AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Case Report
*Corresponding Author: Salman Syed, D.O., Resident Physician at Mather Hospital at Northwell Health, Port Jefferson, NY.
Citation: Salman Syed, Hadassah Stein, Fareeha Aajmal, (2024), Mixed autoimmune hemolytic anemia during recovery from Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP): A Case Report, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews, 18(1); DOI:10.31579/2690-4861/487
Copyright: © 2024, Salman Syed. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 03 June 2024 | Accepted: 07 June 2024 | Published: 18 June 2024
Keywords: antibodies; red blood cells; diagnostic; clinical presentation
Mixed autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is characterized by hemolysis with the coexistence of warm and cold autoantibodies. It is a relatively rare condition, accounting for 6.5-8.3% of AIHA cases. It is diagnosed by identifying IgG and C3d with cold agglutinins on monospecific direct antiglobulin testing. We present a unique case of a 69-year-old female who developed mixed hemolytic anemia while she was being treated for chronic idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP).
A 69-year-old female with a history of ITP and anemia was sent to the emergency room by her hematologist to receive a blood transfusion for low hemoglobin found in outpatient labs. It was associated with fatigue, generalized weakness, and shortness of breath. On review of systems, she denied having any abnormal bleeding, bruising, dark stools, fever, chest pain, palpitations, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea, abdominal pain, urinary symptoms, rash, or joint pain. Additional medical history included hypertension, hyperlipidemia, anxiety, depression, and acid reflux. Home medications included 60 mg oral prednisone daily and Romplostin weekly for ITP, along with Metoprolol, Omeprazole, and Paroxetine for her other chronic medical conditions. She did not use tobacco or recreational drugs and did not drink alcohol.
Vital signs revealed a heart rate of 110 but were otherwise unremarkable. The EKG showed sinus tachycardia. During the physical exam, the patient did not appear distressed. However, her skin appeared pale, she had scleral icterus, and she was tachycardic on auscultation.
Figure 1: Hemolysis during warm autoimmune hemolytic anemia (WAIHM): Antibody-coated red blood cells pass through the spleen, where they are engulfed and degraded by macrophages. Some erythrocytes will become microspherocytes due to losing some cell membranes and being released back into circulation. Microspherocytes have rigid cellular membranes and lack flexibility, so they ultimately are re-sequestered in the spleen and degraded. Alternatively, IgG-coated red blood cells travel to the liver, where weak activation of complement leads to extravascular hemolysis [2]
Source http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Labs showed a leukocytosis of 34.93k/ul, platelet count of 557k, hemoglobin of 6.6g/dl, and hematocrit of 18.4%, which subsequently dropped to 5.4 g/dl and 15%, respectively, on repeat blood draw in the ED. The complete metabolic panel showed normal values for Blood urea nitrogen (BUN), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) but elevated total Bilirubin of 6.1 with a direct bilirubin of 0.4. Blood sugar was elevated at 183, which was expected given steroid usage. The chest radiograph was negative for any acute pulmonary process. The patient was COVID-negative. She received one unit of packed red blood cells in the emergency room and was admitted for further workup.
Further hematologic workup showed lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) of 690 (135-214 microliter) and haptoglobin less than 20 (30-200 mg/dl) during admission. Immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE) and serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) testing for plasma cell dyscrasias were negative. The Direct Antiglobulin Test (DAT), also known as the Direct Coombs Test, was positive for C3d and warm antibodies. Cold agglutinin titer was greater than 1:512 (normal is less than 1:64). Abdominal ultrasound revealed splenomegaly without hepatomegaly. Lower extremity duplex was negative for clots, and the echocardiogram showed an ejection fraction of 77% with normal right ventricular systolic function and
elevated right ventricular pressure, suggesting moderate pulmonary hypertension. Based on the results, the patient was diagnosed with mixed-type AIHA.
Follow up investigation was then conducted to elucidate the cause of AIHA. Peripheral
blood smear showed reticulocytosis of 22% (normal range 0.5 to 2.5%) with a normal estimated platelet count of 460k, which was expected given that the patient was already on home steroid treatment. Thrombophilia testing and hepatitis serology were negative. Serology for HIV, Syphilis, CMV, and Mycoplasma pneumonia were likewise negative, while EBV IgG was positive with negative IgM. CT scan of the chest and pelvis done to rule out a lymphoproliferative process demonstrated splenomegaly but was otherwise negative. Bone marrow biopsy was obtained and analyzed with cytogenetic karyotyping negative for gross chromosomal abnormalities and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) panel study negative for chromosomal rearrangements characteristic of myeloproliferative disorders and myelodysplastic syndromes. She received four units packed-RBCs during admission and was discharged on a steroid taper, Romploistosm, and Rituximab once Hb was stable at 8.5g/dl.
Figure 2: Non-contrast CT demonstrated splenomegaly, which is consistent with AIHA with splenic sequestration and hemolysis Abdominal ultrasound showing splenomegaly measuring 15.5x 15.7x5.4 cm (normal 12x7x5).
Mixed warm/cold autoimmune hemolytic anemia is a relatively rare condition, and current evidence on its optimal management is limited. Additionally, the variability in diagnostic criteria across sources further complicates both the diagnosis and management of this pathology.[1]
This is a unique case of mixed warm and cold autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) emerging in a patient with pre-existing ITP. The patient's diagnosis was confirmed by a positive Direct Antiglobulin Test (DAT) for both IgG and complement C3d, along with a high cold agglutinin titer[2,3,4]. The patient's elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and low haptoglobin levels were consistent with a hemolytic process. The splenomegaly noted on ultrasound and CT was consistent with splenic sequestration and destruction of red blood cells. An echocardiogram was performed to assess cardiac function given the anemia. Chronic iron deficiency anemia can lead to hyperdynamic circulation and hypoxic pulmonary constriction with resultant pulmonary hypertension, as was revealed on this patient’s echocardiogram [5]. She was treated with steroids, romiplostim, and rituximab, which helped stabilize her hemoglobin levels.
Mixed AIHA involves the simultaneous presence of warm and cold autoantibodies and is relatively rare, accounting for 6.5-8.3% of AIHA cases [1]. Approximately half of diagnosed cases have no identifiable cause [1]. Warm autoantibodies, primarily IgG, typically react at body temperature and lead to extravascular hemolysis via splenic macrophage-mediated destruction [3]. Cold agglutinins, usually IgM, react at lower temperatures, triggering complement activation and intravascular hemolysis[ 6,7,8].
The coexistence of warm and cold antibodies can lead to a more severe anemia and can present diagnostic and therapeutic challenges [9,10,11]. The diagnostic workup includes comprehensive hematologic and serologic testing to rule out secondary causes such as lymphoproliferative disorders or infections. Standard treatment is with steroids, romiplostim, and rituximab.
Implications for Practice
This patient was found to have mixed AIHA in the setting of known ITP and anemia. This case cautions against anchoring, especially in a complex clinical context. Anchoring is a cognitive error where excessive weight of information obtained early on impedes one’s ability to change a presumed diagnosis in the face of new knowledge [12]. In this case, the patient’s acute anemia could have been attributed to their underlying ITP and chronic anemia if thorough investigation had not been pursued.
One limitation of this case is the absence of a clear underlying cause for the mixed AIHA as investigations for secondary causes such as infections, lymphoproliferative disorders, and other autoimmune diseases yielded negative results. However, it is not unusual for cases of AIHA to be idiopathic [13,14]. Although lymphoproliferative disorder was a differential in the setting of the patient’s splenomegaly, the bone marrow biopsy came out to be negative. Additionally, the patient was not followed for a lengthy interval at the time of this publication, so the long-term prognosis and potential for relapse in this patient with multiple hematologic comorbidities were not determined. [15,16]
This case report contributes to the limited literature on mixed AIHA by detailing the clinical presentation, diagnostic algorithm, and treatment approach for patients with concurrent ITP. The complexity of managing such cases necessitates a thorough and multidisciplinary approach. Continued documentation and analysis of similar cases will enhance understanding and improve management strategies for this rare clinical presentation.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
