AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Case Report
*Corresponding Author: Muhammad Reyhan Syawal., Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Padjadjaran University / Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia.
Citation: Syawal M. Reyhan, Ompusunggu S. Estethia, Dahlan R. Hanafi, (2023), Lower Thoracic Spinal Myeloradiculopathy with Intramedullary Schwannoma in an Elderly Woman: A Rare Case Report, J. Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, 13(3); DOI:10.31579/2578-8868/268
Copyright: © 2023, Muhammad Reyhan Syawal. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of The Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited
Received: 17 March 2023 | Accepted: 05 April 2023 | Published: 27 April 2023
Keywords: intramedullary schwannoma; spinal tumors; laminectomy; hyperplastic; verocay bodies
Intramedullary schwannomas are a rare form of spinal tumors. Here, we present a case of a 61-year-old woman who was admitted to our hospital with complaints of weakness in both lower extremities, numbness, urinary and defecation disorders, and radiculating back pain. Physical examination revealed sensory and motoric deficits in the lower extremities, as well as autonomical dysfunctions. Radiological imaging revealed a mass at the lower level of thoracic spinal segment, which was confirmed as a schwannoma through histopathological analysis. The patient underwent laminectomy tumor removal and posterior stabilization. She was also diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension. Spinal intramedullary schwannoma is a rare condition that requires a thorough history and physical examination for diagnosis, particularly for patients with neurological impairments. Prompt treatment is essential once the diagnosis is made.
Schwannoma is the most frequent nerve sheath tumor of the spine, and in most circumstances, it tends to be solitary. Referring to some reports, the prevalence of spinal schwannoma is approximately 0.24 cases out of 100.000 individuals; hence, spinal schwannoma is considered to be a very rare medical condition.1 Sensory nerve roots are the typical sites of schwannoma, which manifests as a globular, well-defined, encapsulated mass that is well-defined and isolated from the other rootlets.2
Complete surgical excision is the gold standard treatment for symptomatic spinal schwannomas since prevents the progression of symptoms, speeds up recovery in most patients, and lowers the likelihood of recurrence. Patients who are poor surgical candidates or those with recurring malignancies may undergo radiotherapy as a last resort.2
Here we report a case of a 61-year-old woman with the chief complaint of progressive neurological loss, including motoric deficits (inability to walk) along with sensory dysfunctions. Autonomic involvements were also complained.
A 61-year-old woman was referred to our hospital with inability to walk as the chief complaint. This condition was accompanied by numbness, urinary, and defecation disorders. Based on history taking, these complaints were preceded by radiculating pain at her back in 2017 and in July 2018 she felt weakness on her both lower extremities and the symptoms worsen since then. Prior to admission, she had lumbosacral x – ray on March 17th 2022 and contrast lumbosacral MRI on April 5th 2022 from neurology outpatient clinic at our hospital.
Vital signs showed stage I hypertension, and thoracic examinations were unremarkable. Neurological examinations demonstrated normal awareness (GCS = 15), no nuchal rigidity, and normal pupillary responses.
Neurological examinations revealed impaired sensory functions: hypesthesia at the level of L1 and below. Absence of perianal sensation, voluntary anal contraction, and great toe extension were found during sacral segment evaluations. Motoric functions are described as in Table 1.
The patient also had urinary and fecal incontinence. Laseque sign (-), physiological reflexes are all positive, no clonus nor spasm were found.
However, Babinski sign was positive.
Laboratory tests showed no remarkable results except for high random and fasting blood glucose (366 & 123 mg/dL, respectively).
| Elbow flex | 5/5 | Hip flexion | 4/4 |
| Wrist extension | 5/5 | Knee extension | 4/4 |
| Elbow extension | 5/5 | Ankle dorsoflexion | 4/3 |
| Flexion of middle distal phalanx | 5/5 | Great toe extension | 4/3 |
| Finger abduction | 5/5 | Ankle plantar flexion | 4/1 |
Table 1: Motoric status of the patient
Clinical presentation of the patient showed normal facial feature; second to fourth photos demonstrated motoric function test of the patient; with the last picture showed external condition of patient’s back (Figure 1). On plain chest radiographs, thoracic x – ray showed cardiomegaly. Lumbosacral x – ray revealed normal alignment of the spine segments. Spinal MRI was taken a month after Xray showed hypointense spinal cord mass at the level of T11 – T12, with inhomogen strengthening upon contrast adminstration (T1 weighted). On T2 weighted MRI scan, isotense mass lesion was detected at the spinal level of T11 – T12 (Figure 2).
Figure 1: Physical conditions of the patient.
Figure 2: Thoracal segment MRI, showing hypointense spinal cord mass at the level of T11 – T12, with
As the treatment, the patient underwent bilateral laminectomy to the medial facet T11 to T12. Duramater looks white, intact, bulging and no pulsation. We did the durotomy at posterior midline, looks intramedullary tumor mass that filling the spinal canal from posterior to anterior, capsulated, grayish-red and the tumor originating from the nerve radix. The tumor resected 100%, avital rostral and caudal radixes are cut. The duramater primary sutured and covered with fibrin glue. We installed 8 pieces (4 levels) pedicle screws at T10 to L1. Planning, preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative findings are showed as in Figure 7 – 10.
The spinal tumor was successfully resected, with the size of ~ 2 cm (Figure 3), and we referred for histopathological examination to confirm the diagnosis on April 25th 2022, with the tissue size of 2.2 ×1.5×1.3cm. Histopathological result was showing hyperplastic, wavy tissue with spindle – shaped cells, Verocay bodies (+) and arranged in storiform pattern. Lymphocytes and dilated blood vessels were seen. No malignant cells were detected. The conclusion was schwannoma at vertebrae thoracal 2.
Figure 3. Intraoperative findings (tumor resection process). A-B = dural incision ; C= tumor resection ; D-E = dural closure, F = spinal instrumentation. G. Resected tumor.
Based on history, physical, and the results of supporting examinations, we diagnosed the patient for having myeloradiculopathy due to schwannoma at the level of T11 – T12, accompanied by stage I hypertension and diabetes mellitus.
According to their anatomic locations, spinal tumors can be classified as intramedullary, intradural extramedullary, or extradural; that include meningiomas, neurofibromas, and schwannomas.3,4
Schwannoma is a benign tumor that grows slowly (as the other benign masses) and is encapsulated. The mass is made entirely of schwann cells that are derived from the neural crest (also known as neurinomas of “verocay”, and neurilemmomas), due to the histopathological findings. Any myelinated central or peripheral nerve with schwann cells can give rise to the tumor. Schwannoma is categorized by the World Health Organization as a grade I benign tumor. 90% of the time, schwannomas are isolated. Attention should be paid to syndromic relationships when there are many tumors in the same patient (neurofibromatosis type 2, schwannomatosis, and carney complex).5,6,7 In our patient, the histopathological finding showed the appearance of verocay bodies; in accordance with the conventional slogan ‘verocay bodies’ as stated by the most literatures.
The majority of schwannomas, including those that occur within the spinal cord are sporadic. Neurofibromatosis type 2, schwannomatosis, and the carney complex are three diseases where schwannomas can arise, and both sporadic and syndromic schwannomas may have a genetic cause. 3 percent of syndromic schwannomas are caused by neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2), 2% by schwannomatosis and 5% by meningiomatosis with or without neurofibromatosis type 2.8,9
Referring to genetic studies, the NF2 gene on chromosome 22 is crucial for the growth of both sporadic and syndromic schwannomas. The merlin protein is produced by the NF2 gene (schwannomin). The NF2 gene is inactivated as a result of certain gene mutations, which prevents the merlin protein from being produced. The majority of schwannomas show both NF2 alleles to be inactive. In individuals with Carney complex, there may be a decrease in PRKAR1A expression, while mutations and inactivation of SMARCB1 can occur in spinal schwannomas.8,9 We didn’t conduct chromosomal nor genetic studies on our patient.
Clinical manifestations, such as radiculopathy and neurogenic claudication, as well as progressive sensory loss and back pain radiating from the tumor level, are the two primary symptoms of schwannomas.3,4
Rodgers et al., and Mohme et al., in their observational and report studies stated that localized back pain is more common in patients with unilateral localized spinal tumors than with concentric growths, which are linked to distributed pain and motor impairments in thoracic schwannoma; these findings are most prevalent in the fourth and fifth decades of life, with a reported male-to-female ratio of 1:1, despite of a recent observation of a modest male preponderance in one of the largest datasets.4,8 Our patient was having radiculating back pain in 2017 (four years apart prior to admission), by which her symptoms worsen since then. She also had motor impairment that was proven by the inability to walk and move her both lower extremities independently.
Besides motor and sensory impairment, autonomic dysfunction also must be taken into account among patients that having spinal mass due to its compressive and debilitating effects toward micturition and defecation physiology; in our patient, we found she had urinary and fecal incontinence. Yang et al.10 and Mattar et al.11 also reported the same findings as our patient had.
There are several available treatment choices available. As for small sized tumor, it is preferable to keep these benign lesions under close observation because resection in a challenging situation could cause a major physiological disadvantage. Radiological modalities that moreover, especially in patients with comorbidities, such as hypertension and longstanding T2DM, surgical interventions might resulted in profound tissue injury.8
However, despite of its invasiveness, several clinical trials and systematic reviews stated the surgical intervention is the gold standard for spinal schwannomas.2,12,13 Surgical resection, as conducted in our study, can stop tumor progression and hence preventing further neurological deficits. It also improve patient’s quality of life and to reduced neurological – related symptoms.12,13
In the majority of individuals, surgical removal utilizing a typical midline posterior route is possible. By separating the tumor from the nearby neural structures (spinal cord and/or nerve roots) and then gently dissecting it from an afferent nerve root, the mass is completely removed. Cutting the nerve root during schwannomas surgery is a generally popular option, despite controversy. The majority of publications claim that cutting a nerve root does not significantly raise the likelihood of postoperative neurological impairments. Keep in mind that sensory root origin is significantly more prevalent and that functional compensation by neighboring spinal roots has been proven.2,14,15
Several surgical techniques are also available, one of them is laminectomy to freely resect the underlying tumor. A laminectomy was carried out to levels above and below the tumor using a midline incision and dissection of the bilateral subperiosteal muscles. Sometimes an extraforaminal tumor could not be removed through the laminectomy site, so a radical facetectomy was done. The paraspinal muscle and skin were stitched together after the tumor was removed using microsurgical methods.14,15
In cases of radical facetectomy or spinal instability, we performed posterior rigid stabilization usin posterior instrumentation, and a laminoplasty was carried out utilizing a plate or laminar screw.14,15
Spinal intramedullary schwannoma is a rare medical condition. A thorough history taking, physical and supporting examinations are needed to diagnose its existence. Once the diagnosis is made, treatment must be initiated, particularly for those who have neurological impairments.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
