AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article
*Corresponding Author: Seyed Reza Aghazadeh, candidate in occupational health, Department of Occupational Health and Safety Engineering, Faculty of Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
Citation: Seyed Reza Aghazadeh, Morteza Jafari, Mohammad Ahmadi, (2024), Measurement of noise pollution caused by vehicles and the level of annoyance corresponding to it in the residents of Navvab Expressway neighborhood, J. General Medicine and Clinical Practice, 7(17); DOI:10.31579/2639-4162/224
Copyright: © 2024, Seyed Reza Aghazadeh. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 04 September 2024 | Accepted: 23 September 2024 | Published: 02 October 2024
Keywords: noise annoyance; noise nuisance; vehicle noise; ISO15666
Disturbance caused by noise causes malfunctioning, reduction of efficiency and negative impact on personal and social life. The purpose of this study is to measure the amount of sound disturbance caused by vehicles and the amount of disturbance based on the standard (ISO15666-2017) in the residents near the Navvab highway. The relationship between the variables was done using non-parametric tests and analysis of variance, and the data was analyzed with spss21. The equivalent sound level was 61 dB during the day and 53 dB at night, which is more than the permissible limit provided by the country (45-50). Also, there is a significant relationship between noise level and nuisance score.
and also reduces people's efficiency and has a negative impact on people's personal and social life. According to statistics published by the European Union, only in this continent, about 108 million people are exposed and the noise caused by road traffic is higher than the standard (above 55 decibels). It is also estimated that the amount of annoyance caused by traffic noise has reached more than 30% [16].
According to the statistics of the United Nations, the lifestyle is changing compared to previous years, and this has led to the expansion of urban life and a sharp increase in the population of cities, the number of vehicles and the resulting traffic, especially in large cities in developing countries. With the increase in the traffic of vehicles, the noise caused by them and as a result the noise annoyance has also increased. Unfortunately, the city of Tehran has also suffered from this big environmental problem and the residents of this city are facing noise pollution caused by vehicles. Noise pollution in addition to throughout the day, even at night and during rest and sleep, the lives of people, especially in the residential areas adjacent to the main roads and highways of Tehran, has suffered from annoying noise.
In many countries, various standards and guidelines have been developed in order to control exposure to traffic noise and its management, as well as control noise annoyance. For example, in the European Union, Directive 2002/49 EC, related to the assessment and management of noise and environmental noise has been published and the permissible level of noise caused by traffic has been declared in order to control discomfort and noise annoyance [8].
In the country of Iran, the Environmental Protection Organization has developed standards to control the permissible level of noise in residential areas based on the investigations. As seen in Table1, according to the Iranian environmental standard, it is 55 decibels (dba) during the day and 45 decibels (dba) at night for residential areas [10].
Average balance of the day (7 am to 10 pm) (Dba) Day LP | Average night balance (10 pm to 7 am)) Dba) Night LP | Area type |
| 55 | 45 | residential area |
| 60 | 50 | Mixed zone (current-residential) |
| 65 | 55 | Commercial-administrative area |
| 70 | 60 | Area of activity (residential-industrial) |
| 75 | 65 | Industrial zone |
Table 1: Permissible limit of noise pollution based on the standard of Iran's environmental organization
In evaluating the noise caused by vehicles, there are two influential factors, one is measuring the level of noise exposure and comparing it with the standards, and the other is people's understanding of different levels of vehicle noise and the level of noise annoyance caused by it, which is less noticed. Numerous studies have been conducted in the field of noise pollution and the annoyance caused by it in the world, but the country studies in this field are limited and few, and most of the studies are only limited to measuring the level of noise exposure and the amount of annoyance caused by vehicle traffic noise. It has not investigated people, especially in residential areas and at night. The main purpose of this study is to determine the level of exposure to noise caused by the passage of vehicles on Shahid Navvab Safavi highway in the residential area of Navvab b, comparing the results with It is the national standard as well as the assessment of the relationship between the level of noise exposure and the annoyance caused by it all day and night.
The present study is a descriptive-analytical cross-sectional type and was conducted in the spring of 2022 in Navvab b neighborhood of Tehran city, adjacent to Shahid Navvab b Safavi highway. In order to check the level of annoyance of people, a questionnaire including demographic information (age, gender, marital status, education) and level of annoyance was prepared.
By referring to similar studies, the number of samples was determined to be 200, and in order to eliminate incomplete questionnaires, a total of 250 questionnaires were prepared and distributed among the residents. After collecting the data, 203 of the 250 questionnaires were approved. The study used the method recommended by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO 15666-2017) to measure annoyance caused by noise. Based on this exposure standard, the average level during the day (7 am to 10 pm), the average level at night (10 pm to 7 am) and finally the total day and night balance was measured. Also, the maximum noise level during the day and night was also calculated and measured. The used sound meter was manufactured by TES Company, model 1358, which was calibrated before use. Based on the recommendation of ISO organization and Iran environmental organization, audio network A and slow mode (SLOW) were selected for measurement. [1, 3, 4, 5]
The scale of noise annoyance was done using a 4-level verbal annoyance scale. In order to better understand by people and to easily convert it into a percentage, a scale of 0 to 100 was used (a score of zero means "doesn't bother", a score greater than zero to 25 is "slightly annoying", a score greater than 25 to 50 is "moderately annoying", a score greater than 50 to 75 is "annoying", and a score greater than 75 is "very annoying".
Regarding the classification of the level of annoyance, it was decided that according to the studies carried out, including the study of Midma et al., as well as Panovik et al., the rating of annoyance should be such that an annoyance score less than 60 indicates a low level of annoyance and an annoyance score equal to 60 and be considered more indicative of high-level annoyance [14].Finally, by using non-parametric statistical tests, analysis of variance and Pearson's correlation coefficient, the correlation between the data obtained from voice estimations and the data obtained from self-reporting of individuals was obtained, and the significance level was considered to be 0.05. Data analysis was done with SPSS version 21 statistical software.
45% of the participants in the study were women and 55% were men. People in the age range of 30 to 49 years with 36% were the largest age range. 49% of people were single and 51% were married. In order to investigate the relationship between annoyance score and Non-parametric Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for age, sex, marriage, and education variables, and the results show no correlation between age, sex, marriage, and education variables with the annoyance score.
| Individual profile | category | Frequency | Percent | P-VALUE *p<0> |
marital status
| Single | 99 | 49 | 0.16 |
| married | 104 | 51 | ||
gender
| Man | 112 | 55 | 0.3 |
| Female | 91 | 45 | ||
Age
| under 18 years old (children and youth) | 43 | 21 | 0.7 |
| 19-29 (junior) | 57 | 28 | ||
| 30-49 (middle of the year) | 73 | 36 | ||
| 50 and above (elderly) | 30 | 15 | ||
| Level of Education | High school | 85 | 0.42 | 0.23 |
| diploma | 35 | 0.17 | ||
| Associate Degree | 40 | 0.2 | ||
| Bachelor's degree and higher | 43 | 0.21 |
Table 2: General demographic characteristics of the studied population
The results of measuring the noise caused by the passage of vehicles showed that the average level of traffic noise is unfavorable for the people participating in the research (Table 3). The average noise level equivalent to 61 dB during the day and 53 dB at night was obtained, which indicates exposure exceeding the permissible limit provided by the Environmental Protection Organization for residential areas, and the level of exposure during the day is 11 dB and at night 8 dB is more than is the limit.
| Sound level during the day (7 am to 10 pm) | Sound level at night (10 pm to 7 am) | 24hour sound level | ||||||
| Min | Max | Ave | Min | Max | Ave | Min | Max | Ave |
| 41 | 67 | 61 | 39 | 59 | 53 | 51 | 72 | 64.1 |
Table 3: Results of measurement of sound level caused by vehicles on Navvab b highway
In table 4, the percentage and frequency of annoyance scores are presented separately for day, night and 24 hours. As can be seen, the highest frequency of annoyance above 60 was obtained during the night with 71%, and the lowest annoyance above 60 was related to It is 24-hour annoyance with 55% annoyance. Therefore, the perception of annoyance by residents is much higher at night than during the day.
The results of the analysis of variance test between the measured sound level level and the annoyance score show a significant relationship between the two variables of the annoyance level and the measured sound level in all three modes of day, night and 24 hours. The test results are in table number 4 and 5 are displayed.
| Low annoyance (less than 60) | High annoyance (more than 60) | Annoyance | ||
| Frequency | Percent | Frequency | Percent | |
| 77 | 38 | 126 | 62 | Day |
| 59 | 29 | 144 | 71 | the night |
| 91 | 45 | 112 | 55 | 24 hours |
Table 4: The amount of noise annoyance by number and percentage
| P-VALUE | R | Measured sound level |
| 0.006* | 0.213 | Daytime noise level (7 am to 10 pm) |
| 0.000* | 0.411 | Night sound level (10 pm to 7 am) |
| 0.003* | 0.304 | Total sound level 24 hours a day |
Table 5: Correlation between the measured sound level and the level of annoyance perceived by people
In order to compare the results of the sound level and the annoyance caused by it, the results of the present study and the results of similar studies, including the study of Madima in 2007 and the study of Jakojevic in 2009, are drawn in the diagram of Figure 2. [7, 14]
Figure 2: Comparison of the relationship between the level of sound level and the percentage of annoyance caused by sound in 3 different studies
In general, by examining the graph, the correlation between the sound level and the annoyance caused by it can be completely confirmed in all 3 studies. Of course, the sound level and also the annoyance score in the studies, although they have a similar trend, but they are different in terms of numerical value. which is caused by various factors, including the average speed of passing vehicles, the number of passing vehicles and also their type. Based on the studies of these factors, it has a significant effect on the level of produced sound and as a result, human perception of the produced sound.
The results of the current study show that the level of annoyance is high in both time periods measured. The results related to annoyance in the night time period is 71% much higher than the annoyance perceived during the day. Jahan on the effect of sound level on annoyance showed that in most of these studies, the effect of noise level on increasing annoyance has been confirmed [6, 9, 12, 13, 17, 18].
In the studies that have been conducted inside the country on topics related to noise annoyance, it shows a significant relationship between noise annoyance and the level of exposure to noise. Acceptance indicates the high level of noise annoyance caused by passing vehicles [1]. Also, in a study, Kayani Sadr et al investigated the level of noise pollution in Khorram Abad city and the results presented by them also show the direct effect of vehicle noise on noise annoyance [4]. and colleagues in Tabriz city in 2014, the researchers confirmed the impact of noise caused by the passage of vehicles on health and increasing the level of annoyance.[2] In 1996, during a research project, Ali Mohammadi and colleagues emphasized the relationship between the level of noise caused by Basij highway traffic and the level of annoyance caused by noise. They announced that the traffic noise has led to disruption in the performance of the residents of the studied area and women are more annoyed. Therefore, it is suggested to take corrective measures in order to provide physical, mental and psychological health.[3]
Considering that the studied area is a residential area, unlike commercial and office areas that are deserted at night, in residential areas, people are constantly present at home to rest at night, and considering the reduction of noise caused by activities daily and normal noises in homes (television, radio, gas stove, etc.) This issue has caused people to be more sensitive to annoying noises. Therefore, the average level at night is more important in residential areas. Therefore, it requires careful consideration in the construction of settlements and goat farms.
In the areas where the highways and the main rivers of the cities are located, care must be taken to maintain the proper distance from the highways in the construction and operation of residential areas, also in the case of residential areas and when expanding roads and streets, this point should be made. should be fully taken into consideration. However, regarding the current conditions and residential places such as the Navvab b neighborhood investigated in this study, considering that the costs incurred in the construction of highways and residential settlements do not allow for destruction or fundamental changes, it can be done using Sound walls were used to reduce the noise caused by highway traffic in order to reduce the amount of noise annoyance caused by traffic and the passage of vehicles.
It is suggested that as a research project in the next studies, the level of noise caused by vehicles in two residential areas adjacent to the main highways of the city, one without a sound barrier and the other with a sound barrier, should be carried out in order to reduce the role of sound barriers. The noise level produced by vehicle traffic and the level of annoyance caused by it should be investigated and compared.
In the studies conducted, many researchers have emphasized the effect of the level of noise and the level of discomfort and irritation, including in the studies
The cooperation of all the dear ones who helped us in the implementation of this research project, especially the respected residents of Navvab b neighborhood, is thanked and appreciated. It is also necessary to give special thanks to Dr. Nasiri and his colleagues that the main idea of this article was formed by using the very good article of these dear ones.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
