AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article
*Corresponding Author: Alejandro Ezequiel Bugueiro Bertier, General Surgery Department, Ain Fernández General hospital.
Citation: Bugueiro Bertier AE, (2023), Middle Aortic Syndrome in An Advance Age Patient Description of a Surgical Case, Journal of Clinical Surgery and Research, 4(6); DOI:10.31579/2768-2757/097
Copyright: © 2023, Alejandro Ezequiel Bugueiro Bertier. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 04 September 2023 | Accepted: 20 September 2023 | Published: 11 October 2023
Keywords: aortic coarctation; intermittent claudication; aorta; hypertension; aortic stenosis
Middle Aortic Syndrome : is a rare form of presentation of aortic´s coarctation that represents 0.5-2% of this same entity. It usually occurs in the pediatric or young adult population, which is why the age of this patient is interesting for this case. It mostly affects women with an estimated ratio of 4:1. Renal involvement is the most prevalent and idiopathic etiology is the most frequent.
This pathology presents clinically as difficult-to-control hypertension together with intermittent claudication. This article includes the case of an 81-year-old female patient with a history of hypertension, sedentary lifestyle, smoking, osteoporosis, cholecystectomy in 2010 and appendectomy in childhood. On this occasion, the patient presented a stenosis of the infrarenal abdominal aorta and a superficial femoral artery lesion simultaneously, for which she was approached in a hybrid manner with a straight balloon-expandable stent and a suprapatellar femoral-popliteal bypass.
The term Middle Aortic Syndrome was described for the first time in 1947 by Quain and collaborators who observed this pathology in a pediatric age group with an average age of 9 years. Middle Aortic Syndrome is the name we use to denote infradiaphragmatic aortic stenosis. This entity represents 0.5 to 2% of all coarctations of the aorta and mainly affects the pediatric or young adult population with a higher prevalence in women (ratio of 4 to 1 compared to men according to the Coarctation of the Aorta in the study Unusual Sites by Bengt Hulting & Aado Vendsalu).
These stenoses occur in different locations and they have a relevant influence on the subject's clinical condition depending on the affected arterial territory. Most commonly, renal artery involvement is observed, which can reach up to 70percentage (within this percentage, two-thirds of the time, both renal arteries are involved bilaterally). The most affected renal areas that are described most frequently (approximately 69percentage) are the suprarenal, leaving the intrarenal location in second place (approximately 23percentage) and last but not least is the infrarenal location (8percentage). as is the case that we will describe below.
If it is the renal artery involved, it generally manifests as hypertension that is difficult to control pharmacologically meaning that cannot be controlled by the use of up to 3 antihypertensive drugs at maximum doses. In these cases, the objective would be to reduce the tension below the 95percentage percentile in the pediatric population or, in the event of left ventricular hypertrophy or target organ damage, the 90percentage percentile should be reached. In adults this consists of maintaining systolic pressures below 120 mmHg and diastolic pressures below 80 mmHg. If this hypertension is not treated, it could lead to left ventricular hypertrophy that eventually leads to heart failure, a common cause of mortality in subjects with this pathology. If the involved artery is the superior mesenteric or celiac trunk, this may be reflected as symptoms of intestinal ischemia with its suggestive post-ingestion periumbilical pain and weight loss due to rejection of food. Let us remember that apart from these signs and symptoms, the patient may also experience intermittent claudication which will be expressed by abdominal murmurs and the possible absence of femoral pulses.
According to the study Disease Beyond the Arch: A Systematic Review of Middle Aortic Syndrome in Childhood by Rawan et al. its etiologies are multiple but within all the varieties we find that the idiopathic etiology is the most frequent with almost two thirds of all cases. This is followed by the inflammatory cause that shows takayasu as the most relevant and within the genetic origins we can highlight neurofibromatosis type 1 among others. With a lower percentage of the total, we have other causes such as tuberculosis, syphilis, rubella, radiotherapy or fibrosis to name a few.
Diffuse congenital hypoplasias, such as those seen in Noonan syndrome, Sam William syndrome, Alagille syndrome, and tuberous sclerosis, to name a few, could have their embryological origin due to the overfusion of the two dorsal aortas in the 4th week of development, generating the hypoplasia of the aorta.
It is important to know the origin of middle aortic syndrome because the abdominal aorta may not be the only vessel affected. For example, in neurofibromatosis type 1 it can be associated with cerebral arteriovenous aneurysms and fistulas. In rubella it could occur simultaneously with stenotic pathology of the aortic valve. Takayasu vasculitis primarily involves the aortic arch and descending aorta among many other associations.
The diagnosis of middle aortic syndrome can be through renal Doppler, tomography or resonance. Renal Doppler is the first line with a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 68%. This modality, despite its low specificity, is indicated to reduce exposure to rays and the use of contrast. As an advantage, MRI allows us to estimate pre- and post-stenosis flows, but if what we want is to evaluate the lesion and its characteristics, then angiography is the indicated method. If we suspect brain injuries, we should consider a tomography or brain MRI.
It is recommended as initial therapy to start with a single antihypertensive agent and reach the maximum dose or adverse effect before adding another drug. In principle, enalapril or losartan should be started and diuretics should preferably be used as combined therapy. If elevated pressures persist that cannot be controlled by the use of various hypertensive drugs, surgical treatment is evaluated. If the lesion presents as an isolated stenosis, it can be treated with an isolated patch or also a bypass that bypasses the stenosis if the coarctation is very narrow. The same applies to thoracoabdominal stenosis that can be treated with a bypass that connects the thoracic cavity with the abdominal cavity. Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) is preferred as a material for patches over woven or knitted Dacron.
Renal or splanchnic reconstruction will be performed in which case it corresponds. For renal reconstruction, new implantation away from the diseased aorta is recommended. It is generally preferred to use homologous arterial grafts; venous grafts are not recommended due to the risk of aneurysm formation. If the stenotic lesions affecting the renal artery are multiple or this same kidney is hypotrophic, that is, 2 to 3 cm smaller than its size and non-functioning, this may be an indication for nephrectomy. Let us remember that nephrectomy is only performed if the other kidney can supply the function. An alternative to consider is kidney autotransplantation that improves hypertension and kidney function. Repair of the splenic artery can be performed with a prosthesis or implant of venous material.
The objective of this article is to describe a surgical case that occurred in June 2022 at the Juan A. Fernandez general hospital in Buenos Aires City (Argentina). What makes this case very interesting is the advanced age of presentation, given that there is not much literature describing the problem presented. In general, cases of pediatric patients or patients under 25 years of age who present major symptoms are reviewed.
We report the case of an 81-year-old female patient with multiple clinical comorbidities including hypertension, sedentary lifestyle, smoking and osteoporosis. His surgical history highlights an appendectomy in childhood and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 2010. Imaging showed infrarenal abdominal aortic stenosis with a concomitant stenotic lesion in the right femoral artery, both lesions diagnosed by arterial angiography. In the physical examination of both lower limbs, both femoral pulses were present with detection of a left popliteal pulse and the rest of the examination was completed with positive flow Doppler signals for the other reference points.
The hospital has an operating room equipped with portable C-arm rays to perform the endovascular approach and all the necessary elements to complete the laparotomic surgical treatment. It also has a recovery room next to the operating rooms where, by protocol, the immediate post-operative period is carried out.
For this case, it was decided to hold a meeting in June 2022 where it was concluded that a hybrid approach would be the best option given the patient's age and comorbidities. For resolution, a 43 mm andrastent XL straight balloon-expandable stent was used, placed through an 8F right femoral introducer. Taking advantage of the femoral approach and exposure, the proximal anastomosis is performed, constructing a suprapatellar femoro-popliteal By Pass with an 8mm PTFE prosthesis.
In the immediate post-operative examination, the presence of all pulses was evident with favorable changes in color and temperature in both limbs. As part of the institution's own hospital protocol, the patient completed the 1st postoperative day in a closed unit and after 72 hours, given the favorable evolution, hospital discharge was determined to continue outpatient follow-up in external clinics.
If we look at open surgery statistics, it gives us positive results regarding the treatment of hypertension in approximately 9 out of 10 cases. This type of surgery has low morbidity and mortality in patients with good general condition. Despite presenting good results, the reoperation rate due to new stenosis is almost 10% 5-12 years after the first procedure.
The endovascular approach generates a greater number of morbidities over time such as dissections, leaks, aneurysms or thrombosis of the placed stent. Therefore, it requires reinterventions and may cause restenosis. Different studies mention that 55% of patients are free of interventions after one year and 33
In conclusion, based on all the data presented and the favorable result demonstrated by the patient, we must suggest that a hybrid approach is the best way to resolve this type of pathology with the same lesions. On this occasion, the patient's characteristics, age, comorbidities and availability of resources were evaluated. The hybrid approach would be the best option because it not only improves surgical times but also the postoperative period is less aggressive for the patient. As for the follow-up by outpatient clinics, it is carried out with imaging follow-up using contrast-enhanced CT scans every month and then every six months or a year depending on kidney function.
We want to raise the following question: Is an endovascular approach or an open approach better? If both resources are available, doesn't the combination of them give the best result? And finally, when we present a patient, we see a single possibility of resolution or we recognize that we have ways of using different techniques or approaches.
All authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
We thank all the staff from surgical instrumentation, nursing and all those who help us day by day. Without them these cases could not be carried out.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
