AUCTORES
Research Article
*Corresponding Author: Anthony Kodzo-Grey Venyo, North Manchester General Hospital, Department of Urology, Delaunays Road, M8 5RB, Manchester. United Kingdom
Citation: Grey Venyo AK, (2024), Enterobius Vermicularis Infection of the urinary bladder, kidney and urinary tract organs: Review and Update, Clinical Research and Clinical Trials, 10(1); DOI:10.31579/2693-4779/191
Copyright: © 2024, Anthony Kodzo-Grey Venyo. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 10 February 2024 | Accepted: 29 March 2024 | Published: 17 May 2024
Keywords: enterobius vermicularis infection of bladder; pinworm infection; enterobiasis; visualisation; microscopy; cystoscopy; visualisation; medication, recurrence; prevention; high index of suspicion; mebendazole; pyrantel pamoate; albendazole
Enterobius Vermicularis infection which is also called Pinworm infection or threadworm infection, and as well is referred to as enterobiasis, is a human parasitic disease that is caused by pinworm, Enterobius vermicularis. The most common manifesting symptom is itching or pruritus within the peri-anal region. The period of time from swallowing of the Pinworm eggs to the appearance of new eggs around the anus is stated to be between 4 weeks and 8 weeks. It has been pointed out that some individuals who are infected by Pinworm have tended to be asymptomatic. Enterobius Vermicularis is stated to spread between people by pinworm eggs. The pinworm eggs initially tend to be found around the anal region and they could survive for up to three weeks within the environment. Pinworms may be swallowed following contamination of the hands, food, or other articles. It had been pointed out that individuals who are at risk for the development of Pinworm infections are those who go to school, dwell within in a health care institution or prison, or who take care of individuals who are infected by pinworm. It has been iterated that another animal does not spread the Pinworm disease. It has been iterated that diagnosis of pinworm infection is established is by visualisation of the worms which are about one centimetre long or the eggs under a microscope. It has been iterated that treatment of pinworm infection is typically with utilisation of two doses of the medicaments including: mebendazole, pyrantel pamoate or albendazole two weeks apart. It has been recommended that every individual who dwells with or takes care of a pinworm infected person should be treated contemporaneously. Washing personal items in hot water pursuant to receiving each dose of medication has been recommended. Good hand-washing, daily bathing in the morning, and daily changing of underwear has been stated to help with regard to the prevention of pinworm reinfection. It has been iterated that pinworm infections commonly occur in all parts of the world and that pinworm infections are the most common type of worm infection within Western Europe, Northern Europe and within the United States of America. It has been documented that School-aged children are most commonly infected by Pinworms. It has been iterated that within the United States of America about 20% of children would develop pinworm at some point. It has also been documented that pinworm infection rates among high-risk groups might be as high as 50%. It has been pointed out that pinworm infection is not considered a serious disease and that pinworms are understood to have afflicted humans throughout history. The important thing to realise is that Pinworm infections could afflict the urinary bladder and organs of the urinary tract and unless clinicians have a high index of suspicion for pinworm infections of the urinary tract that had tended to be reported sporadically on rare occasions, the diagnosis could be delayed or missed. Pinworm infections of the urinary bladder and urinary tract could be asymptomatic or the manifestations tend to be non-specific including lower urinary tract voiding symptoms, abdominal discomfort or pain, loin discomfort or pain, non-visible haematuria, visible haematuria or spontaneous voiding out of worm-like material which the clinician confirms based upon visualisation of the worm or microscopy examination demonstrating features of the worm or finding of the worm in the process of cystoscopy or ureteroscopy examinations. Even though rare, clinicians need to be aware of the fact that Enterobius Vermicularis infection of the urinary bladder and urinary tract organs has tended to be reported on rare occasions.
It has been iterated that one-third of individuals who are afflicted by pinworm infection have tended to be totally no-symptomatic [1] [2] The main symptoms are itching (pruritus) in and around the anus as well as the perineum. [3] [4] [4] The itching occurs mainly during the night, [3] [5] and is caused by the female pinworms migrating to lay eggs around the anus. [4] [6] Both the migrating females and the clumps of eggs are irritating, as well as the sticky substance that is produced by the worms when the eggs are laid. [5] [7] The intensity of the itching varies, and it can be described as tickling, crawling sensations, or even acute pain [8] The itching leads to continuously scratching the area around the anus, which can further result in tearing of the skin and complications such as secondary bacterial infections, including bacterial skin inflammation, and hair follicle inflammation [3] [4] [8] General symptoms are trouble in sleeping, and restlessness [3]. A considerable proportion of children do experience loss of appetite, weight loss, irritability, emotional instability, and bed wetting. [3] Pinworms cannot damage the skin, [4] and they do not normally migrate through tissue [4]. Nevertheless, might move onto the vulva and into the vagina, [3] [4] from there moving to the external orifice of the uterus, and onwards to the uterine cavity, fallopian tubes, the ovaries, and the peritoneal cavity. [4] This can cause inflammation of the vulva and vagina (vulvitis and vaginitis) [3] [4]. This causes vaginal discharge and itchiness of the vulva. [3] The pinworms can also enter the urethra, and presumably, they carry intestinal bacteria with them. [4] According to Gutierrez (2000), a statistically significant correlation between pinworm infection and urinary tract infections had been shown; [4] nevertheless, Burkhart & Burkhart (2005) had maintained that the incidence of pinworms as a cause of urinary tract infections remains unknown. [2] One report had indicated that 36% of young girls with a urinary tract infection also had pinworms, [2] painful micturition had been associated with pinworm infection. [2] The relationship between pinworm infestation and appendicitis had been researched, but there was a lack of clear consensus upon the matter: While Gutiérrez had maintained that there exists a consensus that pinworms do not produce the inflammatory reaction, [4] Cook (1994) stated that it is controversial whether pinworms are causatively related to acute [6], and Burkhart & Burkhart (2004) had iterated that pinworm infection causes symptoms of appendicitis to surface. [2] In view of the rarity of Enterobius Vermicularis infection of the urinary bladder and the urinary tract organs, the ensuing article related to Enterobius Vermicularis of the urinary bladder and organs of the urinary tract has been written and divided into two parts: (A) Overview that has discussed miscellaneous general overview aspects of Enterobius Vermicularis and (B) Miscellaneous Narrations and Discussions Related to Enterobius Vermicularis infections of the urinary bladder, kidney and urinary tract organs.
To review and update the literature on Enterobius Vermicularis of Urinary bladder, Kidney, and Urinary tract organs.
Internet data bases were searched including: Google; Google Scholar; Yahoo; and PUBMED. The search words that were used included: Enterobius Vermicularis of bladder; Enterobius Vermicularis of urinary tract organ; Enterobius Vermicularis of kidney; pinworm infection of bladder; and pinworm infection of urinary tract organs. Thirty-six (36) refences were identified which were used to write the article which has been divided into two parts:
[A] Overview [8]
Definition and General iterations [8]
Aetiology of Enterobius Vermicularis [8]
The aetiology of Enterobius Vermicularis had been summated as follows: [8]
Epidemiology of Enterobius Vermicularis Infection
The epidemiology of Enterobius Vermicularis infection has been summated as follows: [8]
Pathophysiology of Enterobius Vermicularis Infection
The pathophysiology of Enterobius Vermicularis infection has been summated as follows: [8]
Clinical History and Examination Findings
The clinical history and examination findings in cases of Enterobius vermicularis infections had been summated as follows: [8]
Evaluation / Assessment of patients Afflicted by Enterobius Vermicularis Infection
The evaluation of Enterobius Vermicularis Afflicted Patients had been summated as follows: [8]
Treatment / Management of Enterobius Vermicularis Infection
The treatment / Management of Enterobius Vermicularis Infection had been summated as follows: [8]
Or
Or
Differential Diagnoses
The differential diagnoses of Enterobius Vermicularis Infection had been summated to include the following: [8]
Prognosis of Enterobius Vermicularis infection
The prognosis of Enterobius Vermicularis Infection had been summated as follows: [8]
Complications associated with Enterobius Vermicularis Infection
The general complications associated with Enterobius Vermicularis infection had been summated as follows: [8]
Enterobius Vermicularis infections of the urinary bladder, the kidney and urinary tract.
Enterobius vermicularis infections of the urinary bladder and urinary tract are extremely rare and the symptoms have tended to be non-specific and unless a high index of suspicion is not exercised, the diagnosis may be delayed or missed or the diagnosis may emanate as a surprise to the clinician. In view of the rarity of Enterobius Vermicularis infection of the urinary bladder and urinary tract, urinary tract affliction of Enterobius Vermicularis has been separately documented in the next section of the article. [8]
[B] Miscellaneous Narrations and Discussions from some Case Reports, Case Series, and Studies Related to Enterobius Vermicularis Infections of the Urinary Bladder, Kidney and organs of the Urinary Tract.
Choudhury et al. [13] stated the ensuing:
Choudhury et al. [13] reported a 58-year-old lady, who had presented to their outdoor clinic with a history of recurrent dysuria and increased frequency of micturition over the preceding 9 months. She did not have any history of associated fever or haematuria. Nevertheless, the patient complained of having occasional pruritus within her peri-anal and peri-urethral region. The patient was known to be diabetic and she was on oral hypoglycemic medicaments. She denied having any history of urethral instrumentation in the past. She had previously been treated with prophylactic antibiotics, but her symptoms had not resolved. The results of her repeated urine culture came out to be sterile; nevertheless, she had increased pus cells within her urine. One week before her outdoor visit, the patient had noticed small, white worms within her urine. She carried one such urine sample to the outdoor clinic (see figure 1). Upon low power microscopy examination, the worm was identified as Enterobius vermicularis. She had ultrasound scan screening of her kidney, ureter, and urinary bladder region, which demonstrated some echogenic floating materials within her urinary bladder. She underwent cystoscopy examination, which failed to demonstrate any worm-like structure within her urinary bladder or any other abnormality. Planoconvex ova of the Enterobius Vermicularis were identified within her urine sample; nevertheless, wet mount examination of her stool specimen did not demonstrate any eggs. The patient was treated by a single dose of 400 mg of oral albendazole which was repeated after 2 weeks in order to eradicate any emerging parasites. The symptoms of the patient completely resolved and there was no recurrence of her symptoms at her 6-month follow-up. Her urine upon examination during her 6 months follow-up assessment did not reveal any abnormality.
Figure 1.
Adult pinworm isolated from urine. Reproduced from [13] under the Creative Commons Attribution License.
Choudhury et al. [13] made the ensuing educative summating discussions:
Figure 2.
E Vermicularis eggs (wet mount). Reproduced from: [17] under the Creative Commons Attribution License.
Figure 3.
The living worm (left) after the incision of its spherical envelope (right). Reproduced from [17] under the Creative Commons Attribution License.
Even though there was a speculation that the infection was sexually transmitted, the patient denied it. The patient did not experience any symptoms from the gastrointestinal tract or itching sensation within his anus. The cello-tape test was undertaken and a microscopy examination identified Enterobius vermicularis eggs. Even though the patient had a negative cello-tape test and no irritative symptoms he was treated with mebendazole 100 mg PO bid for 3 days followed by two more courses with 3-week time interval. At his six-month follow-up assessment, there had been no recurrence of enteroparasitosis. After informing the patient, his three grandsons were examined using the cello-tape anal swab technique (one smear per child), for the presence of Enterobius vermicularis eggs. All three samples were positive for parasite eggs and the children were treated with the same antihelmintic regimen.
Zahariou et al. [17] made the ensuing discussions:
Zahariou et al. [17] made the ensuing conclusions:
Sammour et al. [30] stated the following:
Sammour et al. [30] reported a 54-year-old woman, who had manifested with a history of irritative urinary voiding symptoms for one month. She had recently been treated with norfloxacin, with no improvement. Her urinalysis demonstrated leucocyturia, and her urine culture was negative. She had Computed Tomography (CT) scan of her abdomen which showed an 8 mm stone within her distal left ureter, which was removed endoscopically. Her cystoscopy was normal during her ureteroscopy stone removal. Her voiding symptoms did not improve after her ureterolithotripsy, and she had persistent leucocyturia despite negative urine cultures and three courses of antibiotics. She had a second CT scan which did not demonstrate any urological abnormalities. She was treated with analgesics; after two months the patient noticed two worms within her own urine and brought them to the clinic. The worms were examined in a parasitology laboratory and a diagnosis of mature female Oxyurus worms (Enterobius vermicularis) was made. The patient was treated with 200 mg mebendazole once a day, for three days, with complete resolution of her urinary voiding symptoms and normalization of her urinalysis. A scotch-tape test applied to the perianal and perineal areas after treatment was negative. In her follow-up after six months, the patient remained asymptomatic.
Sammour et al. [30] made the ensuing discussions:
Conclusions
Nil
Acknowledgements to:
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.