info@auctorespublishing.com
+1-(302)-520-2644
+1-(302)-520-2644

Nanofiltration-Concept and Prospects

  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. Pharmaceutics and Pharmacology Research
  4. Archives
Submit Guidelines

Review Article

Nanofiltration-Concept and Prospects

  • Nida tabassum khan 1

*Corresponding Author: Nidaabassum khan Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Life Sciences & Informatics, Balochistan.

Citation: Nida T khan (2021) Nanofiltration-Concept and Prospects J Pharmaceutics and Pharmacology Research. 4(4); DOI: 10.31579/2693-7247/047

Copyright: © Nida tabassum khan, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: 06 September 2021 | Accepted: 11 September 2021 | Published: 23 October 2021

Keywords: reverse osmosis; ultrafiltration; surfactants; electrodialysis; innovation; non-permeable

Abstract

Nanofiltration is a pressure-driven film measure for fluid stage detachments. It is employed in numerous applications due to lower energy utilization and higher motion rates. The properties of nanofiltration membranes lie between those of non-permeable reverse osmosis layers and permeable ultrafiltration layers where partition is typically thought to be because of size rejection and, sometimes, charge impacts. The improvement of nanofiltration development as a practical association over continuous years has provoked a pivotal extension in its application in different endeavours, for instance, treatment of blurring effluents from the material industries, division of medications from development stocks, demineralization in the dairy business, and metal recovery from wastewater and disease clearing

Introduction

Nanofiltration (NF) is a pressure driven membrane process based on the separation capabilities of reverse osmosis and ultrafiltration [1]. Nanofiltration is often used where the divalent ions (Ca, Mg etc) have to be removed but it can also be employed in the separation of ions from solutes such as small molecules of sugars [2,3]. The molecular weight cut off of nanofiltration membranes is between 200 - 1000 Daltons, which means pore size ranges between 1 - 10 nm [4]. Typical rejections of NF membranes are 60 % for NaCl, 98 % for magnesium sulphate, glucose and sucrose [5,6]. Generally, this opens up the possibilities enhancing process efficiency and the production of new products, particularly in the food industry and biotechnology [7]. Some other specific applications of nanofiltration are the removal of colour, removal of trihalomethane precursors from surface water, removal of low molecular weight species such as organics in pharmaceutical production, surfactants from waste waters etc [8,9]. The potential applications of nanofiltration are in food industry and environmental protection [10].

Nanofiltration membrane process

Reverse osmosis membranes are basically non-permeable, and allows passage of fluid by high working pressing factor of 20 to 100 bars [11]. Nanofiltration membranes has pore size of 1–5 nm and it can hold particles, and low sub-atomic weight organics [12]. It has essentially higher water porousness than reverse osmosis membranes and works at lower pressure normally 7 to 30 bar [13]. Similarly, ultrafiltration membranes possess pore size ranges from 5 to 20 nm and holds fine colloids, macromolecules, and microorganism and works with pressure scope of 1 to 10 bar [14]. The other types of membranes that are utilized in fluid measures are microfiltration (MF), electrodialysis (ED), fluid film (LM), pervaporation (PV), fume penetration (VP), and gas saturation (GP) [15,16,17]. 

Nanofiltration membrane construct

Nanofiltration membranes possess a fixed charge created by the separation of surface assemblies such as sulphonated or carboxyl acids [18]. The characteristics of nanofiltration membranes, subsequently, permits particles to be separated by a mix of the size and ultrafiltration electrical impacts and the particle collaboration systems of reverse osmosis [19]. Such types of membrane presented novel technique in wastewater treatment [20]. The pore size of nanofiltration membrane is approximately 1 nm which allows even little uncharged solutes to be dismissed while the surface electrostatic properties permit monovalent particles to be sensibly very much communicated with multivalent particles for the most part held [21,22]. These features make this membrane very valuable in the fractional process and in solutes expulsion from complex interaction streams [23]. Nanofiltration membranes are one of the promising advances for the treatment of typical normal matter and inorganic defilements in surface water since surface water has low osmotic squeezing factor therefore a low-pressure movement of nanofiltration is possible [24]. In the nanofiltration of surface waters, ordinary normal combinations, which have commonly enormous iotas appeared differently in relation to film pore size, could be dispensed with by sieving instrument, however the inorganic salts by the charge effect of the layers and particles [25,26].

Separation mechanisms in nanofiltration

Nanofiltration take advantage of lower working pressure factor appeared differently in relation to reverse osmosis, and higher regular excusal diverged from ultrafiltration [27]. For the colloids and immense particles, physical sieving would be the prevalent excusal framework however for the particles and lower sub-nuclear weight substances, plan spread instrument and charge effect of membrane plays an important role in segmentation [28]. There are four stages of nanofiltration separation which are as follows:

  1. Wetted surface: Water binds with the membrane through hydrogen bonding and the atoms which structure the hydrogen holding with the layer can be moved [29].
  2. Preferential sorption/Capillary dismissal: Membrane for nanofiltration is assorted and microporous, and static revulsion occurs because of numerous electrostatic factors [30].
  3. Solution dissemination: Solutes and solubles break up in the membrane due to dispersion [31].
  4. Charged slim: Electric twofold layer in the pores allows release of particles of similar charges and counter-particles are dismissed because of the streaming potential [32]. The excusal of uncharged molecules is overpowered by size preclusion, while that of ionic species is influenced by both size dismissal and electrostatic joint efforts [33]. Electrostatic ascribes of nanofiltration membranes have been known to play an important part in excusal anions, to be explicit, negative zeta potential on the layer surface changes with different pH and gathering of electrolytes [34].

Membrane fouling in the nanofiltration process

Like some other film measures, nanofiltration membranes are vulnerable to layer fouling [35]. Layer fouling is one of the enormous hardships in any film or membrane layouts therefore understanding the fouling instrument and perceiving a suitable control decision is one of the crucial sections of this applications [36]. The responses for fouling issues require a multipronged approach including the film properties, useful conditions, feed characteristics, etc [37]. The nanofiltration membrane fouling could be a direct result of inorganic precipitation or scaling, colloidal fouling, regular adsorption and moreover biofouling [38]. While biofouling is huge in long stretch, without a doubt, biofouling happens exclusively after normal or inorganic or colloidal fouling [39]. Since coordinated efforts among solutes and the membrane layers are deficiently seen, it is possible that effects like charge associations, crossing, and hydrophobic affiliations may accept a huge part in membrane fouling [40]. Membrane layers with greater pores show a more essential decline as filtration proceeds because of inward plugging up [41]. In any case, movement decline isn't actually due to fouling but various factors like center polarization or osmotic factor component or film compaction can appear as fouling during the nanofiltration association [42]. Concerns like contemplated three limits, silt thickness record (SDI), modified fouling document (MFI), and the immediate association of the mass trade coefficient (MTC) to investigate the fouling [43]. Regardless, no association between's these limits were procured exhibiting that the fundamental filtration laws most likely will not be considerable for nanofiltration measures [44]. It was reported that the regular blends with sub-nuclear weight higher than 30 kDa was responsible for membrane fouling [45]. In addition, change in fouling framework after 20 h movement, possibly on account of the associations of the hydrophobic and hydrophilic pieces of organics [46]. In another study it was reported that the use of especially hydrophilic films with pore size of 1–2 nm and low working strain could reduce fouling because hydrophilic membranes were more resistant to fouling regardless of pore size [47]. Membrane fouling would be amazingly genuine in charged layers which can attract the oppositely charged organics with no issue however in case of particles like calcium, phosphorus, aluminium and iron, etc film fouling during water treatment measure were further developed [48].

On the other hand, colloidal materials could cause more fouling than natural materials in nanofiltration because of the following reasons:

  • Natural fouling due to the presence of organic species on the membrane surface [49]
  • Deficiency of saturate transition through the membrane [50]
  • Due to the testimony of natural substances [51]
  • Scaling which is characterized as the arrangement of mineral stores accelerating from the feed stream to the film surface [52].

Control of membrane fouling

Membrane fouling is ordinarily controlled either by working the system inside the essential movement range or adding engineered materials or conceivably by pre-treatment which is the most uplifting answer for fouling control [53]. Normally used channel media is not sufficient to reduce the fouling, therefore a combination of coagulation, ozonation and biofiltration is utilized as a better option [54]. Extension of a polyelectrolyte overhauled the molecule excusal in nanofiltration [55]. Incited carbon adsorption is an outstandingly convincing pretreatment measure Since the basic decrease in fouling is predominantly a result of speedy, irreversible adsorption of regular substances on the film surface, giving a pre-treatment, for instance, adsorption or flocculation of organics before passing the feed course of action through the layer is extraordinarily amazing response for the film fouling issue [56,57]. Pretreatment of the feed to nanofiltration is one of the huge considerations to guarantee lower membrane fouling [58]. High molecular weight solids can damage the film surface unequivocally and break the stream in the filtration structure [59]. Recently, high-rate flocculation and appealing molecule exchange sap have been endeavoured to kill hydrophobic and hydrophilic organics exclusively to diminish the regular fouling on the nanofilter layers [60].

Conclusion

Since nanofiltration shows properties between those of ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis, both charge and size of atom accept huge part in nanofiter excusal part. Thus, nanofiltration membrane is defined as a charged ultrafiltration structure with a low infolding reverse osmosis system.

References

  1. Mohammad, A. W, Teow, Y. H, Ang, W. L, Chung, Y. T, Oatley-Radcliffe, et al (2015). Nanofiltration membranes review: Recent advances and future prospects. Desalination, 356, 226-254.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  2. Petersen, R. J. (1993). Composite reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes. Journal of membrane science, 83(1), 81-150.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  3. Raman, L. P, Cheryna, M., & Rajagopalan, N. (1994). Consider nanofiltration for membrane separations. Chemical Engineering Progress;(United States), 90(3).
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  4. Schäfer, A., Fane, A. G., & Waite, T. D. (Eds.). (2005). Nanofiltration: principles and applications. Elsevier.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  5. Bowen, W. R., & Mohammad, A. W. (1998). Characterization and prediction of nanofiltration membrane performance a general assessment. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 76(8), 885-893.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  6. Eriksson, P. (1988). Nanofiltration extends the range of membrane filtration. Environmental Progress, 7(1), 58-62.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  7. Volkov, A. V., Korneeva, G. A., & Tereshchenko, G. F. (2008). Organic solvent nanofiltration: prospects and application. Russian Chemical Reviews, 77(11), 983.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  8. Peeters, J. M. M, Boom, J. P, Mulder, M. H. V, & Strathmann, H. (1998). Retention measurements of nanofiltration membranes with electrolyte solutions. Journal of membrane science, 145(2), 199-209.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  9. Oatley-Radcliffe, D. L, Walters, M, Ainscough, T. J, Williams, P. M, Mohammad, A. W., & Hilal, N. (2017). Nanofiltration membranes and processes: A review of research trends over the past decade. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 19, 164-171.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  10. Abdel-Fatah, M. A. (2018). Nanofiltration systems and applications in wastewater treatment. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 9(4), 3077-3092.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  11. Bowen, W. R., & Mohammad, A. W. (1998). Characterization and prediction of nanofiltration membrane performance—a general assessment. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 76(8), 885-893.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  12. Tul Muntha, S., Kausar, A., & Siddiq, M. (2017). Advances in polymeric nanofiltration membrane: A review. Polymer-Plastics Technology and Engineering, 56(8), 841-856.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  13. Chun-Te Lin, J., & Livingston, A. G. (2007). Nanofiltration membrane cascade for continuous solvent exchange. Chemical Engineering Science, 62(10), 2728-2736.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  14. Marchetti, P., Peeva, L., & Livingston, A. (2017). The selectivity challenge in organic solvent nanofiltration: membrane and process solutions. Annual review of chemical and biomolecular engineering, 8, 473-497.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  15. Bowen, W. R., & Welfoot, J. S. (2002). Predictive modelling of nanofiltration: membrane specification and process optimisation. Desalination, 147(1-3), 197-203.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  16. Xu, Y., & Lebrun, R. E. (1999). Investigation of the solute separation by charged nanofiltration membrane: effect of pH, ionic strength and solute type. Journal of membrane science, 158(1-2), 93-104.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  17. Ji, Y., An, Q., Zhao, Q., Chen, H., Qian, J., & Gao, C. (2010). Fabrication and performance of a new type of charged nanofiltration membrane based on polyelectrolyte complex. Journal of Membrane Science, 357(1-2), 80-89.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  18. Gu, Y. H., Yan, X., Chen, Y., Guo, X. J., & Lang, W. Z. (2020). Layer-by-layer assembled GO-based membranes with high long-standing stability and chemical resistance applied in dye separation and desalination. 2D Materials, 7(4), 045016.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  19. Xu, G. R., Liu, X. Y., Xu, J. M., Li, L., Su, H. C., Zhao, H. L., & Feng, H. J. (2018). High flux nanofiltration membranes based on layer-by-layer assembly modified electrospun nanofibrous substrate. Applied Surface Science, 434, 573-581.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  20. Wang, T., Qiblawey, H., Sivaniah, E., & Mohammadian, A. (2016). Novel methodology for facile fabrication of nanofiltration membranes based on nucleophilic nature of polydopamine. Journal of Membrane Science, 511, 65-75.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  21. García-Martín, N., Silva, V., Carmona, F. J., Palacio, L., Hernández, A., & Prádanos, P. (2014). Pore size analysis from retention of neutral solutes through nanofiltration membranes. The contribution of concentration–polarization. Desalination, 344,
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  22. Bowen, W. R., & Welfoot, J. S. (2002). Modelling the performance of membrane nanofiltration—critical assessment and model development. Chemical engineering science, 57(7), 1121-1137.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  23. Dischinger, S. M., McGrath, M. J., Bourland, K. R., Noble, R. D., & Gin, D. L. (2017). Effect of post-polymerization anion-exchange on the rejection of uncharged aqueous solutes in nanoporous, ionic, lyotropic liquid crystal polymer membranes. Journa
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  24. Liu, X., & Bruening, M. L. (2004). Size-selective transport of uncharged solutes through multilayer polyelectrolyte membranes. Chemistry of materials, 16(2), 351-357.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  25. Werber, J. R., Osuji, C. O., & Elimelech, M. (2016). Materials for next-generation desalination and water purification membranes. Nature Reviews Materials, 1(5), 1-15.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  26. Schaep, J., Van der Bruggen, B., Vandecasteele, C., & Wilms, D. (1998). Influence of ion size and charge in nanofiltration. Separation and Purification Technology, 14(1-3), 155-162.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  27. Košutić, K., Novak, I., Sipos, L., & Kunst, B. (2004). Removal of sulfates and other inorganics from potable water by nanofiltration membranes of characterized porosity. Separation and Purification Technology, 37(3), 177-185.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  28. Nghiem, L. D., Schäfer, A. I., & Elimelech, M. (2005). Pharmaceutical retention mechanisms by nanofiltration membranes. Environmental science & technology, 39(19), 7698-7705.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  29. Gao, Z. F., Feng, Y., Ma, D., & Chung, T. S. (2019). Vapor-phase crosslinked mixed matrix membranes with UiO-66-NH2 for organic solvent nanofiltration. Journal of Membrane Science, 574, 124-135.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  30. Robinson, J. P., Tarleton, E. S., Millington, C. R., & Nijmeijer, A. (2004). Solvent flux through dense polymeric nanofiltration membranes. Journal of membrane science, 230(1-2), 29-37.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  31. Nguyen, N. N., Fargues, C., Lewandowski, R., Guiga, W., & Lameloise, M. L. (2012, September). Assessing nanofiltration and reverse osmosis for the detoxification of fermentable solutions. In Euromembrane Conference 2012 (Vol. 44, p. np). Academic Pre
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  32. Park, A. H. A., Zhu, C., Fan, L. S., & Sandvik, P. (2000). Particle Technology. Kirk‐Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, 1-51.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  33. Braghetta, A. H. (1995). The influence of solution chemistry and operating conditions on nanofiltration of charged and uncharged organic macromolecules (Doctoral dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill).
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  34. Cheng, S., Oatley, D. L., Williams, P. M., & Wright, C. J. (2011). Positively charged nanofiltration membranes: review of current fabrication methods and introduction of a novel approach. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 164(1-2), 12-20.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  35. Bellona, C., Marts, M., & Drewes, J. E. (2010). The effect of organic membrane fouling on the properties and rejection characteristics of nanofiltration membranes. Separation and Purification Technology, 74(1), 44-54.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  36. Guo, W., Ngo, H. H., & Li, J. (2012). A mini-review on membrane fouling. Bioresource technology, 122, 27-34.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  37. She, Q., Wang, R., Fane, A. G., & Tang, C. Y. (2016). Membrane fouling in osmotically driven membrane processes: A review. Journal of Membrane Science, 499, 201-233.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  38. Mohammadi, T., Madaeni, S. S., & Moghadam, M. K. (2003). Investigation of membrane fouling. Desalination, 153(1-3), 155-160.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  39. Vrouwenvelder, J. S., Van Paassen, J. A. M., Wessels, L. P., Van Dam, A. F., & Bakker, S. M. (2006). The membrane fouling simulator: a practical tool for fouling prediction and control. Journal of Membrane Science, 281(1-2), 316-324.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  40. Ma, H., Bowman, C. N., & Davis, R. H. (2000). Membrane fouling reduction by backpulsing and surface modification. Journal of Membrane Science, 173(2), 191-200.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  41. Kimura, K., Hane, Y., Watanabe, Y., Amy, G., & Ohkuma, N. (2004). Irreversible membrane fouling during ultrafiltration of surface water. Water research, 38(14-15), 3431-3441.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  42. Jonsson, G., & Prado-Rubio, O. (2011). Modeling and operation of dynamic membrane processes. In Key note at ICOM conference (Vol. 425).
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  43. Li, C., Sun, W., Lu, Z., Ao, X., & Li, S. (2020). Ceramic nanocomposite membranes and membrane fouling: A review. Water research, 175, 115674.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  44. Mohammad, A. W., Ng, C. Y., Lim, Y. P., & Ng, G. H. (2012). Ultrafiltration in food processing industry: review on application, membrane fouling, and fouling control. Food and bioprocess technology, 5(4), 1143-1156.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  45. Hashino, M., Hirami, K., Ishigami, T., Ohmukai, Y., Maruyama, T., Kubota, N., & Matsuyama, H. (2011). Effect of kinds of membrane materials on membrane fouling with BSA. Journal of Membrane Science, 384(1-2), 157-165.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  46. Laine, J. M., Campos, C., Baudin, I., & Janex, M. L. (2003). Understanding membrane fouling: a review of over a decade of research. Water Science and Technology: Water Supply, 3(5-6), 155-164.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  47. Jiang, S., Li, Y., & Ladewig, B. P. (2017). A review of reverse osmosis membrane fouling and control strategies. Science of the Total Environment, 595, 567-583.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  48. Seidel, A., & Elimelech, M. (2002). Coupling between chemical and physical interactions in natural organic matter (NOM) fouling of nanofiltration membranes: implications for fouling control. Journal of membrane science, 203(1-2), 245-255.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  49. Schäfer, A. I., Fane, A. G., & Waite, T. D. (2000). Fouling effects on rejection in the membrane filtration of natural waters. Desalination, 131(1-3), 215-224.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  50. Hong, S., & Elimelech, M. (1997). Chemical and physical aspects of natural organic matter (NOM) fouling of nanofiltration membranes. Journal of membrane science, 132(2), 159-181.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  51. Fan, L., Harris, J. L., Roddick, F. A., & Booker, N. A. (2001). Influence of the characteristics of natural organic matter on the fouling of microfiltration membranes. Water Research, 35(18), 4455-4463.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  52. Iorhemen, O. T., Hamza, R. A., & Tay, J. H. (2017). Membrane fouling control in membrane bioreactors (MBRs) using granular materials. Bioresource technology, 240, 9-24.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  53. Bagheri, M., Akbari, A., & Mirbagheri, S. A. (2019). Advanced control of membrane fouling in filtration systems using artificial intelligence and machine learning techniques: A critical review. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 123, 229-252.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  54. Kimura, K., & Oki, Y. (2017). Efficient control of membrane fouling in MF by removal of biopolymers: Comparison of various pretreatments. Water research, 115, 172-179.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  55. Mishima, I., & Nakajima, J. (2009). Control of membrane fouling in membrane bioreactor process by coagulant addition. Water science and technology, 59(7), 1255-1262.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  56. Zhang, X., Guo, J., Wang, L., Hu, J., & Zhu, J. (2013). In situ ozonation to control ceramic membrane fouling in drinking water treatment. Desalination, 328, 1-7.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  57. Yu, W., Campos, L. C., & Graham, N. (2016). Application of pulsed UV-irradiation and pre-coagulation to control ultrafiltration membrane fouling in the treatment of micro-polluted surface water. Water research, 107, 83-92.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  58. Du, X., Shi, Y., Jegatheesan, V., & Haq, I. U. (2020). A review on the mechanism, impacts and control methods of membrane fouling in MBR system. Membranes, 10(2), 24.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  59. Fane, A. G., Beatson, P., & Li, H. (2000). Membrane fouling and its control in environmental applications. Water science and technology, 41(10-11), 303-308.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar

Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.

img

Virginia E. Koenig

Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.

img

Delcio G Silva Junior

Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.

img

Ziemlé Clément Méda

Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.

img

Mina Sherif Soliman Georgy

We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.

img

Layla Shojaie

The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.

img

Sing-yung Wu

Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.

img

Orlando Villarreal

Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.

img

Katarzyna Byczkowska

Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.

img

Anthony Kodzo-Grey Venyo

Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.

img

Pedro Marques Gomes

Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.

img

Bernard Terkimbi Utoo

This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.

img

Prof Sherif W Mansour

Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.

img

Hao Jiang

As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.

img

Dr Shiming Tang

Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.

img

Raed Mualem

International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.

img

Andreas Filippaios

Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.

img

Dr Suramya Dhamija

Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.

img

Bruno Chauffert

I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!

img

Baheci Selen

"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".

img

Jesus Simal-Gandara

I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.

img

Douglas Miyazaki

We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.

img

Dr Griffith

I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.

img

Dr Tong Ming Liu

I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.

img

Husain Taha Radhi

I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.

img

S Munshi

Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.

img

Tania Munoz

“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.

img

George Varvatsoulias

Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.

img

Rui Tao

Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.

img

Khurram Arshad

Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.

img

Gomez Barriga Maria Dolores

The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.

img

Lin Shaw Chin

Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.

img

Maria Dolores Gomez Barriga

Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.

img

Dr Maria Dolores Gomez Barriga

Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.

img

Dr Maria Regina Penchyna Nieto

Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.

img

Dr Marcelo Flavio Gomes Jardim Filho

Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”

img

Zsuzsanna Bene

Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner

img

Dr Susan Weiner