AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Case Report
*Corresponding Author: Shoichiro Ozaki, the Institute of Physical and Chemical Research 2-1 Hirosawa,Wakoshi Saitama Japan.
Citation: Shoichiro Ozaki. (2020) in clear water no fish can live. Water purification promote global warming, decline of countries. Biomedical Research and Clinical Reviews. 2(1); DOI: 10.31579/2692-9406/004
Copyright: © 2020 Shoichiro Ozaki, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 04 April 2020 | Accepted: 18 December 2020 | Published: 24 December 2020
Keywords: nox; nox elimination; co2 assimilation; protection of global warming
Carbon dioxide CO2 increasing 2 ppm yearly since developed countries started elimination of NOx and elimination of NP. Global warming is happening by the decrease of CO2 assimilation from insufficient supply of NP fertilyzer. Developed countries hated NOx and NP and are eliminating NOx and NP. Japan is criticized as increasing much CO2. Japan is eliminating NOx,NP completely using much electricity producing 2 billion tone CO2 for the elimination of NOx and NP. Fish production of Japan dropped to 10%. GDP do not increase. If developed countries stop elimination of NOx,NP . CO2 assimilation is activated. Production of grain and fish increase. DGP will increase and global warming will stop.
The earth is warming by the increase of burning of fossil. In the world, 140 billion tone fossil is burned. Three times of CO2 420 billion tone CO2 and 16.8 billion tone NOx (mixture of 90 % NO and 10 % NO2) are produced. Almost 100% of produced CO2 is converted to carbohydrate (later fossil) by CO2 assimilation.
CO2 assimilation
CO2 + H2O + 114 Kcal ——————-> 1/6 C6H12O16 (carbohydrate) + O2
CO2 + H20 + 114 Kcal <—————— Fosil fuel + O2
Burning
Global warming protection ratio (GWPR) = produced CO2/ fixed CO2
Cause of global warming is said to be increase of CO2. CO2 is increasing 2 ppm annually.
About 140 billion tone CO2 is remaining un assimilated. CO2 assimilated CO2 is 280 billion tone. GWPR = 420/280 = 1.55 we can decrease GWPR by decrease of produced CO2 or by increase of fixed CO2. To increase fixed CO2, acceleration of CO2 assimilation by increasing the supply of NP. Developed 7 countries wish to provide clean water and clean air and eliminated NOx and NP. By these eliminating procedure, supply of NP is retarded, CO2 assimilation is retarded and growth of plant is retarded and production of food like grain and fish is retarded, DGP increase is stopped and countries are declining. [1-38]
NOx should be released as it is.
NOx is playing very important role for CO2 assimilation, growth of plant and plankton, climate control (ref 39-65). But developed countries are eliminating NOx by ammonia by the reaction
4 NO + 4NH3 + O2 ———> 4N2 + 6 H2O —— (1)
The reaction (1) is elimination of one fertilizer by other one fertilizer. This is tremendous loss of precious resources. Since this reaction was carried out, Seto inland sea, Japan changed dramatically. Transparency of sea increased. Turbidity by plankton disappeared. Eel glass disappeared. Fish, sell and sea weed production decreased. Fish production of the world increased at developing countries who do not do NOx elimination like China, India and Indonesia. But fish production of developed countries decreased since NOx elimination.
Waste water should be dumped as it is
Developed countries are eliminating NP in waste water. In Japan 2200 waste water clean center were build 117.8 billion kWh electricity (1.16 % of total electricity 10080billion kWh) were used for the operation of this center. For the production of 117.8 billion kWh electricity, 600 thousand tone fuel was burned. If we stop waste water purification. 600 x 3 = 1600 thousand tone CO2 emission is saved. By the operation of this center, Emission of 44.8 thousand tone N and 17.5 thousand tone P is lost. By the elimination of NOx and NP, Fish production of Japan decreased from 12 million tone of 1975 to 2.5 million tone after 1980. Because of decrease of NP concentration of sea water, plankton cannot grow and fish, cell, sea weed cannot grow. Fish cat 20 times plankton. Plankton grow by eating same weight CO2.
By elimination of NP, 12 x 20 = 240 million tone CO2 fix is lost. If Japan stop NOx, NP elimination and increase NP concentration increase and 2.4 billion plankton grow and 2.4 billion tone CO2 is fixed and 12 million tons fish will be produced.
Bon fire is recommend
Slash and burn agriculture is carried out for many thousand years in the world.
Wood is burned and wood turn to the field which can produce crops. Ash produced by burning is said to be effective substance. But main effective substance is NOx. When tree 1000 tone is burned, 1000/ 25 = 40 tone NOx is produced. And 40 tone NOx can grow 40 x 25 = 1000 tone plant [35]. In Japan, 3 billion tone garbage is collected and burned at high temperature incinerator to produce 0.12 billion tone NOx. This NOx is eliminated by ammonia.
In Japan very special law about the garbage incinerator was set up in 2002 by the reason much NOx is produced at lower temperature. By this rule, incinerator must be burned at higher temperature than 800 °C by adding excess fuel to keep higher temperature. Corrugated carton and fallen leaves must be burned at high temperature incinerator. Bon fire is inhibited by the reason bon fire produce much NOx.Burning of rice straw wheat straw is not possible. Big earth quake and tsunami happened in east Japan in 2011. Debris disposal was not allowed to burn on site. Debris disposal must transfer to far away district having high temperature incinerator consuming much fuel and money. Operation of this high temperature incinerator is using much excess fuel releasing much CO2.
Garbage, waste wood, fallen leave, straw should be burned on site producing much fertilizer NOx. Bon fir inhibition rule should be abandoned. [36]
Method to fit Paris agreement
510 billion tones CO2 are now producing in the world.To fix so much CO2, promote plant growth and increase of CO2 fix are essential.
Plant has C/N = 25/1 composition in average. As one molecule N combine with 25 molecule CO2, supply of 510/25 = 20.5 billion tone N is essential. To supply N, NOx should be released to air as it is. NOx is produced 16.8 billion tone. In waste water, estimated 10 billion tone NP are contained. From these NOx,NP, 7 developed countries are eliminating 6 billion tone NOx and 4 billion tone NP.
To stop the increase of CO2, to accelerate CO2 assimilation, 7 developed countries should stop NOx elimination stop NP elimination and do bon fire. Then (6+ 4) x 25 = 250 billion tone CO2 can be fixed. CO2 emission and fix become equal and GWPR (Global Warming Protection Ratio) become 1 and fit Paris agreement. [5, 7, 10, 16, 19, 22, 24, 29, 31- 38]
Comparison of NOx, NP elimination countries and no NOx, NP elimination countries
Developing countries like China, India do not eliminate NOx and NP and release as it is. Electricity price is low. CO2 assimilation is activated. Production of agriculture and fish industry increase. GDP is increasing 6% for 40 consecutive years. China use 106 billion tone CO2 and 4 billion tone NOx effectively and increased fish production to 81.53 million tone.
India use 1billion tone NOx effectively and grain production increased 5 times in 1950—>2010. Population increased 3.8 billion to 12.5 billion in 1951—>2014. On the contrary, 7 developed countries are eliminating NOx,NP and CO2 assimilation is depressed production of grain and fish is depressed. GDP growth rate is low. GWPR is high. Japan is doing NOx, NP elimination most severely. 8 million tone fish production is lost yearly. Fish price is 10 $ /Kg. Japan is losing 0.08 billion $. 6.7 million $ per person. GDP growth rate increased only 1.6 % from 1985 to 2017 the country who use NOx NP are growing and increasing population. The country who eliminate NOx,NP are declining and decreasing population. [32]
CO2em (CO2 emission), CO2fix, CO2em/p (CO2 emission per person), NOxcon(NOx
Concentration at exit gas), W dump (Wastewater dumping), GWPR (global warming protection ratio), GDP (GDP increase ratio) of 11 countries are shown in Table 1
Japan, Germany, UK and Italy are narrow and they cannot fix CO2 produced at there countries. GWPR is over 1. These countries are surrounded by sea. They can fix CO2 by plankton CO2 assimilation by increase of NP concentration of sea. NOx, NP elimination should be stopped
Japan should stop NOx, NP elimination and should not inhibit bon fir.
Japan is criticized as producing much CO2 .Japan producing much CO2 for electricity generation for elimination of NOx, NP.
Japan established very severe law. Every factory must eliminate NOx by NH3 to less than 0.1 g/kWh. Japan eliminate NP in waste water purification center completely using much electricity. Japan producing 12.5 billion tone CO2 and criticized as most CO2 increasing country .Wood and agriculture field can fix 1000 tone CO2 per 1 Km2. Japan land is 3.8 x 105 km2. Fixable CO2 at Japan is 3.5 x 105 x 1000= 3.8 billion tone. Japan increasing 12.5-3.8 = 8.7 billion tone CO2.
GWPR of Japan is 12.5/3.8= 3.3. Japan is using 28 million tone NH3.for the elimination of NOx. 11 million tone butane is used for the preparation of NH3 and generating 33 million tone CO2. Japan also using 118 billion kWh electricity for water purification. If Japan stop NOx,NP elimination,CO2 emission will be reduced to 12.5-1-1= 10.6 billion tone. By using 0.5 billion tone NOx, 0.5x 25= 12.5 billion tone CO2 can be fixed. GWPR will decrease to 10.5/ 12.5 = 0.84. This value is fit to Paris agreement.
Influence of 2019-nCoV on global warming
2019 -nCoV situation is giving big influence on global warming and climate. About 140 billion tone fuel is burned and 420 billion tone CO2 is produced in 2019. By 2019 -n CoV, sight-seeing trip and other activity are restricted. Fuel burning by airplane, car and ship are restricted. Fuel burning will decrease from 140 to 110 billion tone. 30x 3= 90 billion tone CO2 will not produce. 2 ppm CO2 increase will drop to 1.57 ppm. Estimated CO2 concentration at 2021 will be 412-1.57=410.4 ppm
Summary
If developed countries stop NOx,NP elimination, CO2 assimilation is promoted and global warming will stop.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
