AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Case Report
*Corresponding Author: Aziz Slaoui, Gynaecology-Obstetrics and Endocrinology Department, Maternity Souissi, University Hospital Center IBN SINA, University Mohammed V, Rabat, Morocco.
Citation: Aziz Slaoui, Hanaa Lazhar, Noha Amail, Najia Zeraidi, Amina Lakhdar, et al (2023), Meigs Syndrome: about an Uncommon Case Report. J. Women Health Care and Issues. 6(1); DOI:10.31579/2642-9756/135
Copyright: © 2023 Aziz Slaoui, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 03 December 2022 | Accepted: 26 December 2022 | Published: 05 January 2023
Keywords: meigs syndrome; tumoral markers; ovarian fibroma
Background
Ovarian fibroma is a very unusual epithelial tumor representing less than 1% of all ovarian tumors. It can be asymptomatic and discovered during surgery or be associated with a pleural effusion preferentially located on the right side and a more or less abundant free ascites in the framework of the so-called Meigs syndrome. The challenge of management then lies in distinguishing benign from malignant since clinically, radiologically and biologically everything points towards malignant which requires radical surgical treatment. We report here the case of a 69-year-old postmenopausal patient with a clinical form of Meigs' syndrome that strongly suggested ovarian cancer.
Case Presentation
We hereby report here the case of a 69-year-old patient, menopausal, gravida 4 para 3 with 3 live children delivered vaginally and one miscarriage. She presented with ascites, hydrothorax and a solid tumor of the ovary. Serum CA 125 and HE 4 levels were very high. ROMA score was highly suggestive of malignancy. A hysterectomy with adnexectomy was performed. It was only the histological evidence of ovarian fibroma and the rapid resolution of its effusions that confirmed Meigs syndrome.
Conclusions
Meigs syndrome is an anatomical-clinical entity that associates a benign tumor of the ovary, ascites and hydrothorax. Highly elevated CA 125 and HE-4 tumor markers often point clinicians towards a malignant tumor and compel radical surgical treatment. This case report reminds us once again that only histology confirms the diagnosis of cancer.
Epithelial tumors of the ovary are very diverse in nature and often pose difficult diagnostic problems [1]. On the one hand, it is necessary to be able to confirm their organic nature in order not to over-treat a functional lesion, and on the other hand, it is also necessary to be able to assess their benign or malignant nature. Among them, we can mention the fibroid of the ovary which is a very unusual tumor representing less than 1% of all ovarian tumors [1]. Ovarian fibroma may be asymptomatic and discovered during surgery or it may be associated with a pleural effusion preferentially located on the right side and a more or less abundant free ascites in the so-called Meigs syndrome. We herein report the case of a 67-year-old menopausal patient with a clinical form of Meigs' syndrome that strongly suggested ovarian cancer.
Case Presentation
We hereby report here the case of a 69-year-old patient, menopausal, gravida 4 para 3 with 3 live children delivered vaginally and one miscarriage. She had been operated for ovarian torsion in her childhood treated by left adnexectomy and given the delay in management and ovarian necrosis. She presented to our facility with dyspnea, uncounted weight loss, fatigue, cough, abdominal pain and constipation. At our admission examination, the patient's general condition was altered by asthenia. She was polypneic at 28 cycles per minute and her blood pressure was 130/80 mmHg. Her weight and height were respectively 67 kg and 1.63 m with a BMI of 26.2. The abdominal examination was marked by abdominal bloating and diffuse dullness. The speculum examination revealed a healthy cervix and the vaginal touch coupled with the abdominal palpation revealed a mobile and solid right latero-uterine mass. Ultrasound examination showed abundant ascites, a uterus of normal size and morphology associated with a heterogeneous, poorly delineated right latero-uterine tissue mass of about 142x95 mm. The ascites fluid was transudate. The thoracic-abdominal-pelvic CT Scan revealed the presence of a right basal pleural effusion, a large intraperitoneal effusion and a large right pelvic fleshy mass 160 mm in transverse axis and 100 mm in anteroposterior axis, appearing to originate from the right adnexa. Biologically, the tumor markers were highly increased with CA 125 at 1028.3 IU/l, while HE-4 was 122.1 pmol. ROMA score was strongly suggestive of malignancy.
In view of the clinical and paraclinical context, the diagnosis of Meigs syndrome was evoked but ovarian cancer was also strongly feared. Thus, a preoperative paraclinical workup was proposed for surgery and came back normal.
After obtaining the patient's written consent, an exploratory laparotomy by median approach was performed under general anesthesia. On exploration, we found a very abundant ascites formed by a citrine yellow liquid of about 2.5 liters; a large ovoid ovarian tumor pedicled at the expense of the right ovary measuring 22 cm long axis and 15 cm short axis, bumpy, irregular surface, firm consistency, pearly white appearance, overhanging the uterus, more or less twisted but easily mobilizable without any adhesion. A careful exploration did not find any peritoneal carcinosis. Nevertheless, in view of the strong suspicion of malignancy, we performed a hysterectomy with right adnexectomy associated with an omentectomy, an appendectomy and biopsies of the diaphragmatic cupolas (Figure 1).
Figure 1: Photography of the total hysterectomy specimen without adnexal preservation showing a hard, smooth, yellowish tumor developed in front of the right ovary, measuring 15 cm in diameter.The large tumor removed was hard, smooth, yellowish in color, measuring 16 x 14 cm, and weighed 1350 g (Figure 2).The surgical specimens were sent to a histopathology laboratory. Pathological examination of the surgical specimen showed macroscopically a firm greyish solid tumor and microscopically a connective tissue tumor consisting of small regular spindle cells forming intersecting bundles and corresponding to a fibroid of the ovary. The rest of the biopsies were free of any malignancy. The post-operative course was uneventful. There was a very remarkable clinical recovery with disappearance of signs and drying of the pleural and peritoneal effusions. The patient was discharged after 6 days of hospitalization. Postoperative follow-up at 6 and 12 months was strictly normal.
Figure 2: Photography of the tumor removed measuring 16 x 14 cm, hard, smooth and yellowish in color.
Demons-Meigs syndrome was first described by Spiegel Berg in 1866 [2]. Demons et al. in 1887 provided a pathophysiological explanation for the presence of hydrothorax and Meigs in 1954 published 84 cases [2 – 5]. It is a very uncommon anatomical-clinical entity that occurs in 0.25% of ovarian tumors and most often affects women in the pre- and post-menopausal period, between the ages of 40 and 50 [6]. In its typical form, it groups together the Funck-Brentano conditions which are three [7]. First there are the anatomical/clinical conditions with the association of pleurisy, ascites and an ovarian fibroid. Then, there are the evolutionary conditions with recurrence of the pleural effusion after puncture and its drying up after. Finally, the physic-chemical conditions are defined by an identical pleural and ascitic fluid, in the form of a serofibrinous transudate without germs or neoplastic cells. The pleural effusion is located on the right in almost 65% of cases; however, an effusion on the left (15%) or bilaterally (20%) is possible [8 – 9]. The syndrome is also characterized by prognostic conditions, and recovery without sequelae after removal of the ovarian tumor is known. Our observation strictly meets the definition of the Demons-Meigs syndrome, by the association of an ovarian fibroid, ascites and hydrothorax and by the perfect recovery after surgical removal.
The pathophysiology of ascites and hydrothorax in Demons-Meigs syndrome is still debated and remains hypothetical. The vascular (venous and lymphatic) theory seems to be more convincing because it is unicist, although several pathophysiological hypotheses have been put forward. In 1944, Dockerty et al. [10] explained the appearance of ascites by a partial obstruction of venous return, linked to a torsion of the pelvic tumor. Serous fluid then transudates through the capsule. For Meigs et al. [11 - 12], the genesis of ascites is explained by an increase in pressure in the intratumoral lymphatics causing fluid to leak through the peritoneum. The passage of peritoneal fluid to the pleural cavity is thought to be via transdiaphragmatic lymphatic channels. This network is more developed on the right than on the left because of the liver mass, hence the right-hand predominance of the pleural effusion. The ascites is thought to be caused by fluid loss due to tumor oedema resulting from compression or torsion of the fibroid on its axis. In this case report, the hydrothorax was also found on the right.
Ovarian fibromas are usually large tumors with an average size of 140 mm; the largest reported ovarian fibroma measured 300 mm × 200 mm × 100 mm [13]. Their macroscopic appearance is very variable, most often a solid stromal tumor (as in our case) and more rarely a cystic tumor called cystadenofibroma [1]. Clinically, the major difficulty is to differentiate between ovarian fibroma and other solid ovarian tumors. Ovarian malignant tumor is all the more easily evoked as fibroid of the ovary is almost always associated with ascites and pleural effusion, which is known as Meigs' syndrome [14].
Moreover, Meigs’ syndrome is not specific to ovarian fibroids as there are pseudo Meigs syndromes [15], hence the major interest of pelvic ultrasound. In cystic ovarian tumors, it allows the benign or malignant character of the tumor to be approached with a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 87% [16; 17]. But in solid tumors, as in our case, this sensitivity is less accurate because the images are more varied and less specific. The most frequent image of the ovarian fibroid is that of a solid hypodense polylobed mass without calcification. The performance of this morphological ultrasound is improved today by the use of Doppler, which allows the type of tumor to be better defined and has been shown to be useful [18]. CT and MRI give images that are no more specific than those observed on ultrasound. Their interest lies above all in the detection of peritoneal, diaphragmatic or epiploic carcinosis, the absence of which is an important element pointing to benignity in this context [15].
The contribution of tumor markers remains to be discussed. CA 125 elevation in ovarian fibroma was first reported by O'Connel et al. in 1987 [19] and all cases published thereafter have been associated with elevated CA 125 [13; 15; 20 – 23] with a mean of 1200 IU/l and extremes of 286 IU/l [22] and 2360 IU/l [20]. The level found in our observation is within this range. Overall, the levels recorded in ovarian fibroids are much higher than those observed in ovarian cancers [2]. This association of ovarian fibroids with a significant elevation of CA 125 is a finding that is still open to discussion as to its pathophysiological explanation. Rouzier et al. [15] suggested an attempt at an explanation by formulating the hypothesis that this hypersecretion of CA 125 would be of mesothelial origin and related to a mechanical irritation (for example a torsion) or an increase in intraperitoneal pressure. To date, the marker HE-4 has only been studied once by Danilos et al. [24] who, like us, observed high seric levels with a very favorable ROMA score for malignancy. Although the latter may have contributed greatly to the better management of ovarian cancer, we have reached its limits here.
Finally, mistakenly considered as a malignant tumor, we opted, as many authors before us, for radical treatment which proved to be useless [15, 7]. Favorable spontaneous evolution showed that Meigs syndrome closely mimics ovarian neoplasia and proves that the existence of ascites and/or pleural effusion are not necessarily synonymous with malignancy in the presence of an ovarian tumor. Again, only histological evidence confirms ovarian cancer.
Conclusions
Meigs syndrome is an anatomical-clinical entity that associates a benign tumor of the ovary, ascites and hydrothorax. Highly elevated CA 125 and HE-4 tumor markers often point clinicians towards a malignant tumor and compel radical surgical treatment. This case report reminds us once again that only histology confirms the diagnosis of cancer.
Abbreviations
CA 125: Cancer Antigen 125
HE-4: Human Epididymis protein 4
ROMA: Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm
BMI: Body Mass Index
CT: Computerized
MRI: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Declarations
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Sources of funding
There are no funding sources to be declared.
Ethical approval
Ethics approval has been obtained to proceed with the current study.
Consent
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.
Author contribution
AS: study concept and design, data collection, data analysis and interpretation, writing the paper. HL: study concept, data collection, data analysis,writing the paper. NA: study concept, data collection, data analysis, writing the paper. NZ: study design, data collection, data interpretation, writing the paper. AL: study design, data collection, data interpretation, writing the paper. AB: study design, data collection, data interpretation, writing the paper. AK: study concept, data collection, data analysis, writing the paper.
Guarantor of Submission
The corresponding author is the guarantor of submission.
Acknowledgements
None.
Availability of data and materials
Supporting material is available if further analysis is needed.
Provenance and peer review
Not commissioned, externally peer-reviewed.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
