AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article
*Corresponding Author: Tsybin Alexander Vladimirovich, Russian Scientific Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics named after R.R. Vreden, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Citation: A.V. Tsybin, V.V. Lyubchak, S.S. Bilyk, R.M. Tikhilov, A.S. Falkovich, et al, (2024), New concept in surgical anatomy of the acetabulum in the framework of hip arthroplasty. Fundamental study, J. Clinical Orthopedics and Trauma Care, 6(4); DOI:10.31579/2694-0248/092
Copyright: © 2024, Tsybin Alexander Vladimirovich. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 17 May 2024 | Accepted: 28 May 2024 | Published: 11 June 2024
Keywords: acetabulum; endoprosthetics; post-traumatic deformity; walls; ASPID
The term “acetabular walls” appears both in publications analyzing the survival of endoprostheses and in various classifications developed within total hip replacement. Despite the accumulated experience, there is no information in publications on determining the boundaries of acetabular walls. Currently, an original classification of post-traumatic deformities of the acetabulum “ASPID” has been developed, which also does not describe the boundaries of the walls. Purpose of the study: to develop a method for determining the boundaries of acetabular walls in primary total hip replacement.
Materials and methods
Data from computed tomography of the pelvic bones of children aged 10-12 years and 30 preparations of the pelvic bones of adults without signs of acetabular dysplasia were used. Results. When analyzing 3D models of computed tomograms of the pelvic bones of children 10-12 years old without signs of acetabular dysplasia, extra-acetabular fixed anatomical landmarks were identified through which planes can be drawn dividing the children's acetabulum into conditional walls separated by cartilage. Then, the pelvic bones of 30 adults were scanned and similar structures were made, which made it possible to draw the boundaries of the walls of the acetabulum. The third stage was to determine the proportional ratio and area of each wall of the acetabulum in groups of children and adults and compare the results obtained. The absence of statistical differences in the groups of children and adults when determining the lobes of the superior, posterior and medial walls of the acetabulum indicates the high reliability of this technique.
Conclusion
The proposed technique allows, within total hip arthroplasty, to divide the acetabulum into the walls, which in some cases can make it possible to more accurately determine surgical tactics and improve the result of this surgical procedure, including within the framework of the original ASPID assessment system. The study is devoted to the theoretical aspects of total hip replacement
Total hip replacement is the gold standard for treating hip pathology. Present total hip replacement began in the sixties of the last century [1]. Since then, numerous articles analyzing the outcomes, including long-term outcomes, and complications of this surgical procedure have been published around the world.The condition of the bone stock for implantation is one of the main factors in the reliability of primary fixation and survival of the artificial joint. To describe the surgical technique of the operation itself, analyze long-term results, complications and classify cases of primary and revision hip endoprosthetics, the concept of “acetabular walls” was introduced. Despite the more than fifty-year history of total hip arthroplasty, there is no definition of the concept of the boundaries of the “acetabular walls” in the literature. This definition relates to a greater extent to the theoretical aspects of endoprosthetics, however, at present, when using the term “acetabular walls”, there is no clarification regarding their boundaries. The term “acetabular walls” is found both in publications on the analysis of the survival of endoprostheses, and in various classifications developed as part of total hip replacement [2-6]. Despite the accumulated experience in total hip replacement, there is no information on determining the boundaries of the acetabular walls, while, for example,[7] in the publication “Morphology of the bone structures of the acetabulum and the femoral component of the hip joint” describe in sufficient detail the parameters of the acetabulum, including the thickness of the walls, without specifying the boundaries of the latter [7]. Returning to classical orthopedics, in the classification of acetabular fractures AO, in addition to the columns, there are also damages of acetabular posterior wall, however, the boundaries of the walls are also not defined within the framework of the proposed fracture assessment system [8]. In addition, there is a Russian Federation patent dated December 28, 2020 “Method for choosing surgical tactics depending on the degree of deformation of the acetabulum and the state of the integrity of the pelvic ring in patients with post-traumatic coxarthrosis,” in which the authors propose an original classification of post-traumatic deformities of the acetabulum “ASPID” based on three criteria, including localization of deformity: anterior, superior, posterior and medial walls of the acetabulum, In it authors also do not disclose a method for determining the boundaries of the walls listed above[9-10]. Thus, there is currently no described method for determining the boundaries of the acetabular walls, and where these boundaries lie within the framework of total hip arthroplasty, however, the concept of the “acetabular walls” has existed and has been widely used for a long period of time. The present study is devoted to solving this problem.
Purpose of the study: to develop a method for determining the boundaries of acetabular walls as part of primary total hip replacement.
In the study, we used data from computed tomography of the pelvic bones of children aged 10-12 years and 30 preparations of the pelvic bones of adults without signs of acetabular dysplasia. Standard computer programs were used to construct 3D models and analyze them, determining the necessary landmarks, constructing planes, and dividing the acetabulum into walls. Computed tomograms of the pelvic bones of children aged 10-12 years without signs of hip dysplasia were taken as the theoretical basis for developing a method for determining the boundaries of the walls of the acetabulum for the following reason. It is known that at birth in children, the acetabular cartilaginous complex is located between the ilium above, the ischium below and the pubis in front. The outer two-thirds of this structure forms the so-called acetabular cartilage, and its medial third belongs to the medial wall. During puberty (10-12 years), the depth of the acetabulum increases due to the development of three secondary ossification centers. The "acetabular bone" is the secondary epiphysis of the pubis and contributes to the development of the anterior wall of the acetabulum. The acetabular epiphysis is the secondary growth center of the ilium and forms the main part of the superior wall of the acetabulum. The ischium also contains a small, innominate secondary growth center that helps form the posterior wall of the acetabulum [11-12].Thus, at the age of 10-12 years in children, the walls of the acetabulum are formed from 4 ossification centers (1 primary and 3 secondary). Since the final formation of the walls has not yet occurred at this age, a clear boundary between them is visible on computer tomograms. This phenomenon leads to this (research) effort to determine and describe the boundaries of the walls of the acetabulum using extra-acetabular landmarks. Landmarks must be determined established so that the lines drawn through them in the process of 3D modeling based on computed tomograms in adults are close to the lines of incomplete osteogenesis separating the walls of the acetabulum in children (Figure. 1).
Figure 1: An example of a 3D model of the pelvis of a child aged 10-12 years.
The first stage of the study was an analysis of computed tomograms of the pelvic bones of children 10-12 years old without signs of acetabular dysplasia. 3D models of the pelvic bones were constructed and extra-acetabular fixed anatomical landmarks were determined through which planes can be drawn dividing the children's acetabulum into conditional walls separated by cartilage. The second stage involved scanning the pelvic bones of 30 adults and carrying out similar constructions, which ultimately make it possible to draw the boundaries of the walls of the acetabulum. The third stage was the determination of the proportional ratio and area of each wall of the acetabulum in groups of children and adults, comparison of the results obtained to identify errors in measurements, followed by a conclusion about the possible consistency of the proposed method. At the first stage of the study, extra-acetabular landmarks were identified during the analysis of 3D models of the pelvic bones of children aged 10-12 years without signs of acetabular dysplasia, which formed the basis for the second stage of the study.
The analysis of computed tomograms of the pelvic bones in adults. For this purpose, computed tomography of the pelvic bones was performed, on the basis of which a highly accurate three-dimensional surface of the pelvic bones was formed, on which the points designated at the first stage of the study were marked, namely: the most protruding point of the tubercle of the pubic bone [1], the most protruding point on the crest of the pubic bone [2], the most prominent point of the ischial tuberosity [3] and the most prominent point of the anterior inferior iliac spine [4]. The exit plane of the acetabulum is formed: the two most prominent points of the acetabular notch [5, 6] and a point on the upper wall of the acetabulum [7], obtained by drawing a perpendicular from the middle of the line of the transverse ligament to the upper wall. Next, the center point of the acetabulum is determined on the plane of its exit - the maximum transverse diameter was determined and the distance was divided in half. Further construction of the planes was carried out relative to the exit plane of the acetabulum and the point - the center of the acetabulum [8] (Fig. 2).
Figure 2: Marking points on the 3D model of the acetabulum.
The construction of planes was carried out using points both located directly on the triangular mesh of the computer model and freely located in a three-dimensional coordinate system. To construct the planes, we used 3D modeling applications with reverse engineering functionality. Three points are the minimum necessary and sufficient number to construct a plane in a three-dimensional coordinate system. The projection of a circle onto the wall of the acetabulum is constructed using the function of a planar drawing, the projection of the lines of which is superimposed on the surface of the triangulation model at the required angle. Definition of the boundaries of the acetabulum was performed using a tool for dividing the main mesh into separate surfaces, specifying a series of points that were subsequently connected into one closed line.The first plane is formed by points - the center
of the acetabulum, the most protruding point of the tubercle of the pubic bone, the most protruding point on the crest of the pubic bone. The second plane is formed by points - the center of the acetabulum, the most protruding point of the ischial tuberosity and the most protruding point of the anterior inferior iliac spine.From the center point of the acetabulum, parallel to the plane of its exit, a circle is formed with a radius of ¼ of the maximum transverse diameter, thus projecting the medial wall. From the center point of the acetabulum, a perpendicular is lowered onto the projection of the transverse ligament parallel to the plane of exit of the acetabulum. Using an additional third point - the center of the medial wall, we obtain a plane that divides the fragment of the lower part of the acetabulum into the anterior and posterior sections (Fig. 3), which finally allows us to form the anterior, posterior, superior and medial walls (Figure. 4).
Figure 3: Division of the acetabulum using planes.
Figure 4: The acetabulum, divided into anterior, superior, posterior and medial walls after analyzing the 3D model of the pelvis.
Using the algorithm presented above, constructions were made on models of the pelvic bones of five children and 30 models of pelvic bones obtained by scanning anatomical preparations with a 3D scanner. At the third stage of the study, after modeling and dividing 35 3D models of the pelvis into walls, the areas and proportions of each wall were calculated in all cases. The results were entered into the appropriate tables to compare the data obtained in order to determine the consistency of the original method of dividing the
acetabulum into “walls” presented in the publication as part of hip replacement. For this purpose, several statistical analysis methods were used. First, a one-way analysis of variance was carried out, as a result of which it was revealed that the ratio of percentages for the upper, posterior and medial walls of both adults and children does not differ statistically, which indicates the consistency of the developed methodology (Table 1). The indicators for the anterior wall differ slightly, but this may be due to the small number of measurements in the studied samples.
| A(%) | S(%) | P(%) | I(%) | |
| Adults (30) | ||||
| Average value | 25,79 | 24,54 | 35,31 | 14,38 |
| Standard deviation | 2,63 | 3,55 | 3,21 | 1,01 |
| Error of the mean | 0,48 | 0,65 | 0,59 | 0,18 |
| Children (5) | ||||
| Average value | 30,08 | 23,02 | 32,10 | 14,80 |
| Standard deviation | 3,10 | 4,51 | 5,46 | 2,73 |
| Error of the mean | 1,39 | 2,01 | 2,44 | 1,22 |
| Difference between means | 4,30 | 1,52 | 3,20 | 0,41 |
| Difference error | 1,47 | 2,12 | 2,51 | 1,23 |
| Ratio of difference to difference error | 2,93 | 0,72 | 1,27 | 0,33 |
Table 1. One-way analysis of variance (comparison of means of two samples).
The data from the last row (the ratio of the difference to the error of the difference) is compared with the tabulated value of the Student distribution at the 0.05 significance level with 30 + 5 – 3 = 32 degrees of freedom, which is 2.037. If the resulting number is greater than the table one (2.037), then it is considered that the data in the two samples differ - like at wall “A”. In the remaining three cases - S, P, I - the obtained numbers are less than 2.037, and the data in the samples of adults and children do not differ. A similar result is obtained when using a nonparametric estimation method - the Mann-Whitney rank test (U-test, Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test), which allows you to test the hypothesis about the difference between two samples. The samples compared the percentages of each acetabular wall separately (Table 2). For each percentage share (A, S, P, I), data from both samples were combined and ordered (ranked) in ascending order. Each subject was assigned a serial number (“rank”). Then, separately for adults and children, the sums of ranks (R1 for the group of adults and R2 for the group of children) and U-statistics U1 and U2 were calculated using the formulas:
where n1 and n2 are the number of adults and children examined, respectively.
| A(%) | S(%) | P(%) | I(%) | |
| Adults (n1 = 30 measurements) | ||||
| Sum of ranks R1 | 483 | 561 | 569 | 542 |
| U1 | 132 | 54 | 46 | 73 |
| Children (n2 = 5 measurements) | ||||
| Sum of ranks R2 | 147 | 69 | 61 | 88 |
| U2 | 18 | 96 | 104 | 77 |
| Table value of Mann-Whitney statistics at a confidence level of 0.05 | 39 |
Table 2: The Mann-Whitney rank test.
The smallest of the two obtained numbers Ue = min (U1, U2) was chosen as the Mann-Whitney U-statistics. If the value of the Mann-Whitney statistic Ue was less than the table value (for example, when measuring the percentage of wall “A”), the null hypothesis of no differences between the two samples was rejected and the alternative hypothesis was accepted, that
is, the difference between the two samples was considered statistically significant. In the remaining three cases - for the percentages of walls S, P, I - the data in the samples of adults and children do not differ. However, from the interval diagram below you can see that the difference in the percentages of wall A in adults and children is also not very significant (there is no difference in walls S, P, I) (Figure. 5).
Figure 5: Interval diagram (difference in the percentages of walls in adults and children).
Here, the colored elements refer to data in adults, and the black oblique crosses refer to the corresponding data in children. Filled rectangles correspond to the second and third quartiles, horizontal lines in the middle of these rectangles are medians, T-shaped extension lines (“whiskers”) indicate maxima and minima without taking into account outliers, individual colored dots (only at “P” in the diagram) –outliers, that is, values deviating from the main sample by more than 1.5 interquartile ranges from the nearest quartile.
1. The proposed method for determining the boundaries of the walls of the acetabulum is currently the only one in the world literature that is theoretically credible.
2. Statistical differences between the group of children and adults in determining the proportion of the anterior wall of the acetabulum are insignificant and are likely due to the small number of measurements in the groups. The absence of statistical differences in the groups of children and adults when determining the lobes of the superior, posterior and medial walls of the acetabulum indicates the high reliability of this technique.
3. To further assess the reliability of this technique, a larger number of measurements performed by several specialists with the determination of Cohen's Kappa coefficient and statistical analysis of the results are required.
4. The proposed technique allows, within the framework of the ASPID classification, to more accurately determine the boundaries of the walls of the acetabulum, which will certainly help improve the results of primary hip replacement in patients with stage 3 post-traumatic coxarthrosis through a more accurate choice of surgical tactics depending on the localization of the deformation of the walls.
Analysis of the literature on various aspects of hip replacement shows frequent confusion among researchers on what should be considered the “acetabulum walls”. Due to the fact that such a concept does not exist in human anatomy, novice surgeons may encounter various misconceptions, along with inconsistencies on how to perform hip replacement techniques such as implanting the acetabular component of the prostheses. This may not be a problem during standard primary arthroplasty when damages to the
acetabulum are limited to minor changes without consequences of any fractures or congenital pathology, and the bone base does not have structural changes or deformation. In contrast to the above, in the presence of injuries of traumatic origin, the anatomy of the acetabulum acquires its own unique configuration, which is difficult to describe and classify due to the absence of a generally accepted assessment system. As a result, publications on the results of arthroplasty in patients with consequences of acetabular fractures are scattered, cover extremely small groups of patients, and have no global practical value due to the lack of a generally accepted systematic approach. In Russian Scientific Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics named after R.R. Vreden has developed an original typing system to describe the acetabulum in the sequel after the fracture, which is called “ASPID” by analogy with the TNM system, which has found its use in oncology. Since the basis of the proposed “ASPID” system are acetabular walls, the concept of the boundaries of the latter is necessary, including in relation to theoretical aspects that confirm the need to implement this original system. In conclusion, the presented study is unique, as it has no analogues, and could be a templet for a larger scale study focused on analysis of the condition of acetabulum in patients with various congenital and post-traumatic deformities.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
