AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Mini Review
*Corresponding Author: Nkole Aboughe M, Department of Pediatric Surgery CHU Mother-Child Jeanne Ebori Foundation, Gabon, Department of Surgery University of Health Sciences, Gabon.
Citation: Nkole Aboughe M, Abegue M, Nguele Ndjota B, Comlan E, Bouambela M, et al. (2023), Management of esophageal atresia: our sub-Saharan Experience about 2 Surviving Cases, Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology, 5(4); DOI:10.31579/2692-9562/083
Copyright: © 2023, Nkole Aboughe M. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
Received: 23 February 2023 | Accepted: 13 March 2023 | Published: 21 March 2023
Keywords: laryngectomy; tracheoesophageal fistula; voice disorders; speech therapy
Esophageal atresia is a congenital malformation incompatible with life due to the inability to eat on the one hand but also to tracheobronchial flooding.
Esophageal atresia is a congenital malformation incompatible with life due to the impossibility of eating on the one hand but also of tracheobronchial flooding. Its morbidity and mortality has clearly improved in developed countries but is still very high in Africa.
Our study reports the observations of the first two cases out of ten, having survived the surgical treatment of this pathology at the Mother-Child Foundation Jeanne Ebori University Hospital in Libreville over a period of 2 years, as well as the means highlighted to achieve this.
Observation 1
BB N. Newborn born at the end of 40 weeks +2 days, vaginally, from a pregnancy having benefited from 5 prenatal consultations and weighing 3280g. The first minute apgar was 10/10. He was treated for a maternal-fetal infection with a fever at birth of 39.8°C. He was then transferred to D7 of life in front of the diagnostic suspicion in our structure.
The admission examination found:
Dehydration, hypersialorrhoea, jaundice and rales of bronchial congestion.
The thoraco-abdominal X-ray revealed the nasogastric tube in the proximal esophageal cul-de-sac with digestive aeration suggesting an esophageal-tracheal fistula.
Management consisted of hospitalization, conditioning, dorsal decubitus in prone position and continuous suctioning.
First-line antibiotic therapy (cefotaxime, gentamicin, metronidazole), basic intakes with SG10% enriched in electrolytes. No associated malformations were found on ultrasound scans
He was operated on D8 of life. The cure consisted of an end-to-end anastomosis with closure of the tracheal fistula and verification of the seal, after right antero-lateral thoracotomy and an extra-pleural approach. A trans-anastomotic nasogastric tube and a chest tube were placed. The patient was extubated on the operating table while breathing spontaneously.
The diagnosis of type III esophageal atresia was confirmed intraoperatively. In the immediate postoperative period, the patient was put on second-line antibiotic therapy (ceftazidine, vancomycin and metronidazole) with parenteral nutrition with Kabivein*, adapting the intake to the weight of the child.
The chest drain and the nasogastric tube were removed on D6 postoperatively.
Postoperative follow-up was marked on D6 postoperatively by suppuration of the wall with a CRP of 181ng/l treated with daily local care with Dakin and the replacement of ceftazidine by imipenem. The TOGD performed on day 7 postoperatively confirmed esophageal continuity and allowed the start of enteral feeding.
On D8 postoperative, the onset of fever and abdominal distension with collateral venous circulation had suspended enteral feeding until the resumption of transit 48 hours later.
He also received a blood transfusion for an anemia at 8.6g/dl.
On postoperative day 10, the wound was clean, and bacteriological examination of the pus had found Enterobacter sensitive to ciprofloxacin.
The patient was discharged on D29 postoperative and D30 of hospitalization.
The follow-up at 18 months was normal.
Observation 2
BB L. was born in 40 SA, with a weight of 3425g. He was transferred from a Regional Hospital Center for suspected esophageal atresia on D6 of life. He was born vaginally at the end of an unmonitored pregnancy with an Apgar at 7/10 and tinted amniotic fluid.
The examination on admission found:
Respiratory distress with hypersialorrhoea, bronchial congestion, and crackles in both lung fields.
The thoraco-abdominal X-ray revealed the nasogastric tube wound in the proximal esophageal cul-de-sac with digestive aeration in favor of an eso-tracheal fistula. No associated malformations were found on cardiac, abdominal and trans-frontanellar ultrasound.
Management consisted of conditioning; supine position, in prone position with continuous aspiration of the esophageal cul-de-sac.
First-line antibiotic therapy (cefotaxime, gentamycin, metronidazole) and basic intakes with SG10% enriched with electrolytes.
He was operated on D8 of life (i.e. 48 hours after his admission). The intraoperative diagnosis confirmed type III esophageal atresia. The cure consisted of an end-to-end anastomosis with closure of the fistula after a right antero-lateral and extra-pleural thoracic approach. Verification of tracheal tightness was made, a trans-anastomotic naso-gastric tube and a thoracic drain were put in place. The patient was extubated on the operating table while breathing spontaneously.
In the immediate postoperative period, the patient was put on second-line antibiotic therapy (ceftazidine, vancomycin, metronidazole) and parenteral nutrition. The trans-anastomotic nasogastric tube was accidentally torn out post-operative H3). Biological assessment was normal on postoperative day 2.
On D3, the symptomatology was marked by abundant hypersialorrhoea and bronchial congestion. The chest X-ray performed revealed right pulmonary atelectasis (photo). The treatment then consisted of placement in left lateral decubitus and physiotherapy with normal radiographic control after 48 hours.
A TOGD was done on D13 post-operative highlighting an esophageal stenosis. (X-ray)
Twenty-two days after the first intervention, the patient was taken back to the operating room for a thoracotomy after the failure of an attempt at dilation. It was a complete esophageal stricture.
In the immediate postoperative period, he was put on imipenem and fed parenterally, then on D3 postoperatively by the trans-anastomotic tube.
The thoracic tube was removed on day 4 postoperatively.
The control TOGD performed on day 7 postoperatively was normal. Three days after D38 of hospitalization, the patient is authorized to be discharged. The follow-up at one year was normal.
Esophageal atresia is an emergency whose prognosis depends on the precocity of the management and therefore of the diagnosis. In developed countries, antenatal diagnosis is performed at least once in two [1]. In Africa the antenatal diagnosis is rarely made, this is the case for the studies of Mouafo et al [2] in Cameroon, Mbaye et al. [3] in Senegal, Mohamed Benkirane in Morocco and Bouguermouh in Algeria. A polyhydramnios is found in a few cases, but the lack of knowledge of the malformative pathology in the ultrasound follow-up of parturients explains the fact that this does not lead to in-depth investigations for the diagnosis.
For our two patients, the antenatal diagnosis was not carried out either.
This condition being unknown is therefore neither systematically sought in the antenatal period (polyhydramnios, pouch sign on ultrasound, etc.), nor in the delivery room where the systematization of the test of the nasogastric tube formerly required seems to have retreated. This explains the late diagnostic delay of 6 days which is ours. It is also in Treichville [4] i.e. 6.6 days and in Yaoundé [2]. These births took place in a hospital setting.
Neither of the 2 patients was born in our structure. In Marrakech [5] 74% of their patients were outborn. Type III esophageal atresia is the most common. Bouguermouh D and coll [6] and Ben kirane and coll [5] respectively found 67% and 74% of type III.
The malformative assessment did not objectivize any anomalies.
Al-Salam AH et al [7] in Saudi Arabia found 50% associated malformations, 49% of which were of cardiac origin; Tandon et al [8] in India also found these same comorbidities. Harifetra et al [9] in Madagascar did not carry out a malformative assessment due to its unavailability.
We performed extra pleural right thoracotomies. Tandon et al [8] also used this therapeutic approach for the majority of their patients. They also benefited from parenteral nutrition in the immediate postoperative period.
The response time for our patients was 8 days.
The intervention times in the Mouafo [3] and Mbaye [4] studies were 4.8 and 5.7 days respectively; these times are longer in most African studies. Ehua [4] found long intervention times of 11 and 15 days in his two survivors and also resorted to off-label parenteral nutrition in the absence of neonatal parenteral nutrition available. Although the literature describes a short time for intervention as a factor of good prognosis, the survivors in our study and even more in the study of Ehua have a long time for intervention and in general in the African studies are operated late [2 .3.6]. If the absence of antenatal diagnosis and late diagnosis do not allow early surgical management, the extension of the intervention time has also made it possible to treat aspiration pneumopathy by continuous aspiration and incisor antibiotic therapy, and restore the hydro-electrolyte balance. This preoperative resuscitation improves the prognostic classification of these patients, especially in our study from class B to class A of Wastson.
It would perhaps be wise in our African context not to rush before these cases but to take the time to stabilize the vital functions of these patients to improve their chances of survival and proceed to their malformation assessment. This peri-operative resuscitation probably improved the survival of our patients, especially the second, despite surgical revision 22 days after the first intervention. Our patients were extubated on the operating table in spontaneous breathing and immediately put on triple broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy. In fact, sepsis and mediastinitis, along with anastomotic leaks and after associated heart defects, constitute the mortality factors found in most studies.
The survival of 2 of our patients with a follow-up of one and a half years shows that it is possible to successfully manage this condition in our country.
Esophageal atresia is a pathology whose mortality remains high. It is an obsession for pediatric surgeons in developing countries. However, late management did not affect the vital prognosis of our patients. A powerful and broad antibiotic therapy as well as an adapted parenteral diet (adult without inherent complications so far) were the strengths of the postoperative resuscitation of these patients.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
