exploit this technique during our described hemithyroidectomy.
The ILNs are classically called recurrent nerves, but the endocrine surgeon must always keep in mind the possibility of theirs non-recurrence.
The non-recurrence is very rare on the right side, and almost exceptional on the left one, but not impossible. We know from Literature that the presence of the lusory artery is almost always associated with the right NRLN, but not always.
The patient gave his informed consent to write this paper.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
