AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Review Article
*Corresponding Author: Edgar Natha, Javier Degollado-García, Alfredo Bonilla-Suastegui, Héctor A. Rodríguez-Rubio, Bill Roy Ferrufino-Mejia, et all (2023). Microsurgical Treatment of a Giant Intracavernous Carotid Artery Aneurysm in a Pediatric Patient. Case Report and Literatu
Citation: Edgar Natha, Javier Degollado-García, Alfredo Bonilla-Suastegui, Héctor A. Rodríguez-Rubio, Bill Roy Ferrufino-Mejia, et all (2023). Microsurgical Treatment of a Giant Intracavernous Carotid Artery Aneurysm in a Pediatric Patient Case Report and Literature Review. J. Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. 13(1); DOI:10.31579/2578-8868/255
Copyright: 2023 Edgar Nathal, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of The Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited
Received: 02 January 2023 | Accepted: 12 January 2023 | Published: 19 January 2023
Keywords: giant intracranial aneurysm; bypass; trapping; pediatric neurosurgery
Introduction: Intracranial aneurysms in pediatric age represent 4 - 5% of all cases, and 20% are giant (>25mm). The main sites of occurrence are ICA and MCA; about 55% - 72.5% of cases present rupture and secondary SAH with a 10% - 23% mortality.
Case Description: We report the case of a previously healthy nine-year-old woman that initiated severe right retroocular pain and holocraneal headache. Her relatives detected paresis of the III, IV, and VI cranial nerves three days later. After evaluation, an MRI showed the presence of a giant aneurysm in the cavernous portion of the internal carotid artery (ICA) with a mass effect. The patient was treated surgically through a high-flow bypass using a radial artery graft and trapping of the aneurysm. The patient had an uneventful postoperative course and was discharged three days after the operation to continue in follow-up at the outpatient clinic.
Discussion: The options for treatment are endovascular treatment through flow diverters or stenting and coiling, with the risk of incomplete occlusion or thrombosis. On the other hand, the goal of surgery is the permanent occlusion through the proximal closure of the ICA if a balloon occlusion test shows good collateral circulation or by trapping the aneurysm combined with a high-flow bypass if the collateral circulation is not good or absent.
Conclusion: Even when the surgical option was successful in this case, there is no consensus about the best treatment; the selection of the method to use in these aneurysms depends on the center´s experience when confronting this rare entity.
Intracranial aneurysms in pediatric age represent 4 - 5% of all cases, and they have an annual “de novo” rate of 0.7% [1,2,4]. Aneurysms of the anterior circulation represent 75% of the cases. The main sites of occurrence are the internal carotid artery (ICA) and the middle cerebral artery (MCA), representing 27% and 26% of the total. In the posterior circulation, the basilar top is the most common site of location [4]; About 55% - 72.5% of cases present rupture and secondary subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) with a 10% - 23% mortality [1,2,4]. About 27.5% - 30% of unruptured aneurysms present with thunderclap headache without SAH, partial III nerve palsy, ischemic stroke, and seizures (2). On the other side, saccular aneurysms exceeding 25 mm in maximal diameter have traditionally been classified as “giant” in size. Giant lesions comprise approximately 2 to 5 percent of all cases. Still, in children, they occur with far greater frequency (about 20% in some reported series). Approximately 40% occur in the carotid distribution, 25% in the anterior and middle cerebral artery distribution, and 30% in the vertebrobasilar territory [8]. In this report, we discuss the case of an unruptured giant intracavernous carotid artery aneurysm, presenting as an acute cavernous sinus syndrome, in a previously healthy 9-year-old female patient. The surgical strategy used to solve the case is also discussed.
Case Report/Case Presentation
A 9-year-old female without important background information presented a pulsatile right retroocular pain with secondary holocraneal headache associated with nausea and vomiting. She received medical attention and was diagnosed with ocular infection. Three days later, her mother observed the absence of ocular movements, and the patient was sent to an ophthalmologist who diagnosed probable right orbital cellulitis. The patient was redirected to a pediatric third-level hospital. The neurological examination showed a right palpebral ptosis, mydriatic pupil not reactive to light stimuli, and complete paralysis of the right III, IV, and VI cranial nerves. An MRI study revealed a giant aneurysm in the cavernous portion of the right ICA (shown in Fig. 1). An angiography with a balloon occlusion test (BOT) was completed showing poor collateral circulation. After analysis of the case, the vascular neurosurgery department decided to perform trapping of the aneurysm with a high flow-bypass from the external carotid artery to the middle cerebral artery with a radial artery graft.
Figure 1: MRI, axial (T2), and sagittal (T1) views show an aneurysm of 54mm in diameter partially thrombosed in the cavernous segment of the right ICA.
Surgical Technique
The patient was positioned supine with a left-side head rotation of 30o and fixed with the three-pin Mayfield head holder. A pterional approach was completed with an additional neck incision following the anterior border of the sternocleidomastoid muscle for carotid exposure. The carotid bifurcation was identified and isolated. Simultaneously, the left forearm was prepared to obtain a radial artery graft. A previous Allen test showed good collateral blood flow at the palmar arch. After obtaining the graft, it was tunneled from the neck to the temporal side of the craniotomy. The inferior trunk of the M2 segment of the MCA was isolated with a dam. A proximal end-to-side anastomosis was completed using nylon 9-0. After, we performed an end-to-side anastomosis between the radial graft and the external carotid artery with an 8-0 suture (shown in Fig. 2). The patency of the bypass was confirmed with fluorescein video angiography (FL-VAG) and intraoperative Doppler. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient was discharged three days later to continue with a follow-up at the outpatient clinic (shown in Fig. 3).
Figure 2. Intraoperative images. A) Right pterional craniotomy. B) The carotid bifurcation is identified, and the external carotid artery is isolated. C) A termino-lateral anastomosis is made with a radial artery graft previously obtained from the left arm with an 8-0 suture. After completion of the anastomosis, the clamp is released, and patency of the proximal bypass is confirmed. D) The recipient artery is prepared at the level of the Sylvian fissure. The inferior trunk of the MCA is selected for the second end-to-side anastomosis. The anastomosis is completed with a 9-0 suture using separate points. E) The anastomosis is completed, and its functioning is verified with the intraoperative Doppler. F) After closing the ICA at the bifurcation with a 0-silk suture, a clip is positioned just proximal to the origin of the ophthalmic artery to trap the cavernous sinus aneurysm permanently.
Figure 3. Postoperative images of 2 months (A-C) and 6 months (D-F) after surgery. A and D) Coronal view shows a patent bypass (yellow arrows). B and E) CTA in axial view. The MCA's bypass (arrow) and branches are seen without evidence of low-density areas. C and F) Pre and postop (6 months) images of the aneurysm. The mass effect is reduced with improvement of the cavernous sinus symptomatology.
Figure 4. Postoperative evolution. Superior row (A-C) shows the postop course at 2 months. A) Partial opening of the right eyelid, with an adequate response of the superior rectus muscle and spontaneous pupillary reflex. B) Adequate response of superior oblique muscles. Resolution of the right IV nerve lesion. C) Paralysis of the right abducens muscle (VI nerve palsy) is still present. Inferior row (D-F), postop course at 6 months. D-E) Adequate function of III nerve. F) Complete remission of VI nerve palsy.
Clinical presentation
Treatment of giant cavernous aneurysms is still a matter of concern. There exists the possibility of endovascular treatment using flow diverters or some alternative technique such as stenting and coils (“jailing”) [3,4,10]. However, the availability of these devices is limited in some countries. In the case of the “jailing” technique, there exists the possibility of perpetuating the mass effect producing permanent pressure over the cranial nerves [13]. Conversely, the surgical technique depends upon the BOT results to demonstrate the grade of collateral blood flow. If the patient shows an excellent flow, the simple proximal ligation of the ICA (Hunterian ligation) is enough to induce aneurysm thrombosis. In this case, some authors recommend completing a low-flow superficial temporal artery to middle cerebral artery (STA-MCA) bypass to avoid “de novo” aneurysms in the long term. In case of insufficient collateral blood flow, trapping the aneurysm together with a high-flow bypass will solve the situation [4,6,11,12]. Our patient presented a cavernous sinus syndrome secondary to a giant aneurysm in the cavernous portion of the ICA. A similar case was reported in an 11 years old child who presented with right eye exotropia associated with a severe headache [7]; in another case, the aneurysm caused a severe retroocular pain diagnosed as a Tolosa–Hunt syndrome [9]. These syndromes are explained by the mass effect caused by the aneurysm over the lateral wall of the cavernous sinus.
Association with other pathologies
Some studies have described the relationship of intracranial aneurysms in children with diverse diseases such as problems in reticular fiber formation, gene mutations, connective tissue diseases (v.gr. Marfan’s syndrome, Ehler-Danlos syndrome), coarctation of the aorta, fibromuscular dysplasia, sickle cell anemia, Paget syndrome and tuberous sclerosis [2,4,5,6]. Approximately 15% of the cases can be due to an infectious etiology [7]. Further work did not show any of these conditions in our patient.
Treatment of choice
Intracranial aneurysms in pediatrics are uncommon but have a higher risk of rupture than in the adult population [8]. In the case of cavernous sinus aneurysms, they present with a mass effect, acting like a tumor. In the case of rupture, they produce a carotid-cavernous fistula with ipsilateral ocular signs and symptoms. As was said before, treatment could be accomplished through clipping or endovascular coiling; however, for aneurysms at this location, studies show better results with clipping in terms of durability, recurrence rate, and less need for additional procedures [4,6]. Some authors, like Sania et al., describe a higher recurrence rate in endovascular therapy and a higher rate of “de novo” aneurysm formation in children [11].
Regarding the endovascular treatment for a similar case like ours, there exist reports of successful treatment of a giant aneurysm in a child using a flow diverter stent with a good evolution three years after the procedure [10]. On the other side, surgical treatment was used in a child with a bilateral giant aneurysm that underwent a bilateral STA-MCA bypass, followed by endovascular carotid artery occlusion with a balloon on both sides, tolerating both procedures without postoperative complications [6]. These cases are described in table 1, together with other reports from the literature.
| Table 1. Published cases of giant intracavernous aneurysms in pediatric age | ||||||||||||
Case No |
Authors |
Year |
Age/ Sex
|
Associated pathology |
Clinical presentation |
No. |
Side |
Treatment |
Complications
|
Follow-up | ||
| 1 | Devadiga et al. (14) | 1969 | 1/M | None | Paresis of left side | 1 | Lt | None | Dead | None | ||
| 2 | Banna et al.(15) | 1990 | 1/F | Chest infection | Proptosis | 1 | Rt | Embolization | None | 4 Mo | ||
| 3 | Linskey et al.(16) | 1991 | 15/M | None | Orbital pain | 1 | Lt | Proximal occlusion | None | 2 Mo | ||
| 4 | Cekirge et al. (3) | 1996 | 4/F | None | Left third nerve palsy | 2 | Bil | Coiling | None | 3 Mo | ||
| 5 | Sanai et al.(11) | 2010 | 15/M | None | Diplopia and headache | 1 | Lt | Proximal balloon occlusion | None | 1 Mo | ||
| 6 | Meyer et al.(12) | 1989 | NI | None | Mass Effect | 1 | Rt | Proximal occlusion and Bypass | None | 2 yrs | ||
| 7 | Rehman et al.(6) | 2010 | 11/M | Juvenile Paget’s disease | Left abducens nerve palsy | 2 | Lt | Bypass / proximal occlusion | None | 2 Mo | ||
| 8 | Kumaria et al.(10) | 2018 | 12/M | Septic artristis | Diplopia | 1 | Lt | Flow diverter stent | None | 3 yrs | ||
| 9 | Buño et al.(7) | 2018 | 11/M | Horner Syndrome | Diplopia | 1 | Rt | Clipping | None | 6 Mo | ||
| 10 | Present case | 2022 | 9/F | None | Proptosis | 1 | Rt | Bypass/ Trapping | None | 2 Mo
| ||
Abbreviations: NI, no information; Rt, right-side; Lt, left-side; Bil, bilateral; female gender; M, male gender; Mo, months; yrs, years.
Table 1: Published cases of giant intracavernous aneurysms in pediatric age.
Outcome giant aneurysms in the pediatric population
A retrospective multicentric study documented unfavorable outcomes with aneurysms larger than 5 mm, and this size was also independently associated with aneurysm recurrence. The annual “de novo” aneurysm rate, mainly based on 3 Tesla MRI, was 0.7%. [2]. In the case of cavernous sinus aneurysms, it is expected that the mass effect will improve after treatment, reducing the compression of the aneurysm over the cavernous sinus, and alleviating the symptoms of the patients. In our case, the extraocular motility deficits and proptosis resolved after surgical treatment, as was previously reported in similar cases (shown in Figure. 4) [7,15].
There has yet to be a consensus about the best treatment for giant cavernous aneurysms in the pediatric age. Favorable results depend on comorbidities, clinical presentation, and the centers' experience treating this rare entity, so the published cases still need to permit us to draw a unique conclusion. Regarding the treatment used for this case, we can say that proximal carotid occlusion, based on a BOT showing excellent collateral circulation, is an acceptable method of treatment to induce thrombosis of the aneurysm and further improve the symptoms caused by the mass effect. In case of poor collateral circulation, a high-flow bypass and trapping the aneurysm is the best way of treatment. Direct clipping of cavernous sinus aneurysms has been abandoned because of the high incidence of cranial neuropathies.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
