AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article
*Corresponding Author: Deepak Menon, Grodno Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Scarborough General Hospital, York and Scarborough Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Woodlands Drive, Scarborough, North Yorkshire, YO12 6QL, United Kingdom.
Citation: Oliver Goulden, Deepak Menon, Adnan Faraj, (2024), Lessons from the first wave: Mental Health Impact of Covid-19, Psychology and Mental Health Care, 8(6): DOI:10.31579/2637-8892/283
Copyright: © 2024, Deepak Menon. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 22 May 2024 | Accepted: 07 June 2024 | Published: 17 June 2024
Keywords: covid-19; mental health; healthcare workers;questionnaire
Background: Pandemics have a disproportionate impact on the mental health of healthcare workers. Alongside its substantial impact on physical health, the COVID-19 pandemic continues to exert a profound effect on mental wellbeing.
Aims: To determine the level of stress, anxiety and depressive symptoms amongst healthcare workers in a single United Kingdom (UK) centre during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, and to identify contributing factors which may be targeted to improve mental wellbeing in the future.
Methods: A questionnaire was distributed to staff members of a UK district general hospital within a two-week period. Questions were based on the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales questionnaire. Additional questions were included, allowing for perception of adequacy of wellbeing resources, senior support, access to personal protective equipment (PPE) and impact on training to be assessed.
Results: 69 total responses were collated. 36% of respondents reported depressive symptoms, 44% reported anxiety-related symptoms, and 30% reported stress-related symptoms. Of all respondents, 25% reported inadequacy in the availability of staff wellbeing resources, 10% reported inadequacy in senior support, and 9% reported inadequacy in PPE availability. 59% of respondents reported an adverse impact on training. A significant relationship was noted between impact on training and depressive symptoms (p=0.03).
Conclusion: A high rate of depression, anxiety and stress was reported in healthcare professionals. Impact on training was identified as a significant contributory factor. Wellbeing resources are in place however access is poor. Future plans need to focus on the provision of targeted tools aiming to improve mental wellbeing.
To date, COVID-19 has caused over 500 million confirmed infections and over 6 million deaths [1]. Alongside the huge impact that the virus has had on physical health, the impact of the virus continues to exert profound acute and chronic effects on the world’s mental health. The need to plan for this mental health crisis was recognised early on by the World Health Organisation [2]. Indeed, the largest tertiary hospital in the Hunan Province ran a program to support staff members’ psychological wellbeing [3]. The literature has long recognised the mental health challenges of working in healthcare [4,5]. Evidence from previous epidemics, such as the South Asian Respiratory Virus (SARS) and the Middle East Respiratory Virus (MERS), has shown that pandemics have a disproportionate impact upon the mental health of healthcare workers [6-9]. The evidence is bearing out this pattern for COVID-19. In their cross-sectional study across 34 hospitals in China, Lai et al. noted 72% of healthcare workers in China reporting psychological distress, and 50% reporting symptoms of depression [10]. This study aims to review the level of stress, anxiety and depressive symptoms amongst healthcare workers in a single United Kingdom (UK) centre during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. Secondary aims include assessing local perception of the adequacy of senior support, impact on training, availability of personal protective equipment (PPE), and utilisation of staff wellbeing measures during this period to identify possible contributing factors. We subsequently present a commentary of key learning points to reduce the mental health burden exerted by current and future pandemics.
A paper questionnaire was distributed to all staff members within a district general hospital between a two-week period (4th May 2020 to 18th May 2020). All responses were anonymised, and involvement was voluntary. Local directorate approval was granted. Response options were multiple-choice. The survey was based on the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales 21 (DASS-21) questionnaire, where respondents were asked to circle a rating for each statement between zero and three [11]. The lowest score (zero) defined an opinion of ‘does not apply to me at all’, and the highest score (three) defined an opinion of ‘applied to me very much, or most of the time’. A total score was calculated from which the presence and severity of depression, anxiety and stress-related symptoms could be objectively determined. Unanswered questions were scored zero. Additional questions were included allowing for secondary outcomes to be defined (Figure 1).
For questions relating to the availability of staff wellbeing resources, access to the trust staff wellbeing support webpage, PPE availability, and degree of senior support, a score of zero defined inadequacy and scores one to three defined adequacy. For the question relating to impact on training, a score of zero defined adequacy and scores one to three defined inadequacy. Hypothesis testing using chi-square test was used to analyse the association between categorical variables. A p-value <0>
69 responses were collated following distribution of the questionnaire. Of these, 19 (28%) were doctors, 20 (29%) were nurses or care practitioners, 29 (42%) were other members of the allied health professional team, and one respondent did not identify a role. 25 (36%) respondents reported depressive symptoms, 30 (44%) reported anxiety-related symptoms, and 21 (30%) reported stress-related symptoms all ranging from ‘mild’ to ‘extremely severe’ in severity. No significant association was identified between presence of depressive symptoms and clinical role when comparing doctors (42% vs 39%, p=0.80) or nurses/care practitioners (40% vs 35%, p=0.72) to other healthcare practitioners respectively. 17 (25%) respondents reported inadequacy in availability of staff wellbeing resources. One individual was excluded from analysis due to no response. 35 (52%) reported not having accessed the ‘Staff Wellbeing Support’ webpage (score zero). No significant association was identified between depressive symptoms reported and availability of wellbeing resources offered to staff members (p=0.47). 7 (10%) respondents reported inadequacy in being supported by a senior (score zero). No significant relationship was identified between adequacy of senior support and depressive symptoms (p=0.70). 6 (9%) individuals reported inadequacy in availability of PPE. Two datasets were excluded from analysis due to incomplete values. No significant relationship was identified between availability of PPE and depressive symptoms (p=0.27). 36 (59%) respondents reported training had been adversely affected and was therefore considered inadequate. 8 datasets were excluded due to incomplete values. A significant relationship was identified between impact on training and depressive symptoms reported in healthcare workers (p=0.03).
Unprecedented Strains: The Risk of Moral Injury Amongst Healthcare Workers
The rate of depressive symptoms reported in our centre was 36% during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. This is a concerning figure, particularly in association with the high levels of concomitant anxiety and stress reported by staff members. A significant contributory factor is the unprecedented strain upon the UK’s healthcare resources. This has the potential to lead to moral injury, particularly for those working at the frontline. The concept of moral injury originated within the military and describes psychological distress experienced by individuals when their own action or inaction violates their own ethics [12]. Examples have been seen in medical students in prehospital care where they are exposed to a high-pressure environment with insufficient training [13]. This is borne out in a systematic review that reported frontline workers are at increased risk of developing adverse mental health outcomes during disasters [14]. Individuals working in unfamiliar departments or hospitals because of rota gaps will also carry a risk of developing moral injury if they feel they have not been adequately trained to do so. Furthermore, the long hours and high stress of dealing with sick and dying patients can lead to compassion fatigue.
Worry about Physical Health: A Major Psychological Stressor
Given the long standing and highly publicised issues regarding availability of PPE in the UK, together with the number of healthcare professions that have died after contracting COVID-19, it is likely that this has been a major source of psychological stress for employees within the National Health Service (NHS). However, our results demonstrate no significant relationship between PPE availability and depressive symptoms, with a low rate of inadequacy reported by respondents. This contradicts existing data and may have reflected local variance in equipment availability. Chen et al. report lack of PPE to be both a source of stress and a barrier to staff accessing psychological help at the largest tertiary centre in the Hunan Province [3]. This suggests concerns about physical health is detrimental to mental wellbeing, which is echoed by an Australian study by Kisely et al. reporting an infected family member or child at home were major sources of stress [15]. Hence, a coherent and well considered psychological support system goes hand-in-hand with a system of PPE. Chen et al. report mental wellbeing being improved by practical provisions including PPE, food to avoid the stress of shopping in depleted shops, and accommodation to sleep after long shifts [3].
Post Traumatic Growth: Can anything good come from the COVID-19 Pandemic?
Shared trauma can bring teams together due to increased communication, trust and respect between members that have seen each other work well under very difficult circumstances [16]. This in turn can also lead to the development of skills in leadership and the emergence of new leaders within the group, together with empowerment of junior members of the team that have the opportunity to prove themselves in a challenging situation. However, in order for this to happen, teams need to be well led with strong mutual respect between the team and the leader [16]. Our results suggest 90% of those questioned felt adequately supported by their immediate seniors, facilitating the growth of local teams. It will be important for hospitals to continue this sense of support into the future. Staff will need to receive regular support as both the physical effects of the virus and its mental health implications will be long-lasting. Furthermore, it is easy for those in leadership roles to have their own needs neglected [12], and so mental health services for healthcare professionals need to include all levels of seniority. However, we identified a significant relationship between impact on training and depressive symptoms reported in healthcare professionals. Hence, the detrimental impact of the virus on professional progression likely has a negative impact on mental health in healthcare workers, acting as a key psychological stressor. It will therefore be important that the appropriate senior involvement and a strong support system is in place to support individuals in pursuing their training.
Proactivity: Ensuring Accessible and Targeted Support
Though there was no significant relationship between depressive symptoms and the availability of wellbeing resources, a large proportion of respondents reported the availability of staff wellbeing resources as inadequate (25%). However, the proportion of respondents who had not accessed the ‘Staff Wellbeing Support’ webpage was also substantial (52%), which may suggest low perceived adequacy may be related to low utilisation rather than relating to the quality of resources available. This could be due to lack of awareness, the perceived need to ‘stay strong’, or a lack of willingness among healthcare workers to discuss their own mental health [3]. Therefore, any program dealing with healthcare workers’ mental health would need to proactively make sure that staff were aware of it, and not rely on members accessing it themselves. This, together with the high numbers that a program will need to reach, will require use of new techniques within the field of digital psychiatry such as telepsychiatry, artificial intelligence and internet-based computer aided mental health tools [17]. Furthermore, a proactive approach using these tools will be needed to deliver help where it is most needed. Studies have identified that female staff members, frontline workers, and nurses are at increased risk of developing mental health symptoms during a pandemic [10,18]. We should establish identification of those healthcare workers that are at greater mental health risk from the virus and offer targeted resources. A further study found that staff members’ concerns varied with age - with staff members aged between 31-40 most worried about infecting their families, and staff over 40 most worried about their own health [19]. Such an approach will need continual research in this area. In conclusion, this study has identified that the COVID-19 pandemic has exerted a significant mental health burden on healthcare professionals. Key contributory factors include impact on training and a lack of uptake of staff wellbeing support measures. Going forward, appropriate leadership and senior support to fulfil training needs, and the proactive provision of targeted tools aiming to improve mental wellbeing is vital. With adequate mental health provision, we can try to ensure that the NHS learns many lessons and bounces back from this crisis stronger than it was before. None of the concepts required for this are new – they are things that we read in the key performance indicators of slogans of NHS organisations. However, putting them into practice is difficult and time consuming, but very necessary if we are not to face a mental health pandemic amongst healthcare professionals after they have risked so much fighting COVID-19.
Key Points
None
None
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
