AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Review Article
*Corresponding Author: Iva Srdanovic, Department Touro College of Pharmacy. United States.
Citation: Iva Srdanovic (2022) Late Catch-up In-Stent Restenosis and Stent Thrombosis for 2nd Generation Biodegradable Polymer Drug Eluting Stents J. Pharmaceutics and Pharmacology Research. 5(3); DOI: 10.31579/2693-7247/061
Copyright: © 2022, Iva Srdanovic, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 29 November 2021 | Accepted: 01 December 2021 | Published: 18 January 2022
Keywords: Stent Restenosis; Stent Thrombosis; Biodegradable Polymer.
Second generation drug-eluting stents (DES) have reduced the rate of in-stent restenosis (ISR) to < 10% [1, 2] in patients undergoing PCI. However, late catch-up in-stent restenosis remains an issue despite the advent in drug-eluting stent technology from 1st to 2nd generation drug eluting stents. The late catch-up phenomenon has been associated with serious consequences and adverse events and remains an important issue in modern practice, despite medical advances with more biocompatible and biodegradable polymers, as well as new therapeutic agents and thinner scaffolds in the development of 2nd generation DES polymer systems. The idea behind biodegradable polymers has been to provide a more controlled elution profile for DES drugs, allowing for long-term therapeutic, but sub-toxic, drug levels in the arterial tissue to prevent ISR and stent thrombosis. However, the late catch-up phenomenon remains an issue resulting in 2ndary revascularization beyond the first year of primary PCI, as it is defined as ISR >1 year. Late stent thrombosis (<1 year) and very late stent thrombosis (>1 year) also remain an issue for biodegradable polymer systems. A long-term presence of the polymer can cause inflammation and thrombogenesis, which is dependent upon polymer degradation kinetics in case of biodegradable polymer DES systems. However, the cause of late catch-up restenosis and stent thrombosis is multi-factorial from a drug-in-polymer formulation perspective of drug release kinetics, e.g., drug elution profile, drug physiochemical properties, and polymer degradation kinetics. It appears that the focus should be on controlling burst release for both late catch-up restenosis and stent thrombosis phenomena.
A Review on the release kinetics (burst release) influence on the late catch-up phenomenon and stent thrombosis for 2nd generation biodegradable DES systems
Drug eluting stents release an anti-proliferative drug from a polymer matrix coating metallic struts to prevent arterial smooth muscle cell (SMC) proliferation and neointimal hyperplasia at the site of vessel injury upon stent implantation. A stent is composed of metallic struts and polymer coating containing the anti-proliferative agent as either a reservoir or polymer matrix formulation. Late catch-up restenosis is defined as in-stent restenosis beyond 1 year of primary PCI procedure. [3] It is caused by the narrowing of the stented segment as a result of inefficacious concentrations of the anti-proliferative agent in the arterial tissue necessary to inhibit SMC proliferation and neointimal hyperplasia. One of the major challenges in DES performance has been developing an optimal release profile to keep drug concentration at efficacious but sub-toxic levels in the arterial tissue over a sufficiently long enough period of time to prevent smooth muscle cell proliferation and subsequent restenosis without inhibiting re-endothelization, as stent thrombosis has been associated with inhibited re-endothelization of arterial tissue. In other words, drug elution profile should be sustained for a long enough time-period to provide anti-restenotic effects, especially until the polymer degrades in case of biodegradable polymers.
Drug release kinetics characterized by initial burst release have been associated with late catch-up restenosis and stent thrombosis. A rapid, uncontrolled initial release of drug and rapid release rate may cause tissue toxicity without sustaining efficacious and required drug therapeutic levels in the arterial wall long term due to systemic loss of the therapeutic agent. At the same time, this burst release leaves the tissue exposed to polymer known to cause inflammation and, thus delays vascular healing and inhibits re-endothelization [4,5]. In other words, burst release results in a high loss of drug to the systemic circulation without it being retained in the arterial tissue for a long enough time to exhibit its anti-proliferative effects and inhibit late catch-up restenosis. [4,5]. Burst release can subject arterial tissue to more drug than it can absorb and retain [6], so high and extreme drug doses overwhelming tissue receptors can cause augmented fibrin deposition, intra-intimal hemorrhages, mural thrombus, medial necrosis and excessive arterial expansion, all associated with stent thrombosis and exacerbated neointimal tissue [7,8].
Drug physiochemical properties play an important role in burst release and release kinetics in general, as well as drug uptake and retention by the surrounding arterial tissue, when the drug is being released from the polymer matrix. Polymer properties, such as hydrophilicity, degree of crystallinity, pore size and pore density, influence drug diffusion through polymer matrix and polymer degradation kinetics, as well as subsequent drug release rate. Understanding formulation factors influencing burst release and release kinetics, as it pertains to the drug type, polymer degradation kinetics, as well as certain coating techniques associated with burst release, can help explain the late catch-up restenosis phenomenon and stent thrombosis in biodegradable drug eluting stent systems.
Factors Influencing Burst Release:
Drug physiochemical characteristics controlling drug elution profile, drug concentration in polymer matrix, polymer permeability and thickness for both DES reservoir and polymer matrix systems, solvent evaporation rate following DES coating, as well as polymer properties governing degradation mechanisms and drug release kinetics are all factors contributing to burst release [9-19]. Initial rapid release of the drug from DES systems should not result in high depletion of the polymer matrix, because such release would not allow for longer elution profiles at the site of action in the arterial tissue following stent implantation, necessary to inhibit SMC proliferation and prevent late catch-up restenosis [20, 21]. Burst release results in high drug doses released initially and lost to systemic circulation, leaving the arterial tissue void of efficacious therapeutic levels of the anti-proliferative agent necessary to inhibit ISR [4,5]. At the same time, drug overwhelming tissue receptors could cause toxicity, increasing the risk of inflammatory and thrombogenic response, which is exacerbated by the fact that the arterial wall remains subject to polymer reactions for several months until its degradation. Table 1. shows different biodegradable FDA approved stents, the initial burst release followed by the rest of the elution profile. Figure 1. shows the time it takes for the polymer to degrade. Even though burst release can be favorable to heal the initial impact and injury of stent implantation to the arterial tissue, uncontrolled burst release represents a major challenge in developing an optimal DES drug release profile to reduce the incidence of late catch-up restenosis and stent thrombosis in biodegradable DES polymer systems.
Drug Physiochemical Properties Affecting Drug Elution Profile and Burst Release: -Limus Family of Drugs - Lipophilicity, Ionizability, and Crystallinity
Sirolimus and its derivatives have been the anti-proliferative agents of choice for 2nd generation biodegradable DES systems. -Limus family of drugs are cytostatic immunosuppressants with a wide therapeutic window, leaving arterial tissue viable as opposed to causing cell death, which is the case with cytotoxic agents like paclitaxel used in 1st generation DES systems. Sirolimus and its derivatives inhibit the cell cycle at the G1 to S phase. Sirolimus and its analogues, such as zotarolimus (Endeavor, Medtronic) and everolimus (Xience, Abbott), have varying degrees of lipophilicity and ionizability. Drug lipophilicity/hydrophobicity, ionization/polarity (pKa values) have an influence over drug elution profile from the DES polymer matrix into the aqueous interstitial fluid and blood plasma [physiological pH (7.37-7.43)] in terms of drug dissolution kinetics as well as drug diffusion through and solubility in the polymer reservoir or matrix DES system. Zotarolimus is extremely lipophilic, and the high degree of lipophilicity and poor water solubility slow down the dissolution profile in the interstitial fluid of arterial tissue; thus, increasing dissolution kinetics to increase bioavailability should deliver just enough as opposed to too much drug with better permeability through cell membrane. The slow dissolution profile results in negligible drug tissue concentrations conductive to re-endothelization [22]. High degree of lipophilicity also allows for lower effective concentration at the site of action as compared to sirolimus in terms of reducing the incidence of adverse vascular events associated with restenosis [23, 24]. Zotarolimus has a shorter in vivo half-life than sirolimus, but the same high affinity binding to the immunophilin FKBP12 [25]. Biolimus A9 is another highly lipophilic derivative of sirolimus, readily absorbed by arterial tissue [26].
On the other hand, the more polar derivatives of sirolimus, such as everolimus, have a faster dissolution profile from the polymer matrix into the surrounding tissue media that can result in burst release in comparison to sirolimus and zotarolimus, which lack in ionizable groups. Everolimus faster dissolution profile is countered by a slower rate of cell uptake and subsequent lower tissue concentrations as compared to the more hydrophobic anti-proliferative agents, which prevents tissue receptors from being overwhelmed by high drug doses associated with stent thrombosis. It is important to note that drug transmural diffusivity and retention by arterial tissue, even though affected by the water/lipid avidity of therapeutic agents within the arterial tissue, has also been shown to be more influenced by the specific protein binding sites, dictating drug retention time within the arterial wall. Everolimus has a much higher interaction with mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 2 as compared to sirolimus, shorter half-life and better bioavailability [27], allowing for lower concentrations to be effective at the site of action.
Burst release is also a result of higher drug concentration being dispersed in the outer layers of DES polymer system - a limitation of different solvent-based coating techniques as opposed to high drug content in DES as evident in Table 1 [28-30]. An optimal DES formulation itself should have a lower drug content to prevent a high initial burst release. Low MW drugs have higher propensities for burst release as a result of osmotic pressure [31]. The -limus family of drugs represents a group of relatively small compounds with the following molecular weight: sirolimus (915 g/mol) [32], zotarolimus (966 g/ml) [33], everolimus (958 g/mol) [34] and biolimus A9 (986.3 g/mol) [35]. Drug solubility in DES polymer matrix systems also affects drug release kinetics from the formulation.
Degree of crystallinity is another factor contributing to burst release. Drug-eluting stents containing crystalline drug particles may be favored for better drug delivery over the conventional approach of spraying amorphous form in polymer solutions onto metallic struts especially when combined with biodegradable polymers and an anti-inflammatory agent like the -limus drug family agents that can counter any tissue reaction arising from presence of polymer degradation products [25, 36]. Amorphous drug elution profile from DES is dependent on diffusion along a concentration gradient, and thus associated with a rapid, uncontrolled drug burst upon initial release. On the contrary, crystalline drug elution is dependent on dissociation/dissolution reaction from the crystalline lattice associated with a high activation energy barrier, eliminating the initial burst release characteristic of diffusion-controlled mechanisms, and resulting in a more consistent and gradual drug release rate throughout polymer absorption regardless of the amount of drug remaining in the coating [4, 37].
MiStent containing sirolimus crystals embedded in a biodegradable polymer matrix composed of polylactide-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) showed a negligible burst release in comparison to conventional DES containing amorphous sirolimus drug, as well as a more linear, long-term drug elution profile extending over a 9-month time period. Conventional biodegradable DES are characterized by a relatively short, logarithmic-type pattern drug elution profile with an initial burst release, follow by the remaining drug being released from the polymer matrix and eventually falling below therapeutic levels with most of the drug dose lost to systemic circulation following burst release, while the polymer remains intact. This increases chances of late catch-up restenosis and stent thrombosis (Figure 1) [4]. Previously it has been shown that crystalline sirolimus elution from MiStent sustains higher drug loads in tissue compared to conventional coated stents with similar drug loads of sirolimus drug in amorphous form [20]. Drug elution without an initial
burst release, or a negligible burst release, lasting over 9 months for MiStent releasing crystalline sirolimus drug, can possibly be associated with lower rates of stent thrombosis and inhibited vessel restenosis.
Drug release (yellow) and polymer absorption (blue) arranged by length of polymer degradation. Modified from source [47].
Release Mechanisms and Polymer Properties Affecting Drug Release Kinetics:
Drug release kinetics from biodegradable polymers are initially characterized by diffusion/dissolution and diffusion and/or swelling and then controlled by polymer degradation (bulk degradation and/or surface erosion). Swelling of polymer systems increases free volume and mesh size and is followed by drug diffusion through the swollen network into the site of injury caused by stent implantation. Polymer swelling can facilitate diffusion by increasing the aqueous solvent content in the formulation and creating pores for drug diffusion out of the matrix as it partitions between the polymer and the aqueous solvent depending on its polarity/solubility [49, 50]. Polymer degradation kinetics ultimately control drug release from DES biodegradable polymer systems, resulting in pore formation that eventually dictates drug release from the matrix, allowing for facilitated drug transport/diffusion and release as the polymer molecular weight decreases and the polymer chains become less entangled upon degradation, as is the case with PLGA polymer degradation and erosion [51]. Drug release is highly dependent on the following polymer properties: molecular weight, monomer composition, degree of crystallinity, porosity, hydrophilicity, degree of swelling and degree of cross-linking, as these govern drug diffusion and polymer degradation kinetics. Polymer degradation is also dependent on temperature and pH [52, 53-55]. These factors contribute to changes in polymer glass transition temperature (Tg) and, as a result affect the degree of crystallinity and water uptake, which determines polymer permeability, subsequent drug diffusion through the matrix, and polymer degradation kinetics. [56-58]. Particle shape and size also influences drug release, as the ratio of surface area to volume is an important parameter facilitating more water contact [52] with increasing surface to volume ratio resulting in accelerated polymer degradation kinetics [59]. Polymer surface morphology can also be modified to control drug release from polymeric DES systems [60].
Commonly Used Biodegradable Polymers: PLA, PGA, PLGA
Commonly used synthetic biodegradable polymers for DES polymer reservoir and matrix systems include thermoplastic aliphatic poly(esters) such as polylactic acid (PLA), polyglycolic acid (PGA), and poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA). PLA can be made using two types of monomers: two stereoisomers of lactic acid (D and L). PLA prepared using D-lactic acid, PDLA, is a crystalline material resulting from its regular chain length; on the other hand, PLA prepared using L-lactic acid, PLLA, has a semi-crystalline structure. PLLA and PDLA polymer blend yields PDLLA, which has amorphous characteristics. The presence of methyl groups on PLAs makes them more hydrophobic in nature [61]. Therefore, the chirality of the monomer influences drug release kinetics because it has an effect on the biodegradability and mechanical properties of PLA. Studies have shown that D and D/L forms of PLA degrade faster than the L form, as the latter is more crystalline in nature in comparison to the other two [62-66]. PLA degrades through ester bond backbone hydrolysis [67].
PLGA (Poly (d,l-lactic-co-glycolic acid) is a copolymer of lactic acid (PLA) and glycolic acid (PGA) whose physical, thermal and mechanical properties depend on the ratio and type of the monomers used for the polymer blend [68]. PLGA properties can be modified changing the molecular weight and PGA to PLA copolymer composition to adjust the degree of crystallinity, hydrophilicity, and glass transition temperature (Tg)of the copolymer blend. Increasing the ratio of lactic to glycolic acid can increase polymer hydrophobicity with an increase in methyl groups, which in turn reduces the rate of water penetration through the device and subsequent hydrolysis and degradation, to allow for a more controlled drug release profile. As a rule, higher glycolic acid content yields faster degradation rates due to PGA being more hydrophilic as compared to PLA allowing for higher rates of water uptake and hydrolysis of PLGA ester linkages. 50:50 PGA to PLA ratio is the exception to the rule because it exhibits the fastest degradation rates with increasing PGA content leading to faster polymer degradation kinetics below 50% [55, 69, 70 ].
Biodegradable polymers like PLA, PGA and PLGA, degrade by bulk erosion associated with burst release and subsequent loss of the anti-proliferative agent too early on during the arterial healing process, as well as inhibition of re-endothelization associated with stent thrombosis [50, 71-73]. Drug lost to systemic circulation as a result of the initial uncontrolled burst release results in sb-therapeutic levels in the arterial tissue needed to prevent SMC proliferation and neointimal hyperplasia and subsequent late catch-up restenosis long-term. At the same time, synthetic PLA, although biocompatible, can take more than a year to degrade and therefore carries a risk of late and very late stent thrombosis [49, 74]. In case of Orsiro, it takes up to 15 months to degrade and is, therefore, present long after the drug has been eluted in the first three months and lost to systemic circulation [47]. Additional problems may arise from poor mechanical performance and generation of acidic products from polymer degradation, which may lead to inflammatory responses and induce neointimal hyperplasia and subsequent restenosis, as well as thrombosis at lower pH values for the biological environment [75, 76]. The acidic by-products of PGA as well as its fast degradation kinetics make it an unfavorable candidate to be used for as a single polymer matrix and can lead to local inflammation at acidic pH as a degrading component of a PLGA polymeric system [77].
Bulk Erosion vs Surface Erosion: Implications for Burst Release for Biodegradable DES Polymer Systems
Bulk erosion, characteristic of PGA, PLA and PLGA degradation, is associated with more burst release and unpredictable drug release profiles as compared to surface erosion; it is a suboptimal mechanism for controlled drug delivery [73]. Biodegradation by surface erosion means that a polymer goes through a heterogeneous process degrading from the surface inward proportional to the surface area, while maintain its bulk integrity, so the drug release form surface eroding systems is often correlated with a controllable and reproducible erosion rate with thicker systems having longer erosion times. In other words, polymers degrade quickly at the surface without the penetration of water molecules by hydrolysis [69, 71, 73]. Contrary to surface erosion, in bulk erosion, the rate at which the water penetrates the device is higher than the rate of erosion, so water penetration rate exceeds the rate at which the smaller polymer constituents are converted into water-soluble materials, resulting in homogenous degradation of the entire matrix with an initial burst release [71, 73]. As mentioned earlier, PLA, PGA and PLGA degrade by bulk erosion associated with burst release [50, 71-73] and unpredictable drug release rates-a suboptimal mechanism for drug delivery as compared to surface erosion [73].
Solvent Evaporation Rate and Burst Release:
Coating techniques involving solvent evaporation upon drug deposition onto the polymer/scaffold or scaffold alone can result in burst release. Complications associated with solvent-based coating techniques, such as dip coating and spray coating, include bridging, pooling and lack of uniformity, which is especially the case with coating thickness less than 0.5 mm [78, 79]. Varying concentrations of drug and polymer can result in burst release with an uneven drug distribution such that the outer layers are rich with the drug of choice in comparison to the rest of the matrix [11, 28-30]. Multiple rounds of spray coating can lead to significant mixing between different layers of the polymer matrix [80] and result in higher drug content near the surface [81].
Drug release kinetics, especially burst release, have been associated with late catch-up restenosis. An initial uncontrollable release of the DES therapeutic agent can lead to sub-therapeutic levels of the antiproliferative agent in the arterial tissue, which is needed at optimal levels over an extended time-period to “safeguard” the tissue from narrowing in; most of the drug is released initially as part of burst release and lost to systemic circulation shortly after, so the drug concentration falls below the efficacious therapeutic levels. Burst release has also been associated with delayed re-endothelization and subsequent stent thrombosis. Drug overwhelming tissue receptors at high initial doses released as part of burst release can cause augmented fibrin deposition, intra-intimal hemorrhages, mural thrombus, medial necrosis and excessive arterial expansion, all associated with stent thrombosis and exacerbated neointimal tissue. Biodegradable polymers are especially prone to burst release as a result of bulk erosion mechanism for polymer biodegradation. Drug physiochemical properties, as well as polymer properties governing polymer degradation kinetics, also influence the drug elution profile and subsequent drug concentration in the arterial tissue that needs to be sustained long-term to prevent late catch-up restenosis, but at subtoxic levels to avoid stent thrombosis. When too much anti-proliferative agent is released too soon, then the drug is lost to systemic circulation, leaving the tissue exposed to struts and polymer without a drug concentration efficacious enough at inhibiting SMC proliferation, which essentially leads to late catch-up restenosis (ISR>1 year). The focus of DES technology should be optimal release profiles of the anti-proliferative agent with special attention on burst release to improve the device for better clinical outcomes.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
