AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Editorial
*Corresponding Author: Evgeny Bryndin, Research Department of Research Centre
Citation: Evgeny Bryndin (2022). Natural Patterns and Magnetic and Mental Processes of Coronavirus Activation and Neutralization. J. Archives of Medical Case Reports and Case Study, 5(2); DOI:10.31579/2692-9392/087
Copyright: © 2022 Evgeny Bryndin, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 29 November 2021 | Accepted: 03 January 2022 | Published: 10 January 2022
Keywords: coronavirus; pandemic; spiritual cleansing; pole change; magnetic therapy
For twenty years, humanity has seen the third attempt at the transition of coronavirus to humans. The vaccine has been found, but coronavirus transitions will not stop even with the improvement of medicine. Nobel laureate in medicine Professor Luc Montagnier argues that vaccines may not live up to humanity's hopes of getting rid of COVID-19. Collective immunity for coronavirus has not been developed, repeated infections are more and more common, beds of seriously ill people are not empty, and mortality is running high, no one knows what will happen to all of us. In Israel, where vaccination has long been compulsory, and over 60% of the population, including underage children, have been vaccinated, the incidence is not just declining, but still breaking all records. So, the maximum number of cases here was revealed on September 1 - 16,629, which almost caught up with Russia (18,368 confirmed on the same September 1) with our percentage of vaccinated 26.1% of the number of citizens. At the end of September 2021, morbidity and mortality increase, because it is a system. Based on existing monthly pneumonia mortality statistics over the past 15 years, there are three waves each year. Since September 22, there has been a surge of pneumonia, ARI, and even non-communicable diseases. The second wave comes at the end of December - January, it is usually three times larger than the first. Then around March-April there is a third wave. These three waves exist steadily from year to year, their amplitudes can change, then one will be higher, then the other, they are not absolutely hard on schedule, but they are reproduced regularly in other countries. The first wave of the Spanish pandemic covered the world just at the end of September 1918. The coronavirus was the same. The first wave in America is September 2019, an unexplained surge of pneumonia with a rather high mortality rate, which was written off for smoking e-cigarettes and called "vape." Now they decided to watch the surviving tests of patients, and there - COVID-19. In Europe, it was the same.
The outbreak of coronavirus occurred simultaneously and almost synchronously in different countries. And this corresponds to the classical ideas of virology. Three waves of coronavirus exist from year to year at intervals of three months - three months - three months. There is a natural mechanism that can control such waves. June 22 is the day of the summer solstice, December 22 is the day of the winter solstice, September 22 and March 22 are the days of the autumn and spring equinox, respectively. Increasing and decreasing morbidity in humans is always close to these astronomical points. Statistics on heart attacks and strokes, and it turned out that non-communicable diseases have the same rise in mortality on the same dates. For other bacteria, streptococci and staphylococci, in these numbers all microflora is activated, which causes the corresponding diseases.
Infections are usually transmitted under three conditions: a large dose of pathogen, quite close contact or epizootia - an outbreak of infection. Population density becomes additional stimuli for the high rate of infection. Viruses do not affect separately Chinese or representatives of other nations, viruses are apolitical and have no religion. They can adapt to any changes in the environment no worse than a person. The only thing to thank them for is the evolutionary perfection of the human immune system. For centuries, when any infection appeared, the human body produced antibodies and formed cellular immunity. When there are more than 30% of people with antibodies, we can say that the epidemic will end soon. Scientists have the opportunity to observe attempts by viruses to make a crossview transition thanks to laboratory tracking methods.
The outbreak of epidemics is not an accident, but a combination of circumstances. And all of them are caused by changes in the environment. This is always a unique situation that occurs as a result of a change in the state of the environment, in which a person falls into new conditions of interaction with other species of animals. And today the anthropogenic impact on the environment has reached absolutely unmatched proportions compared to previous generations, in addition, man as a species is constantly growing.
At the beginning of the last century, the famous scientist Chizhevsky studied dark spots in the sun and revealed the amazing synchrony of solar energies and their influence on terrestrial biological processes. Viruses have receptors that are simultaneously activated during this period. Waves of infectious diseases flare up in different countries at the same time. Now we have 80
In conditions of pole change, the significance of cellular adaptive immunity comes to the fore, which is formed by the results of contacts with viruses. It is based on the so-called T-lymphocytes, which give the body's cells a command to produce antibodies when they meet the virus again. As a result, even if no antibodies are found in the blood of the sick, this does not mean that they have no immunity: with a new contact with the virus, T-lymphocytes launch their "production." As a result, people either show no symptoms of the disease at all, or it passes in erased form. Today, virologists explain that 80% of those infected survive a new coronavirus infection easily, precisely the work of T-cell immunity.
One of the studies conducted in the United States analyzed donor blood samples obtained from 2015 to 2018 - 50% of them showed T cells by SARS-CoV-2. A similar study in the Netherlands revealed 20% of blood samples with T cells. In Germany, reactive T cells were found in a third of seronegative SARS-CoV-2 healthy donors (23 out of 68). In Singapore, a team of researchers analyzed blood samples taken from people who had no contact or personal history with SARS or COVID-19; 12 of 26 samples taken before July 2019 showed T cells to the SARS-CoV-2, as did 7 of 11 samples taken from people who were seronegative to the virus. Similar studies with approximately the same data were conducted in the UK and Sweden. Yes, all these studies examined small groups of people, but their results are difficult to ignore.
And now they remembered that something similar happened during the swine flu pandemic in 2009. Many people carried it easily, which was already explained by the presence of reactive T cells formed as a result of encountering genetically similar influenza viruses. A study conducted during the 2009 outbreak by the U.S. Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) found that 33% of people over 60 had cross-reactive antibodies to the H1N1 virus.
Today, scientists suggest that cross-immunity to SARS-CoV-2 can be developed not only in those who once had seasonal human coronaviruses, but even in those who met with coronaviruses of some animals.
In theory, outbreaks of infectious diseases follow a certain trajectory. Among the population deprived of immunity, the number of new infections is growing rapidly. At some point in this growth, a bend should occur, and the incidence will begin to fall. In the 1970s, a theory was born that defined this inflection point as the threshold of collective immunity (HIT) and even a formula for its definition HIT = 1 − 1/R0 (R0 is the average number of secondary cases). According to her, experts calculated that under SARS-CoV-2, at least 50% of people need to be ill in order to achieve collective immunity. But there are other, more optimistic calculations - such should be from 10% to 20%. Scientists at the University of Oxford, for example, believe that when there are people with already existing immunity in the population, as studies of T-lymphocytes can show, the threshold of collective immunity can be reduced to 10%.
Today, for example, everyone is studying the phenomenon of Sweden, where quarantine was abandoned at the beginning of the epidemic - and the number of cases and deaths was off the scale. Today, there in Stockholm, a city of 2 million people, only 50 people were hospitalized with COVID-19. Has collective immunity developed in Sweden? Swedish scientist Buggert conducted a study: studying close relatives of patients with confirmed COVID, he found T-cell responses in those who were seronegative or asymptomatic. While about 60% of family members produced antibodies, others had T cell responses.
However, today, speaking of immunity, everyone focused on antibodies. And talk that antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 begin to weaken after only 2-3 months suggests repeated infections. Even doctors are increasingly talking about them. A growing number of evidence from colleagues about re-infections and, worse, that occurred against the background of high antibody titers is encouraging.
With T cells, things may be different: Singaporean scientists, for example, discovered reactive T cells to SARS-CoV-1 in patients with SARS coronavirus 17 years (!) After infection. The metropolitan doctor, who worked in intensive care in 2003, said that she herself had SARS-CoV-1, which was not believed to be in Russia: Almost all my colleagues were ill - we had severe pneumonia, very similar to those that we now see. However, this time, having contracted SARS-CoV-2, I suffered it almost without symptoms, on my legs, although I am at risk. And colleagues who were ill then, now, continuing to work in intensive care, either do not get infected or get sick easily. The viruses SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 are genetically identical by 80%, and obviously we acquired cross immunity. It is estimated that in early 2000, many store sellers, pilots, and airport employees were the first SARS.
At the beginning of the pandemic, the key direction was that we needed antibody data to understand who was infected and how many were protected, "wrote immunologists from Imperial College London. - As we have learned more about this complex infection, it is time to recognize that we also need data on T cells.
So against the background of the recent statement by the representative of WHO that we have not come close to collective immunity, the results of research on cellular immunity are encouraging [8-14].
The use of magnets as a physiotherapeutic agent has a long history. Famous doctors of ancient times used the power of magnetic fields to treat various diseases. Since the middle of the 20th century, magnetotherapy has been undergoing a rise, new devices have appeared, while the debate about the effectiveness of the method does not subside. In Russia, the physiotherapeutic school has a great history, and the methods of magnetic therapy are recognized as medical. Treatment with magnetic factors as part of physiotherapy today is one of the links of non-drug and non-surgical rehabilitation.
Studying the effects of magnetic fields on the body and a wide variety of devices in our time have led to a significant expansion of indications for the use of magnetic therapy. Today it is difficult to find a disease in the treatment of which one or another type of magnetotherapy could not be used. Softness of exposure, wide possibilities for personalization and accessibility of the method made magnetotherapy a popular type of treatment and prevention [15-18].
Clinics, sanatoriums and other medical institutions are developing rehabilitation programs after the COVID-19. Mechanisms for recovery from illness are still under study. But it is already clear that magnetic therapy can be safely added to basic medical recommendations - breathing gymnastics, outdoor walks and quality sleep.
All microorganisms, ranging from viruses to fungi and microbes, reach the negative magnetic field. That is, a negative magnetic field is such a great universal antibiotic. When the electric dipole has a negative charge, the magnetic field will also be negative.
The use of a magnetic field to help patients after a severe coronavirus infection began in several subjects of the Russian Federation. Special devices for this previously helped in the treatment of hypertension and diseases of the musculoskeletal system. The pioneers were doctors of the Ivanovo region. They tried to prescribe magnetotherapy to people in whom COVID-19 gave complications to the lungs. The wellness effect was evident. Today, this practice has been introduced in some other regions. For example, in Crimea, magnetic therapy is included in the rehabilitation programs of sanatoriums.
Clinical trials have confirmed that the magnetic field has a good effect on the course of treatment of vessels and respiratory organs, spine and joints. The complex provides a medically free effect on the human body with weak and ultra-weak negative magnetic fields: both general and specific - with an eye on a particular organ or system. Metabolism is accelerated, blood oxygen saturation is increased, immunity is improved, cell and tissue regeneration is accelerated. Several hundred sources of magnetic field are controlled from a computer.
The world lives in a state of struggle with a new coronavirus, and hundreds of thousands of patients need restorative treatment. Doctors note that most of those who have undergone coronaviruses even in mild form have symptoms such as shortness of breath, headache, fatigue, depressed mood - the so-called postcovid syndrome. Multimag is used to restore patients after COVID-19.
The therapeutic factor of the device is the effect of various magnetic fields. The purpose of the action is to activate the adaptation capabilities of the body and restore metabolic processes. Rostec development can be used in medical institutions, sanatoriums, rehabilitation and fitness centers. "Multimag" is successfully used to strengthen immunity and prevent diseases, including viral infections, which include coronavirus. It treats Multimag with the help of dosed exposure to weak frequency-modulated magnetic fields, and it is possible to affect both the body as a whole and individual organs. At the same time, 400 magnets are involved in the device, and wide possibilities for tuning allow you to choose individual treatment.
The body in the magnetic field behaves like a diamagnet. Diamagnets - have the property of magnetization in the opposite direction of the external field, that is, they have a negative value of magnetic susceptibility, independent of strength. Many organic substances, such as silicon, germanium, spring water and others, contribute to the human body to acquire the properties of a diamagnet. Diamagnet magnetization occurs in the presence of an external field. Magnetic therapy helps the body become a diamagnet and neutralize coronavirus.
The use of low-frequency magnetotherapy in the medical rehabilitation of patients after suffering pneumonia associated with COVID-19 allows improving the general condition, lung function, increasing physical activity and contributing to the restoration of activity in everyday life.
In an environment with positive mental energy, pathogenic organisms do not develop: bacteria and viruses, including coronavirus.
Scientists have identified a mental field around the brain [19]. The mental field ensures the normal course of all neurophysiological processes. It is determined that this mental field is highly energetic on special carriers, which are epiphysis crystals. They make it possible to keep a huge energy information volume in the protein body.
In the situation with coronavirus, when the problem must be solved immediately, the active generation of mental energy of enormous strength begins. And then the psychoenergetic process of exposure to coronavirus is performed. Not many can consciously manage mental energy. Psychological protection is associated with positive content of thoughts, feelings and behavior.
From a spiritual point of view, coronavirus is a cleaner. The level of moral, ethical and spiritual standards is low in large cities. Humans do not keep God's covenants. The world lives in evil. It makes spiritual sense that the widespread disease with coronavirus occurred on the eve of Lent and understanding of sins before the celebration of the nativity of Christ. We must understand that this is a punishment for sins. We must understand and understand this well, and from this we must proceed in our lives [20-21]. And always ask God for forgiveness - both for himself and for peace. The Lord will pardon and protect, if we really all realize sinfulness, we will obediently strive to live according to the covenants of God, then the pandemic will end.
Megacities are an urban environment with a concentration of low spiritual energies. Coranavirus causes people to cleanse themselves mentally and increase positive mental energy. The virus does not affect those who constantly seek to reveal their essence. Coronavirus has energy, information, and several molecules. It is at the level of energy frequencies and functions on other vibrations than a spiritual person with positive mental energy.
Long-term studies of viral mass diseases indicate the realizing role of natural processes and the controlling role of spiritual processes in the international phenomenon of pandemics. The results of the studies set out in the article and publications. confirm this. The controlling substance reveals the spiritual level of society. In accordance with the spiritual level of society and the ecological state of the environment, it launches natural processes and mechanisms according to spiritual laws to cleanse people. Currently, another natural process in the form of coronavirus infection has been launched to cleanse humanity. It is already becoming seasonal in order for peoples to realize the unrighteous destructive activities of life, to correct and improve it by observing spiritual, hygienic, sanitary and environmental standards for the benefit of humanity and nature.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
