AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article
*Corresponding Author: Muhammed Kamruzzaman, Consultant (Physiotherapy), Protibondhi Seba O Sahajyo Kendra, Jatiyo Protibondhi Unnayan Foundation, Bangladesh.
Citation: Muhammed Kamruzzaman, Delwar Hossain, (2024), Effects of Neuro-Muscular Electrical Stimulation and Graded Oscillatory Mobilization for an Individual with Post Stroke Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy, Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Research, 7(2); DOI:10.31579/2768-0487/126
Copyright: © 2024, Muhammed Kamruzzaman. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 01 February 2024 | Accepted: 15 February 2024 | Published: 20 February 2024
Keywords: neuro-muscular electrical stimulation; graded oscillatory mobilization; reflex sympathetic dystrophy
Background: Reflex sympathetic dystrophy syndrome (RSD) is a disorder that causes lasting pain, usually in an arm or leg, and it shows up after an injury, stroke, or even heart attack. But the severity of pain is typically worse than the original injury itself.
Objective: To assess effects of Neuro-Muscular Electrical Stimulation and Graded Oscillatory Mobilization for an individual with Post Stroke Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy.
Methods: This was cross sectional descriptive study. Visual Analog Pain Scale (VAS) and Voluntary Control Grade (VCG) were used. Thirty individuals with Post stroke Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy (RSD) were included in the study purposively.
Results: In study group there is a very good improvement of pain and good improvement of pain and very good improvement of voluntary control grade and patient can easily move shoulder joint. In control group there is an excellent improvement of pain and very good improvement of voluntary control grade and patient can easily move shoulder joint.
Conclusion: Effects of Neuro-Muscular Electrical Stimulation and Graded Oscillatory Mobilization for an individual with Post Stroke Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy is proven.
Post stroke Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy (RSD) is a health problem among populations in developing countries, and a major cause of medical expanse, absenteeism, and disability. Although RSD usually is self-limiting and benign disease that tends to improve spontaneously over time, a many varied therapeutic interventions are available for the treatment of Post stroke Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy. However, the effectiveness associated with most of these interventions has not yet been demonstrated beyond doubt and, consequently, the therapeutic management of Post stroke Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy varies widely. One of the major challenges for researchers in the field of Post stroke Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy is to provide evidence of which treatment, if any, is of most benefit for subgroups of patients Post stroke Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy. Neuro-Muscular Electrical Stimulation and Graded Oscillatory Mobilization with exercise therapy is a widely treatment for an individual with Post stroke Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy. Like other developing country in Bangladesh, stroke with hemiplegia is more clinical problem. Because hemiplegia causes a great hamper in flow of life and produce disability which reduce earning capacity of an individual. Overall, it has a negative impact on our population health and economic growth. Stroke with hemiplegia may last for 2 weeks to six months even 12 months or even life long, If patient did not treat with physiotherapy properly other complication occur such as pain with restricted movement around affected side of shoulder joint is most common named with Post stroke Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy. Post stroke Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy causes pain and restricted like difficult to elevation or abduction of shoulder. Pain may be sudden and sharp or it may be occurred with movement, changing posture also during sleeping. Pain and paresthetic sensation may refer to arm, forearm or also hand. It is important to treat Post stroke Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy properly. Otherwise, Muscles of arm and shoulder girdle become week. Recent studies have shown that plastic changes in the central nervous system may be closely related to poststroke rehabilitation.1-2 As for the methods of rehabilitation treatment, quite a few domestic and foreign literatures have reported that the group training treatment model can achieve satisfactory results, but the effect is relatively slow. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) has been applied to the treatment of stroke patients since the last century.3 The peak current of NMES with a specific waveform can maximize the number of responsive motor units and the rate at which they are generated, resulting in tonic contraction and powerful force.4 The application of NMES can not only improve muscle strength but also reduce the spasm of muscles by inducing relaxation or mutual inhibition by maximum contraction.5 Bakhtiary and Fatemy6 found that NMES observably improved the muscle strength of anterior tibial muscle and ankle dorsiflexion muscle and the static spasm of plantar flexor. Barth et al.7 also suggested that the application of electromyographic- (EMG-) triggered NMES to the anterior tibial muscle five days per week for 4 weeks in patients with chronic stroke could improve the range of motion of ankle dorsiflexion, balance, and gait. You et al.8 emphasized the potential efficacy of NMES in the treatment of foot drop and showed that NMES has a beneficial help in the recovery of spasm after stroke.
Study design: Descriptive cross-sectional method
Material Used
Sample Design
Purposive sampling method
Sample Size
Thirty individuals with Post stroke Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy (RSD)
Study Setting
Department of Physiotherapy, Gono Bishwabidyalay, Savar, Dhaka.
Rehabilitation Center for Disabled (RCD) at Holy Crescent Hospital Ltd, Khulshi, Chittagong.
Khagrachary Pain Paralysis Physiotherapy &Rehabilitation Center (KPRC) Khagrachary
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
| Patient ID | Age | Sex | VAS | VCG |
| 617 | 67 | M | 9 | 2 |
| 344 | 56 | F | 6 | 4 |
| 520 | 45 | F | 5 | 4 |
| 620 | 48 | M | 7 | 3 |
| 321 | 42 | F | 4 | 5 |
| 342 | 60 | F | 5 | 3 |
| 436 | 72 | M | 6 | 3 |
| 742 | 50 | F | 8 | 3 |
| 673 | 58 | M | 7 | 2 |
| 804 | 60 | M | 3 | 5 |
| 756 | 53 | F | 6 | 3 |
| 724 | 41 | F | 5 | 3 |
| 764 | 59 | F | 7 | 2 |
| 564 | 63 | M | 6 | 3 |
| 234 | 71 | F | 9 | 1 |
Table1: Pretreatment data of control group of individuals.
| Patient ID | Age | Sex | VAS | VCG |
| 617 | 67 | M | 5 | 4 |
| 344 | 56 | F | 3 | 2 |
| 520 | 45 | F | 2 | 5 |
| 620 | 48 | M | 3 | 5 |
| 321 | 42 | F | 0 | 6 |
| 342 | 60 | F | 1 | 5 |
| 436 | 72 | M | 3 | 4 |
| 742 | 50 | F | 3 | 5 |
| 673 | 58 | M | 2 | 5 |
| 804 | 60 | M | 1 | 5 |
| 756 | 53 | F | 2 | 5 |
| 724 | 41 | F | 0 | 6 |
| 764 | 59 | F | 2 | 4 |
| 564 | 63 | M | 1 | 5 |
| 234 | 71 | F | 3 | 4 |
Table 2: Post treatment data of control group of individuals.
| Measures | Age | VAS | VCG |
| Total Number | 15 | 15 | 15 |
| Mean | 56.33 | 6.2 | 3.07 |
| Standard Deviation | 9.47 | 1.64 | 1.06 |
| Confidence Interval (+-) | 112.66 or 0.00331 | 12.4 or 0 | 6.13 or 0 |
Table 3: Results of Pretreatment.
| Measures | Age | VAS | VCG |
| Total Number | 15 | 15 | 15 |
| Mean | 56.33 | 2.067 | 4.67 |
| Standard Deviation | 9.47 | 1.289 | 0.94 |
| Confidence Interval (+-) | 112.66 or 0.00331 | 4.1328 or 0.0012 | 9.27 or 0.07 |
Table 4: Results of post treatment.
| Patient ID | Age | Sex | VAS | VCG |
| 117 | 57 | M | 8 | 2 |
| 334 | 66 | M | 6 | 4 |
| 420 | 46 | F | 5 | 4 |
| 520 | 48 | M | 7 | 3 |
| 329 | 49 | F | 4 | 5 |
| 302 | 61 | F | 5 | 3 |
| 486 | 70 | M | 6 | 3 |
| 642 | 53 | F | 8 | 3 |
| 873 | 57 | F | 7 | 2 |
| 814 | 61 | M | 4 | 5 |
| 846 | 58 | F | 6 | 3 |
| 924 | 44 | M | 5 | 3 |
| 754 | 58 | F | 7 | 2 |
| 644 | 62 | M | 6 | 3 |
| 284 | 72 | F | 8 | 1 |
Table 5: Pretreatment data of case study group of individuals.
| Patient ID | Age | Sex | VAS | VCG |
| 117 | 57 | M | 5 | 3 |
| 334 | 66 | M | 4 | 4 |
| 420 | 46 | F | 3 | 5 |
| 520 | 48 | M | 4 | 3 |
| 329 | 49 | F | 1 | 6 |
| 302 | 61 | F | 2 | 3 |
| 486 | 70 | M | 3 | 4 |
| 642 | 53 | F | 3 | 4 |
| 873 | 57 | F | 1 | 5 |
| 814 | 61 | M | 2 | 5 |
| 846 | 58 | F | 3 | 4 |
| 924 | 44 | M | 2 | 3 |
| 754 | 58 | F | 3 | 5 |
| 644 | 62 | M | 2 | 5 |
| 284 | 72 | F | 3 | 4 |
Table 6: Post treatment data of case study group of individuals.
| Measures | Age | VAS | VCG |
| Total Number | 15 | 15 | 15 |
| Mean | 57.47 | 6.13 | 3.07 |
| Standard Deviation | 8.09 | 1.31 | 1.06 |
| Confidence Interval (+-) | 114.94 or o | 12.26 or 0 | 6.14 or 0 |
Table 7: Results of Pretreatment.
| Measures | Age | VAS | VCG |
| Total Number | 15 | 15 | 15 |
| Mean | 57.47 | 6.13 | 3.07 |
| Standard Deviation | 8.09 | 1.31 | 1.06 |
| Confidence Interval (+-) | 114.94 or o | 12.26 or 0 | 6.14 or 0 |
Table 8: Results of Post treatment.
A total of 15 patients allocated to control group and 15 patients allocated to case group.
1) In control study group visual analogue pain scale (VAS) before vs after treatment Mean 6.2 and 2.06, Standard deviation 1.64 and 1.289, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 12.40 and 4.1328. Voluntary control grade (VCG) before vs after treatment Mean 3.07 and 4.67, Standard deviation 1.06 and 0.94, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 6.13 and 9.27. It means, in control group there is an excellent improvement of Pain and very good improvement of voluntary control grade and patient can easily move shoulder joint.
2) In case study group visual analogue pain scale (VAS) before vs after treatment Mean 6.13 and 2.73, Standard deviation 1.31 and 1.06, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 12.26 and 5.46, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 6.14 and 8.26. It means, in study group there is a very good improvement of Pain and good improvement of Pain and very good improvement of voluntary control grade and patient can easily move shoulder joint.
Reflex sympathetic dystrophy syndrome (RSDS) - also known as complex regional pain syndrome - is a chronic condition characterized by severe burning pain, pathological changes in bone and skin, excessive sweating, tissue swelling, and extreme sensitivity to touch. The syndrome, which is a variant of a condition known as causalgia, is a nerve disorder that occurs at the site of an injury (most often to the arms or legs). It occurs especially after injuries from high-velocity impacts such as those from bullets or shrapnel. However, it may occur without apparent injury. The symptoms of RSDS usually occur near the site of an injury, either major or minor, and include: burning pain, muscle spasms, local swelling, increased sweating, softening of bones, joint tenderness or stiffness, restricted or painful movement, and changes in the nails and skin. One visible sign of RSDS near the site of injury is warm, shiny red skin that later becomes cool and bluish. The pain that patients report is out of proportion to the severity of the injury and gets worse, rather than better, over time. It is frequently characterized as a burning, aching, searing pain, which may initially be localized to the site of injury or the area covered by an injured nerve but spreads over time, often involving an entire limb. It can sometimes even involve the opposite extremity. Pain is continuous and may be heightened by emotional stress. Moving or touching the limb is often intolerable. Eventually the joints become stiff from disuse, and the skin, muscles, and bone atrophy. The symptoms of RSDS vary in severity and duration. However, there are usually three stages associated with RSDS, and each stage is marked by progressive changes in the skin, nails, muscles, joints, ligaments, and bones. Stage one lasts from 1 to 3 months and is characterized by severe, burning pain at the site of the injury. Muscle spasm, joint stiffness, restricted mobility, rapid hair and nail growth, and vasospasm (a constriction of the blood vessels) that affects color and temperature of the skin can also occur. In stage two, which lasts from 3 to 6 months, the pain intensifies. Swelling spreads, hair growth diminishes, nails become cracked, brittle, grooved, and spotty, osteoporosis becomes severe and diffuse, joints thicken, and muscles atrophy. As the patient reaches stage three, changes in the skin and bones become irreversible, and pain becomes unyielding and may now involve the entire limb. There is marked muscle atrophy, severely limited mobility of the affected area, and flexor tendon contractions (contractions of the muscles and tendons that flex the joints). Occasionally the limb is displaced from its normal position, and marked bone softening is more dispersed. The cause of RSDS is unknown. The syndrome is thought to be the result of damaged nerves of the sympathetic nervous system - the part of the nervous system responsible for controlling the diameter of blood vessels. These damaged nerves send inappropriate signals to the brain, interfering with normal information about sensations, temperature, and blood flow. Since RSDS is
most often caused by trauma to the extremities, other conditions that can bring about RSDS include sprains, fractures, surgery, damage to blood vessels or nerves, and cerebral lesions. The disorder is unique in that it simultaneously affects the nerves, skin, muscles, blood vessels, and bones. RSDS can strike at any age, but is more common between the ages of 40 and 60. It affects both men and women, but is most frequently seen in women. Although it can occur at any age, the number of RSDS cases among adolescents and young adults is increasing. Investigators estimate that two to five percent of those with peripheral nerve injury and 12 to 21 percent of those with hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) will suffer from RSDS. RSDS is often misdiagnosed because it remains poorly understood. Diagnosis is complicated by the fact that some patients improve without treatment. A delay in diagnosis and/or treatment for this syndrome can result in severe physical and psychological problems. Early recognition and prompt treatment provide the greatest opportunity for recovery. RSDS is diagnosed primarily through observation of the symptoms. However, some physicians use thermography - a diagnostic technique for measuring blood flow by determining the variations in heat emitted from the body - to detect changes in body temperature that are common in RSDS. A color-coded "thermogram" of a person in pain often shows an altered blood supply to the painful area, appearing as a different shade (abnormally pale or violet) than the surrounding areas of the corresponding part on the other side of the body. An abnormal thermogram in a patient who complains of pain may lead to a diagnosis of RSDS. X-rays may also show changes in the bone. Physicians use a variety of drugs to treat RSDS, including corticosteroids, vasodilators, and alpha- or beta-adrenergic-blocking compounds. Elevation of the extremity and physical therapy are also used to treat RSDS. Injection of a local anesthetic, such as lidocaine, is usually the first step in treatment. Injections are repeated as needed. TENS (transcutaneous electrical stimulation), a procedure in which brief pulses of electricity are applied to nerve endings under the skin, has helped some patients in relieving chronic pain. In some cases, surgical or chemical sympathectomy - interruption of the affected portion of the sympathetic nervous system - is necessary to relieve pain. Surgical sympathectomy involves cutting the nerve or nerves, destroying the pain almost instantly. But surgery may also destroy other sensations as well. Functional neuromuscular electrical stimulation is a closed-loop form of electrical stimulation that attempts to restore function in individuals with damaged or destroyed nerve pathways. The prosthetic device delivers individuals pulses through surface or implanted electrodes connected to the neuromuscular system. The stimulation of the peripheral nerves trigger muscle contractions to produce functionally useful movements. One application of NMES is to restore upper extremity functions in individuals with strokes, and C5-C6 tetraplegia (quadriplegia). Other applications of functional NMES include treatment for foot drop by assisting with ankle dorsiflexion and gait training in spinal cord injuries. H-wave stimulation stimulation is a distinct form of electrical stimulation that produces a direct, localized effect on the conduction of underlying peripheral nerves. It differs in wave form from transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). It has been evaluated primarily as a pain treatment from a variety of etiologies including diabetic neuropathy, muscle sprains, temporomandibular joint dysfunction (TMJ), and reflex sympathetic dystrophy (RSD). It has also has been studied for wound healing and improving post-surgical range of motion. There are multiple devices approved through the FDA pre-market approval process. Threshold electrical stimulation is described as the delivery of low-intensity electrical stimulation to target spastic muscles during sleep at home. The stimulation is not intended to cause muscle contraction. Although the mechanism of action is not understood, it is thought that low-intensity stimulation may increase muscle strength and joint mobility, leading to improved voluntary motor function. The technique has been used most extensively in children with spastic diplegia related to cerebral palsy, but also in those with other motor disorders, such as spina bifida. Devices used for threshold electrical stimulation are classified as “powered muscle stimulators.” As a class, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) describes these devices as “an electronically powered device intended for medical purposes that repeatedly contracts muscles by passing electrical currents through electrodes contacting the affected body area.”
Effects of Neuro-Muscular Electrical Stimulation and Graded Oscillatory Mobilization for an individual with Post Stroke Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy is positive and satisfactory.
This was a self-funding study. There was no conflict of interest.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
