AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Review Article
*Corresponding Author: Nanda Rachmad Putra Gofur, Department of Health, Faculty of Vocational Studies, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
Citation: Nanda Rachmad Putra Gofur, Aisyah Rachmadani Putri Gofur, Soesilaningtyas, Rizki Nur Rachman Putra Gofur, Mega Kahdina, Hernalia Martadila Putri (2022). Management Congenital Heart Disease Surgery during COVID-19 A Review Article. Cardiology Research and Reports. 4(2); DOI: 10.31579/2692-9759/040
Copyright: © 2022 Nanda Rachmad Putra Gofur, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 19 November 2021 | Accepted: 08 December 2021 | Published: 02 February 2022
Keywords: CHD disease; COVID 19; management
Introduction: Congenital heart disease is a form of heart abnormality that has been acquired since the newborn. The clinical course of this disorder varies from mild to severe. In mild forms, there are often no symptoms, and no abnormalities are found on clinical examination. Whereas in severe CHD, symptoms have been visible since birth and require immediate action. Generally, the management of congenital heart disease includes non-surgical management and surgical management. Non-surgical management includes medical management and interventional cardiology. Medical management is generally secondary as a result of complications from heart disease itself or due to other accompanying disorders. In this case, the goal of medical therapy is to relieve symptoms and signs in addition to preparing for surgery. The duration and method of administration of drugs depend on the type of disease at hand.
Discussion: The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which led to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, was initially reported in Wuhan, China in December, 2019. The rapid rise in the number of cases worldwide led to hospitals struggling to cope with the sudden influx of patients. This has had a ripple effect on other parts of health care as manpower and supplies needed to be reallocated. Within cardiology, this has led to outpatient appointments and elective surgeries being reduced and/or postponed. COVID-19 appears to have a complicated relationship with cardiovascular system, as studies have suggested cardiovascular diseases increase disease severity and mortality rates in those who are infected. However, the virus has also been shown to cause cardiovascular complications such as acute myocardial injury, heart failure, and arrhythmia.
Conclusion: Coronavirus may also cause myocardial injury via the cytokine storm that occurs in response to a possible large immune response during the infection. Cardiac involvement such as right ventricular failure and congestion can either be a result of respiratory distress or direct cardiac injury caused by the virus, as suggested by the raised cardiac troponin I in critical patients compared to non-critical patients.
Congenital heart disease is a form of heart abnormality that has been acquired since the newborn. The clinical course of this disorder varies from mild to severe. In mild forms, there are often no symptoms, and no abnormalities are found on clinical examination. Whereas in severe CHD, symptoms have been visible since birth and require immediate action. With the development of technology, especially echocardiography, many heart abnormalities that previously could not be detected by physical examination and usual support, ECG, radiology using this tool can be detected easily [1].
In most cases, the cause of CHD is unknown. Various types of drugs, maternal diseases, exposure to X-rays, are thought to be exogenous causes of congenital heart disease. Rubella disease suffered by the mother in early pregnancy can cause CHD in the baby. In addition to exogenous factors, there are also endogenous factors associated with the incidence of CHD. Various types of genetic diseases and certain syndromes are closely related to the incidence of CHD such as Down syndrome, Turner syndrome, and others [1,2].
Congenital heart disease (CHD) is the most common and global inborn defect, affects approximately 1% of live births globally (Brida, et al; Wu, et al.). CHD is a term for a range of birth defects that have varying levels of severity depending on the type. Different types of CHDs include coarctation of the aorta (CoA), atrial septal defects (ASDs), and ventricular septal defects (VSDs) (NHS). Studies have suggested that patients with CHD may be at an increased risk of complications, and thus poorer outcomes, if they acquire COVID-19. Although some data have shown no such correlation [3].
Generally, the management of congenital heart disease includes non-surgical management and surgical management. Non-surgical management includes medical management and interventional cardiology. Medical management is generally secondary as a result of complications from heart disease itself or due to other accompanying disorders. In this case, the goal of medical therapy is to relieve symptoms and signs in addition to preparing for surgery. The duration and method of administration of drugs depend on the type of disease at hand [1,3].
Midline sternotomy incision, deepened layer by layer, bleeding is stopped, the sternum is opened with a sternal saw, the bleeding is stopped (if necessary with bone wax), attach a sternum retractor. The thymus is removed or removed, the pericardium is opened and fixed/stitched to the wound margin with silk 3.0 in several places. Identification of the Inominata or PLSVC . vein. Identification of PDA. Preparation of cannulation, heparin is given 3 mg/kgBW bolus IV, Sutures cannulate the aorta, SVC, and IVC with 4 non-absorbable braided 3.0/4.0 sutures or 4 monofilament 5.0 threads. Check ACT and AGD. If ACT > 200, the aorta is cannulated, SVC and IVC are connected to the CPB machine. Cannula fixed with 2.0 silk thread 1 piece. The CPB engine is run when ACT400, the temperature is lowered gradually to 32-34 degrees Celsius [10,15].
SVC and IVC were totalo-occlusion using cotton tape. If PDA is found, PDA is ligated with 1 non-absorbable braided 2.0. Placed ulcardioplegia or IV Catheterno.14/16 on the aortic root and connected to the line cardioplegia of perfusionis. The aortic cross clamp is placed on the ascending aorta before the aortic cannula, cold cardioplegic fluid is infused into the aortic root. The RA is opened parallel to the atrioventricular sulcus. The edges are fixed with silk 3.0.(4.0). Identify ASD, pulmonary veins, SVC and IVC estuaries, coronary sinus (unroofed or not), mitral valve (make sure there is no cortriatiatum) and tricuspid valve. If there is a PAPVD, re-routing ASDClosure At the ASDP Primum, carefully evaluate the mitral valve if present cleft and regurgitation performed MV repair with sutures on the cleft with polypropylene 5.0/6.0 interrupted 4-5 pieces [10, 15].
ASD Closure with or without patch pericardium with using 5.0 or 4.0 . polypropylene. Evaluation of residual ASD, if any, closed with thread sutures polypropylene 5.0 or 4.0. Body temperature is increased gradually. Deairing of the left heart, rapid lung development, position Trendelenburg patient. Klemscrossaorta is released, the heart beats spontaneously. PAline is entered directly to PA in ASD casewith severe PH (MPAP > 2/3 systemic). RA is closed (MPA in cases of ASD with PHsevere)with 5.0 or 6.0 polypropylene yarn while deairing right heart. Total occlusion SVC and IVC removed 10,12].
The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which led to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, was initially reported in Wuhan, China in December, 2019. The rapid rise in the number of cases worldwide led to hospitals struggling to cope with the sudden influx of patients. This has had a ripple effect on other parts of health care as manpower and supplies needed to be reallocated. Within cardiology, this has led to outpatient appointments and elective surgeries being reduced and/or postponed. COVID-19 appears to have a complicated relationship with cardiovascular system, as studies have suggested cardiovascular diseases increase disease severity and mortality rates in those who are infected. However, the virus has also been shown to cause cardiovascular complications such as acute myocardial injury, heart failure, and arrhythmia [4].
CHD require continuing care, particularly amongst newborns and infants who often require surgery during a narrow window of time to avoid death and provide for optimal outcomes. Crisis management strategies for congenital heart disease have recently been published (Stephens, et al). The stategies deal with many aspects such as social exposure and distancing, triage, timing and role of the surgeon. However, social distancing can be particularly challenging for our patients, given their age and family structure. In addition, asymptomatic children can be carriers and especially for younger it is difcult to keep masks and maintain social distancing. For this reason testing should be performed on every patient, even asymptomatic patients, as well as their parents. In this period, cooperation between surgeons and cardiologists is even more important to evaluate hospital resource utilization, clinical status of the patient and risk of delaying surgery, comorbidities and complexity of the procedure and risk of exposure for the patient, family and healthcare staf [5].
In addition, Levy and colleagues try in a short communication to answer the most frequent questions for pediatric patients with CHD (Levy, et al). However, there are few established concepts: (1) the best test for SARS-CoV2 in the peri-operative setting is a PCR of respiratory secretions. Serology serum testing for antibodies (IgG) will demonstrate prior exposure (or maternal status for neonates) rather than active illness, so is less useful in a peri-operative setting; (2) CT scans should not be used to screen for or diagnose pediatric COVID-19. CT scans should be reserved for other clinical indications based on symptoms; (3) ll parents entering the hospital or clinic should be screened for symptoms suggesting COVID-19 and for test screening performed routinely; (4) for infants born to COVID positive mothers should be reasonable to separate him from the mother if will need cardiac surgery to try avoid post-natal infection. In fact, there is minimal evidence of placental vertical transmission. It may also be reasonable to do serial testing on the infant, but there is no consensus on the correct timing (Schwatrz, et al); (5) surgery should be scheduled with advice from a multidisciplinary team of experts including cardiac medical, cardiac surgical, and infectious diseases as indicated. If prudent, surgery should be delayed until the patient’s symptoms have improved and/or testing has been repeated (often after 14 days) and is negative[6].
The use of lung ultrasound in the pediatric population could be very useful for screening and management, as already we have demonstrated in the management of children with CHD (Cantinoti et al; cantinoti, et al). The adoption of lung ultrasound to monitor lung disease during the COVID-19 outbreak may reduce the number of chest X-ray, limiting dangerous radiation cumulative exposure (cantinoti, et al). Lung ultrasound is an easy, cheap and fast technique that can be repeated at patient bed. While in adult setting (especially in overweight patients) image quality of lung ultrasound may be suboptimal, in the small thorax of children image quality is usually extremely high. Furthermore in the small thorax of the children, lung examination is faster and a complete and accurate examination of all lung sectors may be achieved in a few minutes [7].
Even though COVID-19 infection in childhood is less common and with milder symptoms than when occurring in adult patients, it is not without the risk of cardiac involvement, especially in the patients with a background of congenital heart disease. In newborns and children, previous cardiac surgery is related with the risk of a more severe form of the disease, being admitted to intensive care unit, and needing intubation as well as mechanical ventilation [8].
One study reported two patients with unspecified repaired CHD, aged 8 months and 1 year, respectively. These two cases showed the most severe disease progression, as they developed impaired renal function, with high levels of lactate dehydrogenase and impaired coagulative function. One of the reported patients also had a suspected hereditary metabolic disease and malnutrition. They both developed ARDS and were admitted to ICU, requiring mechanical ventilation [9].
In regard to ACHD, Sabatino et al conducted a nationwide survey in Italy that included patients with CHD who either were suspected of having COVID-19 or confirmed. Interestingly, all patients with poor outcomes were confirmed COVID-19 positive, as opposed to the mild disease progression that was experienced by those only suspected of being COVID-19 positive. They suffered from a range of different CHDs including TGA and VSDs. One of them required continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy, whilst another was put on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) therapy and ended up in ICU. The majority of these patients experienced complications including heart failure (55%), stroke, and arrhythmias. Arrhythmias are frequently seen in CHD-COVID-19-positive patients with palpitations accounting for 22% of the presenting complaints and this often requires intensive care treatment [10].
A study outlined the categories of children with CHD that would be at increased risk of severe illness if they acquired a COVID-19 infection. These included patients with a large VSD, “single heart physiology” such as hypoplastic left heart syndrome and tricuspid atresia, and patients who had an upcoming surgical procedure or had already undergone one, including the Fontan procedure [11, 12].
Whilst the aetiology of cardiovascular complications due to SARS-Cov-2 infection is not clear, it has been proposed that ACE2 receptors could be used as a mode of entry into myocytes and cause myocardial injury through various mechanisms. 2019-nCoV gains access into the cells by binding to the same receptor, angiotensin-converting enzyme II (ACE2), as SARS-CoV[13].
SARS-CoV-2 downregulates the expression of ACE2 once inside the cells in which ACE2 is responsible for converting angiotensin II to angiotensin 1–7. Angiotensin II has a pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic role as well as being a vasoconstrictor, whereas angiotensin 1–7 play an important anti-inflammatory and antioxidant role as well as causing mild vasodilation, protecting the heart and lungs from injury. Angiotensin II levels are found to be notably increased in the plasma of those infected with SARS-CoV-2 whilst high ACE2 levels were seen in those less affected by the virus and these levels reportedly decrease with age. Decreasing levels of ACE2 may explain why the elderly are at a higher risk of severe illness from COVID-19 compared to the paediatric population [14].
High ACE2 levels seen in the younger population can be protective as it leads to increased conversion of angiotensin II to angiotensin 1–7 to counteract any vasoconstriction, downregulate cytokines, leukocytes, and fibrosis. On the other hand, in those with low levels of ACE2, angiotensin II accumulates and can lead to pro-inflammatory effects resulting in severe cases. Another factor that could contribute to the reduced cases and a better prognosis in the paediatric population may be the absence of co-morbidities and fewer risk factors such as smoking and obesity [15].
Coronavirus may also cause myocardial injury via the cytokine storm that occurs in response to a possible large immune response during the infection. Cardiac involvement such as right ventricular failure and congestion can either be a result of respiratory distress or direct cardiac injury caused by the virus, as suggested by the raised cardiac troponin I in critical patients compared to non-critical patients.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
