AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article
*Corresponding Author: Cruz García Lirios, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México.
Citation: Francisco R. Sandoval V., Cruz G. Lirios, (2023), Networks of knowledge management in the literature from 2020 to 2023, Journal of Clinical Surgery and Research, 4(5); DOI:10.31579/2768-2757/090
Copyright: © 2023, Cruz García Lirios. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 26 June 2023 | Accepted: 06 July 2023 | Published: 17 July 2023
Keywords: covid-19; centrality; clustering; networks
Exploratory trajectories of knowledge management of organizations that tend to balance opportunities and capacities through motivational leadership processes are specified. A non-experimental and documentary study was carried out with a selection of sources indexed to international repositories such as Dialnet, Latindex, Publindex, Redalyc and Scielo, as well as registered in ISSN-DOI in the period 2020 to 2023. From the theoretical, conceptual and empirical frameworks, the model of dependence relations between determinant variables -norms, values, beliefs, perceptions- was specified with respect to knowledge management. By the model explains the balance between the relations of power and influence between the leader and the followers, mediating variables of motivational order - attitude, intention, ability and knowledge - were included. In relation to the proposals of the state of knowledge and the literature reviewed, the relevance of the model compared with other more diverse and general proposals is discussed.
A gross mode human capital are paradigms from which knowledge networks acquire a formative, assimilative, technological, individual, motivational and social mobility sense (Vuong et al., 2022). That rational choice, an instrument of human capital, is circumscribed to an omnipresent training system where the individual generates his own opportunities and develops both skills and knowledge based on the utility and the profit of his decisions. In this sense, knowledge networks burst the human capital to endow it with legitimacy and transparency when debating and agreeing on the decisions that will benefit a group or community, academic, scientific and technological.
The competence and cooperation involved in the formation of human capital determines the knowledge networks, since these are the ones that delineate the strategies of balance between demands and resources (Kirchner, Ipsen & Hansen, 2021). Once the innovations are established, the knowledge networks determine the symbols, meanings and meanings relevant to the collaboration and resolution of conflicts within the groups. Innovations, as intelligent systems foster technological change and organizations must adjust their capacities to the entrepreneurship of new knowledge. The opportunities resulting from the dynamics of innovative networks will delineate the development of skills and knowledge. It is a process of creating value for the individual, the collaborative group and the innovative organization. Although human capital highlights the importance of individual decisions in relation to innovation groups, the management culture goes beyond this synergy because it involves a balance between the values of the company and the leader's capacity.
Therefore, the specification of a model for the study of the culture of knowledge management through collaborative networks will explain such complexity. Organizational culture is understood as a process of dependency relations between external variables with respect to variables internal to the organization (Ghasemi, Nejad & Aghaei, 2021). It is a scheme in which technology, structure, values, norms and needs determine the motivational variables - affiliation, power, utility - and these in turn affect the consequent variables - leadership, management, entrepreneurship, innovation, productivity, satisfaction, rotation, absenteeism, accident rate, adaptation, innovation, reputation.
In this process, the labor culture theory holds that values and norms are the determinants of consequent variables through mediating and moderating variables (Wang & Wu, 2021). The moderating variables are those that reduce or increase the negative or positive effect of the variables external to the organization. This is the case of knowledge insofar as autocratic values decrease when they affect workers' commitment or increase the influence of democratic values when they affect cooperation among employees. The mediating variables are those that only transfer the effects of the values and the norms on the consequent variables. This is the case of attitudes and intentions that not only link norms and values with behaviors, but also give them a cultural meaning. Those autocratic values, when linked to behaviors of obedience and conformity, are mediated by unilateral attitudes.
In this way, the theory of organizational culture explains scenarios of consequent variables based on autocratic or democratic values and norms (Li et al., 2022). The labor culture supposes indicators that would correspond with the features of the consequent variables. In this sense, the management culture to be indicated by self-efficacy, hope, resilience and optimism involves a process of autocratic values and standards from which emerges a leadership and with it a specialist in management. In the opposite case, the absence of leadership and management is determined by depersonalization, exhaustion or relative frustration with unilateral tasks, objectives and goals. Therefore, the theory of labor culture explains the emergence of management only if norms and values indicate an autocratic process from which decisions and strategies are centered on a leader specialized in management.
However, organizational management is a more specific process than those explained by the theory of work culture (Velásquez & Lara, 2021). As a management becomes specific, the labor culture, its values and norms must be more punctual to be able to be linked to the objectives and goals of the management. Organizational management, unlike the work culture, is a specific process, since it involves objectives and goals, ponderable and comparable. In this sense, organizational management refers to a process of indicators linked to the systematic monitoring and evaluation of processes, strategies and behaviors. Because organizational management is guided by innovative values and norms, it is a process of systematic and constant change, according to the contingencies of the environment and therefore contrary to the vertical and unilateral structure of the autocratic culture where the dependence on a leader.
However, organizational management derived from the autocratic culture supposes historically different goals and objectives in the face of innovations and specific changes (Saide & Sheng, 2021). As the organizational management is specified and intensified, the autocratic culture is reduced to its minimum expression and gives way to a more participatory culture. Therefore, organizational management involves competition regarding proposals and monitoring and evaluations. It is because of these differences between cultures and management that the theory of organizational management explains the advent of an innovation and a change based on the interrelation between power - unilateral decisions and vertical structures that produce obedience and conformity in the majority - and influence - intentions of change based on innovations of minorities.
That is, those who make decisions are circumscribed to power and influence relationships as the objectives and goals are more specific, but if both are not modified from the achievement of achievements, then it is an autocratic culture. In this way, transformational leadership is linked to variables related to the processes of influence rather than power, since the motivation for effectiveness, satisfaction and effort means n traits of concerted management between the leader and the followers (Deliu, 2020). Or, when communication, cohesion and support negatively correlate with attrition, depersonalization and dissatisfaction, but positively impact the commitment, then we witness a scenario in which the autocratic majority culture interacts with the participation of minorities.
Organizational management theory explains the advent of the interrelationship between power relations -decisions deciding on the behavior of followers- and relationships of influence -talents generating opportunities and knowledge- (Schleper et al., 2021). From both theories, labor culture and organizational management, it is possible to specify the logical explanatory trajectories of consequent variables. Unlike the study related to culture and labor management where fatalistic or optimistic scenarios are anticipated based on correlations between external variables with respect to variables internal to the organization, the specification of a model integrates the variables that by its study systematic it is possible to infer trajectories of dependency relationships. The specification of a model supposes a revision of the relations of dependence established in studies of the prediction of a process, strategy or behavior. It is assumed that the explanatory variables with respect to the variables to be predicted form a system of logical trajectories known as the nomological network. In this sense, the paths of dependency relationships explain the nomological networks are established based on a review of literature over a period.
However, the specification of a model to depend on enough studies related to a process, strategy or behavior, assumes preponderant trajectories that have not always been demonstrated by the studies (Bratianu & Bejinaru, 2021). Therefore, it is necessary to postulate dependency relationships that, since they have not been established logically or empirically, creativity or intuition can postulate as feasible relationships between the variables reviewed, or postulate variables that are not conceptualized or weighted by the state of knowledge. In the case of relationships not established by the literature, it is possible to infer them from studies in which the variables were conceptualized and / or weighted in order to explain other processes, strategies or behavior similar or different from those that are intended to explain.
In the case of variables not used in the studies of a process, strategy or organizational behavior, it is possible to infer it from the correlations between indicators (Abdalla, Renukappa & Suresh, 2023). The specification of a model is made from 1) include the empirical relationships demonstrated by the literature reviewed and 2) propose variables and relationships not established by the state of knowledge. In this sense, the studies of culture and labor management have shown that values and norms are variables external to the relations of power and influence in an organization.
However, norms and values when interacting with environmental contingencies are associated with the processing of available information known as beliefs and perceptions (Karakose et al., 2021). In this way, the external or determining variables would be values, norms, beliefs and perceptions that would explain consequent variables such as; entrepreneurship, innovation, satisfaction, productivity, competitiveness and its opposite variables such as turnover, absenteeism, dissatisfaction, unproductivity, compliance or obedience.
However, since the determining variables are indicative of general processes that would affect specific variables, they must be mediated or moderated by variables such as attitudes, abilities, opportunities, intentions, knowledge or emotions (Al-Omoush, Simón-Moya & Sendra-García, 2020). The mediating and moderating variables allow to specify and intensify the effect of the determining variables on the consequent variables. This is how the culture model of knowledge management would include six explanatory hypotheses of trajectories of logical relations between the determining variables and management, mediated by motivation, attitude, intention, skills and knowledge. These are the studies related to the traditional and transformational leadership styles in which the difference between external demands and resources optimized by the talent of the leader is explained but reducing the participation to a function of expectation.
It is s study concerning knowledge networks because of the interplay between market demands and resource optimization based on information of possible scenarios (Gombos et al., 2021). It is about the studies of opportunities and capabilities because of a participative and competitive culture since each opportunity corresponds to a skill. In these investigations, the effects of the surrounding information with respect to culture and management are explained by the interrelation of the determinant variables with leadership styles, opportunities, capacities, objectives and goals. The management that proposes feasible scenarios is studied from the intentionality of its objectives and goals based on information from the balance between demands and resources. The formation of knowledge networks is explained by the norms, values, beliefs and perceptions of talents, as well as the motivation of leaders, the formation of skills, knowledge and attitudes around planned and systematic decisions.
The objective of this paper is to establish a model to explain the incidence of labor culture on organizational management. From a review of the theoretical, conceptual and empirical frameworks, the logical trajectories were established for the prediction of management in the face of demands that exceed resources and their optimization is encouraged.
By the literature corresponding to the period from 2020 to 2023 was reviewed, a documentary investigation was projected. In relation to the analysis of the state of the art, an exploratory work was proposed and a cross-sectional study regarding the observation threshold, considering that the phenomenon is permanent.
A search of articles in indexed repositories was carried out, considering the analysis period, as well as the keywords. Out of a total of 320 abstracts, 10 were selected which made up the analysis sample related to the perception of knowledge as part of the formation of intellectual capital.
The opinion mining inventory, content analysis and Delphi technique were used for data analysis and information processing, considering the period of observation and systematization of the state of knowledge.
A keyword search was carried out in www.gloogle.scholar in order to be able to select the abstracts and process the data according to the qualification of expert judges on the subject. A value of -1 was assigned to the summaries that reported the perception of knowledge as an exogenous process to the formation of intellectual capital, with 0 for those who only mentioned the concept and +1 for those who modeled the term as a variable.
The analysis package for social sciences version 23.0 was used considering the parameters of normal distribution, contingency, proportion, adjustment and residual in order to be able to observe the relationships between categories and analyzed findings, as well as their structural configuration.
The values in Table 1 show a distribution that tends to be normal and by meeting this requirement it is possible to perform contingency analysis in order to contrast the hypothesis of dependent relationships between the categories of analysis and the abstracts of abstracts previously qualified by the judges. experts in perception and knowledge.
Table 1: Centrality of knowledge management in the lliterature from 2020 to 2023
Note: Elaborated with data study
To find and be able to establish the axes of discussion around the ten selected extracts in risk thresholds, we proceeded to estimate the matrix of probability proportions (see Table 2).
Table 2: Clustering of knowledge management in the literature from 2020 to 2023
Source: Elaborated with data study
Once the probability ratio matrix was established, which indicates that the consultation decisions of the selected literature are at the permissible risk threshold for decision-making, a model of structural equations was estimated in order to appreciate its composition of categories and extracts.
The adjustment and residual parameters 〔x2 equal 13,24 (13df) p greater than ,05; NFI equal ,997; CFI equal ,990; RMSEA equal ,006〕suggest the non-rejection of the null hypothesis relative to the significant differences between the models reported in the literature with respect to the structure established in the present work.
The contribution of this work to the situation lies in the modeling of the perception of knowledge, if the literature consulted links this process to the formation of intellectual capital, as well as to the management of entrepreneurship and innovation. In relation to the theoretical, conceptual and empirical frameworks, the inclusion of organizational culture as a mediator of the demands of the environment and the structural representation of organizational resources is recommended. Lines of observation related to knowledge management from the scarcity of resources and depending on the demands of the environment, they suggest that the estimation of decision thresholds be established from a modeling of trajectories, but in the present work we appreciate that the relationships between the categories and the extracts at least indicate a complex structure of data that can be actionable, but adjustable to decision criteria in the evidence.
Knowledge management as a source of data that can be materialized in task protocols for the achievement of objectives discernible to goals, although in the present work it is noted that the perception of risk is linked to knowledge management. The influence of the pandemic seems to have established a more permissible threshold of risks for knowledge managers than are reported in the state of the art (Mahdi & Nassar, 2021). Knowledge management goes through risk management thresholds whose decisions are legitimized based on the codification of objectives, tasks and goals, but in the present work it has been shown that the perception of risk It is linked to the management of knowledge in the selected literature, differentiating itself as an alternate process and a clear impact on performance. Research lines related to risk management will clarify the limits of intention to carry out a task based on data-oriented goals. Lines concerning risk perception and knowledge management will make it possible to warn of the risk thresholds related to decisions to train intellectual capital in health contingencies such as the SARS CoV-2 pandemic and the Covid-19 disease.
The contribution of the present work to the state of knowledge consists in the specification of the relations and the logical trajectories between the cultural variables that determine the management of knowledge through mediating variables. However, the possible relationships between the variables included in the model suppose more explanations that can be compared with the established ones. In this sense, the debate around the direct determination of the management from the norms, values, beliefs and perceptions contrasts with the specification of the present model, since the mediating variables could be suppressed in autocratic organizations and diversified into participative organizations.
Therefore, the specification of the model explains the culture and management of organizations balanced between their demands and resources, opportunities and capacities, power and influence.
In contexts of uncertainty, scarcity and risk, organizations tend to be more participatory and require models of culture and management that are more diverse, specific and innovative. However, organizations, even when their environment is uncertain, have based their emergence and persistence based on the balance between their processes. The objectives and goals of the organizations not only reflect their culture, but also base their human essence, since leaders and followers are the central elements of their intentions and products.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
