AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article
*Corresponding Author: Derya Özalp Ünal, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry Field Crops Central Research Institute, Quality and Technology Department/Plant Food Research Center, Ankara, Turkey. Email: derya.ozalpunal@tarimorman.gov.tr.
Citation: Derya Ozalp Unal, Tevhide Sel, (2024), Impact of Extraction Methods on the Anticancer Potential of Garlic: A Study of White and Black Garlic Extracts, J. Nutrition and Food Processing, 7(13); DOI:10.31579/2637-8914/264
Copyright: © 2024, Derya Ozalp Unal. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 06 September 2024 | Accepted: 20 September 2024 | Published: 01 October 2024
Keywords: garlic; black garlic; cytotoxicity
Colorectal cancer is one of the most common cancers globally, characterized by epithelial transformation and dysregulation. Phytochemicals derived from garlic exhibit anticancer properties by affecting key pathways such as cell proliferation and apoptosis. This study investigates the effects of maceration and cold extraction methods on the bioactive components, antioxidant activities, and anticancer potentials of white and black garlic extracts.
Black garlic, produced through fermentation, has lower moisture and protein content than white garlic, which is attributed to the Maillard reaction. Black garlic, particularly when extracted using the maceration method, shows higher total phenolic and flavonoid content, indicating increased antioxidant activity. In anticancer assays, black garlic extracts, especially those obtained by cold extraction, demonstrate significant cytotoxic effects on Caco-2 cells compared to white garlic extracts. The maceration method provides higher phenolic content but shows variable effects on cell viability, while cold extraction is more effective for black garlic.
These findings highlight how extraction methods affect the bioactivity of garlic extracts and underscore the potential of black garlic extracts in cancer prevention and therapy. Optimizing garlic fermentation and extraction processes could enhance health benefits, and future research should aim to improve these processes.
Colorectal cancer, including colon and rectal cancers, ranks third after breast and lung cancers, with a prevalence of 10% among cancer cases in the world in 2020. Colon cancer is multi-stage, characterized by complex and differentiated, irregular intestinal-epithelial differentiation, proliferation, and apoptosis [1, 2, 3]. According to the World Health Organization, 80% of the world's population uses traditional practices. Therefore, phytochemicals are being extensively researched [4]. As a result, phytochemicals have been reported to exhibit anticarcinogenic properties by influencing the onset and progression of cancer through the regulation of various pathways, including cell proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, angiogenesis, invasion, migration, and metastasis [5, 6, 7]. Herbal remedies with anticancer effects are obtained from vegetables and fruits such as curcumin (turmeric), capsaicin (chili flakes), lycopene (tomatoes), resveratrol (grapes), sulforaphane (broccoli), and allicin (garlic) [8].
Garlic has gained a reputation in many cultures and folklore as a disease-protective therapeutic agent [9]. Raw garlic cloves contain about 65% water, 28
2.1 Chemicals and reagents
2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH•), AlCl3.6H2O, dimethyl sulfoxide, PBS, ethanol, gallic acid, gentamycin, Hydrogen peroxide, hydrochloric acid, lithium sulfate, MTT, methanol, sodium dodecyl sulfate, sodium hydroxide (NaOH), sodium molybdate dihydrate, sodium nitrite (NaNO2), sodium carbonate (Na2CO3), sodium tungstate dihydrate were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co. (St. et al., USA).
2.2 Plant materials and preparation of extracts
In the study, Taskopru garlic, which is unique to Kastamonu province and plays an important role in Turkey's garlic production, was used as a material. White and black garlic were obtained from the company of Umitköy Gurme (Kastamonu/Turkey). The white and black garlic were stored in a cool, dark room before use.
2.3 Cold extraction
The extraction method involved crushing white or black garlic into a paste, adding 20 grams of the paste to 100 ml of methanol, ethanol, or ultra-pure water, and then incubating the mixture in a water bath at 24°C for 2 hours. After centrifugation and filtration, the extracts were stored at +4°C. For cell culture, DMSO was added to methanol or ethanol extracts, while water extracts were mixed with DMEM, and all extracts were stored at +4°C until use [34].
2.4 Maceration
The extraction method by Güdücü (2014) was modified and used. Garlic was crushed into a paste and mixed with methanol, ethanol, or water. The mixture was kept in closed flasks, shaken in a water bath for 5 days, and then centrifuged. The solution was filtered, and extracts were stored at +4°C. Those for cell culture were evaporated and stored at +4°C until use [35].
2.5 Moisture content assay
The moisture content of white/black garlic is determined according to AACC's (2000) Method No. 934-01934-01. The 5 g sample was dried in a drying oven (Protech, model: T T107, N/A) at 105.5°C for 15 hours [36].
2.6 Crude protein assay
AACCI Method Nos determined the protein amounts of the white/black garlic. 46–30 using the nitrogen analyzer (Leco et al.) [37].
2.7 Crude fat assay
The crude fat content of the white/black garlic sample was estimated based on method no. 920-39 guidelines in AACC (2000). The amount of crude oil was determined in the soxhlet device (Gerhardt, Sox-416) using a dried sample (10 g) and n-hexane as the solvent [36].
2.8 Total ash assay
The ash content of white and black garlic was determined using the AACC Method No. 942-05 [38]. First, a 5 g sample was charred until no smoke came out. Next, the sample was burned in a mold oven at 550-600ºC (Mipro, model: MKF, 150601) for 5-6 h or until grayish-white residues were obtained.
2.9 pH assay
10 g of the garlic sample was blended in 100 ml of distilled water to measure pH. They were centrifuged for 3 minutes at 1500 rpm. The solution was filtered through filter paper. A pH meter (HANNA, model: HI 4221) measured the pH value of white and black garlic extracts [39].
2.10 Scavenging activity (DPPH•) assay
The extracts' free radical scavenging activities were determined using the 2, 2—Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH•) method [39]. The absorbance was measured at 515nm by the Shimadzu UV-1202 spectrophotometer.
2.11 Determination of total phenolic content (TPC) assay
The Folin-Ciocalteu method, as determined by Odabasoglu et al. (2004), was utilized to measure the total phenolic content of white and black garlic [40]. The samples were allowed to stand 90 min before measurement at 760 nm using the Shimadzu UV-1202 spectrophotometer. Finally, the total phenol content for white and black garlic was calculated in gallic acid equivalents (mg GAE/g). All the experiments were performed in triplicate.
2.12 Determination of total flavonoid content (TFC) assay
The total flavonoid content in white and black garlic was analyzed by a colorimetric method described by Boateng et al. (2008) [41]. The absorbance at 510 nm was efficiently recorded using the Shimadzu UV-1202 spectrophotometer. The samples were analyzed in three repetitions, and their results were presented as milligrams of rutin equivalent per gram (mg RE/g).
2.13 Cell culture
The Caco-2 cells, originally obtained from ATCC no. HTB-37, were cultured in T75 cm2 flasks in Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium (DMEM) with 4,500 mg/l glucose, 1% Penicillin-Streptomycin, 1% non-essential amino acids, and 10
3.1 Physicochemical properties of white/black garlic
In the study, the moisture content, crude protein, total fat, carbohydrate, and pH values of black garlic were all lower than those of white garlic (p<0>0.05).
| Components | Content in White Garlic | Content in Black Garlic |
| Moisture (%) | 69,33±0,96a | 37,94±0,02b |
| Crude Protein (%) | 11,16±0,91a | 6,93±0,03b |
| Crude Fat (%) | 1,94±0,02a | 0,71+0,02a |
| Total ash (%) | 2,51±0,02a | 2,02+0,01b |
| pH | 6,93±0,03a | 4,67+±0,02b |
*: mean±standard
**: The differences between the same lines are statistically highly significant (p<0>
Table 1. Comparison of contents of physicochemical components between white garlic and black garlic.
3.2 The antioxidant content of white/black garlic
Based on maceration and cold extraction methods, the total phenolic content of the aqueous black garlic extract using cold extraction was significantly higher than other groups (<0>0.05). The highest total flavonoid content was obtained in the aqueous black garlic extract of the maceration extraction (p<0> 11 Total phenolic contents (mg GAE/g) Total flavonoid contents (mg RE/g)Samples Cold Extraction Maceration Cold Extraction Maceration BME 0,88±0,07aABC 2,40±0,12adE 0,60±0,04aA 3,00±0,11aB BET 0,66±0,14bAB 1,58±0,13abCDE 0,58±0,06aA 2,21±0,27bC BSU 1,80±0,14cDE 2,94±0,56deF 0,26±0,03bD 0,41±0,05cDEF SME 1,22±0,07dBCD 3,43±0,26deF 0,58±0,07aE 0,81±0,05dAE SET 0,03±0,01eA 0,67±0,10bAB 0,30±0,02abF 0,32±0,02cDF SSU 3,25±0,09fF 3,72±0,71eF 1,10±0,08bG 1,89±0,03bH
*: GAE = Gallic acid equivalents; RE = Rutin equivalents.
**: Values are mean ± SD.
***: a-d: Values followed by different letters in the row significantly differ by Duncan’s multiple range test (< 0>
****: A-H: Values followed by letters in the same line significantly differ by Duncan’s multiple range test (< 0>
Table 2. The total polyphenol contents of three different white and black garlic extracts were prepared using cold extraction and maceration methods.
3.3 Antioxidant activity of white/black garlic
The DPPH activity of aqueous black garlic was higher than other groups in cold extraction and maceration methods. The highest DPPH activity was obtained in the cold extraction of the aqueous extract of black garlic. In the maceration method, black garlic extracts showed higher DPPH activity than white garlic extracts.
| Samples | Cold Extraction | Maceration | |
| BME | 82,66±14,14aA | 53,07±5,10aBC | |
| BET | 50,83±7,23abB | 33,48±4,41bBD | |
| BSU | 79,89±13,89aC | 11,95±1,21cD | |
| SME | 1836,20±16,19cE | 2456±10,19dF | |
| SET | 34,28±2,11bBD | 40,52±3,84abBD | |
| SSU | 3194,40±15,85dG | 2388,80±3,92dH | |
*: GAE = Gallic acid equivalents
**: Values are mean ± SD.
***: a-d: Values followed by different letters in the row significantly differ by Duncan’s multiple range test (<0>
****: A-H: Values followed by letters in the same line significantly differ by Duncan’s multiple range test (<0>
Table 3. The DPPH activity of three different white and black garlic extracts was prepared with cold extraction and maceration methods (mg GAE/g).
3.3 Cytotoxic effect of white/black garlic
Figure 1. Cytotoxic Effects of White Garlic Extracts Obtained by Cold Extraction (CE) and Maceration (ME) Method on Caco-2 Cells at 24. Hours
Figure 2. Cytotoxic Effects of Black Garlic Extracts Obtained by Cold Extraction (CE) and Maceration (ME) Method on Caco-2 Cells at 24. Hours
Figure 3. Cytotoxic Effects of White Garlic Extracts Obtained by Cold Extraction (CE) and Maceration (ME) Method on Caco-2 Cells at 48. Hours
Figure 4. Cytotoxic Effects of Black Garlic Extracts Obtained by Cold Extraction (CE) and Maceration (ME) Method on Caco-2 Cells at 48. Hours
Figure 5. Cytotoxic Effects of 5-FU on Caco-2 Cells at 24. and 48. Hours
IC50 values of the MTT assay for 24-hour incubation in white garlic extracts obtained by cold extraction method were 62,50 mg/ml BME, 50.00 mg/ml BSU, 67.00 mg/ml BET, 175 mg/ml SME, 87.5 mg/ml SSU, 70 mg/ml SET while for 48-hour incubation were found IC50 value of BME 62.50 mg/ml, BSU 58.33 mg/ml, and BET 65.00 mg/ml. IC50 values of the MTT assay for 24 and 48-hour incubation in white garlic extracts obtained by maceration extraction method observed a proliferative effect. IC50 values of the MTT assay for 24 and 48-hour incubation in black garlic extracts obtained by cold extraction method were SME; 165,38 mg/ml, 305,25 mg/ml, SET; 63.00 mg/ml, 106,50 mg/l, SSU; 80.85 mg/ml, 80.85 mg/ml respectively. IC50 values of the MTT assay for 24 and 48-hour incubation in black garlic extracts obtained by maceration extraction method were SME; 66.85 mg/ml, 72,03 mg/ml, SET; 48.88 mg/ml, 59.60 mg/ml, SSU; 48.88 mg/ml, 56,60 mg/ml respectively. Although the maceration method reduced IC50 values compared to black garlic extracts, methanol and aqueous extracts of black garlic showed proliferative effects with increasing doses.
The research showed that black garlic has a significantly lower average moisture content than white garlic. This is because black garlic is produced through a fermentation process, where garlic is fermented at a specific humidity and within a 60-90°C temperature range for 60 days [43]. During fermentation, the moisture content in garlic is reduced due to microbial activity and chemical transformations, resulting in changes in water content. As a result, the production process of black garlic leads to a notable decrease in moisture content, which affects the density and creates a unique flavor profile in the final product.
In our data, white garlic is found to have a crude protein content of 11.16% ± 0.91, whereas black garlic has a lower level of 6.93% ± 0.03. These results suggest that during the fermentation of black garlic, there is a reduction in protein content, and the Maillard reaction may influence this process. The Maillard reaction is a complex chemical process that converts proteins into amino acids and affects the flavor and color of food. Zhang et al. [44] support the idea that such changes, particularly the lower protein content in black garlic, may be associated with the Maillard reaction, contributing to black garlic's unique flavor profile and compositional changes during fermentation. This aligns with the findings of Zhang et al. [45], which indicate a gradual decrease in amino acid nitrogen during thermal processing. Additionally, white garlic contains more crude fat (1.94%) than black garlic (0.71%), and white garlic also has a higher total ash content (2.51%) than black garlic (2.02%). These changes during thermal processing are also noted by Zhang et al. [45].
The total ash content indicates the mineral content and the decrease observed in black garlic could be due to thermal processing, as seen in similar studies. White garlic has a higher pH (6.93) than black garlic (4.67). The decrease in pH during thermal treatment, as observed by Shin et al. [46] and Bae et al. [47], is consistent with the formation of browning compounds. In the context of similar studies mentioned in your text, the work by Sajid et al. [48] and Otunola et al. [49] also supports the observed differences in moisture, crude protein, crude fat, and ash content between white and black garlic. Additionally, the pH decreases from 6.93 to 4.67, as Choi et al. [50] noted, which is consistent with this study's findings. The higher pH in white garlic might be attributed to the differences in the chemical composition affected by thermal processing.
Various techniques are used to extract primary and secondary metabolites from plants. The traditional method involves solid-liquid extraction, commonly known as maceration, where the plant is soaked in a solvent such as water, alcohol, or oil. Modern extraction methods, such as ultrasound, pressure, and microwave, have been developed to improve performance. These advanced techniques reduce process time, save energy, and minimize solvent usage. This enhances efficiency and can change extraction mechanisms, leading to different outcomes compared to simple maceration [51]. Maceration is a prolonged soaking of a sample in a solvent until its bioactive compounds dissolve [52].
The samples obtained through the maceration method generally exhibit higher total phenolic content than those obtained through cold extraction. Specifically, samples of SME and SSU have higher total phenolic content than BME and BSU. The maceration method typically provides higher total phenolic content due to prolonged contact with the solvent. This allows for more effective dissolution and extraction of phenolic components. Water-based extractions generally yield higher total phenolic content than methanol and ethanol extractions. This is particularly pronounced in the case of the SSU sample. SSU samples generally have higher total phenolic content than BSU samples, suggesting that the fermentation process of black garlic may enhance phenolic components. This difference indicates that phenolic components increase during fermentation, enriching plant constituents through chemical transformations. Additionally, water-based extractions generally yield higher total phenolic content than methanol and ethanol extractions. This may be attributed to water's more effective solubilization of specific phenolic components. White Garlic samples generally have lower total phenolic content than Black Garlic samples. The maceration method usually produces higher total phenolic content than the cold extraction method. This is believed to be associated with the maceration method involving longer contact with the solvent, allowing for more effective dissolution of phenolic components during this extended process. In the study, particularly in both extraction methods, SET has significantly lower total phenolic content than BET. White Garlic samples generally have lower total phenolic content than Black Garlic samples. In the maceration method, SME and SSU samples exhibit significantly higher total phenolic content than White Garlic samples. This difference suggests that the fermentation process of Black garlic may increase phenolic components. Previous studies on black garlic have reported that increased antioxidant capacity may be due to increased polyphenols and S-allyl-cysteine, a compound derived from alliin [53]. Temperature and cooking time increase the antioxidant activity of garlic by enhancing the extraction of bound phenolic compounds. This increases garlic's phytochemicals and antioxidant activity [54].
The methanol extraction of white garlic has shown a significant increase in total flavonoid content compared to the cold extraction method. This suggests that methanol extraction is more effective in extracting flavonoids from white garlic samples. The aqueous extract of black garlic has demonstrated a less pronounced increase than the cold extraction method. This implies that aqueous extraction may have a more limited impact on increasing the flavonoid content in black garlic. The ethanol extract of white garlic exhibited a total flavonoid content like the BME in the cold extraction method. However, extraction using the maceration method has shown an approximately four-fold increase in total flavonoid content. This indicates that ethanol extraction may be more effective in extracting flavonoids from white garlic. Additionally, in the case of black garlic samples subjected to heat treatment, no significant difference has been observed between the two extraction methods.
In the study, the decrease in DPPH activity in white garlic samples with the maceration method could be attributed to several reasons. The maceration method typically involves prolonged contact with the solvent. This extended extraction period might lead to the oxidation or degradation of certain components. Significantly, it can affect the stability of phenolic compounds, resulting in a decrease in DPPH activity. The solvent used in the maceration method may be less effective in extracting components that interact with DPPH radicals. Mainly, water-based solvents might reduce the solubility of phenolic components, contributing to a decrease in DPPH activity. Control of temperature may be more challenging in the maceration method. Elevated temperatures can reduce phenolic compounds' stability, which could mean that cold extraction is more effective at preserving phenolic components, thus maintaining DPPH activity. Different extraction methods can yield different phenolic profiles. The maceration method may be less efficient in extracting specific phenolic compounds, leading to a decrease in DPPH activity. Residues in the solvent used during maceration might react with DPPH radicals, diminishing their effectiveness. Combining these factors with the maceration method may reduce DPPH activity observed in white garlic samples. Changes in DPPH activity should be evaluated considering extraction conditions and the composition of the samples. BET exhibited higher DPPH• scavenging activity than SET (p>0.05), while the lowest activity was found in SET. A study found that the antioxidant activity increased for aqueous extracts as cooking temperatures increased. Conversely, the antioxidant activity decreased for ethanolic extracts as the temperature increased [54].
In 24 hours and 48 hours, the samples of BME, BET, and BSU, obtained through the cold extraction method, exhibit a more effective cytotoxic effect on Caco-2 cancer cells. In contrast, the samples obtained through the maceration method are observed to enhance cell viability. Cold extraction and maceration methods can influence the profiles of bioactive compounds transferring from plant material to the solvent. The more efficient extraction of specific bioactive compounds by cold extraction may lead to a cytotoxic effect on cancer cells. Additionally, varying agitation durations can potentially increase the risk of microbiological contamination. Moreover, different agitation periods are thought to elevate the risk of potential microbiological contamination.
The positive effects of samples obtained through the cold extraction method of SME on cell viability are believed to arise through various mechanisms. The first reason for these effects is that bioactive compounds in black garlic, such as sulfur components, support cell viability by regulating intracellular functions and increasing cell membrane stability. Secondly, the potent antioxidant properties of garlic protect cells from oxidative stress, allowing them to remain healthy and thereby enhancing cell viability. Thirdly, the immunomodulatory effects of black garlic can increase cell viability by optimizing immune responses and strengthening defense mechanisms. Additionally, promoting cell division (proliferation) by black garlic may have contributed to the increased cell viability at 24 hours with dose escalation, reaching over 100% viability at 48 hours. Lastly, the time-dependent increase in proliferative activity indicates that the effects of black garlic on cells intensify over time, becoming more pronounced in the long term. SME obtained through maceration has exhibited a higher proliferative effect at lower doses at 48 hours compared to 24 hours in Caco-2 cells.
Additionally, the impact of maceration-derived SME on cell viability at 24 hours is similar to the effect shown by SME obtained through cold extraction at 48 hours. The extended duration of maceration may facilitate greater penetration of the extract's components into the cells, potentially leading to a more pronounced increase in cell viability. This circumstance could result in a more effective release of beneficial compounds, positively influencing cell viability. However, prolonged maceration might increase the risk of microbial contamination, which can affect the overall quality of the extract and its impact on cell viability.
Overall, the analysis of different extraction methods reveals that cold extraction generally provides better results regarding bioactive compounds' efficacy, including higher antioxidant activity and better cytotoxic effects. However, the choice of extraction method should be carefully considered, considering factors such as time, solvent, and potential contamination risks.
The lower moisture content in black garlic highlights its sensitivity to specific humidity and temperature conditions during fermentation. Concurrently, reductions in protein content and alterations in other nutritional components are attributed to the Maillard reaction's influence. Comparative analysis of extraction methods demonstrates that maceration yields higher total phenol content compared to cold extraction. This finding suggests potential phenolic enrichment during fermentation, as evidenced in SME and SSU samples. The observed cytotoxic and proliferative effects in Caco-2 cells underscore the significance of bioactive compounds and extraction techniques in modulating cell viability. The study emphasizes the necessity for a thorough understanding to optimize garlic fermentation and extraction processes, potentially enhancing the production of bioactive compounds with health benefits. Moreover, while high antioxidant products may aid in cancer defense, their consumption warrants caution among cancer patients.
T.S. and D.O.U. performed the experiments and analyzed their data. All the authors wrote the manuscript, prepared figures, and reviewed the final manuscript.
The study was conducted at Ankara University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology (RIA Laboratory), and Central Research Institute of Field Crops (Nutrition and Health Laboratory of Quality and Technology Department). This research received funding from the Directorate of Scientific Research Projects at Ankara University for the “Postgraduate Thesis Project (Doctorate),” with project number 21L0239022.
Supporting Information is available from the Wiley Online Library or the author.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
