AUCTORES
Research Article
*Corresponding Author: Ahmed M. ZahrAllayali, Associate Professor of Dermatology Internal medicine Department Medical College Umm Al-Qura University, ORCID: 0000-0001-6863-2774.
Citation: Ahmed M. ZahrAllayali, Rawan M. Almontashri, Wafa M. Sodagar, Taif N. Alhothali, Jaylan S. Malibari, Nouf A. Alturki, Maab S. AlSwealh, (2024), Evaluating Knowledge of Mothers With 0–24 Month Babies on Management and Preventive Measures for Diaper Dermatitis in Makka Region, Saudi Arabia, Dermatology and Dermatitis, 9(2); DOI:10.31579/2578-8949/149
Copyright: © 2024, Ahmed M. ZahrAllayali. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of The Creative Commons. Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 02 February 2024 | Accepted: 19 March 2024 | Published: 26 March 2024
Keywords: diaper dermatitis; children; mother’s knowledge; saudi arabia
Introduction: Diaper dermatitis (DD) or nappy rash is characterized by the presence of skin erosion and reddishness caused by the prolonged exposure of the diapered area to urine and feces, commonly observed in babies or infants. The incidence of DD is found to be higher among children between the ages of 0 and 12 months. DD can cause an alteration in eating and sleeping patterns, increased crying, anxiety, and emotional stress. Aim: The present study is aimed at measuring the knowledge of the mothers with infants from 0 to 24 months about the management and preventive aspects of DD in the Makka region of Saudi Arabia. Results: The results of the present study showed that 59% of mothers present in the Makka region had good knowledge about the prevalence and management of DD. The findings of the study suggested that the age of the baby, gender, frequency of changing diapers, use of disposable diapers, cleaning, and treatment are related to the prevalence of DD. The socio-economic and demographical characters (age of mother (P<0.05) and educational of mother (P<0.0001)), number of children, age of child (P <0.05), use of diaper (P <0.05), type of diaper (P<0.05), cleaning and drying method (P<0.0001), treatment aspect (P<0.005) and introduction to solids (P<0.0001) are found to influence the knowledge of mother. Conclusion: Although most mothers were educated on DD, it is important to impart knowledge to parents and caretakers about the management, hygiene practices, and preventive measures of DD.
Diaper dermatitis (DD) is termed an irritation condition caused by the various cutaneous eruptions or inflammations (pustules, erythema, and papules) in diaper areas, that is, the genitals, skin folds, lower back, inner thighs, lower back, waistline, and abdomen, in neonates and infants [1]. Non-specific terms like diaper rash, napkin dermatitis, and nappy rash are commonly used in addressing DD [2]. Diaper candidiasis, chaffing dermatitis, and irritant contact dermatitis are the three types of DD. DD imparts discomfort and pain in babies; although DD is infrequently strong enough to cause a life-threatening impact, it is challenging for parents, caretakers, and healthcare workers. It is reported that in babies, the pH of the non-napped area is lower than that of the napped area [3]. The incidence of DD is more prevalent between newborns and 12 months old [4]. The clinical manifestations of DD include redness, dryness, flaky skin, shiny plaques, scaling, erosion, and papules, and rarely, raised nodules or papules. Sometimes, no symptoms are observed in infants with DD except the eruption [5,6]. Agitation, sleeping pattern alteration, change in eating, increased crying, and emotional distress [7].
DD is classified as primary (caused by irritants) or secondary (yeast, including wild candida). The primary cause of DD is urine, feces, moisture, and friction. The outer layer of the skin (stratum corneum) protects the skin from mechanical injury and environmental irritants. In DD, the barriers of the skin are disrupted by excessive hydration due to moisture and friction because of its constant contact with urine and feces [8]. The secondary causes of DD are developmental abnormalities and diarrhea (gastrointestinal factors), an imbalanced gut microflora due to infection in the respiratory tract, fragrances, preservatives, and certain chemicals causing allergic reactions, an inadequate skin care routine including reduced usage of talcum powders and soap, epidermis microorganisms, and teething, which have the ability to aggravate the DD [9] Herpes simplex, HIV infection, psoriasis, biotin and zinc deficiency, scabies, papular urticaria, congenital syphilis, enterobius infestation, Netherton syndrome, Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome, Kawasaki disease, and child abuse are very rare causes of secondary DD [10]. Streptococcus pyogenes and Staphylococcus aureus (bacterial) and mycoses and Candida albicans (fungal) are also causative agents of DD [11].
The trypsin, protease, urease, and lipase (digestive enzymes) present in fecal matter are serious skin irritants that favor the development of DD, and bile salt elevates the disruption caused by these enzymes. The presence of fecal urease can break down the urea in urine. These factors damage or break down the integrity of the epidermal layer, which results in inflammation and the initiation of a repair cascade. After a few days of the repair process, the irritation reduces and the regeneration of normal skin takes place slowly [12]. In the initial stages, a small portion of the diapered area appears to be pink or red with scattered papules and dryness. In the moderation stage, definite or intense redness is observed in a larger area with fewer pustules. In the advanced stage, extreme redness, desquamation, ulceration, eruption, and edema are found in larger areas with plenty of pustules or concurrent papules [7]. In the diagnosis of DD, the physical assessment of skin rashes is taken into consideration, along with the following: type of diaper, duration of the rash, hygiene practice, pain and itching, cleaning routine, and antibiotics used [12]. In the case of the presentation of additional symptoms or failure of basic treatment, a differential diagnosis should be considered. In differential diagnosis of DD, infectious (bacterial (folliculitis, perianal dermatitis, and impetigo), viral (varicella and herpes simplex), and yeast (candidiasis) infections), inflammatory (psoriasis, intertrigo, granuloma gluteale infantum, irritant contact, allergic contact, seborrheic, and atopic dermatitis), and nutritional deficiencies (multiple carboxylases, zinc, and biotin) should be assessed [13, 14].
The first line of treatment for DD is self-management by mothers and caretakers, such as cleaning routines, diapers and wipes, usage of skin care products (powders and creams), regular bathing, and frequency of changing diapers [15]. Corticosteroids, water repellents, barrier creams containing dimethicone, petrolatum, lanolingents, zinc oxide, cod liver oil, calcineurin inhibitors, antifungal (miconazole, tioconazole, fluconazole, nystatin, and clotrimazole), and antibacterial (mupirocin) Prevention methods such as “ABCDE” (air: increasing diaper-free time and allowing frequent aeration, Barrier: using barrier cream, Cleaning: proper cleansing of the diaper area with water and air drying, Diaper: changing the diaper is soiled or within an interval of 1 to 3 hours. Education (targeted education about good hygiene practices and diaper usage must be given to the parents) is useful in managing the DD [12]. The present study is aimed at measuring the knowledge of mothers with children between the ages of 0 and 24 months about DD and its prevention aspects.
Study area
In the present study, mothers with infants were the target group. The study samples were obtained in the Makka region of Saudi Arabia with children aged 0 to 24 months, the age range with the most exposure to diapers and the highest prevalence of diaper dermatitis. The study was conducted from February to July 2023.
Subject recruitment
The subjects recruited in this study were scrutinized based on the questionnaire according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Mothers with infants from 0 to 24 months, mothers who diaper their children, and mothers who are willing to participate in the study meet the inclusion criteria. Mothers with children above the age of 24 months, other city residents who live in Saudi Arabia, mothers who can’t read and understand Arabic, prior skin allergies, family history of skin disease, and parents not willing to participate in the study were excluded from the study. The consent form was obtained from the parents who were willing to participate in the study. The present study was conducted after acquiring proper approval, and the approval number is HAPO-02-K-012-2023-04-1573.
Questionnaire preparation and collection
In the present descriptive cross-sectional study, responses from the mother were obtained online (electronically) using Google Forms and other social media platforms. The questionnaire was prepared in the Arabic language. The questionnaire has been validated [16]. Totally 45, questions were posted to the mothers, questionnaire is divided of several sections such as, questions to analysis sociodemographic (mothers age, educational status of both parents, religion, nationality, age and gender of child), and economical (employment status of parents, monthly income, number of children, and average money on diaper) information, information on diaper needs (introduction of solids, reason for lack of diaper, changing of diaper, episodes of DD, and use of plastic pants), knowledge of mothers on DD was assessed using 13 yes or no questions for each correct answer one point was given and for incorrect and do not know zero point was allotted, attitudes and hygiene practice on DD (cleansing and drying after defecation, type of diaper, treatment and prevention approach), and use of cortisone for DD. Questionnaires were obtained from 749 mothers with children aged between 0 and 24 months, along with a consent form. The questionnaire were validated through a pilot study.
Study variables
In the present study, prevalence of DD and mother’s knowledge were the dependent variables, and age of the mother, educational qualification, employment status, monthly income, money spent on diapers, frequency of diaper changing, recent occurrence of DD, doctor visit, plastic pant usage, use of diapers on children, type of diaper, cleaning method, and drying of the child after bowel movement, treatment, introduction to solid foods, and preventive measures on DD were independent variables.
Statistical Assessment
In the present study, statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics software (version 21). The frequency and percentage were calculated for the descriptive information (sociodemographic, economical, and diaper needs). The mothers were categorized into two groups based on the median value: respondents who scored above seven are placed in the above average category, and respondents who scored seven and below seven are placed in the below average category. A Pearson’s Chi-squared test (bivariant test) was performed to measure the prevalence of DD and the mother’s knowledge of DD. The statistical significance was set at three different levels of P values (P<0>
A total of 749 responses were collected from mothers with infants between 0 to 24 months. The socio-economic and demographic characteristics of mothers were recorded. Among 749 mothers, 32.1% were between the ages of 31-40 years followed by 26-30 years with 29.9%. About 75% of mothers have graduated, and most of them have completed their bachelor's degree (63.9%). Almost all mothers were Muslim (99.5%) and from Saudi Arabia (89.5%). The unemployed (53.1%) were found to be more prevalent among mothers, even though they had good educational qualifications. More than half of the spouses have completed their bachelor degree (59.9%), and almost all of them are employed (91.5%). About 43.6% of families had a monthly income of more than 10,000 Saudi riyals. The prevalence of female children (54.3%) was found to be higher than that of males (45.6%). The mothers of children aged between 12-24 months (22.6%) have participated in the present study (Table.1).
Variable | Criteria | Frequency | Percentage (%) |
Age of mother | 18-25 | 146 | 19.49 |
26-30 | 224 | 29.90 | |
31-40 | 241 | 32.17 | |
41-49 | 102 | 13.61 | |
50 and above | 36 | 4.80 | |
Educational qualification | High school and below | 186 | 24.83 |
Bachelor’s degree | 479 | 63.95 | |
Master and doctoral degrees | 84 | 11.21 | |
Religion | Muslim | 746 | 99.59 |
Non-Muslim | 3 | 0.40 | |
Nationality | Saudi | 671 | 89.58 |
Non-Saudi | 78 | 10.41 | |
Employment status of the mother | Employed | 351 | 46.86 |
Unemployed | 398 | 53.13 | |
Educational qualification of the spouse | High school and below | 183 | 24.43 |
Bachelor’s degree | 449 | 59.94 | |
Master and doctoral degrees | 117 | 15.62 | |
Employment status of the spouse | Employed | 686 | 91.58 |
Unemployed | 63 | 9.07 | |
Monthly household income | 5000-10000 | 295 | 39.38 |
>10000 | 327 | 43.65 | |
<5000> | 127 | 16.95 | |
Child gender | Male | 342 | 45.66 |
Female | 407 | 54.33 | |
How old is your child? | 0-3 months | 89 | 11.88 |
3-6 months | 141 | 18.82 | |
6-9 months | 104 | 13.88 | |
9-12 months | 108 | 14.41 | |
12-24 months | 170 | 22.69 | |
>24 months | 137 | 18.29 |
Table 1: Socio-economic and demographic characteristics of mothers
The child was introduced to solid foods more likely after eight months (36.1%). The majority of mothers (76.1%) had at least one child using a diaper. The average amount of money spent on diapers was found to be 200 Saudi riyals (31.3%). In terms of the frequency of diaper changing per day, 62.6% of mothers changed diapers 4–7 times, and mothers feel that they do not have enough diapers (81.8%). About 65.8% of children didn’t experience DD in the last six months, and some children about 28.4% experienced DD once, and most of them didn’t visit a doctor (73.5%). Most of the mothers (89.7%) were aware that their children should not wear plastic pants. Only 29.3% of mothers attached their diapers loosely to allow the entry of air. The water and soap were used by 49.9% of mothers to clean the child after bowel movements. Gentle patting and drying with a towel (47.2%) were preferred by most of the mothers to dry the child after cleaning. Mothers preferred disposable diapers (94.2%) to cloth diapers. The mothers who participated in the present study used zinc oxide-containing barrier cream (34.5%) to prevent DD. Application of anti-fungal cream (47.3%) was mostly used by the mothers to treat the DD (Table.2).
Variable | Criteria | Frequency | Percentage (%) |
Did you introduce your baby to solid food? | Yes | 525 | 70.09 |
No | 224 | 29.90 | |
When did your child start eating solid food? | >8 months | 254 | 33.91 |
<8> | 271 | 36.18 | |
How many of your children are using diapers now? | 1 | 570 | 76.10 |
2 | 129 | 17.22 | |
3 | 32 | 4.27 | |
4 | 8 | 1.06 | |
5 and more | 10 | 1.33 | |
What is the average amount of money spent on diapers each month? | 100 | 59 | 7.87 |
150 | 145 | 19.35 | |
200 | 235 | 31.37 | |
250 | 164 | 21.89 | |
>250 | 146 | 19.49 | |
How many times do you change diapers per day per child? | 1-3 | 159 | 21.22 |
4-7 | 469 | 62.61 | |
7-10 | 111 | 14.81 | |
>10 | 10 | 1.33 | |
Do you ever feel you do not have enough? | Yes | 613 | 81.84 |
No | 136 | 18.55 | |
How often do you experience this? | Very often | 187 | 24.96 |
Not very often | 562 | 75.03 | |
Has your child been clinically diagnosed with DD in the last 6 months? | Yes | 256 | 34.17 |
No | 493 | 65.82 | |
If yes, how many times has this occurred in the last 6 months? | Once | 213 | 28.43 |
More than once | 97 | 12.95 | |
Did you visit the doctor due to this condition? | Yes | 198 | 26.43 |
No | 551 | 73.56 | |
Do you use plastic underpants? | Yes | 77 | 10.28 |
No | 672 | 89.71 | |
How do you use diapers on your child? | Attach the diaper firmly so that the feces do not leak. | 529 | 70.62 |
Attach it loosely to allow air to enter. | 220 | 29.37 | |
How do you clean your child after bowel movements? | Water only | 169 | 22.56 |
Water and soap | 374 | 49.93 | |
Water and wet wipes | 153 | 20.42 | |
Wet wipes | 53 | 7.07 | |
What do you use to dry after cleaning the child? | Natural air drying | 99 | 13.21 |
Gently patting with a dry towel + natural air drying | 224 | 29.90 | |
Gently patting with a dry towel. | 354 | 47.26 | |
Rubbing with a dry towel | 70 | 9.34 | |
Drying with a hair dryer | 2 | 0.26 | |
What type of diapers do you use? | Disposable diaper only | 703 | 94.25 |
Cloth only | 3 | 4.05 | |
Both disposable and cloth | 41 | 5.47 | |
What substances do you routinely put on a baby's bottom to prevent diaper dermatitis? | Baby lotion (barrier emollient) | 77 | 10.28 |
Baby Powder | 182 | 24.29 | |
Zinc oxide | 259 | 34.57 | |
Vaseline (petrolatum) | 76 | 10.14 | |
Bepanthene moisturizer crème | 3 | 0.40 | |
None | 152 | 20.29 | |
What do you use to treat diaper dermatitis? | Application of baby powder | 68 | 9.07 |
Application of native medication | 38 | 5.07 | |
Application of medicated powder | 56 | 7.47 | |
Application of Vaseline | 123 | 16.42 | |
Application of anti- fungal cream | 355 | 47.39 | |
Use of antibiotics | 32 | 4.27 | |
Nothing | 77 | 10.28 |
Table 2: Investigating diaper management and mother’s attitudes towards DD
The recent occurrence of DD in the babies was correlated with various factors to determine the potential risk factor. Age of mother (P=0.01), employment status (P=0.01), child gender (P=0.001), child age (P<0 P=0.05), P=0.05)>
Variables | X2Value | Df | Prevalence of DD | P value | ||
Yes | No | |||||
Age of mother | 18-25 | 12.500 | 4 | 32 (4.3%) | 114 (15.2%) | 0.014b |
26-30 | 83 (11.1%) | 141 (18.8%) | ||||
31-40 | 92 (12.3%) | 149 (19.9%) | ||||
41-49 | 37 (4.9%) | 65 (8.7%) | ||||
50 and above | 12 (1.6%) | 24 (3.2%) | ||||
Educational qualification of the mother | High school and below | 2.516 | 2 | 64 (8.5%) | 122 (16.3%) | 0.284f |
Bachelor’s degree | 157 (21.0%) | 322 (43.0%) | ||||
Master’s and doctoral degrees | 35 (4.7%) | 49 (6.5%) | ||||
Employment status of the mother | Employed | 6.126 | 1 | 136 (18.2%) | 215 (28.7%) | 0.013b |
Unemployed | 120 (16.0%) | 278 (37.1%) | ||||
Child gender | Male | 11.463 | 1 | 246 (32.8%) | 247 (33.0%) | 0.001d |
Female | 161 (21.5%) | 95 (12.7%) | ||||
How old is your child? | 0-3 months | 18.387 | 5 | 15 (2.0%) | 74 (9.9%) | 0.002c |
3-6 months | 42 (5.6%) | 99 (13.2%) | ||||
6-9 months | 41 (5.5%) | 63 (8.4%) | ||||
9-12 months | 39 (5.2%) | 69 (9.2%) | ||||
12-24 months | 70 (9.3%) | 100 (13.4%) | ||||
>24 months | 49 (6.5%) | 88 (11.7%) | ||||
Monthly household income | 5000-10000 | 3.224 | 3 | 94 (12.6%) | 201 (26.8%) | 0.358f |
>10000 | 43 (5.7%) | 84 (11.2%) | ||||
<5000> | 118 (15.8%) | 208 (27.8%) | ||||
What is the average amount of money spent on diapers each month? | 100 | 2.576 | 4 | 16 (2.1%) | 43 (6.7%) | 0.631f |
150 | 48 (6.4%) | 97 (13.0%) | ||||
200 | 78 (10.4%) | 157 (21.0%) | ||||
250 | 62 (8.3%) | 102 (13.6%) | ||||
>250 | 52 (6.9%) | 94 (12.6%) | ||||
How many times do you change diapers per day per child? | 1-3 | 0.694 | 3 | 57 (7.6%) | 102 (13.65) | 0.875f |
4-7 | 160 (21.4%) | 309 (41.3%) | ||||
7-10 | 35 (4.7%) | 76 (10.1%) | ||||
>10 | 4 (0.5%) | 6 (0.8%) | ||||
Do you use plastic underpants? | Yes | 7.342 | 1 | 37 (4.9%) | 40 (5.3%) | 0.006a |
No | 219 (29.2%) | 453 (60.5%) | ||||
How do you use diapers on your child? | Attach the diaper firmly so that the feces do not leak. | 3.565 | 1 | 170 (22.7%) | 360 (48.1%) | 0.059a |
Attach it loosely to allow air to enter. | 86 (11.5%) | 133 (178%) | ||||
How do you clean your child after bowel movements? | Water only | 8.186 | 3 | 72 (9.6%) | 97 (13.0%) | 0.042a |
Water and soap | 115 (15.4%) | 259 (34.6%) | ||||
Water and wet wipes | 54 (7.2%) | 99 (13.2%) | ||||
Wet wipes | 15 (2.0%) | 38 (5.1%) | ||||
What do you use to dry after cleaning the child? | Natural air drying | 1.187 | 4 | 126 (16.8%) | 228 (30.4%) | 0.880f |
Gently patting with a dry towel + natural air drying | 34 (4.5%) | 65 (8.7%) | ||||
Gently patting with a dry towel. | 73 (9.7%) | 151 (20.2%) | ||||
Rubbing with a dry towel | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (0.1%) | ||||
Drying with a hair dryer | 23 (3.1%) | 48 (6.4%) | ||||
What type of diapers do you use? | Disposable diaper only | 5.702 | 2 | 233 (31.1%) | 470 (62.8%) | 0.058a |
Cloth only | 3 (0.4%) | 2 (0.3%) | ||||
Both disposable and cloth | 20 (2.7%) | 21 (2.8%) | ||||
What substances do you routinely put on a baby's bottom to prevent diaper dermatitis? | Baby lotion (barrier emollient) | 6.791 | 5 | 24 (3.2%) | 53 (7.1%) | 0.237f |
Baby Powder | 50 (6.7%) | 132 (17.6%) | ||||
Zinc oxide | 92 (12.3%) | 167 (22.3%) | ||||
Vaseline (petrolatum) | 28 (3.7%) | 48 (6.4%) | ||||
Bepanthene moisturizer crème | 1 (0.1%) | 2 (0.2%) | ||||
None | 61 (8.1%) | 91 (12.1%) | ||||
What do you use to treat diaper dermatitis? | Application of baby powder | 42.632 | 6 | 21 (2.8%) | 47 (6.3%) | 0.000e |
Application of native medication | 14 (1.9%) | 24 (3.2%) | ||||
Application of medicated powder | 22 (2.9%) | 34 (4.5%) | ||||
Application of Vaseline | 55 (7.3%) | 68 (9.1%) | ||||
Application of anti- fungal cream | 129 (17.2%) | 226 (30.2%) | ||||
Use of antibiotics | 13 (1.7%) | 19 (2.5%) | ||||
Nothing | 2 (0.3%) | 75 (10.0%) | ||||
Did you introduce your baby to solid foods? | Yes | 30.015 | 1 | 212 (28.3%) | 44 (5.9%) | 0.000e |
No | 313 (41.8%) | 180 (24.0%) |
Sample size n=749, Significance levels at P<0>
Table 3: Analyzing the factors influencing the prevalence of DD
The majority of mothers (82.3%) knew that DD is a common skin condition in babies and young children. And 85.8% were aware that not changing the diaper of a baby frequently can lead to DD. About 86.6% of mothers knew that the alcohol content of the wipes could irritate the baby's skin. Zinc oxide-containing creams (68%) were mostly used by the mothers. Only 12.1% of mothers were mindful that a sprinkle of talcum powder on the diaper would not soak up the moisture. The false statement that disposable diapers have been shown to cause DD was identified by 18.4% of mothers. The thumb rule to visit a doctor if DD does not clear up was followed by 79% of mothers. Only 13.3% of mothers were familiar with the fact that attaching a diaper firmly will not prevent leakage. Informed knowledge about the false statement that to remove odor, wipe with a wet tissue containing perfume was observed in 72.2% of mothers. Most mothers (91.5%) were conscious of the cleaning procedure to wipe out the excreta thoroughly with water and rub the area with a towel. The mothers (32.8%) were sensible to the false statement that it is effective to apply ointment and powder together when DD occurs, and 34.8% of mothers didn’t encourage the fact that if you wash the area frequently with water when a baby has DD, it will worsen. About 83.8% of mothers supported the fact that poor diapering is one of the causes of DD (Table.4). In the present study, about 55.9% of mothers had good knowledge, and 44% of mothers had below-average knowledge on the management and prevention aspects of DD.
Questions | Criteria | Response | Percentage (%) |
DD is the most common skin condition in babies and young children (yes). | Yes | 617 | 82.37 |
No | 38 | ||
Do not know | 94 | ||
One of the most common causes of DD is not changing the baby diaper (yes). | Yes | 643 | 85.84 |
No | 48 | ||
Do not know | 58 | ||
Some baby wipes that contain alcohol can irritate an infant’s skin (yes). | Yes | 649 | 86.64 |
No | 35 | ||
Do not know | 65 | ||
DD ointments that contain zinc oxide (yes). | Yes | 510 | 68.09 |
No | 91 | ||
Do not know | 148 | ||
A sprinkle of talcum powder on a diaper will soak up moisture (no). | Yes | 451 | 60.21 |
No | 141 | ||
Do not know | 157 | ||
Disposable diapers have been shown to cause DD (no). | Yes | 247 | 32.97 |
No | 138 | ||
Do not know | 364 | ||
The general rule of thumb is to call the doctor if DD does not clear up (yes). | Yes | 592 | 79.03 |
No | 56 | ||
Do not know | 101 | ||
When putting on a diaper, attach it tightly so that the excrement does not leak (no). | Yes | 611 | 81.57 |
No | 100 | ||
Do not know | 38 | ||
To remove odor, wipe with a wet tissue containing perfume (no). | Yes | 136 | 18.15 |
No | 541 | ||
Do not know | 72 | ||
Wipe the excreta thoroughly with water and rub the area with a towel (yes). | Yes | 686 | 91.58 |
No | 38 | ||
Do not know | 25 | ||
When DD occurs, it is effective to apply ointment and powder together (no). | Yes | 298 | 39.78 |
No | 246 | ||
Do not know | 205 | ||
If you wash the area frequently with water when a baby has DD, it will worsen (no). | Yes | 261 | 27.36 |
No | 222 | ||
Do not know | 266 | ||
The poor type of diaper is one of the causes of diaper dermatitis (yes). | Yes | 628 | 83.84 |
No | 28 | ||
Do not know | 93 |
Table 4: Assessment of mother's knowledge on diaper hygiene practices and preventive measures
The association between the mother’s knowledge of diaper management, hygiene practices, and preventive measures is assessed using the chi-squared test. The results showed that high significance was found between a mother’s knowledge and socio-economic characteristics (educational qualification), method of cleaning and drying, and introduction to solid foods (P<0>
Variables | X2Value | df | Knowledge of the mother | P value | ||
Above Average | Below Average | |||||
Age of mother | 18-25 | 14.424 | 4 | 63 (8.4%) | 83 (11.1%) | 0.006c |
26-30 | 134 (17.9%) | 90 (12.0%) | ||||
31-40 | 146 (19.5%) | 95 (12.7%) | ||||
41-49 | 59 (7.9%) | 43 (5.7%) | ||||
50 and above | 17 (2.3%) | 19 (2.5%) | ||||
Educational qualification of the mother | High school and below | 19.589 | 2 | 81 (10.8%) | 105 (14.0%) | 0.000e |
Bachelor’s degree | 279 (37.2%) | 200 (26.7%) | ||||
Master’s and doctoral degrees | 59 (7.9%) | 25 (3.3%) | ||||
Employment status of the mother | Employed | 0.878 | 1 | 190 (25.4%) | 161 (21.5%) | 0.349f |
Unemployed | 229 (30.6%) | 169 (22.6%) | ||||
Child gender | Male | 2.491 | 1 | 202 (27.0%) | 140 (18.7%) | 0.115f |
Female | 217 (29%) | 190 (25.4%) | ||||
How old is your child? | 0-3 months | 12.581 | 5 | 39 (5.2%) | 50 (6.7%) | 0.028a |
3-6 months | 70 (9.3%) | 71 (9.5%) | ||||
6-9 months | 56 (7.5%) | 48 (6.4%) | ||||
9-12 months | 65 (8.7%) | 43 (5.7%) | ||||
12-24 months | 106 (14.2%) | 64 (8.5%) | ||||
>24 months | 83 (11.1%) | 54 (7.2%) | ||||
Monthly household income Saudi riyal | 5000-10000 | 3.718 | 3 | 162 (21.6%) | 133 (17.8%) | 0.294f |
>10000 | 192 (25.6%) | 134 (17.9%) | ||||
<5000> | 65 (8.7%) | 62 (8.3%) | ||||
What is the average amount of money spent on diapers each month? | 100 | 3.356 | 4 | 30 (4.0%) | 29 (3.9%) | 0.500f |
150 | 82 (10.9%) | 63 (8.4%) | ||||
200 | 126 (16.8%) | 109 (14.6%) | ||||
250 | 80 (10.7%) | 66 (8.4%) | ||||
>250 | 101 (13.5%) | 63 (8.4%) | ||||
How many times do you change diapers per day per child? | 1-3 | 4.012 | 3 | 80 (10.7%) | 70 (10.5%) | 0.260f |
4-7 | 269 (35.9%) | 200 (26.7%) | ||||
7-10 | 66 (8.8%) | 45 (6.0%) | ||||
>10 | 4 (0.5%) | 330 (44.1%) | ||||
Has your child clinically diagnosed diaper dermatitis (Rash) in the last 6 months? | Yes | 1.461 | 1 | 151 (20.2%) | 268 (35.8%) | 0.227f |
No | 151 (20.2%) | 225 (30.0%) | ||||
Did you have to visit the doctor due to this? | Yes | 0.213 | 1 | 108 (14.4%) | 311 (41.5%) | 0.645f |
No | 90 (12.0%) | 240 (32.0%) | ||||
Do you use plastic underpants? | Yes | 1.512 | 1 | 38 (5.1%) | 39 (5.2%) | 0.219f |
No | 381 (50.9%) | 291 (38.9%) | ||||
How do you use diapers on your child? | Attach the diaper firmly so that the feces do not leak. | 1.468 | 1 | 289 (38.6%) | 130 (17.4%) | 0.020a |
Attach it loosely to allow air to enter. | 241 (32.2%) | 89 (11.9%) | ||||
How do you clean your child after bowel movements? | Water only | 34.760 | 4 | 114 (15.2%) | 54 (7.2%) | 0.000e |
Water and soap | 204 (27.2%) | 170 (22.7%) | ||||
Water and wet wipes | 88 (11.7%) | 65 (8.7%) | ||||
Wet wipes | 12 (1.6%) | 41 (5.5%) | ||||
What do you use to dry after cleaning the child? | Natural air drying | 28.921 | 4 | 229 (30.6%) | 125 (16.7%) | 0.000e |
Gently patting with a dry towel + natural air drying | 121 (16.2%) | 103 (13.8%) | ||||
Gently patting with a dry towel. | 229 (30.6%) | 125 (16.7%) | ||||
Rubbing with a dry towel | 28 (3.7%) | 43 (5.7%) | ||||
Drying with a hair dryer | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (0.1%) | ||||
What type of diapers do you use? | Disposable diaper only | 7.821 | 2 | 402 (53.7%) | 301 (40.2%) | 0.020a |
Cloth only | 1 (0.1%) | 4 (2.2%) | ||||
Both disposable and cloth | 16 (2.1%) | 25 (3.3%) | ||||
What substances do you routinely put on a baby's bottom to prevent diaper dermatitis? | Baby lotion (barrier emollient) | 8.767 | 5 | 38 (5.1%) | 39 (5.2%) | 0.119f |
Baby Powder | 91 (12.1%) | 91 (12.1%) | ||||
Zinc oxide | 157 (21.0%) | 102 (13.6%) | ||||
Vaseline (petrolatum) | 44 (5.9%) | 32 (4.3%) | ||||
Bepanthene moisturizer crème | 3 (0.4%) | 0 (0) | ||||
None | 86 (11.5%) | 66 (8.8%) | ||||
What do you use to treat diaper dermatitis? | Application of baby powder | 21.013 | 6 | 34 (4.5%) | 34 (4.5%) | 0.002c |
Application of native medication | 19 (2.5%) | 19 (2.5%) | ||||
Application of medicated powder | 24 (3.2%) | 24 (3.2%) | ||||
Application of Vaseline | 63 (8.4%) | 60 (8.0%) | ||||
Application of anti-fungal cream | 226 (30.2%) | 129 (17.2%) | ||||
Use of antibiotics | 20 (2.7%) | 12 (1.6%) | ||||
Nothing | 33 (4.4%) | 44 (5.9%) | ||||
Did you introduce your baby to solid foods? | Yes | 12.860 | 1 | 316 (42.2%) | 103 (13.8%) | 0.000e |
No | 209 (27.9%) | 121 (16.2%) |
Table 5: Correlating the mother’s knowledge on the management of diapers, hygiene practices, and preventive measures
Sample size n=749, Significance levels at P<0>
DD is defined as inflammation in the diapered area (genital, abdomen, and thighs) with varying degrees of severity on the epidermis of babies [17].
The present study is aimed at measuring the knowledge of mothers on DD with children age of 0 to 24 months in Makka region, Saudi Arabia. The outcome of the present study revealed that the age of the mother, employment status, child gender, age of the child, use of plastic pants, method of using a diaper, cleaning method, type of diaper, and treatment were found to have a statistical association with the prevalence of DD. Kim (2019) [18], reported that improper hygiene practices, such as cleaning and drying methods and applying talcum powder during DD, were reported to worsen the disease. In the present study, about 60% of mothers were unaware of the conscious use of talcum powder on DD. A study conducted by Eke and Opara (2013) [19], in Nigeria reported that education qualification has significance for DD, and most of the mothers preferred Vaseline for the bottom and anti-fungal cream to treat DD.
Biranjia-Hurdoyal and Pandamikum (2015) [20], reported that the prevalence of DD is higher among babies who wear disposable diapers, and the results of the present study also showed that a higher prevalence of DD was observed in babies who used disposable diapers. Irregularity in changing diapers and usage of cloth diapers were found to have an influence on the prevalence of DD. The significant prevalence of DD was found to reduce with age [1]. The results of the present study also denoted the same: advancement in age reduced the incidence of DD and showed a higher significance between the age of the child and the prevalence of DD. Jewaro et al. (2021) [21], reported that using barrier cream, frequency of using diapers, and breast feeding are interlinked with the prevalence of DD. They also identified diarrhea as a potential risk factor for deepening the DD and suggested that educating mothers on these complications will be useful in reducing the incidence of DD. A study conducted in Saudi Arabia by Mohamed et al. (2021) [22], revealed that the age and gender (female) of infants has a strong influence on the prevalence of DD. In the present study, the prevalence of DD was found to be high among infants of age between 12-24 months. Similar results have been suggested by Alghamdi et al. (2022) [23], where infants between the ages of 19-24 months showed a higher risk of DD. Li et al. (2012) [3] demonstrated that introduction to solid foods, frequency of changing diapers, and home location were found to be risk factors for DD. In the present study, a higher significance was observed between the introduction of solid foods and the prevalence of DD. Joseph and Mathew (2013)[24], produced the contradicting result that the age of the mother or family type doesn’t have any significance with the mother’s knowledge.
The results of the present study showed that mothers had average knowledge of diaper management and hygiene practices. About 55.9% of mothers had good knowledge, and 44% of mothers had less knowledge on the management of diapers and hygiene practices. The percentage of good diaper management in the present study is higher than the recent studies conducted by Prithiba et al. (2020) [25], in Kanchipuram District, India, and Collins et al. (2023) [16], in Northern Ghana, West Africa (23.5%). The findings of the present study revealed that the association between socioeconomic factors (age of mother and educational qualification of mother), cleaning and drying method after bowel movement, type of diaper used, and treatment for DD were found to be correlated with the mother’s knowledge.
A recent study conducted by Collins et al. (2023) [16], showed that employment status and cleaning and drying methods were found to have a correlation with the mother’s knowledge of diaper management and hygiene practices. The results of the study conducted by Prithiba et al. (2020) [25], were found to contradict the outcome of the present study. The study showed that there is no significant correlation between the demographic factors (educational qualification, employment, diaper usage, and number of children) and the mother’s knowledge of DD. But the study revealed that family type and mother’s age showed significance with knowledge of DD. Wanjiku et al. (2016) [26], conducted a study to observe the relationship between sociodemographic and economic factors and DD. The results revealed the interlink between educational qualification, income of the mother, child age, and DD. In the present, maternal educational qualification was found to have a strong statistical association (P<0>
The present study highlighted that various factor like socioeconomic status (age of mother and employment status of mother), age and gender of child, plastic pant usage, use of diaper, type of diaper, cleaning method, introduction to solid foods, and treatment method are influencing the prevalence of DD, and these factors are also potentially correlated with the mother’s knowledge and preventive aspects of DD. In the present study, the majority of mother respondents from the Makka region of Saudi Arabia had good knowledge of diaper usage and management and were found to be aware of diaper dermatitis, but a higher prevalence of DD was observed among the population. So, the study strongly suggests the necessity and importance of creating awareness about DD and targeting parents and caretakers about diaper-related issues that would be helpful in containing the occurrence of DD and would possibly reduce the suffering of infants.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.