AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article
*Corresponding Author: Fé Fernández Hernández, Faculty of Medical Science “10 de Octubre”, at University of Medical Science of Havana. Havana, Cuba. Postal Code 10500.
Citation: Fé F Hernández, Efraín S González. (2022). Full Validation of A New Formula Estimating The Smoking Economic Burden By Morbidity. Biomedical Research and Clinical Reviews. 6(1); DOI: 10.31579/2692-9406/090
Copyright: © 2022 Fé Fernández Hernández, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attributiosn License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 21 October 2021 | Accepted: 30 December 2021 | Published: 12 January 2022
Keywords: estimation; smoking economic burden; morbidity
Introduction: In the Health Economy research context usually researches are assuming that the probability of the morbidity attributable to smoking is equal to the probability of the health spend attributable to smoking. Also is attributed the whole health spend because of active smokers to smoking. To solve this limitation, the authors suggested a new rate to measure the smoking economic burden by morbidity.
Objective: To evaluate the feasibility from a new rate to measure the smoking economic burden by morbidity.
Methods: Was made a bibliographic research to describe the estimation process from the smoking economic burden by morbidity. Were utilized as theoretical method the analysis and synthesis, the comparative and the systematization. As empiric methods were used the Principle of Multiplication and the bibliographic research.
Results: The rate designed solves the limitation identified during the research about the estimation of the smoking economic burden by morbidity.
Conclusion: The new rate will provide a better estimation from the smoking economic burden by morbidity. It application will may identify the role of active smokers and passive smokers in the formation of the smoking economic burden. However, it application must be agree to the supposes identified.
Smoking is a significant health market weakness close related to tobacco consumption intensity. The smoking impact over the health finance management carries to big fiscal spends agree to the tobacco consumption intensity too [1].
In the Health Economy context is usually used the illness burden attributable to smoking (morbidity close related to smoking probability´s) as similar to the smoking economic burden by morbidity (probability to health spend because of smoking) [2].
This limitation is given because there isn´t a single generalized form estimating the smoking economic burden by morbidity because this risk factor is researched as other risk factor without take account the self particular characterstic from smoking. Then, the precise measurement from this rate is a significant present necessity for epidemiologic researches and health Budget administration too [3].
Smoking is given by the tobacco consumption [4] Smoking impact over the Public Health mean san opportunity cost because of financial pressure to the health financial administration attributable to tobacco consumption [5].
People agree to tobacco consumption support that smoke is a personal and single decision. However, this argument don´t take account the smoker dependence to tobacco consumption becuse of nicotine. Also make reference to the effective employment because of the tobacco economy. Nevertheless, this argument don´t consider the labor productivity lose attributable to smoking given by labor time lose smoking and smoker earlier death before retire age [6]
Also is supported that earlier smoker death carries to fiscal save because of reduction in retirement payments. However, this argument don´t take account all social costs attributable to smoking before the smoker death [7].
Acknowledge the whole smoking economic impact over the health financial administration is very important. As consequence is important a precise measurement from this economic impact to design and apply effective policies or the smoking control [8,9].
WHO is agree increasing tobacco price by tax. This economic policy must provide a context where fiscal income would increase and tobacco consumption would reduce because of the general behavior from these economic goods as ordinaries and necessaries goods [10] Thus is evidenced the real necessity from the precise estimation from the smoking economic burden for the Public Health and the whole society too [11].
In Cuba, fiscal income related to tobacco consumption, the economic heavy from the tobacco industry over the external trade and the social and cultural conditions close related to tobacco consumption don´t make easy the effective smoking control [12].
Cuba had developed severl researches describing the relation between tobacco consumption, Price and other economic variables. However, Cuba hasn´t an actualized cost – benefit relation quantified to support an economic policy for an effective reduction from the tobacco consumption. This situation is given by the unknowledge from the smoking economic burden measurement´s. (13) Also had been researched the use from the tributary policy for the smoking control, showing the fesiability from this policy type to reduce the tobacco consumption. Nevertheless, anyone from these researches shows the whole smoking economic burden over the Public Health [14,15].
From the ten main death causes in Cuba seven are close related to tobacco consumption. All of them are no – communicable illnesses [16]. Patients attention because of these morbidity and mortality causes are mainly present in health institutions with middle or high especialization, carring to more expensive health services because of smoking [17].
Cuban´s goverment organizations had established several measures for the smoking control. However, the empiric evidence shows that those measures aren´t applied wholy [18].
By other side, the salarial measures adopted since had contributed to raise the net salary. For example, in 2010 the middle salary in Cuba was $448.00. In 2018 was $777.00. This increasing represent more than 9% growing annualy. However, since 1990´s until 2019 the trade minor price from tobacco was the same, only $7.00 the box of 20 units. This price represent less than $0.30 USD per box.
This position had done more available the tobacco products carring to increase the effective demand of health services attributables to smoking. However, the unknow from the smoking economic burden by morbidity don´t may make a detailled valuation from the smoking impact over the health services administration [19].
Estimating the smoking economic impact are used mainly two ways. One is using the standart cost agree to the illness protocol. This method is used in limited context as health institution, for example, because of the unavailable generalization use for big populational research, for example, esstimating the smoking economc impact over the health services in a whole economy. At same time, this situation conditiones the effective capability from fiscal authorities for the smoking control [20].
The second way is agree to the economic burden rate. This method looks for determine the expected relative value from the Public Health spend attributable to smoking. This method is largely used in populational researches and is the main supporting the designing and application of public policies for the smoking control. This is the main method analyzed in this research.
Smoking economic burden by morbidity agree to the illness burden
The illness burden is an epidemiologic concept to measure the morbidity impacto ver the researched population. In relative terms is equivaent to the probability from the selected morbidity in the reearched population.
In the analysis from the illness burden is included the analysis from the economic burden from the morbidity cause or risk factor researched. This ter mis equivalent to the probability from the cost attributable to the morbidity cause or risk factor researched [21].
Respect to smoking researching as risk factor, the morbidity attributable is a necessary condition but not sufficient determining the smoking economic burden by morbidity. Since the economic point of view, the illness burden attributable to smoking determines the potential demand of health services because of smoking while the economic burden by morbidity determines the effective demand of health services attributable to smoking [22].
Much researches uses the rate for illness burden attributable to smoking as the rate for the economic burden attributable to smoking by morbidity. This practice carries to a methodologic mistake and may make less trustable the researches results. Especifically this position is assumed when researches uses the economic burden because of active smokers as similar of the smoking economic burden by morbidity. Nevertheless, not all health spend because of active smokers is attributable to smoking and from no smokers health spend a portion is attributable to smoking because of passive smokers [22].
Then, the smoking economic burden by morbidity because of active smokers is always less than the illness burden attributable to smoking. Using both rate as similar carries to over value the true smoking economic impact over the health services.
As example of that is a research from 2016 in Latin America. In this case authors used the rate from the economic burden by morbidity in a way wich interpretation suggests that illness burden attributable to smoking because of active smokers is equal to the whole smoking economic burden by morbidity [23] Other authors as Ariel Barchad [24], Isaranuwatchai [25], Lightwood y Glantz [26], Sung Max [27] had developed similar researches with similar procedure too. This condition shows the necessity to remake the rate estimating the smoking economic burden by morbidity because of active smokers.
In Cuba had been developed several researches related to the smoking economic impact. Much from these researches compare the health spends because of active smokers and no active smokers assuming that the difference between then is attributable to smoking. By this way is assumed the same position previosly analyzed where the health spend by active smokers is used as equal to the health spends attributable to smoking [28].
These researches are suppousing that smoking dimension depend only from the active smoker existence witout consider the relation between the tobacco consumption intensity and the added affect from smoking in the morbidity attributable and the economic burden by morbidity too [28].
By other side, in the analyze from the smoking economic burden by morbidity is usually excluded the passive smokers. This condition makes that the smoking economic burden by morbidity isn´t showed wholy. In this case is important appoint that passive smoking is determined by active smoking because the tobacco active consumption determines the active smoking wich determines the passive smoking. Then, the tobacco active consumption and the smokers number are main variables explaining the smoking economic burden by morbidity and not only the smokers number [22].
Passive smoking plays an important role estimating the smoking economic burden by morbidity and particularly in the cost – benefit relation. Passive smokers induce to health spend attributable to smoking agree to the economic burden attributable to smoking because of active smokers. Also, passive smokers don´t carry to fiscal income because they don´t by tobacco. However, passive smokers spends attributable to smoking may be very significant too [29].
Abstracting, since the economic point of view the main limitation identified estimating the smoking economic burden by morbidity is given by attributating the whole smoking economic burden by morbidity to actie smokers. That´s why a precise estimation from the smoking economic burden by morbidity demand two main modification:
To answer these limitations Fé Fernández Hernández and Efraín Sánchez González introduced new conceptions that carried to propouse significant transformations estimating the smoking economic burden by morbidity agree to the Medical Journal of Pinar del Río. ([29] Nevertheless, it is necessary to valorate the designed rate to measure the smoking economic burden by morbidity. This is the main objective from this research.
Was made a bibliographic research to describe the estimation process from the smoking economic burden by morbidity. Were utilized as theoretical method the analysis and synthesis, the comparative and the systematization. As empiric methods were used the Principle of Multiplication and the bibliographic research.
The economic burden attributable to someone risk factor is determined by the happening of three independient successes at same time: the existence of some person affected by the researched risk factor, the existence of the morbidity related to the researched risk factor and the effective demand of health services attributable to the researched risk factor. (22)
Each one from these successes has a probability associated. Agree to the Multiplication Principle, if someone success A is determined by the happening of several independient successes at same time, the probability associated to A is equal to the product of the probabilities from all successes determining the A happening [30, 31].
The smoking economic burden over the Public Health
All tobacco consumption damages the human health. Then, the illness burden by smoking born since the minimun tobacco consumption. In the smoking economic burden by morbidity case´s isn´t thus because this rate is also determined by the effective demand of health services attributable to smoking. Given that the potential demand is higher than the effective demand, then, the effective demand of health services attributable to smoking is less than the potential demand of health services attributable to the same risk factor. In epidemiologic terms means that the illness burden attributable to smoking is higher than the economic burden attributable to smoking by morbidity all rate measured in reative terms as Fé Fernández Hernández and Efraín Sánchez González suggested.
However, there is a direct proportional relation between the effective demand of health servics attributable to smoking and the tobacco consumption over the minimun tobacco consumption determining the existence of the effective demand of health services attributable to smoking. This means that higher tobacco consumption over that minimun consumption means higher effective demand of health services attributable to smoking. Also means that with the growing of tobacco consumption the difference between the illness burden attributable to smoking and the smoking economic burden by morbidity will be closing.
The cited authors introduces two main concepts showed in following.
Agree to authors, the mathematic fuction ger determined by the tobacco consumption (tc) has two parts
Ger(tc) = 0; tc ≤ mec and
Ger(tc) = 1 – mec/tc; tc>mec (29)
Analizing ger
The tobacco consumption intensity and the morbidity attributable to smoking save a proportional relation with a dynamic in the same sense. As result, the effective demand of health services too because the close relaton between these variables. (30) In analytic terms should be equivalent to support that:
By other side the several impact from smoking over the morbidity at same time determine a desacelerated growing because the same patient only recieve a single health service at same time including when must afford several morbidity consequences attributable to smoking at same time. This phenomena is more evident while tobacco consumption increase because of the growing in the morbidity attributable [30]. In analytic terms should be equivalent to support that:
By other side, it is evident that the smoking economic burden by morbidity is determined by the illness burden attributable to smoking and that´s the main reason of why those rate are close related. However, the accumulative efect from smoking over morbidity suggest a faster growing from the smoking economic burden by morbidity agree to tobacco consumption intensity. This analysis close to the previos may support that:
Abstracting, the rate suggested estimating the effective demand of health services attributable to smoking is trustable and contexted. Also is agree to the main economic and epidemiologic characteristics from smoking related to the estimation of the smoking economic burden by morbidity. As result, the smoking economic burden by morbidity because of active smoker must be calculated as the multiplication of the probability of the morbidity close related to smoking, the probability to has an active smoker and the probability of the effective demand of health services attributable to smoking given by ger.
It is very important take account that exposition to tobacco smoke by smoking or passive exposition is a main variable to understand the smoking economic burden by morbidity behavior´s. (22) That´s why passive smoking needs be explicated by tobacco consumption and tobacco passive exposition at same time [20].
Null tobacco consumption means null smoking economic burden by morbidity because of passive smokers. This is because the smoking economic burden by morbidity because of passive smokers is determined by the smoking economic burden by morbidity because of active smokers agree to passive exposition rate. Then, assuming that
The whole suggested rate estimating the smoking economic burden by morbidity is aproppiate [20].
The new formula suggested estimating the smoking economic burden by morbidity also:
However, the most important from the new formula is given by identify the difference between the potential and the effective demand of health services both attributable to smoking. This suggestion solve the limitation identified previosly in this research. Nevertheless, ger rate isn´t perfect because other rate with similar characteristic may obtain similar results but it easy useful suggest their utilization estimating the smoking economic burden by morbidity.
The new formulation was partially utilized in the Cuban context limited to active smokers for 2019. The result showed that the 11.1% from the health spend in 2019 was attributable to active smoking. If in the cited research should be used the illness burden attributable to smoking as similar to the smoking economic burden by morbidity because of active smoker the rate value would be 16.4%. This difference means an over valuation from the smoking economic burden by morbidity because of active smoker in 5.3%, agree to the journal ECronicon Pulmonology and Respiratory Medicine [20].
Moreover the number result, the new formula solve the necessity to acknowledge and include the effective demand of health services attributable to smoking estimating the whole smoking economic burden by morbidity.
The new rate will provide a better estimation from the smoking economic burden by morbidity. It application will may identify the role of active smokers and passive smokers in the formation of the smoking economic burden. However, it application must be agree to the supposes identified.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
