AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article
*Corresponding Author: Santos Santos Aise, Intituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía (INN). La Habana Cuba
Citation: Aisel S. Santos., Morales Chacón LM., Narjara C. Ferrán., Dearriba Romanidy MU., Liana P. Hernández., et all. (2021) Factors Associated with Short-Term Seizure Recurrence in Extratemporal Epilepsy Surgery. J. Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. 9(3); DOI:10.31579/2578-8868/196
Copyright: © 2021 Santos Santos Aise, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of The Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited
Received: 14 July 2021 | Accepted: 29 July 2021 | Published: 04 August 2021
Keywords: extratemporal epilepsy surgery; prognosis, predictors
Introduction: Drug-resistant extratemporal epilepsy is the second cause of referral to epilepsy surgery.
Objectives: To identify factors associated with short-term seizure recurrence following extratemporal epilepsy surgery.
Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective study of 19 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for drug-resistant extratemporal epilepsy at the National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery of Havana, Cuba, from September 2014 to October 2019. All patients had at least one year of postoperative follow-up. Fisher's exact test was used to search for an association between dichotomous variables. A value of p≤0.05 was considered significant.
Results: After one year of follow-up, seizure freedom reached 31.6% (Engel I) and 36.8% showed significant improvement in the number of seizures (Engel II). The frontal location (p=0.046) and incomplete resection of the epileptogenic zone (p=0.017), bilateral interictal discharges on the preoperative electroencephalogram (EEG) (p=0.017), the presence of epileptiform discharges on the postsurgical EEG (p=0.001), and the occurrence of seizures after the sixth month of surgery (p=0.001), were associated with seizures recurrence.
Conclusions: After one year, 31.6% of patients operated on for extratemporal epilepsy were seizure-free. The incomplete resection of the epileptogenic zone and the presence of epileptogenic discharges in the postsurgical EEG, and the presence of seizures after the sixth month of surgery were the most significant factors of seizure recurrence.
Estimations consider that at least 50 million people live with epilepsy worldwide, 5 million of whom are from the "Americas".[1] Close to one-third of cases do not respond to pharmacological treatment, and of these, between 10 and 15% are candidates for surgery. [2]
20% of patients who underwent surgery showed the extratemporal location, predominantly in the frontal lobe. [3, 4] The outcomes of different series of extratemporal surgery are varied. West et al.(5)found 30 to 50% of seizure freedom (Engel I), Morales et al. [6], in Cuba, found 52.6% of patients in Engel I during the first year and 41.1
We performed a retrospective study of 19 consecutive patients operated for drug-resistant extratemporal epilepsy at the National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery of Havana from September 2014 to October 2019, with a comprehensive epilepsy surgery program. All the patients had at least one year post-surgery follow-up.
The information was gathered from the patients’ medical records. The variables evaluated as potential predictors were: a) age at diagnosis of epilepsy and at the time of surgery; b) medical history (initial precipitating factors related to epilepsy in the prenatal, perinatal, or postnatal stage); c) seizure semiology and monthly frequency; d) preoperative electroencephalogram (interictal EEG, ictal onset) and neuroimaging findings; e) type of surgery; f) results of intraoperative electrocorticography (ECoG) before and after surgery; g) anatomopathological studies; h) postoperative electroencephalogram (EEG) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as well as i) the occurrence of seizures before and after six months. [4-7, 9]
Preoperative evaluation [6,10]
All patients were evaluated in a non-invasive way, with prolonged video-EEG monitoring and electrodes placed according to the international 10-20 system and additional electrodes depending on the topography of the epileptogenic zone (EZ). The interictal epileptiform activity was classified as ipsilateral whenever it was consistent with the ictal onset or bilateral zone when it occurred in both hemispheres. 1.5T and/or 3T high-field MRI with epilepsy protocol was performed in all patients and interictal and ictal single-photon emission tomography (SPECT) was co-registered to MRI in patients with normal MRI.
Surgical Procedure
Depending on the type of surgical procedure used, these were classified as resection, disconnection, or a combination of both. [5]A pre-surgical ECoG was performed and patterns were classified as specific, according to criteria based on Boonyapisit 2003: a) isolated spikes, amplitude> 200 mV; b) bursts duration> 0.5 s, amplitude> 200 μV, frequency ±7–10 Hz, regular firing; c) paroxysmal fast: burst duration> 0.5 s, frequency> 10 Hz, regular firing and d)runs of slow repetitive spikes: duration> 0.5 s, amplitude> 200 μV, frequency <7>
Postoperative prognosis and follow-up [10]
Anatomopathological studies of the samples were performed and classified as focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) according to the ILAE classification, (12) descriptive or unspecified.
Six months after surgery, an MRI was performed. It was evaluated whether the resection of the estimated epileptogenic zone (EZ) was complete or incomplete. It was considered a complete resection when it was possible to completely resect the identified ictal area and the cortex that showed epileptiform activity on EcoG. In patients in whom the MRI showed a lesion, a total resection of said lesion guided by ECoG with the absence of epileptiform activity at the edges of the resection. An EEG was also performed to analyze the topography and the presence or absence of epileptiform activity. After the first year, the cases were classified according to the Engel Class Outcome System, Engle I was considered a good prognosis (seizure freedom) and Engel II to IV a recurrence of seizures, short-term follow-up (one year). [4,7]
Statistical analysis
The information was stored in a Microsoft Excel database, and its analysis was carried out in the SPSS system version 20.1.
The categorical variables were presented in the form of frequencies and percentages. Fisher's Exact Test was used to associate the dichotomous variables. A value of p≤0.05 was considered significant.
Ethical aspects
This research was approved by the Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery Ethics Committee, which acted following the current laws and regulations issued by the Ministry of Public Health of Cuba (MINSAP) and follows the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki of the World Medical Association for Human Medical Research.
Of the 19 patients studied, 16 were male and three females, ranging in age between 13 and 34 years. Most of them (57.9 %) were distributed in the age group of 16 to 30 years.
After one year of follow-up, 31.6 % of the patients were seizure-free (Engel I), seven patients (36.8 %) presented significant seizure improvement (Engel II). The rest were distributed between Engel III (21.1%) and Engel IV (10.5%).
It was observed a predominance of patients with over 15 years from the time of their epilepsy diagnosis until surgery with 13 patients (68.4 %), 8 of which (42.1 %), with more than 20 years of evolution of their disease. (Table 1)
Focal-onset seizures with impaired awareness were the most frequent, 16 patients (84.2 %); likewise, 16 presented seizures with evolution to a bilateral tonic-clonic at some point in their disease. 57.9% of the cases presented more than 20 monthly seizures before surgery. None of these variables was statistically associated with postoperative evolution.
Patients with a history such as hypoxia and head trauma (6 patients = 31.6%) were distributed on the Engel II scale upwards.
The ictal onset in the frontal lobe predominated, 13 patients (68.4%), 11 presented recurrence of seizures. Both had a statistical association in the short term.
Interictal epileptiform activity occurred bilaterally in 8 patients (42.1 %), all of them presented recurrence of seizures after surgery, which was statistically associated (p = 0.017).
On MRI, 57.9% of the patients presented lesions, primarily distributed between Engel I and II. Six non-lesional patients underwent ictal and interictal SPECT and subsequent co-registration with MRI. The focal hyperperfusion found in all of them was consistent with the rest of the evaluation.
Electrocorticography was performed in 16 patients (84.2%), who predominantly were classified as Engel I and Engel II, with classic patterns in the presurgical ECoG and the prevalence of the pattern of the repetitive spikes (68.4%). Table 2.
Resective surgical techniques were given preference, 9 patients for a 47.4 %, prevailing the ECoG-guided lesionectomy, six patients (31.6 %), and subtotal lobar resections. Six patients (31.6 %) benefited from the combination of resective and disconnective techniques. Disconnection surgery was used in only four patients: anterior corpus callosotomy in three patients and multiple subpial transections (MST) in one patient with ZE in the primary motor area.
The postsurgical ECoG showed that the presurgical pattern disappeared in 8 patients (42.1%), and in other 8 patients it was modified.
The most frequent anatomopathological diagnosis was the focal cortical dysplasia type IA with six patients (31.6 %), distributed across Engel classes II to IV, followed by FCD IIA. Out of those that evolved without seizures after surgery (Engel I), two patients were classified as FCD type III B (associated with tumors) and two patients as descriptive results.
In the postsurgical EEG, 11 patients (57.9 %) presented interictal epileptiform discharges (IED), all presented recurrence of seizures after surgery (Engel II-IV), which was statistically significant (p = 0.001). Table 3
Patients with incomplete resection of the EZ (73.7%) predominated in class II or higher of the Engel scale (seizure recurrence), finding a statistical association between these variables (p = 0.017).
Of the 14 patients who presented seizures six months after surgery, 13 evolved from Engel II to Engel IV, which was statistically significant (p = 0.001).
Regarding the postoperative complications, the evolution was very favorable, with a low rate of complications related to the surgical procedure in 4 patients (21.1%), a cingulate infarction, 2 cerebrospinal fluid fistulas, and an epidural hematoma.
In the present research, most cases were male, and the prevailing age group that of 16 to 30 years. Other studies show similar data, such as one that was carried out in China [13] with 82 patients operated on for frontal lobe epilepsy, male sex predominated (59.8%), and the mean age was 19.1 years. Similarly, in a meta-analysis carried out in Cincinnati, USA, with 2028 patients, the male sex predominates (54.3 %), and the mean age is 10.24 ± 1.11 years.[14] Similar results were found in the Cuban series of Morales et al.[6] with 55% male predominance and a mean age of 24.1 ± 10.1 (ranging 5 - 47 years).
The 2019 Cochrane review, [5] reports 30 to 50% seizure freedom after extratemporal epilepsy surgery. In another investigation of frontal lobe surgery, [4] seizure freedom is obtained in 45%, 34%, 26%, 20% and 14% at the end of the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th years respectively after the surgery. Morales et al. [6], in Cuba, find 52.6 % of the patients in Engel I in the 1st year and 41.1
A small sample that reduces the possibility of generalizing the results from the statistical point of view.
The frontal location of the epileptogenic zone and its incomplete resection, the bilateral interictal activity in the presurgical EEG, interictal epileptiform discharges in the postsurgical electroencephalogram, and the presence of seizures after the sixth month after surgery was statistically associated with seizure recurrence.
A favorable evolution was obtained in more than half of the cases, grouped into the Engel classes I and II.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
