AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article
*Corresponding Author: Amrit Singh Thiara, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Postboks 4950, Nydalen, Norway.
Citation: B Lindberg, V Videm, T Dahl, G Sorensen, AE Fiane, AS Thiara. Influence of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Circuit on Nutritional Supplements. J Clinical Research and Reports, 3(5); DOI:10.31579/2690-1919/057
Copyright: © 2020 AS Thiara. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 27 February 2020 | Accepted: 13 March 2020 | Published: 18 March 2020
Keywords: ECMO; nutritional; mortality; RPM; blood samples; concentration; LDL; cholesterol
Background The main function of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is to provide systemic perfusion and gas exchange for patients with severe, acute respiratory or cardiac illness. The ECMO system consists of blood pump and a membrane oxygenator. ECMO oxygenator fibers, blood pump and tubing may bind circulating compounds such as drugs and nutritional components during ECMO support. Any loss of vital nutrients due to adsorption to the ECMO circuits may lead to further nutritional debilitation in critical ill patients.
Objective The purpose of study is to analyze the amount of nutritional supplements adsorbed to the ECMO circuit under controlled ex vivo conditions
Methods Six identical ECMO circuits were primed with fresh human whole blood and maintained under physiological conditions at 36°C for 24 hours. A dose of nutritional supplement calculated for a 70 kg patient was added. 150 mL volume was drawn from priming bag for control samples and kept under similar conditions. Blood samples were obtained at predetermined time points and analyzed for concentrations of vitamins, minerals, lipids, and proteins. Statistical analyses were performed using mixed models with robust standard errors, which allows for repeated samples within each setup and incomplete data.
Results No significant differences were found between the ECMO circuits and controls for any of the measured variables: cobalamin, folate, vitamin A, glucose, concentration of minerals, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, total cholesterol, triglycerides, and total proteins. There was an initial decrease and then and increase in the concentration of cobalamin and folate. Vitamin A concentrations decreased in both groups over time. There was a decrease in concentration of glucose and an increased concentration of lactate dehydrogenase over time in both groups.
Conclusion There were no changes in the concentrations of nutritional supplements in an ex vivo ECMO circuit compared to control samples, indicating that parenteral nutrition can be given during ECMO support. However, the time span of this study was limited, and the design made it impossible to investigate any functional and structural changes over time in nutritional supplements which lead to diminished effects through the ECMO circuit.
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is used alongside conventional intensive care to support critically ill patients [1-3]. It permits treatment and recovery during severe cardiac and pulmonary failure. These patients are given multiple drugs that include sedatives, antibiotics, anticoagulants, and vasoactive agents, as well as nutritional supplements. The pharmacokinetics of medication administered during ECMO is affected, with differences being observed between hydrophilic and lipophilic compounds [2, 3].
Nutritional support is of great importance during ECMO given that these patients are some of the most severely ill and are most likely to have a prolonged stay on the intensive care unit. Furthermore, nutritional requirements may increase due to increased protein catabolism secondary to inflammation and acute illness [4]. There is much debate surrounding optimum nutrition support practices for critically ill patients [5, 6]. Patients who receive ECMO support for weeks or have a poor premorbid nutritional status due to chronic disease often need parenteral nutrition. Parenteral nutrition is commonly given as a sterile emulsion of water, protein, lipid, carbohydrate, electrolytes, vitamins, and trace elements. These nutrient groups have different sizes, charge, and binding properties. The use of parenteral nutrition in patients receiving ECMO support remains controversial because of the possibility of lipid infiltration into the oxygenator causing oxygenator failure [7]. As such, patients on ECMO support may have different drug requirements and need a different nutritional strategy.
The ECMO circuit includes both polyvinyl chloride (PVC) tubing and oxygenator polymethylpentene (PMP) fibers which may bind a variety of circulating compounds such as drugs, and possibly nutrients, effectively reducing the bioavailability of these compounds. Any loss of vital nutrients due to adsorption to the ECMO circuits may lead to further nutritional debilitation in critical ill patients. This is important because there is growing evidence that malnutrition in critically ill patients influences morbidity and mortality [4, 8].
In our previous experience with ECMO circuits, we found a white layer deposited on the venous side of the oxygenator over time, we assumed this to consist of drugs or nutrients [9]. In the ECMO circuits we used previously, the centrifugal pump and oxygenator were separated and the venous side of the oxygenator was accessible for visual inspection during ECMO support [9]. It is clear that the present system is much more advanced with integrated pressure, venous oxygen saturation, and temperature sensors. The system is also more portable and compact, but the centrifugal pump and oxygenator are integrated and it is not possible to observe the equipment for color change on the venous side of oxygenator. Therefore, we performed an ex vivo study to examine the amount and type of nutritional supplements adsorbed in the ECMO circuit.
Ethical approval was obtained by the Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics (2017/2545) Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. Informed consent was obtained from each volunteer blood donor for this ex vivo study.
ECMO Circuits:
Six ECMO circuits of HLS advanced 5.0 (MAQUET, Cardiopulmonary, Hirrlingen, Germany) were used in this ex vivo experiment. These circuits have an integrated centrifugal pump and oxygenator (Maquet Cardiopulmonary AG, Rastatt, GY). The centrifugal pump has a simple and very stable radial magnetic shaft. The oxygenator has a polymethylpentene (PMP) diffusion membrane for gas diffusion, which is solid and non-porous solid (1.3m2). The oxygenator has a priming volume of 240 mL and can handle flow rates of 0.5- 5 L/min. Three pressure sensors, a temperature sensor, and a venous measuring-cell for measuring venous oxygenation saturation and hemoglobin are all integrated in these circuits (10). The size and length of Bioline-coated (Maquet Cardiopulmonary AG, Rastatt, GY) tubing in the ECMO circuits was shortened to reduce the priming volume [11].
The system was first primed with 1L Ringer acetate (Fresenius Kabi AB Uppsala, SW), which circulated for five minutes at 3000 rotations per minute (RPM), to ensure that it was free from air-emboli. Most of the Ringer acetate volume was then replaced with fresh human blood donated by volunteers and collected in CPAD (citric acid, sodium citrate, monobasic sodium phosphate, dextrose, and adenine) (Baxter Healthcare Co, Deerfield, IL, USA) collection bags. 5000 I.E Heparin (Leo Pharma, Ballerup, DK) was added to the circuits to keep activated clotting time (ACT) above 200 seconds. The final volume of the circuit was 815 mL (780-930 mL). The circuit flow rate was kept at 2 L/min, sweep-gas and O2 fraction levels were used to maintain blood gases within physiologically normal levels, at a temperature of 36°C.
After activating a nutritional supplement (Fresenius Kabi Norge AS, Halden, Norway) three-chamber bag of 2100 ml, and the required water-soluble vitamins (Soluvit Fresenius) (Fresenius Kabi Norge AS, Halden, Norway), fat-soluble vitamins (Vitalipid Fresenius) (Fresenius Kabi Norge AS, Halden, Norway), and trace elements (Addaven Fresenius) (Fresenius Kabi Norge AS, Halden, Norway) were added (Table 1). The recommended daily dose of nutritional supplement for a person with normal nutritional state or in conditions with mild metabolic stress is 30 mL/kg. Compared to the blood volume of a person weighing 70 kg, the lowest circuit volume was 18%. Thus, adding 15 mL of nutritional supplement to the circuit was estimated to be a similar dose. The nutritional supplement was injected into the ex vivo circuit two minutes after the pump was started.
Control sample:
A 150 mL control sample was drawn from the priming bag of the ECMO circuit after the calculated amount of nutritional supplement had been added and circulated for one minute. Control samples were kept in a glass Erlenmeyer flask (Greiner bio one, Medi-kjemi AS, Asker, Norway) at 36O C, with a cotton plug on top and agitated continuously to ensure even distribution of the nutrients.
Blood samples and Analyses:
All samples were collected from a three-way stopcock placed in the tubing directly after the oxygenator. A baseline sample was drawn five minutes after nutritional supplement infusion. To maintain blood gases within physiologically normal levels, the circuits and control flasks were kept at a temperature of 36°C during the study period. Samples were collected simultaneously from the circuit (oxygenator group) and the control flask (control group) after 1h, 6h, and 24 h. Samples were drawn into sterile VacutainerR glass tubes, containing ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) (Greiner bio one, Medi-kjemi AS, Asker, Norway) citrate sodium, or CTAD (citrate, theophylline, adenosine, and dipyridamole), (Greiner bio one, Medi-kjemi AS, Asker, Norway) according to the substances to be analyzed. Samples were immediately transported to the laboratory (Oslo university hospital, Oslo, Norway) for centrifugation and analysis. A total of 18 nutritional substances were analyzed over the 24-hour period, including vitamins, minerals, lipids, and total protein (Table 2). Blood gas analyses were performed on samples collected in 2 mL purposed syringes, using an ABL90flex analyzer (Radiometer Medical Aps, DK). Lactate dehydrogenase and glucose were also included because they indicate the extent of hemolysis and metabolism.
Statistics
Statistical analyses were performed using mixed models with robust standard errors, which allows for repeated samples within each setup and incomplete data. Model fit was evaluated using residual plots. Data are presented as mean with 95% nonparametric confidence intervals and standard deviation. P-values < 0>
There were no significant differences in blood gas analyses, pH, temperature, and electrolyte composition between the control and oxygenator groups.
Both cobalamin and folate concentrations decreased in the first hour samples, but increased gradually over time in both groups, whereas vitamin A gradually decreased over time from baseline (Figure 1). There were no significant differences in vitamin concentrations between the two groups (cobalamin p = 0.99, folate p = 0.92, vitamin A p = 0.93).
The concentration of potassium, calcium, phosphorus, and magnesium increased in both groups in the samples taken after 24 hours (Table 3). The concentrations of both calcium and magnesium decreased from baseline to one hour, and then gradually increased over time in both groups. The concentration of potassium increased from baseline until 24 hours. There were no significant differences in concentrations of the minerals analyzed between the groups (potassium p = 0.89, calcium p = 0.84, phosphorus p = 0.63, magnesium p = 0.82). There were no significant differences between the groups for HDL cholesterol (p = 0.99), LDL cholesterol (p = 0.98), or total cholesterol (p = 0.94) (Figure 2).
Triglyceride concentrations were unchanged in the oxygenator group and decreased slightly in the control group, but no significant differences were observed between the groups (p = 0.86) (Figure 3). Total protein increased over time for both groups, but with no significant difference between the groups (p = 0.95).
A number of studies have shown significant alterations in the concentrations of different medications in ECMO circuits with silicone or PVC tubing and a microporous oxygenator membrane [12-16]. The centrifugal pump, membrane oxygenator, and PVC tubing comprise a large surface area for potential drug and nutrient adsorption, which may lead to drug and nutrient loss over time [13-16]. The patients on ECMO support are critically ill and they need a sufficient and balanced diet to improve likelihood of a better outcome. ECMO circuits have improved over the years, for example, by the replacement of components with heparin coated PVC tubing and using a polymethylenepentene (PMP) diffusion membrane in the oxygenator. The composition and materials used in the ECMO circuits may play an important role in the binding characteristics of drugs and nutrients [17-21].
In this study the concentration of many substances, including folate and cobalamin, increased over time in both groups (Figure 1). This may be explained by evaporation (at 36°C) from the oxygenator membrane, the priming bag in the circuit, or through the cotton plug in the glass flask. Some studies also defined insensible water loss from the oxygenator by evaporation. This phenomenon of water loss through a membrane has been theorized to be governed by a combination of diffusion and convection [22-24].
There is a possibility that the hydrophilic nature of oxygenator membranes can adsorb hydrophilic vitamins like folate and cobalamin during ECMO support. The hydrophilic vitamins play essential roles in normal biological functions as coenzymes and antioxidants [25]. However, our study did not indicate a great deal of adsorption of these compounds to the ECMO surface. Furthermore, most adults have liver stores of cobalamin that will last for some time before deficiency develops.
The exposure of both the oxygenator group and control group to light may explain the decrease in the concentration of vitamin A across time in both groups (Figure 1); this effect was also shown by Estensen et al. [8]. Vitamin A is known to be very sensitive to light and is degraded by photolysis, even in fat emulsion and light protected bags [26]. We also expected that the lipophilicity of vitamin A would affect its circuit disposition, but we could not find any difference in concentration of vitamin A between the control and oxygenator groups over time.
Glucose is the major energy source for red blood cells and metabolism in the erythrocytes may explain the decrease in glucose concentration and the increase in LDH concentration in both groups. Increased LDH concentration is also directly related to hemolysis in both the oxygenator and control groups, which could also explain the increase of potassium and phosphorus [27]. There was no significant difference between groups in the concentration of any of the analyzed minerals. The observed trend for minerals throughout the experiment could be explained by cellular metabolism and evaporation through the oxygenator membrane and control samples [22-24].
The small decrease in concentration of LDL and HDL in the samples drawn after 1 hour compared to the baseline samples in both groups is difficult to explain (Figure 2). Oxidation may play some role in the decreasing concentration of LDL and HDL, but routine blood tests are unable to measure oxidized products of lipid and proteins. The concentration of total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and HDL cholesterol increased after 6 hours in both groups, and this could be explained by the evaporation process (Figure 2).
Shekar et al [28] reported that protein bound drugs appear to be significantly sequestered in an ex vivo ECMO circuit. However, we could not observe any significant differences in total protein concentration between the groups (Figure 3). Bioline coating is a combination of heparin and albumin, which make the membrane surface more homogenous and hydrophilic thus preventing cell and protein adhesion. It has been shown that a hydrophilic surface has less protein adsorption than a hydrophobic surface [29]. In order to adsorb protein on a hydrophilic surface, the hydration sheath of the surface and protein must be penetrated. Hydrophilic surfaces are more blood-biocompatible on the basis of minimal interaction with blood components [30, 31]. Our present ECMO circuit is more compact, the oxygenator and centrifugal pump are incorporated in the ECMO console, and it is not possible to observe the venous side of the oxygenator, therefore we are totally dependent on the pressure gradient over the oxygenator to evaluate whether there is any deposition. Again, this only indicates how large an area in the oxygenator is clogged and does not provide any information on what kind of deposits there are. So we are unable to explain that white deposit layer seen in the oxygenator in the old ECMO circuits because of the limited period of this study.
The study was designed to assess the influence of an ECMO circuit on nutritional concentration for a limited period of time to evaluate the possibility that nutritional supplements could be adsorbed by the circuit. Since no patient is connected to the circuit, any change in nutrient metabolism or concentration over time is due to the circuit adsorption. The time period of this study is very limited in comparison to the clinical scenario where a continuous infusion of nutrients may last for days or weeks. Another factor missing in this study is the interaction of nutrients and their metabolism inside the patient. This study was only designed to measure the change in concentration of nutrients over time, so any functional and structural changes in nutritional supplements which lead to diminished effects through the ECMO circuit are beyond the scope of our study. Further multiple dose studies are needed to find the saturation point for nutritional components in the ECMO membrane.
In our study, we tried to mimic the clinical situation in a controlled atmosphere by using fresh human blood which allowed us to study the interaction of nutritional supplements with ECMO circuits. In our single dose ex vivo setup we could not find any differences in the concentration of nutritional compounds between the oxygenator group and the control group. This indicates that it is safe to use parenteral nutrition in standard dosage for critically ill patients who need cardiopulmonary support.
There were no changes in the concentrations of nutritional supplements in an ex vivo ECMO circuit compared to control samples, indicating that parenteral nutrition can be given during ECMO. However, the time span of this study was limited, and the design made it impossible to investigate any functional and structural changes over time. Clinical studies over a longer period of time are needed to evaluate any detrimental effects of an ECMO circuit on nutritional supplements.
ECMO | Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
|
PVC | Polyvinyl chloride
|
PMP | Polymethylpentene
|
EDTA | Ethylenediaminetetraacetic
|
CTAD | Citrate, theophylline, adenosine, and dipyridamole
|
HDL | High density lipid
|
LDL | Low density lipid
|
LDH | Lactate dehydrogenase
|
CPAD Citric acid, sodium citrate, monobasic sodium phosphate, dextrose,
and adenine
ACT Activated clotting time
The authors would like to thank Maquet Cariopulmonary AG (Hirrlingen, Germany) for material support for this study. We are grateful to Dr. Claudius Diez, chief medical officer (Acute care therapies) for his material support for this study.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
