AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Case Report
*Corresponding Author: Sawab Al Hosni, Oman Medical Specialty Board, OMAN.
Citation: Sawab Al Hosni, Ibrahim Al Waili. (2022). Lateral Intercostal Artery Perforator Flap for Breast Cancer: A Case Report from Oman. Journal of Surgical Case Reports and Images, 5(5); DOI: 10.31579/2690-1897/127
Copyright: © 2022, Sawab Al Hosni, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 22 September 2022 | Accepted: 29 September 2022 | Published: 16 November 2022
Keywords: breast cancer; intra-op ultrasound; lateral intercostal artery perforator flap
Breast cancer is the commonest cancer in females. Historically, breast cancer surgery (BCS) was not considered a safe option, until 20 years back when those concerns were dismissed by the introduction of several surgical techniques. Today, women living in countries with fairly advanced healthcare systems, have the option of getting surgical treatment that is both safe and aesthetically pleasing. One of the promising surgeries being discussed in literature and is not widely practiced worldwide is the Lateral Intercostal Artery Perforator Flap (LICAP) flap.
We present a case of a 52 y/o lady who self-presented to the Breast Surgery Outpatient Department (OPD) after she noticed a mass on her left breast. The patient was willing for BCS as she was particularly concerned about cosmesis. LICAP flap surgery was performed and the results were remarkable. LICAP flap is a surgical technique that, despite it requiring sharp surgical skills, continues to be a promising addition to the BCS options for women with breast cancer. With good planning and using intra-op ultrasound it can be the preferred choice for many patients.
Breast cancer is the commonest occurring cancer in females around the world, accounting for about 12% of women. The incidence has been increasing due to the aging population, however, 5-year survival rates have also increased as tumors are being detected earlier and better treatments are being provided [1]. Historically, mastectomies have been the mainstay of treatment for breast cancer as first introduced by William Stewart Halsted (1852-1922) who, later on, was strongly against breast reconstruction and whose opinions have greatly influenced the controversy for several decades mainly for his oncological concerns [2, 3]. In the past twenty years or so, breast conserving surgery started becoming an acceptable option for women with breast caner, and today, different options and techniques have been studied and are available for almost every woman in a country with an advanced healthcare system [2].
Evolution of breast reconstruction surgery
Czerny (1895) was the first surgeon to ever introduce the idea of replacing excised breast tissue with a lipoma. Not long after that, Legueu (1898) and Morestin (1903) attempted to reconstruct the breast after mastectomy by using tissue from the contralateral breast, creating a large unattractive “breast” in the centre of the chest, which was abandoned for oncological concerns and poor cosmesis. Ombredanne (1906) introduced using the pectoralis minor muscle to replace the breast tissue and covering it with a rotating thoracoabdominal skin flap. In that same year, Tansini created a latissmus dorsi (LD) flap which was not used until 70 years following his design, when Olivari re-introduced it with the addition of an implant. Implants were first created by Cronin in 1963, which marked an important phase to the evolution of reconstructive surgery of the breast [2]. From the early 1970s up to the early 1990s, standard surgical treatment for breast conserving surgery (BCS) was first by using the latissmus dorsi myocutaneous flap, followed by the introduction of several techniques including the transversus rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap and the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap along with gluteal and thigh flaps [2,3].
In recent years, Hamdi et al established several highly versatile BCS flaps including the lateral intercostal artery perforator (LICAP) flap [4]. This technique, however, is not frequently used in current practice as it required a tedious microsurgical perforator dissection and perhaps, possible conversion to an LD flap [5].
Anatomy
Often the is skin is redundant in the area of the upper back. This makes the lateral chest wall, adjacent to the inframmary fold, a possible area to harvest skin and fat from for reconstruction, which is basically, the concept of the LICAP flap. According to cadaver dissection in one study, within 6-8cm from the mis-axillary line, there are 2-5 lateral intercostal artery perforators. This characterizes the flap pedicle that can be rotated 180 degrees. Furthermore, one perforator bundle that is more than 5mm in diameter is enough to supply the rotated flap [5].
A 52 y/o married lady, with 6 children, and a background history of ulcerative colitis controlled with medical management, no previous surgical history, self-presented to the Breast Surgery OPD on 19/11/2020 after she noticed a left breast mass 4 months prior to presentation. She did not notice an increase in the size, nor did she notice any nipple changes or discharge.
She has no family history of breast or other cancers, no personal history of smoking or using contraceptive pills and no history of weight loss.
Physical examination
On examination, the patient was haemodynamically normal, local examination of the breasts revealed small breasts of A cup size. There was no obvious asymmetry but skin tethering was noticed on the left breast laterally. There was no nipple retraction or discharge and no skin changes like ulceration, erythema or peu d’orange. On palpation, a small firm lump was felt on the left breast at 3 o’clock measuring about 2x2cm, occupying about a quarter of the breast. Axillary lymph nodes were also palpable on that side. The contralateral breast looked normal and did not reveal any lumps on palpation and there were no palpable axillary lymph nodes.
A Tru-cut biopsy was taken.
Examination
a) Mammogram
A subtle hyperdense focus is noted in the left breast upper outer quadrant. A 1.4x0.7x1.3 cm irregular speculated lesion is noted in the left breast at the 3 o’clock location (figure 1).
Figure 1: mammogram, A. cranio-caudal view, B. mediolateral oblique view
b) US
The ultrasound report showed an ill-defined hypoechoic mass with irregular margins measuring 2.3x1.4cm, BIRADS 5 (figure 2).
Figure 2: Ultrasound image of left breast lesion
c) CT chest, abdomen, pelvis:
As part of staging, the patient had a CT chest, abdomen and pelvis which showed no evidence of metastatic disease.
d) Histopathology
The histopathology report from the left breast mass biopsy showed invasive ductal carcinoma, Nottingham grade III. There was lymphovascular invasion and the hormone receptors that were positive were ER and PR. The Her-2 receptor came back as negative.
Surgery
The patient was taken for a left breast conserving surgery (wide local excision [WLE] + LICAP + sentinel lymph node biopsy). Pre-operatively, marking was done around the tumor, and the LICAP vessels were marked with the use of a hand-held ultrasound Doppler. Methylene blue was injected in the peri-areolar area and massaging was done for about 10 minutes. Then the left axilla was opened and blue-stained lymph nodes were identified and sent for frozen section, which eventually were reported as negative for metastasis hence no further nodes were dissected. A standard WLE elliptical incision was made over the tumor. Upper and lower flaps were raised and a formal WLE was done down to the pectoralis major muscle. The specimen was oriented with a short superior and a long lateral suture. For the LICAP reconstruction, an elliptical incision was made over the area that was identified and marked using the Doppler ultrasound. The flap was raised and rotated safeguarding the blood supply and venous drainage. The flap was then brought forward and rotated into the WLE space. Skin de-epithelialisation was done with good bleeding from the flap and it was fixed using 3-0 Vicryl. Wash done and haemostasis was secured. LICAP clips were inserted to the WLE cavity for future radiotherapy. The wound was closed in layers using 3-0 Vicryl and the skin was closed with monocryl 3-0 subcutaneously. No drain was inserted (figure 3).
Figure 3: surgery steps. A. marking of flap and slnb, B. elliptical skin incision to create the flap, C. flap created, D - G. rotation of the flap, H. skin de-epithelialisation, I & J, skin closure.
The patient in this study was followed up on 5 days (figure 4), 6 weeks and 12 months post-op with excellent outcomes and great patient satisfaction.
Figure 4: Post-operative day 5. I. Anterior view, J. Lateral view.
One of the difficulties in creating a lateral artery perforator flap lies in the fact the perforator does not supply a wide area, hence, the flap might not be large enough to cover the excised tissue [6]. However, this surgical technique may be favourable to patients as not only does it provide good aesthetic outcomes, but it requires a shorter hospital stay and there is no muscle sacrifice in the procedure. An advantage to the surgeon would be that the viability of the flap, ie the vascularity, can be assessed immediately after rotating it [5].
Currently, lateral intercostal perforator flaps are not widely practiced as compared to other commoner breast reconstruction surgeries, due to technical difficulties in creating a flap with a limited range of movement along with the difficulty in the surgical technique itself. Introducing it to current surgical practice is a further development in the evolution of breast reconstruction surgery and a great addition to the options available for patients in order to provide them with aesthetically-pleasing results which is the sine qua non of breast reconstruction surgery.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
