AUCTORES
Research Article
*Corresponding Author: Devi Nereida Puerto-Jiménez, National Institute of Cancerology. Bogota, DC, Colombia.
Citation: Harley A. Martínez, Alexandra P. Rodríguez, Andrés C. Sevilla-Moreno, Emeterio C. Salazar, Puerto-Jiménez DN. (2023), Levels of Diagnostic Reference in Radiography Teams Dental in Bogota, Colombia, J. Women Health Care and Issues. 6(7); DOI:10.31579/2642-9756/171
Copyright: © 2023, Devi Nereida Puerto-Jiménez. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 13 November 2023 | Accepted: 30 November 2023 | Published: 14 December 2023
Keywords: values of reference; radiography dental; protection radiology; optimization
Introduction: the ace radiographs dental her una of the ace exhibitions medicines more frequent has there radiation ionizing. The use of ionizing radiation is associated with a probable risk of adverse biological effects and possible harm to the patient's health. To avoid that patients receive unnecessarily high doses during this time exhibitions, there Composition International of Protection Radiológica recommended there use of the bone levels reference para diagnostic, like una herramienta effective of ayuda has there optimization of there protection radiology of patients. Purpose: to estimate the reference levels for diagnostic intraoral and panoramic dental radiography in the city of Bogotá, DC Methodology: to evaluate the radiographic exposure parameters of the teams and the image quality of 68 periapical dental radiography teams and 23 dental radiography teams panoramic radiography. Estimate the dosimetric magnitudes of incident kerma in area (K a,i ) in intraoral equipment for the radiography of an adult's maxillary molar and the producto kerma aire-area (P KA ) in panoramic radiography equipment in A exam of A adult standard.
Results: el tercer cuartil of there distribution of kerma incident in area para radiography intraoral fire of 3.3 mGy y of the product kerma aire-area, para radiography panoramic view of 103.9 mGy·cm 2. In the frequency distribution of incident heat in the area for intraoral radiography, the highest frequency of equipment is in the range of 2.0–3.0 mGy. In the frequency distribution of the product range-area for the panoramic radiography equipment, the highest percentage of equipment is in the range of 60 to 80 mGy cm 2.
Discuss: the institutions considered to establish diagnostic reference levels in this studio have an adequate quality of the image evaluated with a dental clinician, pero the ace variations in the ace dose of radiation between institutions señalan there necessary of implement herramientas que contributoryan has there optimization of the ace prácticas.
Conclusions: se recommended user the bone values of the bone levels of reference for diagnosis encountered in this investigation to optimize the radiological protection in the radiological dental exposures, and we hope that this studio will be a basic one for new investigations in the next cities of the country.
Dental radiographs are fundamental for the diagnosis of oral diseases, planning and supervision of dental treatments. Informs the Scientific Committee of the National Unions for the study of the boneeffects of thereradiation ionizing classifies dental radiography as one of the most frequent radiological procedures [1,2] . The dose of radiation received during a radiological dental examination is relatively lower in comparison with other radiographic techniques, and is generally lower than the natural radiation received by a person during One day, however, exposure to ionizing radiation is associated with a probable risk of adverse biological effects and possible harm to the health of the patient [1,3,4] . The International Radio
Protection Commission (ICRP in English) endorses the linear model sin umbral (LNT of the English). Este model asume that, in the range of low ionizing radiation doses, any dose different has cero increase el riesgo of induction of cancer o effects geneticos heredables 5. The ICRP sostiene that el model LNT are el more cautious to use in relationship idiot el uso seguro of the ace ionizing radiations 6. Lo mismo señala el Council National Radiological Protection and Mediciones of United States of America (NCRP of the English). El NCRP, Read a critical review of recent epidemiological studies of populations exposed to ionizing radiation, concluding that the majority of these studies are relevant evidence that apoya el uso of the model LNT in protection radiológica 7. Por esta razón, are necessary that health services adopt formal radiological protection methods that can log the maximum benefit possible idiot el minimo riesgo para el patient. In knew mayoria, the ace pathologies secundarias asociadas has Radiation exposure may decrease with adequate preventive and protective intervention [8.9].
Acknowledgment of the recommendations of the ICRP, no Dosage limits and restrictions are recommended for individual patients, as this may reduce the effectiveness of the diagnosis and is more harmful than that. beneficio. Por consistent, el enfasis se debe focus on the justification of radiological examinations, the optimization of protection and the use of levels of Reference para Diagnostic (DRLs, por sus siglas in English) 5. The DRLs are used in the clinical diagnosis to indicate whether in routine conditions the dose levels are paced in a specific image procedure, it is exceptionally high or low for this procedure, considering that the quality the image has not been compromised 10. DRLs do not apply to an individual or to a population group. Various studies have demonstrated that DRLs have an effective herramienta that helps optimize radiological protection in medical exposure of patients for diagnosis and intervention procedures 11. Sin embargo, su application en Colombia are recent y knew determination are A required to obtain the license to use ionizing radiation generators for toma and dental radiography interpretation services from Colombia 12.
In publication No. 135 13, the ICRP defined a magnitude DRL like una magnificence easily medible y that allowed evaluate there cantidad of radiation Used to carry out a concrete clinical test. The ICRP recommends the cantidates to be used as DRLs in different image modalities: for intraoral dental radiography equipment the recommended cantidad. particular in the ace modalities of radiography intraoral and panoramic sound relatively independent of the patient's size. The intraoral dental equipment has its voltage and current intensity and has an adjustable timer. Previously, the best option is to keep the medidos values during the temperature control of the K a, i at the safety of the separator cone to the intraoral equipment and the P KA Medido a la salida del tubo of the bone team of radiography panorama, like the value típico of cada team. There ICRP stablece el Local DRL for dental radiography as the third quarter the distribution of typical dose values from each institution. This calculation form can be useful in identifying the units of X-rays which require more attention for optimization.
The object of this studio is to evaluate the exposure parameters by dental radiography teams and determine the bone DRLs local para there city of Bogota in exams para pacientes adults in team intraoral and panoramic radiography. In actual literature no hay postpone of DRLs in there mayoria of the ace X-ray imaging methods in Colombia, for this reason, This investigation represents a basis for comparison The usual clinical practice in the institutions that provide dental radiography services with international DRLs is established.
Materials methods
There city of Bogota cuenta approximately con el 22 % of the ace institutions of radiography dental of are el kerma incident in area (K ) y para radiography Colombia, between the ace that se encuentran clinics dental, have dental panorámica el product kerma aire-area ( PKA). El consultorios odontologists y centros of radiology oral.
“DRL typical value” refers to the DRL of a dental center that tengan una o miscellaneous salads of rays X. In this case the DRL is calculated using the median of the selected magnitude. The DRL of the dental centers of una locality o una city se denomina “value local of DRL”; of multiple installations in todo el country se llama “value national of DRL” y of multiple countries in one region of the world are called “regional value of DRL”, using the value of the median of the bone values national available). In These cases are stable at the 75th percentile of the distribution of las medianas of there magnificence DRL elegida. The bone DRLs define para the bone different tips of team y examinations in groups of patients of acuerdo with the range of edad y fundamentalmente el peso. Sin embargo, all parameters of exhibition in radiology dental y in The study was carried out between 2016 and 2018 and included the voluntary participation of 68 institutions, among which 101 intraoral and panoramic radiography teams were evaluated. Each team will carry out one evaluation of calidad that included the ace kilovoltage meters pico del tube de x-rays (kVp), capa hemirreductora (HVL), tiempo of exhibition, calidad of imagen y there medicine of K a, i para radiography periapical y P KA para radiography panorámica. In el calculation solo se will include the bone team cuyas radiographs tenian a sufficient image quality for diagnosis, the fuel evaluated with a maniquí TOR DEN (Leeds Test Objects, USA), Figure 1 (derecha). Por end, solo fuiron considered 91 unidades, 68 team intraoral and 23 panoramic radiographs.
For the medidas of the exposure parameters to the salt of the spacer for intraoral equipment and on the front of the image receptor for panoramic radiography equipment, Figure 1 (izquierda) y Figura 2 (derecha), se used el sensor R/F of the Raysafe X2 (Fluke Biomedical, USA). Para the ace medidas of the K a, i In intraoral equipment we use the R/F sensor and to measure the P KA in panoramic radiography equipment we use the Vacup DAP ionization camera (Vacudec, Germany) colocada has there salida of the colimador of the tube X-rays intercept all hazards, Figura 2 (izquierda). esta metodología se used porque no requires that a patient was present during the medication and was based on technical report No. 457 of the International Organization of Energy Atómica (IAEA, por sus siglas in English) 14. (mA) values, select the exposure time for an adult's tooth from the information given by the dentist or the manufacturer's configured time for the equipment. For the case of the team panoramic radiography depends on the configuration of parameters of exhibition of A patient adult standard.
The quality of the image will be considered acceptable if the resolution space era of al menos 5 pares of linea per milímetro (lp/mm) for intraoral radiographs and 2 lp/mm para radiographs panoramas. Asimismo, todas the basic structures contrast with a maniquí TOR DEN fireon observed. The statistical analysis is carried out with the data of the dosimetric magnitude of the medida in the bone team para the bone procedures especificados. The values minimum, medios, maximums, of the primer (Q 1 ), second ( Q2 ) y tercer cuartil ( Q3 ) se calcularon para las dos modalidades de imagen dental.
The results of the exposure parameters and the quartiles of the distribution of the dose medications in the intraoral teams are presented in Table 1 . El Q3 of the K a, i in the bone team digital (CR/DR) are of 2.55 mGy y 4.84 mGy para the bone team analogues of movie type E (fast movie). The Graphic 1 show the distribution of frequencies K a, i spans of A histogram for intraoral equipment. The highest percentage of teams está in el rango of 2.0 – 3.0 mGy. El 50 % of K values is between 1.59 and 3.3 mGy. The distribution tends to be positive, the data is concentrated in there leaves inferior of there distribution. El
Figure 1. Montajes experimental para the ace medidas of parameters of exhibition (quierda) y calidad of imagen in 25 % of the bone values of K have more violas estan more dispersed team intraoral (derecha).
Figure 2: Experimental settings for the product medidas kerma aire-area, PKA, (izquierda) and exposure parameters in panoramic radiography equipment (derecha).
Para las medidas en los intraoral equipos, los cuales tienen normally there tension (kVp) y there corriente that el 25 % of the bone values more bajos. Hay very team intraoral that presentan values atípicos mayores at 6 mGy. The DRL for intraoral, analog and digital radiography equipment in the city of Bogotá is 3.3 mGy.
The results of the exposure parameters and the quartiles of the distribution
of the dose medications in the panoramic radiography teams are presented in Table 2. The Graphic 2 shows the frequency distribution of the P KA a histogram for panoramic radiography teams. The highest percentage of equipment is in the range of 60 to 80 mGy·cm 2 . The bone values of the P KA varian between 26.6 y 143.4 mGy cm. For the 23 panoramic radiography equipment included in the analysis, the Q3 of the P KA es of 103.9 m Gy·cm 2.
has. CR: digitalized.
b. TL;DR: digital directly.
vs. lp/mm: pares of lines por milimeter.
d DRL: levels of reference diagnostics, por sus siglas in English.
Table 1: Results of the boneparameters of exhibition y estimate of dose para radiography dental intraoral para el molar maxilar of a standard adult.
Graphic 1. Histograma of there distribution of frequencies of kerma incident in area in radiography intraoral.
has lp/mm: pares of linespor milimeter.
b DRL: levelsof reference diagnostics, por sus siglas in English.
Table 2: Results of the boneparameters of exhibition y estimate of dose para radiography dental panorámica.
Graphic 2. Histograma of there distribution of frequencies of theproduct kerma aire-areain radiography panorámica.
El number of institutions that presta dental radiology services in Colombia, registered with the Registry Special of Providers of Services of Health (REPS), is approximately 3700 15 . Sin embargo, en Colombia do not report DRLs for practical purposes of radiology odontology, neither has level national nor local. There estimation of the bone DRLs THE permit has the ace
Odontological institutions compare the dose that receives groups of patients from different localities, cities or countries, identify the groups with the dose that is received systematically by the start or by the reference value, take into account the causes and apply corrective medications. For this reason, the determination of diagnostic reference levels is a necessity in the country because it represents the most important guide para optimize the ace dose in studios of radiography dental, apoyada in there mejora continued of the quality of the images.
Para the bone team intraoral, there Table 1 muestra that the exposure of patients to ionizing radiation is 90 % higher in institutions that have analog equipment, compared with those that have digital equipment (CR/DR). Average exposure time for intraoral analogue equipment is 68 % higher than in digital intraoral equipment. For equipment with nominal kVp less than igual to 70 kV, the HVL that is mida should be greater or igual to 1.5 mm of aluminum 16 , the intraoral, digital and analog equipments are in this condition. The HVL of digital intraoral equipment is 6 % greater than the los analogos.
The distribution of doses among the different teams, mostradas in the ace graphics 1 y 2, muestran that exists variations substantial in there practical, between the ace institutions of there city, para el mismo tipo of exploration diagnosis. There variability of the results between the different participating institutions may be related to the type of image processing technology (film or digital), idiot el tiempo of life useful of the team (year of manufacture), with the different models and manufacturers of the equipment and with the exposure parameters used in each institution, among other factors.
So it is accepted that the institutions considered to establish the diagnostic reference levels in este studio, contaron idiot una adequate quality of the image evaluated with a ghost dental, variations in radiation dose señalan there necessary of implement herramientas that contribute to the optimization of practices. This includes the implementation of periodic quality control procedures for our teams, an adequate maintenance program, and data management auditors. there dose of radiation, el uso of técnicas of exhibition
adecuadas has the bone different tamaños of the bone patients and a continued capacity of the personal involucrado in the practice. It's important to be rewarded by many institutions the bone parameters of exhibition se maintain the bones, independent of the patient's anatomy. For example, use the same exposure times in an adult patient than in a pediatric patient.
As for the results in other international studies, Tabla 3, the evolution of dosimetric magnitudes shows a decrease with time of the bone levels of reference para diagnostic (no its statics) for the types of dental radiography modalities. The diagnostic reference levels obtained in Bogotá in this studio, compared with the results at an international level, show that intraoral radiography is the result of the most recent results obtained in countries like this Spain, Emirates Arabs, Reino Unido e Ireland. In the case of panoramic radiography, we see that there is a major fluctuation of the reference levels for diagnostics depends on the country, because of its value obtained in este studio are comparable idiot The countries of India, South and Republic of Korea. The value encountered by the DRL for intraoral dental radiography is found in the range recommended by the European countries in 2014 (5 – 7 mGy) 17 . Sin embargo, se debe hold cuidado al compare of will direct the results of this studio to other countries, ya that the bone studios her affected por differences in the size of the picture, type of projection and dosage, technical exposure parameters such as kVp or exposure time, the parameters in there we realized the studies, among others.
All the previous reasons require you to download the programs of protection radiology in there dental radiology practice, provided for individual justification of the bone studios y there optimization of dose form _ that se getgan images idiot there calidad necessary for the diagnosis and with the lowest possible dose.
Table 3: Niveles of reference para diagnostic (tercer cuartil of the bone values of kerma in area in there area of entrance) para
dental radiography in adults, include the literature published and for this studio.
In this study a first estimate of the losses was made levels of reference para diagnostic in dental radiography for the city of Bogota obtained from the tercer cuartil in una muestra of 68 team intraoral y 23 of radiography panorámica. The bone results get suggestions that el level of reference of diagnostic are of 3.3 mGy for the incident kerma in the area for a higher molar of A adult y 103.9 mGy.cm 2 para A standard panoramic radiography exam. Estos valores pueden ser used por the bone providers of the service of radiology dental like una guide para there practical clinica. If in practice the values are presented at the beginning or significantly below these values, you must have a revision at the end of checking the conditions particularities of there practical that contribute to these dose values and implement optimization strategies.
Please note that in the country we do not know the reference levels for diagnostics in any type of exam o procedure diagnostic idiot team rays _ X, este studio pretend serve of base para new studies in two cities of the country that allow you to drive has there optimization of dose in the bone pacientes y to create a reference mark for practice. Of the same form, before the increment of conical tomography units computed from conical radiography to dental radiography, the country requires the establishment of reference levels for diagnosis for this image mode and updating of periodical format for different radiodiagnostic examinations.
The results of this study can guide future investigations in this field and provide information on the radiation level in these procedures, with which we hope to promote a radioprotection culture and motivate the optimization of the recorded doses.
Agradecemos has there Vicerectoría of Investigations of the ECCI University for technical and financial sources. También agradecemos has the ace 68 health institutions that accept participation in the study.
This study is adjusted to international standards, particularly to the Helsinki Declaration and has established parameters for biomedical investigation defined by the Consejo de Organizaciones Internacionales de las Ciencias Médicas (CIOMS) and has stable parameters in the national ambito for the Resolution 8430 from 1993.
The bone autores declare no hold no conflict of interest.
Este studio fire financed idiot recursos of the Institute
National Cancer Center and ECCI University .
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.