AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article
*Corresponding Author: Adrian Kelly, MMed Neurosurgery cum laude (SMU); FC Neurosurgery (SA),Dr George Mukhari Academic Hospital, Sefako Makhatho Health Sciences University, Pretoria, South Africa,
Citation: Adrian Kelly, Patrick Lekgwara , Brian Pandaram , Dion Otto. Evaluating the Incidence and Risk factors for ventriculo-peritoneal shunt sepsis, J Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. Doi:10.31579/2578-8868/035
Copyright: © Adrian Kelly. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of The Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 17 July 2018 | Accepted: 16 August 2018 | Published: 27 August 2018
Keywords: Ventriculo-peritoneal shunt; Sepsis; Hydrocephalus; Risk factors ventriculo-peritoneal shunt sepsis
Introduction: Patients with increased pressure hydrocephalus are a common referral to the Department of Neurosurgery at Dr George Mukhari Academic Hospital (DGMAH) in Pretoria, South Africa.
Aim: Our study aimed to establish our incidence and evaluate the known risk factors for ventriculo-peritoneal shunt sepsis in all patients whom had a ventriculo-peritoneal shunt inserted during the study period and whom completed 12 months of post-operative follow-up.
Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was performed considering all ventriculo-peritoneal shunt procedures performed between the 01 January 2013 and the 31 December 2015, consecutively drawn from the Neurosurgical operating room operative logbook.
Results: Overall 172 ventriculo-peritoneal shunts were inserted during the study period, 106 (62%) of which were inserted in children and 65 (38%) were inserted in adults. With regards the children (n=106) the most common etiology of hydrocephalus was congenital in 48 (45%) of patients while in adults (n=65) the commonest etiology was tuberculous meningitis in 15 (23%) of cases. Of the 172 patients whom had a ventriculo-peritoneal shunt inserted, 39 (23%) were deceased before completion of the one year post-operative follow-up period. The most common cause of death in this deceased group was progressive neoplastic disease in 20 (51%) of patients and tuberculous meningitis not responsive to cerebrospinal fluid diversion in 12 (31%) of patients. Of the 134 subjects whom had a ventriculo-peritoneal shunt inserted and completed the 1-year post-operative follow-up, 7 (5.2%) developed ventriculo-peritoneal shunt sepsis within the one year follow-up period. The presence of a cerebrospinal fluid leak post the ventriculo-peritoneal shunt procedure (p=0.02) and having had more than two prior ventriculo-peritoneal shunt surgeries (p=0.027) were statistically associated with an increased chance of developing ventriculo-peritoneal shunt sepsis in our study.
Conclusion: Our study confirmed our institutional ventriculo-peritoneal shunt sepsis rate to be 5.2% and furthermore confirmed the significance of two of the known risk factors as taken from the literature. A further finding was that in our setting this procedure was often palliative. Thirty nine (23%) of subjects, despite being afforded the benefit of CSF diversion, demised within 1 year of the procedure due to progression of their underlying disease.
Abbreviations
DGMAH = Dr George Mukhari Academic hospital
Declaration
I declare that this article has not been published previously, nor is it under consideration for publication elsewhere, and that, if accepted, will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, without the written consent of the publisher
Patients with increased pressure hydrocephalus are a common referral to the Department of Neurosurgery at Dr George Mukhari Academic Hospital (DGMAH) in Pretoria, South Africa. The department placed 172 of these shunts in patients between 2013 and 2015, all of whom have now had the opportunity to complete 12 months of post-operative follow–up.
No study to date has specifically evaluated the ventriculo-peritoneal sepsis rate at our institution over a comprehensive one year post-operative follow-up period and hence the importance of this study cannot be overemphasized.
Our study aimed to identify specific risk factors, within the sub-population of ventriculo-peritoneal shunts that developed shunt sepsis, that can be targeted for intervention to reduce our local ventriculo-peritoneal shunt sepsis rate.
Hydrocephalus is defined as the clinical condition resulting from either increased production or decreased absorption of cerebrospinal fluid within the brain. This can result in serious neurological sequelae which range for example from developmental delay and blindness in infants, brain herniation and death in acute adult cases, to the more benign difficulty walking, dementia and incontinence in a more chronic form of the condition seen in the elderly. Ventriculo-peritoneal shunt procedures have been the mainstay in the management of this condition for the last 70 years. While seemingly a straight forward procedure up to 40% of ventriculo-peritoneal shunts fail within the first year of placement, often presenting as shunt sepsis, and have to be revised or replaced [1].
Although a globally accepted ventriculo-peritoneal sepsis rate of below 7% is commonly referenced [1; 2; 3], a considerable range is reported from as low as 1.3% in a North American study from the Hershey Medical Centre in Pennsylvania [3] to as high as 24.6% cited in a Kenyan study [4].
In considering the North American continent as a whole most studies report a ventriculo-peritoneal shunt infection rate of between 8-10% [5]. A large North American study by Davis looked at 2325 consecutively placed shunts over a 10 year period in the state of California and found an infection rate of 3.2% [6]. Another North American study done by Kanev and Sheehan considered 526 shunts placed over a 5 year period and reported an even more optimistic 1.3% shunt infection rate. This study admits it is a retrospective review of the operative procedures performed by a single surgeon [3]. A further North American study done in North Carolina by McGirt et al considered the shunt infection rate in 442 pediatric patients whom underwent ventriculo-peritoneal shunting procedures over a 6 year period. Here a shunt infection rate of 11% was reported. This study supports premature birth and previous shunt infection as statistically significant risk factors for shunt infection [7].
In affording a more global perspective, a Turkish study completed a decade ago by Sacar et al retrospectively considered 124 consecutively placed shunt operations performed over a 4 year period. Here the shunt sepsis rate was reported to be 14.5% [8]. A Kenyan study done by Mwang’ombe and Omulo (2000) considered 345 ventriculo-peritoneal shunt insertion operations performed over a 10 year period during the 1980’s. This study reports a 24.6% shunt infection rate. Limited resources necessitating the sharing of operating rooms for general surgical and neurosurgical procedures where septic and clean cases were both performed, limited human capital and large patient numbers are all factors that contributed to this study result [4].
Several South African studies evaluating our local ventriculo-peritoneal shunt sepsis rates have been performed.
Govender in a study from the University of KwaZulu Natal compared the sepsis rate between antibiotic impregnated shunts and standard shunts and noted an overall sepsis rate of 11%. Govender admits that immunosuppression was not identified and refusal to be tested for HIV was not an exclusion criteria. The cause of hydrocephalus also was not standardized between the two groups despite this having serious implications as a risk factor for shunt infection in itself [9]. Nadvi in another study from the University of KwaZulu Natal looked specifically at the role of ventriculo-peritoneal shunting in patient’s dual infected with HIV and tuberculous meningitis whom now have developed hydrocephalus. Although Nadvi did not specifically assess the shunt sepsis rate, his study confirms a statistically significant relationship between a patients CD4 count and their outcome [10]. Nadvi’s study hence criticizes the study by Govender [9] by confirming the importance of the patient’s immunological status in ventriculo-peritoneal shunt sepsis [10].
Lamprecht et al from Tygerberg Hospital in the Western Cape looked specifically at the ventriculo-peritoneal shunt sepsis rate in patients with tuberculous meningitis whom have developed hydrocephalus. Lamprecht noted this to be a notoriously difficult group to treat and recorded a ventriculo-peritoneal shunt sepsis rate of 13.5%. Lamprecht recognizes the importance of identifying patients within this group that can be treated medically as essential to avoid this high complication rate [11].
The University of Cape Town has published several recent articles on the subject of ventriculo-peritoneal fluid shunting in the context of tuberculous meningitis that confirm the significant complication rate in this group of patients. Rohlwink specifically considered the neurodevelopmental outcomes of children with tuberculous meningitis and hydrocephalus and noted that both the medical and surgical treated group carried with them a statistically significant increased chance of incurring neurodevelopmental deficits relative to controls [12]. Figaji and Fieggan, also from the University of Cape Town, acknowledge the overall poor outcome in this patient group and identify the high complication rate in ventriculo-peritoneal shunted patients. Figaji and Fieggan note that 30%-43% of these shunted patients require re-operation for infection and blockage in the first 6 months [13]. Acknowledging the limitations of ventriculo-peritoneal fluid shunting, more recent studies from the University of Cape Town are now assessing alternatives to this procedure such as that by Figaji and Fieggan whom considered the role of endoscopic third ventriculostomy as an alternative to shunting, as well as the study by Padayachee whom considered a radiographic marker predicting outcome [14;15]. These recent studies do not address ventriculo-peritoneal shunt sepsis and are hence outside the boundaries of this review.
Identified risk factors for ventriculo-peritoneal shunt infection are firstly the age of the patient being shunted [1; 5; 7]. Preterm neonates are especially at risk due to several reasons that include an immature immune system [7; 8]. This increased risk was furthermore found, in this same North American study by McGirt et al, that considered 820 consecutively shunted patients, to persist throughout the first year of life, but equalize with the sepsis rates seen in adults thereafter [7].
The etiology of the hydrocephalus is a further identified risk factor for increasing the shunt infection rate. Hydrocephalus in association with an open meningomyelocoele (MMC) is for example a commonly cited risk factor as the MMC serves as a port of entry into the central nervous system for the infecting organisms [5]. Causes of hydrocephalus that result in significantly increased CSF protein levels (and thereby increase CSF viscosity) make the shunt prone to blockage and thereby increase the shunt infection rate [16;1].
Previous shunt failure is a further cited risk factor for the development of shunt infection across several studies [17; 4; 1]. This risk factor can be explained by the fact that scarring at the previous surgical site impairs the local immune response and thereby predisposes to an increased shunt infection rate [1].
The duration of the shunt surgery increases the likelihood of shunt infection [18]. The mechanism behind this is that by extending the length of the surgery there is an increase in the window period during which the wound can become colonized by circulating organisms in the operating room atmosphere [1]. A Thailand study found this to be a statistically significant risk factor once the operation lasts more than 59 minutes [18].
The operative experience of the surgeon has been shown to be inversely proportional to the risk of shunt infection [5; 1]. This risk factor was directly researched by the large Canadian study which considered 3794 shunts inserted by 254 surgeons across the country over 12 years. The findings of this study reported that the risk of developing ventriculo-peritoneal shunt infection was lower with more experienced surgeons and higher when less experienced surgeons performed the shunt insertions [19].
The occurrence of a post-operative shunt CSF leak is a further risk factor predisposing the patient to an increased shunt infection risk [8; 1]. This problem is avoided by a meticulous opening of the dura intra-operatively in an attempt to limit any CSF escaping alongside the shunt into the scalp tissues and layered scalp wound closure [1].
The type of shunt used is a further implicated risk factor for shunt infection [9; 20]. Research using the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute’s Method for Kirby Bauer disk diffusion susceptibility test protocol [14] has shown that antibiotic impregnated shunt catheters have statistically significant gram positive bactericidal properties as compared to a control group [21]. The specific species tested in this study were staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis which are the two species that commonly cause shunt infections [21].
An additional risk factor identified from the McGirt et al study is the use of a neuro-endoscope to assist in shunt placement which has been found to increase the shunt infection rate [7; 1]. McGirt et al (2003) found that the use of a neuro-endoscope, “which has become routine practice” at the Duke University Medical Centre where the study was conducted since 1995, “to increase the risk of shunt infection 1.6 fold” [7: 860].The reasons afforded by this same author under the discussion are that “the observed association between neuro-endoscope use and increased risk of VP shunt infection include increased duration of surgery, increased complexity of procedure necessitating endoscopic guidance and contaminated endoscopic equipment” [7].
A further risk factor for ventriculo-peritoneal shunt infection, as taken from the Thailand study by Sacar mentioned above, is patient immunosuppression [18]. This study actively excluded immune-compromised patients secondary to retroviral disease by considering this a special group. This was done so as not to confound their results by mis-matching the two groups compared [18].
Our study aimed to establish the ventriculo-peritoneal shunt sepsis rate at our institution over a three year study period from January 2013-December 2015 considering all patients whom had the procedure performed and whom completed the comprehensive one year post-operative follow-up period. We secondarily aimed to statistically evaluate the known risk factors as taken from the literature by establishing their significance in our setting. We hoped that once identified the significant risk factors could be targeted to reduce our local ventriculo-peritoneal shunt sepsis rate.
Materials and methods
Our study was approved by the Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University Research and Ethics Committee (SMUREC/M/102/2017: PG).
A retrospective cross-sectional study was performed considering all patients whom, over the three year study period from the 01 January 2013-31 December 2015, had a ventriculo-peritoneal shunt inserted, as recorded consecutively from the Neurosurgical operating room operative logbook. A unique Study number was ascribed to each patient whom underwent the insertion of a ventriculo-peritoneal shunt during the study period for the purpose of maintaining participant anonymity. These patient files were individually reviewed and the relevant data was transcribed onto a Data Collection sheet. These Data collection sheets were entered into an Exel spreadsheet for analysis with descriptive and inferential statistics. All statistical procedures were be done on SAS (SAS Institute Inc, NC, USA), Release 9.4 or higher, running under Microsoft Windows.
Considering the 172 ventriculo-peritoneal shunts inserted during the study period the mean age of these patients was 14.8 +/- 18.9 years. The youngest patient was 0.01 years and the oldest was 74 years. Further sub-group analysis revealed that 13 (7.6%) of patients were neonates, 64 (37%) of patients were infants, 29 (17%) of patients were children and 65 (38%) of patients were adults. In terms of gender 77 (45%) were female and 94 (55%) were male. Considering time of insertion 89 (52%) of ventriculo-peritoneal shunts were inserted in the morning, 29 (17%) were inserted in the afternoon, and 53 (31%) were inserted at night. Considering the cause of hydrocephalus the commonest cause seen in the pediatric population was congenital hydrocephalus in 48 (45%) of children while in adults the commonest cause was tuberculous meningitis in 15 (23%) of patients. Of the 172 patients included in the study 39 demised before completing the one year follow-up period. In the deceased group the most common causes of death were progressive neoplastic disease in 20 (51%) of patients and tuberculous meningitis not responsive to cerebrospinal fluid diversion in 12 (31%) of patients.
Of the 134 remaining patients whom had a ventriculo-peritoneal shunt inserted and completed the one year surveillance period for the development of ventriculo-peritoneal shunt sepsis, 7 (5.2%) developed this complication. All of these patients were in the pediatric age group and 5 (71%) were less than one year of age. All 7 (100%) of these patients developed ventriculo-peritoneal shunt sepsis within one month of the ventriculo-peritoneal shunt insertion procedure.
Evaluating the known risk factors for ventriculo-peritoneal shunt sepsis neither (1) patient age (p=0.16), (2) having a ventriculo-peritoneal shunt revision in the last three months (p=0.09), (3) having a history of ventriculo-peritoneal shunt sepsis (p=0.18), (4) having a prior external ventricular drain (p=0.06), (5) the surgeons years of experience (p=0.23) , nor the (6) length of the surgery (p=0.60) were statistically significant in increasing a patients chance of developing this complication.
The presence of a cerebrospinal fluid leak post the ventriculo-peritoneal shunt insertion procedure (p=0.02) and having more than two prior ventriculo-peritoneal shunt procedures (p=0.03) were statistically associated with an increased chance of developing ventriculo-peritoneal shunt sepsis in our study.
Discussion
Our study revealed a ventriculo-peritoneal shunt sepsis rate of 5.2% which is in keeping with the globally accepted value of below 7% [1,2,3,4,5,6].
Considering patient age all 7 (100%) of our patients whom developed ventriculo-peritoneal shunt sepsis were children and 5 (71%) were less than one year of age. This finding is supported extensively in the literature where infants are noted in several studies to have an increased chance of developing ventriculo-peritoneal shunt sepsis as compared to adults [7,8]. While in our study patient age was not statistically associated with an increased chance of developing ventriculo-peritoneal shunt sepsis (p=0.16), this clinical trend was demonstrated.
Being one of the commonest procedures performed in our Department translates into surgeon familiarity with this procedure and as such is a further factor explaining our ventriculo-peritoneal shunt sepsis rate. This is in keeping with the literature where the operative experience of the surgeon is a statistically significant variable in reducing ventriculo-peritoneal shunt sepsis [19]. Considering the mean length of our ventriculo-peritoneal shunt procedure to be 75 +/- 29 minutes, this does however fall outside of the 59 minute threshold for reducing ventriculo-peritoneal shunt sepsis as concluded by the Thailand study which specifically considered this variable [18]. In our study the length of the surgery was not statistically associated with an increased ventriculo-peritoneal shunt sepsis rate (p=0.60).
In terms of the etiology of hydrocephalus a significant portion of our patients had congenital hydrocephalus with normal cerebrospinal fluid protein values. This is another factor responsible for explaining our ventriculo-peritoneal sepsis rate due to the sheer number of these pediatric patients where the risk of developing ventriculo-peritoneal shunt sepsis is comparatively low compared to for example ventriculo-peritoneal shunt procedures performed for tuberculous meningitis which dominated in the adult group. This is supported by the literature where a high cerebrospinal fluid protein value is statistically associated with an increased ventriculo-peritoneal shunt sepsis rate and a normal or low cerebrospinal fluid protein value does not share this association [16].
We never use a neuro-endoscope to confirm shunt placement and as such this risk factor for increasing ventriculo-peritoneal shunt sepsis is alleviated from our setting [7].
In our study the presence of a post-operative surgical site cerebrospinal fluid leak was statistically associated with an increased chance of developing ventriculo-peritoneal shunt sepsis (p=0.02). This is supported in the literature as a recognized risk factor for this complication and is supported by our study [8].
A further statistically significant risk factor in our study was two or more previous ventriculo-peritoneal shunt surgeries (p=0.027). This finding is supported by the literature [1,4,17] and our study supports this as a statistically significant risk factor.
In conclusion our study finding was a ventriculo-peritoneal shunt sepsis rate of 5.2% and a statistically significant association was demonstrated between the presence of a cerebrospinal fluid leak (p=0.02) and two or more previous ventriculo-peritoneal shunt surgeries (p=0.027) and an increased chance of developing ventriculo-peritoneal shunt sepsis.
A further finding in our study was that this procedure was often palliative. Thirty nine (23%) of our subjects, despite being afforded the benefit of CSF diversion, demised within 1 year of the procedure due to progression of their underlying disease.
Conflict of interest
None of the authors have any financial nor personal relationships with other people, or organizations, that could inappropriately influence (bias) their work, all within 3 years of the beginning the work submitted.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
