AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article
*Corresponding Author: Atabong Emmanuel Njingu, Kalfou Integrated Health Center, Kalfou Cameroon.
Citation: Atabong Emmanuel Njingu, Fombo Enjeh Jabbossung, Nyuydzedze Stanley Sunjo, Stephen Eyong Njang Ayongi, Gougni Kenne Lioni. (2022). Health-Related Quality of Life and Its Determinants Among Recreational Drug Users in A Rural Area in Cameroon: A Cross-Sectional Study. Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Research. 5(6); DOI:10.31579/2768-0487/087
Copyright: © 2022 Janos Vincze. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 13 June 2022 | Accepted: 04 July 2022 | Published: 15 July 2022
Keywords: recreational drugs; quality of life; whoqol-bref
Background: This study was aimed to evaluate the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and its drivers among recreational drug users, compared to non-users using WHOQOL-BREF.
Methods: A total of 246 recreational drug users and 141 non-recreational drug users were recruited using consecutive sampling of adults in the community. Socio-demographic data, data related to recreational drug use and HRQoL were collected. Data were compared using t-test, analysis of variance and chi-square test. Determinants of HRQoL were obtained using multivariate regression models.
Results: The mean overall quality of life (OQOL) score was significantly higher for non-recreational drug users compared to users (75.89 ± 22.64 vs 61.08 ± 23.94, respectively, p < 0.001), non-users as well had significantly higher mean scores across all four domains of WHOQOL-BREF. After multivariable adjustment, use of recreational drugs negatively affected the psychological domain (β=-4.17, 95% CI -8.22 to -0,13) and the environmental domain (β=-4.47, 95% CI -8.48 to -0.45). Years of recreational drug use affected the social relationship domain (β=-0.55, 95% CI -0.88 to -0.22), OQOL (β=-0.57, 95% CI -0.94 to -0.19), and general health satisfaction (β=-0.71, 95% CI -1.08 to -0.35). Number of recreational drugs used contributed to poorer physical health (β=-1.45, 95% CI -2.57 to -0.33), psychological domain (β=-2.04, 95% CI -3.18 to -0.91), social relationship domain (β=-1.87, 95% CI -3.39 to -0.35) as well as overall quality of life (β=-2.13, 95% CI -3.89 to -0.37). Besides recreational drugs, monthly income also affected physical health (β=5.17, 95% CI 2.96 to 7.38), psychological domain (β=3.34, 95% CI 1.10 to 5.58), environmental domain (β=2.64, 95% CI 0.42 to 4.85) and also the OQOL (β=4.16, 95% CI 0.70 to 7.62).
Conclusions: Our findings suggest that, recreational drugs significantly negatively affect the health-related quality of life of its users. People who use multiple recreational drugs and longer years of recreational drug use had a more widespread effect across the health domains. Higher monthly income could improve the HRQoL of recreational drug users.
Legal and illegal drugs used without medical supervision are referred to as recreational drugs [1]. Alcohol and other substances have for many years been utilized for recreational reasons. Alcohol falls in the category of recreational drugs known as depressants, other categories of recreational drugs includes; analgesics, stimulants and hallucinogens [1,2]. Drug abuse is growing public health problem in both low and high income countries, according world drug report in 2018, the number of deaths linked to drug abuse increased by 60 between the year 2000 and 2018 [3–7].
Cameroon is no different from the rest of the world when it comes to drug abuse. A study in 1996 found a diverse use of recreational drugs among males and female of all age groups [8], another study in Cameroon reported the prevalence of recreational drug use to be 1.64% among medical and nursing students in 2018 [9].
One of the important impacts of recreational drug use on the society is the negative effects on the health of its users. Use of alcohol and other recreational drugs have been identified as risk factors for non-communicable diseases, mental health problems, accidents and high risk behaviours. Drug use also inflicts heavy financial burden on individuals and community [10–13].
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), quality of life (QoL) refers to an individual’s perception of his or her position in life, in the context of the culture and value systems in which he or she lives, and in relation to his or her goals, expectations, standards and concerns [14,15]. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is at times used interchangeably used with QoL, however, some authors consider it to be different or a subset of QoL [16,17]. HRQoL can be defined as an individual’s assessment of his/her experiences, and expectations in health-related aspects of his/her life, notably; physical function, psychological well-being, subjective symptoms, social and cognitive functions. It is also thought to extend to the person’s perception of health correlates like health risks, social support, cultural beliefs and economic status [16–18].
Recreational drug use and the health effects of recreational drug use have been shown to affect the HRQoL of individuals [19,20]. In Cameroon, several studies [15,21–24] have been carried out to evaluate the QoL of people living with chronic health conditions. However, no study has been carried out to assess the QoL of recreational drug users in Cameroon. Our study fills this gap by evaluating the HRQoL and factors affecting the HRQoL of recreational drug users compared to non-users of recreational drugs in Cameroon.
Materials and Methods
Study design and setting
This was a community-based, observational, cross-sectional study. This study was conducted from March 2021 to May 2021 in Mamfe. Mamfe is a border town in the Southwest Region of Cameroon that is about 74 km away from Nigeria. Mamfe has a population of about 34,225 inhabitants spread over a surface area of 744 square kilometers (population density 46 persons/km2). Mamfe is one of the areas affected by the ongoing socio-political crisis in Cameroon [25,26].
Sampling technique and study participants
A target sample size of 374 was obtained using a sample size calculator [27]. A margin of error of ±5%, confidence level of 95% and a 50% response distribution were used. A population of 13,690 people was used since about 40% of the 34,225 inhabitants of Mamfe are adults [26], this study had 387 participants.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Consecutive sampling was used to recruit all individuals aged 18 years and above, that are permanent residents of Mamfe or have lived in Mamfe for at least 12 months and consented to the study. We excluded adults who were sick at the time of the study, those with chronic diseases, did not understand English and those with physical or mental disability.
Definition of terms and variables
Recreational drugs were defined as legal and illegal drugs used without medical supervision [1]. By this definition, alcohol, cigarettes, opioids and other illicit drugs were considered as creational drugs in this study
A recreational drug user was defined as someone who has consumed any recreational drug over the past 12 months [28]. A single question was used to assess this. There is evidence that using a single question for this purpose is valid for screening and evaluation of recreational drugs use [29]. The list of drugs included; alcohol, cigarettes, shisha, cannabis, cocaine, amphetamines, heroin, ecstasy, tramadol, diazepam and sleeping pills, lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), erection enhancing drugs such as sildenafil. A non-recreational drug user was defined as an individual that has never used drugs for recreational purposes.
Units of alcohol consumed per week was calculated as 5% x volume of beer (in ml) consumed per week/1000 [30]. The average concentration of alcohol in alcoholic beer in Cameroon is 5%.
Physical type of employment generally referred to unskilled jobs such as farming, laborer, and other activities that involves mass lifting of > 20 kg. Non-physical type employment referred to skilled jobs and other employment types with mass lifting of < 20>
Study procedures and data collection
Individuals who met the eligibility criteria and consented to the study were interviewed using a pretested structured questionnaire. A door-to-door approach was used to locate participants. To avoid double counting, each individual was asked if they had filled a similar questionnaire prior to recruitment for the study. Literate persons were allowed to fill the questionnaire by themselves after receiving instructions on how to fill the questionnaire. A face-to-face interview was done for illiterate people. Data collected were sociodemographic information, information on the use of recreational drugs and quality of life assessment of participants. Questionnaire was available in English.
The following sociodemographic variables were collected; gender, age, marital status (single, married or widowed), residence (internally displaced, not internally displaced), employment status (employed, housewife, student, unemployed/retired), employment type (physical, non-physical, or combined), level of education (no education, primary, secondary and tertiary education) and average monthly income (FCFA300 000 FCFA (US$1=FCFA530)). Information on the use of recreational drugs, types and frequency of drug used were also collected [15].
The WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire [32] was used to assess the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of participants. The WHOQOL-BREF tool is a generic self-report HRQoL questionnaire. It was designed to be cross-culturally applicable and has been used in clinical practice and research to assess health outcomes, follow-up progression of a disease and compare health states. Compared to other HRQoL evaluation tools such as Short Form 36, WHOQOL-BREF was found to have good-to-excellent psychometric properties across health states [33,34].
The WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire consists of 26 questions, of which 24 are divided into four domains; physical health domain (PHD), psychological domain (PSD), environmental domain (END) and social relationships domain (SRD). The other two items in the questionnaire evaluates an individual’s satisfaction with their state of health (general health score) and individual’s self-perceived quality of life (OQoL score) [32]. The WHOQOL-BREF tool was chosen because of its cross-cultural applicability, low administrative burden, sensitivity and availability in English which is the official language of the study population. Each domain consists of several facets and questions are scored in a 5-point Likert response scale. Item scores obtained were transformed into domain scores using the procedure described in WHOQOL-BREF manual [32]. Scores are converted on a scale of 0 to 100 to allow for comparisons to be made across domains with unequal number of items. Scores were organized such that higher scores imply better health-related quality of life [32,35].
Data management and data analysis
Data collected were entered into Microsoft excel 2016, were cleaned, exported and was analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS v20). Continuous variables were summarized using mean and standard deviation. Categorical variables were summarized using counts and percentages. Sociodemographic variables were compared between recreational drug users and non-recreational drug users using Pearson’s chi-square or Fisher’s exact test. Mean quality of life scores across various domains were compared using independent t-test. We used multivariate linear regression models to determine factors independently associated with WHOQOL-BREF scores. Statistical significance was set at p 0.05
A total of 246 recreational drug users and 141 non-recreational drug users were recruited for this study. The mean age of participants was 34.54 years (SD = 10.96), the male to female ratio was 1.10:1, majority of the study population were single (48.70 %) and employed (55.30%). Details of the sociodemographic features of recreational drug users and non-recreational drug users are shown in Table 1. Higher proportion of males (64.23%) compared to females used recreational drugs, people who were single (48.36%), employed (54.07%), have average monthly income of 50,000 FCFA (50.0%), attained secondary education (45.93%) and those with physical type of employment (48.78%) had higher proportion of recreational drug use.
Table 1: Comparison of sociodemographic characteristics of recreational drug users and non-users The proportions, frequencies, means and SDs are displayed. Chi-square test (for 2×N tables) and t-test (for continuous variables) were used to compare across the two groups. p-value 0.05 indicated statistically significant difference.
Table 2: WHO-BREF domain score differences between recreational and non-recreational drug users Values are represented in mean and standard deviation (SD). Independent sample t-test was used for comparison, p value 0.05 indicated statistically significant difference
Table 3: Association of sociodemographic variables with WHOQOL-BREF domains Proportions were compared using independent sample t-test and one-way ANOVA. p0.005 indicated significant difference.
Table 4 shows the results of multivariate linear regression analysis of factors independently associated with WHOQOL-BREF scores. After adjustments for possible confounding factors, increasing age was associated with better SRD (β = 0.39, p 0.05) and poorer GHS (β = -0.34, p 0.05). Using recreational drugs affected the PSD (β = -4.17, p 0.05) and END (β = -4.47, p 0.05). The SRD (β = -0.55, p 0.01), OQOL (β = -0.57, p 0.01) and GHS (β = -0.71, p 0.001) were significantly influenced by years of recreational drug use. The use of multiple recreational drugs influenced the PHD (β = -1.45, p 0.05), PSD (β = -2.04, p 0.001), SRD (β = -1.87, p 0.05) and the OQOL (β = -2.13, p 0.05). Higher pack years of smoking was associated with poorer PSD (β = -0.32, p 0.05), SRD (β = -0.61, p 0.01) and OQOL (β = -0.67, p 0.01). Higher monthly income was associated with significantly better PHD (β = 5.17, p 0.001), PSD (β = 3.34, p 0.01), END (β = 2.64, p 0.05) and OQOL (β = 4.16, p 0.05).
β = beta coefficient, CI = confidence interval
*** Beta coefficient significant at 0.001
** Beta coefficient significant at 0.01
* Beta coefficient significant at 0.05
Table 4: Multivariate regression model showing factors independently associated with WHOQOL-BREF scores
The aim of this study was to evaluate the HRQoL and its determinants among recreational drug users compared to non-recreational drug users. We found that non-recreational drug users had significantly better scores across all four WHOQOL-BREF domains, as well as significantly better OQOL and GHS when compared to recreational drug users. Other factors such as number and years of recreational drug use, age, gender, marital status and average monthly income also affected the WHOQOL-BREF domain scores. After adjustments, increasing age predicted better PHD but poorer GHS, use of recreational drug was associated with poorer PSD and END. As the years of recreational drug use increased the SRD, OQOL and GHS worsened. Using multiple recreational drugs predicted poorer PHD, PSD, SRD and OQOL. Higher pack years of smoking was associated with poorer PSD, SRD and OQOL. Being internally displaced predicted poorer END. And higher monthly income positively influenced PHD, PSD, END and OQOL.
Our study demonstrated that non-recreational drug users have significantly better mean scores across WHOQOL-BREF domains compared to non-users, this is in line with other studies [36–38] carried out in western countries. Unlike other studies [36–38] in which the psychological domain was the most impaired among recreational drug users, our study showed that the environmental domain of the WHOQOL-BREF was the most impaired amongst drug users. This could be due to the fact that this study was carried out in an area with an ongoing civil war, people living in war zones will likely assess their living environment to be unsafe and unhealthy [39]. Even among non-recreational drug users in this study, the environmental domain had the least score.
The study by Domingo-Salvany et al [40] as well as other western studies [15,34–36] clearly demonstrated that QOL of drug users is made worse by consumption of multiple recreational drugs, longer years of recreational drug use, older age, low average monthly income and low level of education, our findings in this study are similar to what was reported by these studies. The
lower QOL of drug users compared to non-users cannot only be explained by duration, number or amount of drugs use but also by the negative effects of drug use in several areas of their lives with varying severity [38].
In this study, females had superior mean WHOQOL-BREF domain scores when compared to men. This differs from other studies [36,40] where females were reported to have poorer QOL. The difference could be due to the fact that far lower proportion (less than half) of women in this study used recreational drugs compared to the other studies and most (over 75%) of the men in this study were drug users. Hence there were fewer females with the effect of recreational drug use on their health.
After controlling for other factors using multiple logistic regression, number of recreational drugs used was the only factor independently associated with worse physical health score, while monthly income independently predicted better PHD, monthly income was also associated with better PSD, END and OQOL after controlling for other factors. This is similar to findings by Moreira et al in Brazil. According to this study, people with low monthly income were more likely to have poor QOL independent of other factors such as use of recreational drugs [36].
Use of recreational drugs, number of recreational drugs use, years of recreational drug use and pack years of smoking each independently predicted poorer PSD and/or SRD. This finding is similar to other studies in Africa and western countries [15,36–38]. Drug users have been shown to have high prevalence of psychiatric disorders which independently influence their psychological and overall QOL [38].
In this study, apart from average monthly income which positively influence the END, use of recreational drugs and whether an individual is internally displaced or not each independently predicted poor environmental health after controlling for other factors. In another study [36], use of recreational did not affect the END scores. Probable loss of perception of problems related to the environment was suggested as the reason for high END scores among users. In our study being internally displaced and the ongoing sociopolitical crisis in the setting of this study heavily impaired the environmental health of participants.
Our study had some limitations; we used a cross-sectional design which impaired our ability to determine causality which would have been possible with a prospective cohort design. Our findings should be generalized with caution as they likely reflect the situation of a rural area that is affected by civil war. In addition, we did not explicitly assess if there were other ongoing events in the lives of participants that could influenced their responses other than use of recreational drugs. Furthermore, all measures of the WHOQOL-BREF were based on self-reports, the veracity of the responses of individuals cannot be controlled. Finally, there are no population modalities for the use of WHO-BREF in Cameroon. The lack of reference for Cameroon limited our ability to precisely analyse health outcomes.
We however reduced some of the limitations, by choosing a widely validated tool that was developed to be applied across different cultures and allows for comparisons throughout various settings. Future studies to develop a tool that is adapted to assess HRQoL for our environment could go a long way to improve the evaluation of the impact of recreational drug use on the HRQoL of individuals in this environment.
Our findings suggest that, recreational drugs impedes the HRQoL of its users. Number of recreational drugs used, years of drug use, pack years of smoking, age and average monthly income each independently influenced the HRQoL of participants. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first of its kind in Cameroon to provide evidence of diminished HRQoL among recreational drug users in Cameroon. This could serve as basis for appropriate health promotion and sensitization programs to curb the use of recreational drugs which are proven to be detrimental to the health of its users.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to all the health personnel in Mamfe who assisted us in collecting data in the community. We equally thankful to all those who took part in this study.
Abbreviations
QOL ; Quality of life
HRQoL ; Health-related quality of life
WHO ; World Health Organization
WHOQOL-BREF; World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief
OQOL ; Overall quality of life
GHS ; General health satisfaction
SPSS ; Statistical Package for Social Sciences
CI ; Confidence interval
SD ; Standard deviation
Author’s contributions
AEN: conception and design of the study, data collection, data interpretation and data analysis, drafting and review of the manuscript. FEJ: conception and design of the study, data collection, review of the manuscript. AEN and NSS data analysis, data interpretation, drafting and review of the manuscript. GKL and SENA data interpretation, SENA drafting and review of the manuscript. All authors revised and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Funding
This work did not receive any funding.
Availability of data materials
The dataset is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of the Faculty of Health Sciences of the University of Buea. Administrative approvals were obtained from the Southwest Regional Delegation of Public Health and the District Medical Officer for Mamfe. Participants also gave written consent to willingly participate in this study after careful explanation of the study scope and purpose. Data were kept completely anonymous and confidentiality was maintained during processing of questionnaires.
Consent for publication
Not applicable
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interest.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
