AUCTORES
Research Article
*Corresponding Author: NOKAM TAGUEMNE spouse ABENA Marie Elvire, Head of Department of Odontostomatology, Yaounde Center Hospital. Tel 237 699975202.
Citation: Marie Elvire N. A., Nseme E. Eric, Edouma B. Jacques, Emilenne Muriel N. K, Olive Nicole N. M., et al. (2022). Evaluation of the Conformity of Care of Patients Hospitalized for Cervico-Facial Odontogenic Cellulitis in Yaounde-Cameroon. J Dentistry and Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, 5(3); DOI:10.31579/2643-6612/037
Copyright: © 2022, Nseme Etouckey Eric and Nokam Abena Marie Elvire. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 24 June 2022 | Accepted: 20 July 2022 | Published: 01 August 2022
Keywords: cervicofacial cellulitis; drug management; hospitalization; compliance; Yaounde
Introduction: Cervicofacial odontogenic cellulitis is a poly-bacterial inflammatory process of the cellulo-adipal tissue involving the dental organ. The severity of its clinical picture can compromise its treatment and cause death. The vital prognosis of a hospitalized patient depends on the conformity of his management conditions. It is in this perspective that this study was carried out with the aim of evaluating the conformity of care of patients hospitalised for odontogenic cervico-facial cellulitis in Yaounde.
Material and method: This was a descriptive and retrospective study that took place over 7 months during 2022, including all patients hospitalised for cervico-facial cellulitis of oral origin during a 3-year period, from 1er January 2019 to 31 December 2021 at the Yaoundé Central Hospital (HCY), the Yaoundé University Hospital (CHUY) and the Efoulan District Hospital (HDE). Socio-demographic characteristics, clinical and therapeutic aspects, and compliance with management were recorded. Data collection was done with a pre-designed form and the results were processed and analysed using SPSS version 26.0 and Excel 2013.
Results: Out of 134 patient records collected, 67% were male with a sex ratio of 2.04. The age range Age group The age group [20-40] represented 56% of the cases. About 52.2% of the patients worked in the informal sector, followed by 25.4% of pupils and students. Trismus was present in 92.5% of cases. Cellulitis was diffuse in 81.3% of cases, suppurative in 73.9% and acute in 71.6%. Dual therapy with 99.3% Penicillin and 97.8% Imidazole was used in 69.4% of cases; the first level of Paracetamol was used in 94% as an analgesic. Antimalarial drugs were associated with the initial treatment in 5.2% of cases. Incision and drainage used in 52% of cases. The prescribed care was notified and regularly administered in 73.1% of cases; the case fatality rate was 15.7%, with sepsis as the cause in 80% of cases. All the records included the identification, the reason for hospitalisation and the therapeutic prescription. The elements of the hospitalization report, the prescription established at discharge and the conclusion of the clinical examination were contained in 84.3%, 94.8% and 97.8% of cases respectively.
Conclusion: cellulitis affects resourceful men. Even if the compliance of the management conditions was found to be fair, the prognosis is vital with the severity of the infection.
Cervicofacial cellulitis due to dental causes is a polymicrobial infection of the celluloid tissues, the severity of which can lead to death [1]. The severity of the initial or ongoing clinical picture requires hospitalisation and makes their management a real clinical challenge [2]. The vital prognosis of a patient hospitalised for cellulitis depends on the compliance of his or her management conditions; and the total consolidation of his or her state of health depends on the evaluation of his or her permanent or temporary injuries [3]. Compliance in forensic medicine is the quality of what is accurate and meets the established standards [3]. Indeed, the vital prognosis of a patient hospitalised for cellulitis depends on the conformity of the conditions of his care; also, the total consolidation of his state of health depends on the evaluation of his permanent or temporary prejudices [4]. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the conformity of care of patients hospitalised for cervico-facial odontogenic cellulitis in the Cameroonian context
This was a descriptive and retrospective study that was carried out during 4 months in 2022 in the odontostomatology and ENT departments of the Yaounde University Hospital, the Efoulan District Hospital and the Yaounde Central Hospital. The study included all the records of patients who were hospitalised for cervico-facial cellulitis of oral origin during the 3 years from 1 January 2019 to 31 December 2021. The data collected were socio-demographic characteristics, clinical and therapeutic aspects and compliance of the record. Any record with at least 6 of the 11 elements of a good medical record was considered compliant. The data were collected using a pre-designed form and taking into consideration the overall ethical rules relating to the respect of confidentiality and protection of patient information. The data were entered and analysed using SPSS version 26.0 and Excel 2013 for the diagrams.
Out of 134 records selected, 67% were male with a sex ratio of 2.03. The age group [20-40] represented 56% of the cases. About 52.2% of the patients worked in the informal sector, followed by 25.4% of pupils and students.
About 31.3% of the inpatients came to the clinic alone, while 68.7% were referred.
On the clinical level
The most striking clinical signs were asthenia in all patients and trismus in 124 patients (92.5%) (figure 1).
Figure 1: Distribution according to clinical signs.
According to the clinical stages, 81.3% of patients had diffuse cellulitis. Following the evolution of the cellulitis, the acute form was found in 71.6% of cases. The suppurative stage was found in 73.9% of cases. Table 1 shows the different forms of cellulitis. The most common aetiology was dental caries with a total of 114 cases (85%), followed by dental trauma in 8% of cases and dental care in 7% of cases (Table 1).
Clinical forms | Number (N=134) | Percentage (%) |
Topographic | ||
Circumscribed | 26 | 19.4 |
Diffuse | 109 | 81.3 |
Clinic | ||
Acute | 96 | 71.6 |
Chronicle | 27 | 20.1 |
Evolutive | ||
Suppurated | 99 | 73.9 |
Serous | 9 | 6.7 |
Gangreneux | 20 | 14.9 |
Table 1: Distribution according to clinical forms.
The most frequently requested radiological examination was the orthopantomogram in 43.3% of cases. The most frequently requested biological examination was the CBC in 50.7% of cases (Table 2).
Variables | Number (N=134) | Percentage (%) |
Radiological Examination | ||
Dental Panorama | 58 | 43,3 |
Cervico-thoracic scan | 18 | 13,4 |
Chest X-ray | 15 | 11,2 |
Craniofacial X-ray | 10 | 7,5 |
Biological Examination | ||
CBC | 68 | 50,7 |
Fasting blood glucose | 43 | 32,1 |
HIV serology | 42 | 31,3 |
Examination of pus | 16 | 11,9 |
CRP*** | 7 | 5.2 |
TP/TCK | 3 | 2,2 |
*CBC=Blood Count; **HIV=Human Immunodeficiency Virus; ***CRP=C Reactive Protein; PT=Prothrombin Time; APT=Activated Cephalin Time
Table 2: Distribution according to paraclinical examinations
The most common antibiotic therapy was dual therapy in 69.4% of cases. Imidazoles and Penicillins were prescribed in 99.3% and 97.8% of cases respectively. Level 1 analgesics (Paracetamol) were prescribed in 94% of cases. Incision with drainage was performed in 79 patients (52%); associated with tooth extraction in 35% of cases.
Conditions of hospital management
Compliance with treatment administered: Of the patients hospitalized in our sample, the prescribed treatment was regularly administered in 98 patients, i.e. a percentage of 73.1%.
Type of discharge: After hospitalization, 21 cases of death (15.7%) were recorded. Ninety-four cases (70.1%) had a discharge authorised by the doctor (Table 3).
Variables | Number (N=134) | Percentage (%) |
Type of outputs | ||
Authorised exit | 94 | 70,1 |
Discharge without medical advice | 16 | 11,9 |
Transfer/Reference | 4 | 3,0 |
Deaths | 21 | 15,7 |
Total | 134 | 100 |
Table 3: Breakdown by type of exit.
Causes of death: Of the 21 cases of death recorded, 15 deaths were due to sepsis or 80%.
Conformity of the medical record: With regard to the conformity of the medical record, any record with at least 6 elements out of the 11 constituting a good medical record was deemed to be conform. The following elements constituted the medical record evaluation grid [16] :
All records included identification, reason for hospitalization and treatment prescription. The elements of the hospitalization report, the prescription established at discharge and the conclusion of the clinical examination were contained in 84.3%, 94.8% and 97.8% of cases respectively. The table 4 provides a good summary (Table 4).
Variables | Number (N=134) | Percentage (%) |
Compliance of the medical file | ||
Identification sheet | 134 | 100,0 |
Reason for hospitalization | 134 | 100,0 |
Conclusion of the clinical examination | 131 | 97,8 |
Conclusion of additional examinations | 80 | 59,7 |
Pre-anaesthetic consultation form | 0 | 0 |
Surgical reports | 53 | 39,6 |
Therapeutic prescription | 134 | 100,05 |
Hospitalization report | 113 | 84,3 |
Prescription at discharge | 127 | 94,8 |
Document stipulating LAMA*. | 91 | 67,9 |
Written consent of the patient for all medical procedures | 70 | 52,2 |
*LAMA=Leaving against medical advice
Table 4: Compliance elements of the medical file.
Socio-demographic data
Cervicofacial cellulitis affects the age group (20-40) in particular, and is most common in young men working in the informal sector. This result is similar to those found in the literature, and can be explained by the accidental evolution of wisdom teeth, which are erupting, the neglect of oral hygiene, and the exposure of the male gender to the main risk factors [6-8]. The resourcefulness and lack of means of this poor population are the reasons for their late consultations. Patients only came to the hospital for treatment when complications arose [9-11].
Clinical aspects
The main reason for consultation was swelling in 66% of cases, associated with pain in 34% of cases, the aetiology of which was dental caries in 85% of cases. Trismus was associated in almost all patients, 92.5% [10]. This swelling is the result of congestion during the acute inflammatory reaction. HIV was diagnosed in 6.7% of cases, a condition that impairs the defence system and favours the occurrence of infections [8].
Cellulitis was diffuse in 81.3% of cases. The evolution was acute in 71.6% of cases. The suppurative stage constituted 73.9% of cases. This result can be explained by the relatively long delay in consulting the patients and by the rapid evolution of the cellulitis, which can evolve from the serous stage to the gangrenous stage in a few days if appropriate treatment is not provided [9].
Therapeutic aspects
Paraclinical examination
Dental panoramic radiography was performed in 43.3% of cases and blood count (CBC) as a biological examination in 50.7% of cases. In the literature, the radiological examination shows the presence of a peri apical clearness in front of the causal tooth, which constitutes the starting point of the infection. It therefore confirms the dental origin of the cellulitis[12,13].
Medical and surgical treatment
The medical treatment of cellulitis consists of effective antibiotic therapy and good analgesic treatment [14]. The most commonly used type of antibiotic therapy is dual therapy in 69.4% of cases, with penicillins and imidazoles being used in 97.8% and 99.3% of cases respectively. The combination of a beta-lactam (active against streptococci) and an imidazole (against anaerobes) is widely recommended and has been shown to produce satisfactory results[15]. A level 1 analgesic, such as paracetamol, was used in 94% of cases.
The treatment of cervico-facial cellulitis is regulated. It is a medical and surgical treatment associated with the treatment of the entry point. In our case, the etiological treatment was tooth extraction, which was done in 38.8% of cases. Extraction of the causative tooth is frequently found in the literature, and allows effective and rapid management of cellulitis [11]. In the case of a purulent collection, an incision was made to flatten it and surgical debridement of the necrotic tissue was performed [12].
In combination with the treatment of cellulitis, antimalarial drugs were administered to hospitalized patients in 5.2% of cases; this could be explained by the fact that the patient's immune system was already weakened by the cellulitis infection, and therefore more exposed to other opportunistic diseases [10-12].
Compliance with hospital management conditions
During the patients' hospitalization, medical care was recorded in the file and regularly administered to the patients in 73.1% of cases. According to the study by Faye I in 2011, the care given during the patient's surveillance must be reported in the file because if legal action is taken an expert opinion is likely to be sought; he also lists the different constituents of a good medical file [16]. The constituents of a good record identified in the study were the following:
- The identification form, the reason for hospitalization, and the therapeutic prescription were found in all the files, as these elements are the basis of a medical file.
- The conclusions of the clinical and paraclinical examinations were found in 97.8% and 59.7% of cases respectively. These components must imperatively and inexorably appear on the medical file to avoid legal action. Indeed, if legal action is taken, an expert opinion will be sought [17].
- The anaesthetic consultation form was not present in any of the files during our study. This could be explained by the fact that the anaesthetists in our context did not keep their record in the medical file, but rather in their department. Faye I states in his study that it is not enough to only monitor the patient during or after an anaesthesia, the measured values must be reported as well as all the findings made because an incomplete or missing anaesthesia sheet will be difficult or impossible to justify.
- The operative report was reported in 39.6% of cases, while the hospital report was reported in 84.3% of cases. This clarifies the surgeon's responsibility and personal involvement in the event of an accident during or after the operation [16].
- The discharge prescription was found in 94.8% of cases; it allows the patient to be monitored even after hospitalization [16].
- The documents stipulating the Discharge without medical advice were found in 67.9% of cases and the patient's written consent for all medical acts was found in 52.2% of cases; the obligation to request the patient's consent is a legal obligation [16].
The patients were men of the third decade on average, working in the informal sector; they came to the clinic mainly for swelling, the etiology of which was caries and evolutionary accidents of wisdom teeth. HIV was the major antecedent, trismus and fever the most common symptoms, and the clinical forms most frequently found were diffuse, acute and suppurated. The medical management consisted of the administration of a dual therapy comprising Beta-lactam and Imidazole; and a level 1 analgesic such as Paracetamol. Surgical treatment consisted of incision and drainage with or without tooth extraction. The medical records were generally consistent and the presence or absence of certain elements depended on the different hospitals and practitioners.
We thank all the staff of the Odontostomatology and ENT departments of the HCY, CHUY, HD Efoulan hospitals for their collaboration.
No conflict of interest.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.