AUCTORES
Research Article
*Corresponding Author: Fares Jaballah, Department of Psychiatry Avicenna (A), Razi Hospital-Mannouba, Tunis El Manar university, Tunisia.
Citation: Jaballah.F, Ferhi.M, Mannaii.J, Zgueb.Y, Jomli.R, (2023), Impact of Antipsychotics on the Sexuality of Patients Diagnosed with Schizophrenia, J, Clinical Case Reports and Studies, 4(4); DOI:10.31579/2690-8808/171
Copyright: ©, 2023, Fares Jaballah. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 16 May 2023 | Accepted: 20 May 2023 | Published: 26 May 2023
Keywords: sexuality; schizophrenia; antipsychotic; side effects; stigmatization
Background: Sexuality is a natural component of human behaviour. The general population has been extensively studied since the first half of the 20th century. On the other hand, regarding patients treated for Schizophrenia (SCZ), discussing sexual disorders was initially considered inappropriate because it was thought they should not be sexually active. Given these findings, this work proposes to study the sexuality of patients with SCZ.
Aim: Our objectives were to assess the sexuality of patients with schizophrenia, to identify factors associated with sexual dysfunction among these patients, and to determine practitioners' attitudes toward the sexuality of our study population.
Methods: This is a cross-sectional study carried out in the psychiatry department of Kairouan (outpatient department), including 46 patients diagnosed with schizophrenia. A pre-established information sheet was completed for each patient recruited, including socio-demographic and clinical data; on the other hand, three scales ensured a sexual psychometric evaluation: Psychotropic-Related Sexual Dysfunction Questionnaire PRSexDQ - SALSEX ), Arizona Sexual Experiences Scale (ASEX) and Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire - Male Clinical Version ( CSFQ -M -C ).
Results: Concerning the evaluation of sexuality according to the scales used, SD according to the PRSexDQ-SALSEX scores was observed in 31 patients (67.4%). According to the ASEX scores, 24 patients (52%) had a SD, and for the total score of the CSFQ-M-C, 27 patients (58.7%) had a SD. We cannot confirm the existence of a relationship between the dose of the current treatment (in chlorpromazine equivalent) used and the results of the test assessing sexuality. In addition to these results, we can deduce the existence of a statistically significant association between the antipsychotic used and the results of the PRSexDO-SALSEX only.
Conclusions: we recommend that screening for SD in patients followed for SCZ should be systematic, regardless of the AP molecule type and dosage. In this regard, we recommend the establishment of a better therapeutic relationship between caregivers and patients followed for SCZ, based on empathy and trust, so that the latter feel comfortable enough to address the sexual dimension in general and SD in particular.
Sexuality is a natural component of human behavior. The general population has been extensively studied since the first half of the 20th century. It is now accepted that sexual activity and satisfaction contribute significantly to a person's quality of life [1,4]. However, for patients with severe and disabling mental disorders such as SCZ, sexual functioning has received little attention in the management, which should be comprehensive [5]. Indeed, discussing sexual disorders with patients with SCZ was initially considered inappropriate because it was thought they should not be sexually active. Even up to the 1970s, some psychiatrists believed that sexual activity contributed to the development of the disorder [6]. Although these beliefs no longer exist, little work has been done to study the sexual behaviour of patients diagnosed with SCZ [2,7]
At least four elements intervene in the sexuality of the patient suffering from SCZ [8]: the disease, the psycho-social factors, the state of bodily health, and the pharmacotherapy (mainly antipsychotics). Antipsychotic treatment is the cornerstone of the treatment, to which psychotherapy and social rehabilitation are added [13]. Antipsychotics are divided into typical antipsychotics (TPA), also known as first-generation antipsychotics, and atypical antipsychotics (APA), named by some authors as second-generation antipsychotics. Talking about antipsychotics (AP) available in Tunisia, according to the official site of the Tunisian central pharmacy [9] and according to several experts [10], the most commonly used antipsychotics are haloperidol, fluphenazine, and chlorpromazine as typical antipsychotics and olanzapine, risperidone, amisulpride and clozapine as atypical antipsychotics.
In addition, sexual dysfunction (SD) has been reported as an adverse effect of all antipsychotics [11]. Thus, it seems important to quantify the prevalence of this adverse effect in the populations of patients diagnosed with SCZ. However, we note that the work carried out in Tunisia are few and concerns minimal samples of patients.
Given these findings, this work proposes to study the sexuality of patients with SCZ. Our objectives were to assess the sexuality of patients with schizophrenia, to identify factors associated with sexual dysfunction among these patients, and to determine practitioners' attitudes toward the sexuality of our study population.
Characteristics of the study: This is a cross-sectional study carried out in the psychiatry department of Kairouan (outpatient department).
We recruited 46 patients at the consultation of the psychiatry department of Ibn-El-Jazzar hospital, according to the following criteria:
Inclusion criteria
Patients followed for SCZ according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5); 18 years of age or older; Male; Clinically stabilized for at least three months and not hospitalized for at least six months; Patients who have given consent to participate in the study.
Non-inclusion criteria
Refusal to participate in the study; Patients followed for another mental disorder; Age under 18 years; Patients suffering from an intellectual development disorder according to the DSM -5 criteria or dementia; Somatic comorbidity that may lead to a sexual disorder (diabetes, another endocrinopathy, neurological disease, poorly balanced cardiovascular disease, etc.); Association of another treatment that may lead to a sexual disorder; Poor compliance.
Conduct of the study
The study was conducted after free and informed oral consent from all participants in compliance with COVID-19 restrictions. Patients were recruited over five months between February and June 2022. A single examiner, a psychiatric resident, conducted the interviews. They took place in the Ibn-El-Jazzar Hospital (outpatient psychiatry) and had an average duration of 1 hour. We filled in the information sheet through the medical record and the interview. Afterwards, we proceeded to the psychometric evaluation.
Evaluation tools
A pre-established information sheet was completed for each patient recruited, including socio-demographic and clinical data and three questions in the therapeutic context: whether sexuality had been previously addressed by the treating physician(s) and, if so, whether there had been any therapeutic intervention. If the patient himself has previously discussed sexuality and if the patient has already been informed of the possibility of iatrogenic DS. A psychometric evaluation with the help of 3 scales:
(Psychotropic-Related Sexual Dysfunction Questionnaire PRSexDQ - SALSEX ) :
Translated as "Psychotropic-Related Sexual Dysfunction Questionnaire", the PRSexDQ -SALSEX is a hetero-questionnaire designed to screen for the effect of psychotropic treatment on the respondent's sex life. This questionnaire first showed good psychometric properties in patients with depression in 2000 and was validated to explore sexual functioning in patients with SCZ in 2008. An SD is defined based on the total score: mild: 1 to 5, with no item≥2; moderate: 6 to 10, meaning one item=2, with no item≥22 3; severe: 11 to 15, meaning one item≥3.
Arizona Sexual Experiences Scale (ASEX):
The Arizona Sexual Experiences Scale (ASEX) is a 5-item scale developed in 2000 that quantifies libido, arousal, vaginal lubrication or penile erection, ability to reach orgasm, and orgasm satisfaction. It assesses sexual activity involving a partner and/or masturbation. It has been validated in outpatients with SCZ and schizoaffective disorder. Items are measured on a 6-point scale [1-6], with higher scores reflecting impaired sexual function. The female and male versions of the ASEX differ on question 3 regarding erection/lubrication; thus, we retained only version 3A, specific to male subjects. DS is defined as a total score≥19, an item with a score ≥5, and three items with a score ≥4.
Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire - Male Clinical Version ( CSFQ -M -C ): The "Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire"
It is a 14-item self-assessment instrument published in 2006 that assesses behaviours and/or problems in the three phases of the sexual response cycle (desire, arousal, orgasm). The CSFQ -M -C provides scores on the five subscales of the original form of the questionnaire. Items 10 and 14 are not specific to any phase of the sexual response cycle as they track pain during erection or orgasm, and the first item reflects pleasure and satisfaction. The 14 items are scored by the patient from 1 to 5 (increasing intensity or frequency), except for items ten and 14, for which the intensity or frequency decreases from 1 to 5. The total score varies from 14 to 70. Higher scores reflect better sexual functioning and vice versa. For the male version, scores below equal to the following thresholds indicate DS: pleasure (item 1): 4; desire /frequency (items 2 and 3): 8; desire/interest (items 4 to 6): 11; excitement/erection (items 7 to 9): 13; orgasm/ ejaculation (items 11 to 13): 13; total score: 47. We chose this questionnaire because it takes all the domains of human sexuality (desire, excitation, pleasure, orgasm ).
Statistical Analysis
The data were entered and analyzed using SPSS ® Statistics version 24. For the qualitative variables, we calculated the simple frequencies and the relative frequencies (percentages). We determined the means, standard deviations, and extreme values for quantitative variables. The Shapiro-Wilk test within the sample verified the normality of the distribution of the continuous variables. The chi-square test of independence is a statistical hypothesis used to determine whether two categorical or nominal variables are likely to be related. In case of invalidity of this test (due to the low number of employees), we used the two-tailed Fisher exact test. The comparison of two averages was carried out using the Student's test and the Mann-Whitney test (in case of non-validity of the normality hypothesis) for independent samples, taking into account the homogeneity of the variances in each case (verified by Levene's test). The comparison of more than two means was carried out by the ANOVA test and the Kruskal-Wallis test (in case of non-validity of the normality hypothesis). The correlation between the dose of the main antipsychotic drug and the sexuality evaluation scores was done by calculating the Bravais- Pearson linear correlation coefficient r. In all statistical tests, the risk of error α was set at 0.05 according to the classical approach, and the p≤0.05 reflect statistically significant results according to the Neyman-Pearson approach; we consider p-values of 0.05 to 0.15 to be close to significance.
Ethical considerations
Before starting our study, we requested the approval of the ethics committee of Ibn -El -Jazzar Hospital (Kairouan)- Sousse university, which was obtained in February 2022. Each patient recruited freely gave oral consent based on complete, precise, properly conveyed and understood information. We also ensured the anonymity and confidentiality of the collected data and declared that we had no conflict of interest in this study.
Table 1: Socio-demographic data
Table 2: Clinical Data
According to our results, our population had other treatments associated with the antipsychotic; they are summarized in Table 3.
Table 3: Psychotropic drugs used other than antipsychotics
Concerning the notion of therapeutic education by physicians on the adverse effects of APs during initiation or after therapeutic adaptation (dosage/molecules), 36.96% confirmed (n=17) this role of a physician, while 63.04
Since sexuality is a dimension of life, several factors can intervene [8]. We tried to limit the confounding bias of these factors by not including patients with somatic comorbidities that could lead to a sexual disorder; patients taking a treatment that could induce a sexual side effect; those suffering from an intellectual development disorder; and those with poor or doubtful compliance. In addition, we attempted to strengthen the probity of our study by using three questionnaires exploring the sexual life of each patient to include all dimensions of human sexuality and to screen for possible consequences in case of SD related or not to the intake of a AP. Finally, we would like to emphasize that the sample size of our study (46 patients) is comparable to the majority of published studies on the sexuality of patients followed for SCZ.
Relating to the reporting bias, in the context of the doctor-patient relationship, there is an important notion that particularly concerns our study: the notion of « the unspoken ». Several authors [12] have studied the most frequent domains and the determinants of unspoken words, and it turns out that the genital sphere and sexuality are the most frequent domains, particularly in the countries of the Arab-Muslim world. [13] Thus, given the sensitivity of the subject investigated, the proportions of SD in our results may be underestimated because they are under-reported by the patients questioned. Regarding the possibility of polytherapy, in our sample, 58% of patients were under several psychotropic treatments. This raises the problem of distinguishing the effects of the various other treatments on the sexuality of the patients.
Therapeutic management of sexuality
According to a review of the literature, the data of our work reflecting the management and approach of SD in patients with schizophrenia appear to be consistent with the research on this topic. Indeed, the prevalence of SD in the general population is significant and still important in patients with SCZ. According to several authors (14, 5), SD in this population is grossly underestimated by treating physicians. Bernard et al. confirm that the prevalence of SD in their sample was 24% when subjects spoke spontaneously about it and 63% when they were questioned by a physician who discussed sexuality. In fact, in treated and stabilized patients, the prevalence of SD ranges from 15% to 88%, according to the studies of Kockott et al [15]. This prevalence is probably underestimated, as the patients in this study spontaneously reported sexual problems in 15% of cases.
In contrast, this incidence rises to 88% if the physician asks the question. Some more recent studies [16, 17] have found higher incidences of SD, up to 80-90% for patients followed for SCZ, regardless of sex or age. These studies' increase in SD rates is probably related to using self-questionnaires.
In this context, Dr Lazard [18] discussed in his work on schizophrenia and sexual dysfunctions published in 2008, the hostility towards systematic screening for SD, and he put forward several explanatory hypotheses: Physicians' lack of interest in sexuality, lack of skills in sexology; Fear that is addressing sexuality is perceived as a factor of decompensation by poor compliance with treatment, or even induce hostility towards treatment; Physicians objectify that addressing sexuality with patients followed for SCZ would not bring reliable data. Thus, we can hypothesize that this low incidence of spontaneous discussion of SD problems and the ignorance of sexuality on the part of the treating physicians are the origin of poor and inadequate management.
According to our results, 30.4% of the candidates (n=14) confirmed that they used five phosphodiesterase inhibitors without a medical prescription; on the other hand, 69.6% of the patients (n=32) denied this. The ignorance of sexuality can explain these results by the practitioners and the tendency of the patients to solve their problems in all intimacy by referring to their cultural and social beliefs, especially with the effectiveness of these molecules with SD. In this context, Gopalakrishnan et al. studied the efficacy and tolerability of sildenafil in 32 patients with iatrogenic SD secondary to AP by antipsychotics. (19) One of the basic inclusion criteria for the study was being sexually active with a spouse at the time of the study. Patients ranged in age from 20 to 45 years. According to this work, 31 patients reported a significant improvement in the number of erections, the duration of penetration, as well as satisfaction during intercourse after 15 days of treatment. Most patients completed the study (96%), and no participant left due to an adverse drug reaction.
Factors that may be associated with sexual dysfunction according to possible associations
First, we note that the rate of SD according to the three scales we used is not the same. These disparities in the rate of SD could be explained by: the sensitivity of the different scales. The PRSexDQ- SALSEX may be more sensitive than the ASEX or the CSFQ-M-C in detecting SD, hence its higher positivity rate. We note that the range of responses for each item of the PRSexDQ-SALSEX has only four possibilities, whereas there are six possibilities for each item of the ASEX and five for the CSFQ-M-C. The wording of the questions in the scales can also explain this. Because the answer choices for the PRSexDQ-SALSEX items involve some degree of approximation (less than 25%, 25-75%, more than 75% of the time), whereas for the CSFQ- M-C, the answer choices are more precise (≤ once/month, once/month to twice/week, ≥ twice/week).
According to our results, we can confirm the existence of an association between the family of antipsychotics used and the results of the PRSexDO-SALSEX test showing SD. Indeed, a Chinese study published in 2011 that included 100 patients [20] noted that the ASEX scores were higher in the group of patients under TAP, which shows that sexuality in patients depends on the class of the molecule prescribed. Indeed, these patients received antipsychotic monotherapy with clozapine (n = 37), risperidone (n = 30), chlorpromazine (n = 21), haloperidol (n = 9) and olanzapine (n = 3). Referring to the ASEX questionnaire, patients were divided into two groups, the confirmed SD group (n = 47) with a mean ASEX score of 23.57 (± 3.02) and the normal sexual functioning group (n = 53) with a mean ASEX score of 13.19 (± 2.36). The clinical characteristics of the two groups showed no significant differences in age, duration of current medication, age of onset or chlorpromazine dose equivalent.
A review of the literature regarding SDs in people with schizophrenia developed by Peter.M in 2007 [21] highlighted that some of the articles reviewed point out that AAPs seem to have a better tolerance for sexuality than TAPs. Also, according to this work, the role of prolactin is still poorly known, as SD is also found in patients treated with APs that do not increase prolactin levels.
According to Bitner et al [22], the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus may be a site of erectile activity mediated by the D4 dopamine receptor. Since a selective antagonist of D4 diminished this activity by APs, he could hypothesize that antipsychotics with a high affinity for the D4 receptor (such as clozapine) have a higher risk of SD.
A 2012 review by Luciana. V of strategies for treating antipsychotic-induced sexual dysfunction and/or hyperprolactinemia in patients with schizophrenia showed that managing AP-induced SD and/or hyperprolactinemia must be handled very carefully. Indeed, various APs carry a risk of SD despite a minimal effect on prolactinoma, hence switching to an antipsychotic with a better profile (such as aripiprazole) seems desirable. In the same context, the use of 5-IPDEs may be useful.
Regarding the association of SD and chlorpromazine dose equivalent: We could not confirm the existence of an association between the dose of the current treatment (in chlorpromazine) and the results of the sexuality assessment test. Indeed, a cross-sectional study developed in China by Norio et al [23] and published in 2012 investigating the association between chlorpromazine doses and the prevalence of SD in patients with Schizophrenia (N = 191) treated with aripiprazole, haloperidol, olanzapine and risperidone suggested a correlation between the equivalent chlorpromazine dose of AP in only some types of SD (such as increased sexual desire and ejaculatory dysfunction ) in these patients. Furthermore, in this same research framework, another cross-sectional study developed by BoBes.J et al. in Spain and published online in 2010 [24] in schizophrenic patients treated with haloperidol, olanzapine, quetiapine or risperidone (N = 636) showed that the prevalence of sexual dysfunction appeared to be dose-dependent for certain molecules such as olanzapine and risperidone. A review summarises the management of AP-related adverse effects by Labed et al. In 2020 [25], dose reduction of antipsychotic drugs appear to be recommended as first-line treatment for sexual dysfunction. Finally, although SD can be increased dose-dependent with APs, further investigation is needed into the threshold doses of each molecule.
We also recommend that screening for SD in patients being followed for SCZ should be systematic, regardless of AP molecule type and dosage. This could contribute to the sexual health of these patients, but above all, avoid poor compliance with treatment, especially as the patients in our sample rarely raise the subject of sexuality with their carers. Similarly, we remind that the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) recommends using AAPs as first-line treatment for patients followed for SCZ, as they are less likely to cause adverse effects, particularly sexual ones, according to current literature. However, these results were not verified in our work.
Concerning the information provided to patients by the treating physicians about sexual side effects, the results are of paramount importance: the patient is rarely made aware of this possibility at the start of treatment. We, therefore, recommend that patients being followed for SCZ should be given full and accurate information about possible iatrogenic SD, reassuring them of the treatment options available in this case.
Our study has shown that practitioners tend to neglect screening for SD in patients followed for schizophrenia, which may be responsible for poor compliance in a significant proportion of our sample. We found that more than half of our population suffered from SD using all three scales. We also confirmed the existence of a statistically significant association between the family of antipsychotics prescribed and the PRSexDQ-SALSEX scale.
In conclusion, screening for SD in patients followed for SCZ should be systematic, regardless of the AP molecule type and dosage. In this regard, we recommend the establishment of a better therapeutic relationship between caregivers and patients followed for SCZ, based on empathy and trust, so that the latter feel comfortable enough to address the sexual dimension in general and SD in particular.
This study was conducted following the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki, and the confidentiality of patients' data was respected. Written informed consent was obtained from the participant.
The patient has given consent for possible publication of this case report.
No conflict of interest to disclose
None
All the authors contributed to the study's development. All the authors have reviewed the statistical analysis and validated the manuscript's final version.
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article. Further enquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Not commissioned, externally peer reviewed.
The completion of this research project would not have been possible without the contributions and support of all authors. We are deeply grateful to all those who played a role in the success of this project. The first author, Dr Fares Jaballah would like to thank all colleagues on Avicenna Department, RAZI Hospital-Tunisia for their invaluable input and support during my intership.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.