Instant Antibacterial and Anti-Inflammatory Osmotic Polymeric Film to Treat Sore Throat in Children

Research Article

Instant Antibacterial and Anti-Inflammatory Osmotic Polymeric Film to Treat Sore Throat in Children

  • Remi Shrivastava 1
  • Margot Ennuyer 1
  • Ravi Shrivastava 1*

*Corresponding Author: Ravi Shrivastava, VITROBIO Research Institute, Issoire, France.

Citation: Remi Shrivastava, Margot Ennuyer, Ravi Shrivastava (2021). Instant Antibacterial and Anti-Inflammatory Osmotic Polymeric Film to Treat Sore Throat in Children. J Clinical Research and Reports, 7(4); DOI:10.31579/2690-1919/161

Copyright: © 2021 Ravi Shrivastava, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: 02 April 2021 | Accepted: 20 April 2021 | Published: 26 April 2021

Keywords: pharyngitis; children; polymeric film; treatment; osmotic film; pro-inflammatory cytokine; virus glycoprotein; throat infection; paracetamol

Abstract

Background: Pharyngitis, a common viral throat infection in children, involving inflammation, widespread local bacterial contamination and tissue destruction. When clinical signs appear, the disease already became multifactorial. In the absence of any multitarget treatment, we conceived a new generation of topical, osmotic, anti-inflammatory, throat surface cleaning polymeric film, capable of detaching and draining throat surface contaminants nearly instantly.

Material and methods: A glycerol and polymer containing osmotic film was prepared. Osmotic film attracts hypotonic liquid from the throat tissue, which detach and drain throat surface contaminants and create a favorable environment for cell growth and healing.  Specific pro-inflammatory cytokine and virus glycoprotein binding polymers were incorporated in the film to suppress the inflammation. An observational, randomized, placebo-controlled study was performed after the approval of ethical committee on 30 children aged between (3-15), presenting symptoms of acute pharyngitis. After randomization, test product (n=20) and saline control (n=10) solutions were applied as 3-4 throat sprays 4-5 times / day for 15-days. Change in all the key pharyngitis symptom (difficulty swallowing, throat inflammation, irritation, redness, and bacterial deposit) were evaluated employing two-tailed Student’s test for followed by the post hoc Bonferroni’s test for comparisons of multiple groups

Results: Only a few specific polymers were able to bind with viral proteins and/or cytokines in adequate filmogen concentrations. Throat surface cleaning and cytokine neutralization strongly decrease all the pharyngitis symptoms and need for antibiotic therapy compared to controls (p<0.05 from day 3 onwards). No adverse effects were noted in any of the groups.

Conclusion: Clinical results showed excellent efficacy and safety of osmotically active polymeric film. Polymeric drugs may represent an excellent multitarget treatment approach to minimize the use of antibiotics and chemical drugs in the future.

Introduction

Throat infection or pharyngitis, is one of the most common in children. Pharyngitis is defined as an infection and irritation of the pharynx or tonsils which causes swollen throat, difficulty in swallowing, throat irritation, inflammation, pain, fever, fatigue, and headache. Secondary signs may include runny nose, cough, itchy and watery eyes. In 80% of cases, the origin of the disease is viral, particularly rhinovirus, adenovirus, parainfluenza virus, coxsackievirus, coronavirus, and cytomegalovirus [1-3]. Initially, virus attacks a few cells, starts growing, causes cellular damage, and when the cells die, hundreds of free new viral particles are released on the throat surface. The disease is nearly asymptomatic up to this stage. These newly liberated virus particles now attach to new healthy cells, cause widespread tissue damage, open gaps in the intact mucosa barrier and trigger a strong immune reaction [4]. Tissue damage leads to the growth of opportunistic bacteria, particularly group A Streptococcus pyogenes (GAS), releasing Streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxins (SpeA, SpeC, SpeG to SpeM), superantigen A (SSA), and mitogenic exotoxin Z (SmeZ). They activate a large proportion of T-cell population, of which innate immune cells (monocytes, macrophages, dendritic cells, T cells, NK lymphocytes…) elicit an excessive uncoordinated release of proinflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α,IL-6, IL-10, and IL-12 on the throat surface [5,6].  When symptoms start appearing, the disease became already multifactorial involving viral growth, extensive throat mucosa damage, gaps on the throat mucosa allowing systemic entry of contaminants, abundant proinflammatory cytokines and growing microorganisms on the throat surface visible as whitish deposits. If the infection is suppressed rapidly, the immune system produces anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-4 to stop inflammation and provide a favorable environment for cell growth to repair cellular damage. Unfortunately, in most cases, natural defenses are not sufficient to suppress the pathogens and the release of proinflammatory cytokines continues, leading to chronic disease which may last a few weeks. Children being more fragile, suffer more than adults. Treating such a multifactorial disease compulsorily requires a multi-target treatment but in the absence of such medications, analgesics, anti-pyritic, antibiotics, and anesthetics constitute the first-line symptomatic remedies [7-9]. These drugs cannot be used simultaneously, results are not instant, they have no effect on repairing damaged throat mucosa, and they may induce side-effects and/or antibiotic resistance [10,11].

The aim of this study was to test the efficacy and safety of a multi-target, osmotic, non-irritant, and stable film which can be applied on the throat surface to remove all the contaminants including bacteria, viruses, and pro-inflammatory cytokines simultaneously. Cleaning the throat surface should help regenerate cells in a chemical free environment to reconstitute throat mucosa and its natural defense functions. The conception and efficacy of such a pharyngitis treatment for children is explained.

Materials and Methods

1. Selection of an osmotic base: The aim was to find a highly osmotic yet non-irritant filmogen base. After screening different natural and synthetic osmotic, non-cytotoxic, absorbent, and stable liquids, glycerol was selected as the most convenient filmogen base. Osmotic and mucosal irritant potentials were determined in in vitro cell culture models [12,13] and bovine corneal opacity test (BCOP), as described by Schrage et al [14]. The glycerol film was rendered thick and absorbent by adding small quantities of a few commonly used food-grade thickenings agents. 

1.2. Glycerol-polymer binding to render glycerol film mechanically resistant to liquid flow: Mechanical resistance of glycerol film was enhanced by adding specific glycerol molecule binding inert polymers. As specific polymers are known to bind with selected macromolecules (H, OH binding) and specific proteins [15] we identified those polymers, which can bind with glycerol molecules to render the glycerol film stable. Glycerol binding polymeric structures were further tested to evaluate their specific protein binding potential.

1.3. Evaluation of pro-inflammatory cytokine binding potential of glycerol binding polymers:

Polymers, such as plant tannins, are very big molecules. After glycerol binding, many polymeric H and OH sites remain free [16].

As tannin–protein binding is used to tan skin proteins and convert skin into leather, we used the same technology to evaluate polymeric affinity for pro-inflammatory cytokines. The polymeric binding affinity of the key child pharyngitis disease specific pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α, IL-6, IL-10, and IL-12, was evaluated using ELISA tests at fixed polymeric concentration of 0.10% in 5.0% glycerol aqueous solution. Test products were incubated with each purified human recombinant cytokine (Invitrogen, 400 pg/ml) for 5 minutes in PBS. The remaining free and available recombinant cytokine was measured using Specific ELISA kit (Invitrogen, Human IL kits) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Recombinant cytokines without polymers were used as negative controls. The Optic Density (OD) was measured at 450 nm using an ELISA plate reader (luminometer-Envision, PerkinElmer).

Data analysis and interpretation: The scavenge activity of polymers is inversely proportional to the quantity of free cytokine detected. Reduction in quantified cytokine following incubation with polymers compared to the amount in negative controls, indicated the extent of cytokine neutralization due to polymeric binding.

2.0. Efficacy study: An observational efficacy trial was conducted at Mudra Clinical Research, India in 2019 (ISO-14155 certified clinical research organization, Registration N° SQ18N02, dated 05/09/2018, renewed up to 04/04/2021). The protocol and study design were approved by the Institutional Ashirwad Ethics Committee, India (Reg.No. ECR/247/Inst/MH/2013/RR-16, dated 07/08/2018). The study was conducted in accordance with the “Declaration of Helsinki”, concerning medical research in humans (Brazil, October 2013), and following the ICH-GCP guidelines. Informed consent was obtained from all children / parents involved in the study. All subjects gave their informed consent for inclusion before they participated in the study. Being an observational study with a Class I medical device used as a bandage for topical application, containing exclusively food grade ingredients and the evidence of safe use by above 100,000 children for this indication, CTR registration was not required.

Study design: The study was designed as an observational, comparative, randomized, parallel group to evaluate efficacy and safety of the test product (TP) compared to 0.9% saline solution sprays as comparator product (CP).

Key inclusion and exclusion criteria: Main inclusion criteria included (1) Boys and girls aged 3 to 15, (2) Having symptoms of recent throat infection (<72h), temperature >38°C, swelling of tonsils with >50% probability of positive culture for Streptococcus infection, (3) parents ready to provide written informed consent (4) Ready to abstain from other treatments except antibiotics in seriously ill patients to evaluate requirements of antibiotherapy. (5) Ready to follow the protocol and fill-up the daily questionnaire diary, (6) Not under any antiviral or anti-inflammatory treatment, (7) Not suffering from any chronic disease which may impact study parameters.

The main exclusion criteria were (1) Not meeting any of the above inclusion criteria, (2) Allergy to any of the investigational product ingredient, (3) Any disease or treatment which may affect study outcome.

Randomization: Treatments were allocated to patients by carrying out randomization using SAS Version 9.1.3. Biostatistician generated the randomization schedule. Block Randomization methodology was employed to follow 2:1 ratio in TP or CP groups.

Treatment: Test formulation contained an association of glycerol with dual acting glycerol + polymer binding association in water. CP contained 0.9% NaCl solution. The TP and CP were supplied as 30-ml sprays (about 100 sprays / vial, 3-4 sprays / application) to be applied on the throat surface every 20-30 minutes during the first 2h at the start of treatment and 3-4 times per day thereafter for a maximum period of 15-days.

Trial endpoints: Pharyngitis and/or throat infection related parameters were scored on a 1 to 7 scale (1=excellent; 7=worst). Key parameters recorded were: difficulty in swallowing, swollen throat, throat inflammation/redness, throat irritation, and presence of whitish microbial deposit on the throat surface. Throat swabs were examined at the start (Day 0) and at the end of the study. Number of days of antibiotic use in each group was also recorded. Mean scores of each symptom, at each time point, were compared with the baseline (BL: start of treatment) and between the groups on day 1 (2h after first treatment), day 3, day 7 and day 15 (end of the study).

Statistical analyses: Statistical analyses: The normality of the populations was determined by the Shapiro-Wilk test, then statistical analysis was performed by two-tailed Student’s test for comparisons between two groups and the two-way ANOVA followed by the post hoc Bonferroni’s test for comparisons of multiple groups. p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. The analyses were performed with the software GraphPad Prism (version 8.4.2, La Jolla, USA). NS indicates not significant.

Results

Osmotic throat surface cleaning film: The polymer binding with glycerol formed a highly adherent and osmotic film, capable of generating a strong osmotic hypotonic liquid flow from the inner parts of the throat tissue. Polymeric binding with proinflammatory cytokines: To stabilize polymers and glycerol, only glycerol binding polymers were evaluated to identify those having affinity for selected cytokines. The aim was to find a polymeric association capable of binding with the four key proinflammatory cytokines involved in pharyngitis throat inflammation. Due avoid polymeric adherence in the solution, a unique 0.10% concentration of each polymer (n=18 each polymer) was screened in sandwich ELISA tests. Binding results revealed that polymer – protein binding is highly specific as only 10-15% polymeric structures had moderate to strong affinity for one or two cytokines. The Vv polymer derived from Vitis vinifera seeds, blocked nearly 78% IL-6 but had no effect on other cytokines. Sn polymer derived from Sambucus nigra fruit was capable to block nearly 45% IL-6 and nearly 50% TNF-alpha and IL-10 but had poor binding properties with IL-12. Rn polymer isolated from Ribes nigrum fruit extract, antagonized strongly IL-6 but was also capable of neutralizing above 50% IL-12. Therefore, these three polymers, having equally affinity for glycerol molecules, were used in concentrations between 0.10 to 0.40% to conceive the test product solution (Figure 1).

Figure1: IL-6, TNF-α, IL-12, and IL-10 pharyngitis specific proinflammatory cytokine inhibiting properties of Vv, Sn, and Rn polymers at a concentration of 0.10% in sandwich ELISA test. Test products were preincubated with the specific recombinant human cytokine (400 pg/ml) for 5-minutes and free cytokine concentration was quantified following sandwich ELISA test. Reduction in cytokine concentration (n=18) compared to negative controls (PBS) was measured at 450 nm. Polymer – cytokine binding was inversely proportional to the quantity of free cytokine detected. Results were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s post’hoc tests. Confidence intervals 95%. *p<0.05 **p<0.01 ***p<0.001.

Finished formulation: The test product was specifically formulated (20-ml sprays) for throat application in children and contained glycerol (74.63%), a dual acting, glycerol and specific cytokine binding polymeric premix (0.83%), with excipients as described by Shrivastava et al [17].

Efficacy results: Among 34 children screened, 4 were dropped out before enrollment, 30 were randomized and all completed 15-day of scheduled treatment. The CP group was composed of

9 boys + 1 girl (mean age 7.9) while in the TP group, there were 7 boys + 13 girls (mean age 8.3).

Effect on swallowing difficulty

Figure 2: Mean scores of difficulties while swallowing recorded on a scale of 0 to 10 where 0 represents no difficulties.

In figure 2, the scores were high in the saline (black bars, n=10) and polymeric spray treated (gray bars, n=20) groups at the start of treatment (baseline). Swallowing difficulties eased progressively during the 15-day treatment period but the improvement was much faster and strong in the TP treated group with statistically significant differences vs CP from day-7 onwards.

Difficulty while swallowing is an indication of inflammation and pain, a very common pharyngitis symptom in children. Efficacy results in figure 2 show that at baseline (before 1st treatment), the mean score was slightly low in CP vs TP (5.2 and 6.4/10). Regular throat surface cleaning with saline solution was found to be highly effective in minimizing difficulties while swallowing as a reduction of 5%, 15%, 32%, and 53% was observed on days 1 (2h), 3, 7, and 15, respectively. This reduction was remarkably good in the TP group with a decrease of 15%, 51%, 82% and 96% on days 1 (2h), 3, 7, and 15, respectively (p<0.05 vs CP from day 7 onwards).

Effect on swollen throat

Figure 3: Mean swollen throat scores recorded on a scale of 0 to 10 where 0 represents no difficulties.

In figure3, the scores were identical in both groups on the 1st day of treatment (BL and 2h post-treatment) but decreased strongly in the TP (n=20, gray bars) vs CP (black bars, n=10) groups from day-3 onwards. Swallowing difficulties eased progressively during the 15-day treatment period but the improvement was much faster and strong in the TP treated group with statistically significant differences vs CP from day-7 onwards.

Results in figure 3 show a slight reduction of swollen throat symptom in both groups, 2 hours after first treatment on day 1 (-16.19% in TP vs -11.42% in CP). Compared to BL values, the mean decrease in throat swelling was fast in both the groups but the reduction was much stronger in the TP group. Some throat swelling was still present in CP group on day 15 but all the patients in the TP group were totally recovered. In CP group, throat swelling was reduced by day 51.42% on day 7 and 66.66% on day 15, compared to baseline. In TP group, the reduction was as high as 53.33% on day 3, 77.14% on day 7, and 97.14% on day 15. The decrease was statistically significant in TP vs CP from day 7 onwards (p<0.001).

Effect on throat irritation

Figure 4: Mean scores of throat irritation in the treated (n=20, gray bars) vs control (black bars, n=10) groups quantified on a scale of 0 to 10 where 0 represents no irritation.

In figure 4, the mean irritation scores started decreasing progressively but the reduction was much faster in TP compared to BL values. Compared to CP, the decrease in TP was statistically significant on day-3 (p<0.01) up to the day-15 (p<0.001).  

The mean score of throat irritation started decreasing in both groups 2h after the start of treatment compared to the BL values as seen in figure 4 (-14.28% in CP vs -16.07% in TP). Compared to CP, improvement was much faster in the TP group on day 3 (-32.14% in CP vs -47.32% in TP, p<0.01 vs CP) with further reductions on day 7 (-48.21% CP vs -79.46% TP, p<0.001 vs CP) and day 15 (-67.85% CP vs -96.42% TP, p<0.001 vs CP). The inhibition of throat irritation corresponds to the reduction in throat swelling notices during the same period.

Effect on throat redness (inflammation)

Figure 5: Mean scores of throat inflammation recorded by physicians in the treated (n=20, gray bars) vs control (black bars, n=10) groups on a 0-10 scale (0 = no inflammation).

In figure 5, Inflammation started reducing progressively during the treatment period in both groups, but the reduction was much faster in the TP group. Compared to CP, the decrease in TP was statistically significant from day-3 onwards (p<0.01 vs CP from day-3 onwards).  

Throat redness is an indication of inflammatory pharyngitis. As shown in figure 5, compared to BL, there were no differences between the 2 groups 2h post first treatment (mean -9.09% CP vs -13.63% TP) but this reduction was much faster and stronger in TP group.  Compared to baseline, this decrease was 27.27%, 43.63%, 65.45% in CP vs 56.36%, 84.54%, 99.09% in TP group, on day 3, 7 and 15. The difference was statistically significant (p<0.01) vs CP from day 3 onwards.

Effect on whitish deposit on throat

Figure 6: Visual scoring of whitish deposits (bacterial growth) by physicians in the treated (n=20, gray bars) vs control (black bars, n=10) groups on a 0-10 scale (0 = not observed).

In figure 6, both saline solution and test product help reducing bacterial deposits during the entire treatment period compared to BL values, but this reduction is much faster in the TP group.  The TP vs CP throat surface bacterial growth difference is statistically significant from day-3 onwards (p<0.01 vs CP from day-3 onwards).

Figure 6 shows that here was no significant change in mean scores for the presence of whitish bacterial deposits on the throat surface compared to BL, in both groups on the first day of treatment. From day 3, the results show a sharp fall of symptom score in TP group (-56.38%, p<0.01 vs CP from day 3 onwards) with further reduction on day 7 (-80.85%) and day 15 (-97.87%). In CP group, bacterial growth was also reduced with time indicating a mean decrease of 25.53% on day-3), 53.19% on day-7, and 80.85% on day day-15.

Throat swab analyses

At the start of the study, 9/10 (90%) children in the CP group and 16/20 (80%) in the TP group had a positive throat swab for the presence of bacteria. At the end of the study, only 2/10 (20%) children in the CP group and 3/20 (15%) in the TP group were positive, showing that the bacterial contamination on the throat had sharply decreased in both groups but this decrease was stronger in the TP group.

Use of antibiotics

In the CP saline treated group, 40% children (4/10) required antibiotic therapy for a mean period of 6.3 days compared to only 15% (3/20) in the TP group for a mean period of 5.3 days.

Adverse events

No drug related adverse events were recorded in either group throughout the study.

Overall product assessment

Both products were individually marked by patients and investigators as excellent, very good, good, or fair. The corresponding scores for CP and TP groups were 0%,10%, 65%, 25% for CP and 72%, 25%, 2.5% and 0% for TP group indicating that the test product efficacy was highly appreciated by the users.

Discussion

Pharyngitis is one of the most common upper respiratory tract (URT) infections in children and the incidence is nearly 3-times less common in adults than in children. Infection transmission rate is nearly 50% [18].Even though the origin of pharyngitis in children is mostly viral, secondary bacterial infection is the main cause of infection, tissue destruction, and pharyngitis symptoms [4]. Group A beta-hemolytic streptococcus (GAS) is considered the most pathogenic microorganism in children pharyngitis and represents 20-30% sore throat medical visits [19].

If left untreated, it may cause post streptococcal glomerulonephritis and acute rheumatic fever (ARF) that is currently uncommon in most developed countries, but it remains the leading cause of acquired heart disease, rheumatic mitral stenosis in developing and low-income group countries [20-22]. Antibiotics and anti-inflammatory drugs always constitute first-line of treatments but increasing microbial resistance to antibiotics [23], GAS is becoming a major health threat to children, even in developed countries [24,25].

If the disease cause is not suppressed within 3-5 initial days, multiple proinflammatory cytokines continue releasing and accumulating on the throat surface which further interfere with the tissue repair process and minimize natural defenses. The cytokines are released on the mucosal surface, but they easily enter systemic circulation through the broken mucosa barrier. Significantly higher inflammatory cytokine levels (TNF-α >1pg/ml,IL-6 >7pg/ml) were detected in most of the pharyngitis patients as opposed to healthy controls. Clinical parameters of infection are also significantly correlated with high levels of inflammatory cytokines [26-28].

This indicates that although pharyngitis is a common disease in children, the upper respiratory tract (URT) presents a complex physiopathology involving millions of newly generated virus particles, bacteria, microbial degradation products, cellular debris, dead cells, multiple proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines and other proteins on the infected throat surface. These substances continue damaging URT mucosa, causing pain, irritation, itching, inflammation and poor quality of life. This complex physio-pathological chain of events originated because initially a pathogen has killed a cell and caused a cellular damage! Therefore, an effective treatment should first clean the throat surface contaminants to create an ideal environment for rapid healing. Regenerating cells to reconstitute an intact URT cellular mucosa requires a multi-target approach to clean the URT surface of contaminants using a non-chemical and safe mechanism. If contaminants are cleaned and URT mucosa barrier is re-established, disease symptoms should disappear rapidly.

Unfortunately, almost all currently available and commonly used treatments are mono-target, symptomatic, and contain chemicals which are not cell friendly. Pain killers and NSAIDs, such as paracetamol and ibuprofen, help reduce pain and inflammation; anaesthetics such as topical lidocaine reduces only pain sensation; antibiotics like penicillin or amoxicillin minimize bacterial contamination, but these drugs are not totally safe, especially if given too frequently to children. Paracetamol ingestion in very young children increases the probability of hepatotoxicity [29,30] ibuprofen can damage to the epithelium and the micro-vessels of the gastrointestinal system, vomiting and in extreme cases kidney damage [31]corticosteroid therapy may lead to increased appetite & weight gain, fluid retention, and gastrointestinal disorders [32] ; while the use of antibiotics is not always justified or appropriate and may lead to bacterial resistance, which has become a global health threat and economic burden [33]. Antibiotic-resistant bacteria is identified as an increasing issue responsible for high rate of neonate mortality in South East Asian countries [34,35] and over 99 000 deaths in US [36] Above 700,000 deaths per year worldwide are due to antimicrobial resistance and these figures are increasing each year [37].

Therefore, our aim was to find a simple, non-chemical, mechanical and safe mechanism, which can instantly clean and continue cleaning, all the free-floating contaminants from the throat surface. Glycerol is nearly 18 times more osmotic than sea water yet poorly irritant and cell friendly. We rendered glycerol filmogen by binding and stabilizing glycerol molecules with specific polymeric structures having affinity for glycerol.  Filmogen glycerol is stable for 4-6h and ensures a long-lasting throat cleaning process. As any osmotic liquid attracts surrounding hypotonic liquid, the out coming hypotonic liquid from the throat surface generates a strong liquid flow which detaches and drains surface contaminants, including pro-inflammatory cytokines. To further improve glycerol stability and to disactivate incoming cytokines, we employed dual-acting polymers, capable of trapping glycerol molecules as well as specific cytokines [38]. The results of the observational study surprisingly show that cleaning the throat surface regularly with saline solution in children, is relatively effective in suppressing symptomatic manifestation of pharyngitis. Unfortunately, 4 to 6 salt-water throat gargles per day is difficult for children.  Therefore, just spraying an osmotic yet non-irritant and stable solution on children’s throat surface to get rid of pharyngitis within 2-3 days seems an excellent treatment. Moreover, this product acts nearly instantly as a mechanical antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, analgesic, and totally safe device.

Conclusion

Detaching and draining throat surface adhered bacteria, minimizing inflammation, and keeping the throat surface clean without employing any cytotoxic substance, solely through a simple, safe and instant mechanical device, represents a major advancement to treat one of the most common diseases in children.

Abbreviation list

ELISA Enzyme-Linked Immuno-Sorbent Assay; NaCl  Sodium chlorine;  IL  Interleukin;  BCOP Bovine Corneal Opacity Test; TP Test Product; CP Comparator Product; BL Baseline; URT Upper Respiratory Tract.

Author contributions

All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.

img

Virginia E. Koenig

Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.

img

Delcio G Silva Junior

Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.

img

Ziemlé Clément Méda

Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.

img

Mina Sherif Soliman Georgy

We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.

img

Layla Shojaie

The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.

img

Sing-yung Wu

Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.

img

Orlando Villarreal

Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.

img

Katarzyna Byczkowska

Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.

img

Anthony Kodzo-Grey Venyo

Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.

img

Pedro Marques Gomes

Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.

img

Bernard Terkimbi Utoo

This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.

img

Prof Sherif W Mansour

Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.

img

Hao Jiang

As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.

img

Dr Shiming Tang

Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.

img

Raed Mualem

International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.

img

Andreas Filippaios

Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.

img

Dr Suramya Dhamija

Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.

img

Bruno Chauffert

I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!

img

Baheci Selen

"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".

img

Jesus Simal-Gandara

I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.

img

Douglas Miyazaki

We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.

img

Dr Griffith

I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.

img

Dr Tong Ming Liu

I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.

img

Husain Taha Radhi

I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.

img

S Munshi

Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.

img

Tania Munoz

“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.

img

George Varvatsoulias

Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.

img

Rui Tao

Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.

img

Khurram Arshad

Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.

img

Gomez Barriga Maria Dolores

The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.

img

Lin Shaw Chin

Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.

img

Maria Dolores Gomez Barriga

Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.

img

Dr Maria Dolores Gomez Barriga

Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.

img

Dr Maria Regina Penchyna Nieto

Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.

img

Dr Marcelo Flavio Gomes Jardim Filho

Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”

img

Zsuzsanna Bene

Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner

img

Dr Susan Weiner

My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.

img

Lin-Show Chin

My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.

img

Sonila Qirko

My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.

img

Luiz Sellmann