AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article
*Corresponding Author: KOMBOIGO BE, Higher Institute of Health Sciences of Nazi Boni University, 01 BP 1091, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Citation: Some Wc, Komboigo Be, Simpore A, Some Da, Thieba B, (2023) Early Post-Cesarean Rehabilitation in A Tertiary Hospital in Burkina Faso, 2021, J. Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, 7(6) DOI:10.31579/2578-8965/166
Copyright: © 2023, KOMBOIGO BE. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of The Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 12 May 2023 | Accepted: 16 June 2023 | Published: 22 August 2023
Keywords: early; rehabilitation; caesarean section; yoth; burkina faso
Introduction: early post-caesarean rehabilitation could be an ideal alternative in terms of direct health savings for the parturient and indirect for the community.
Objective: Studying the effects of early rehabilitation after caesarean section in women at Yalgado Ouedraogo teaching hospital (YOTH)
Methodology: This was a cohort study comparing two groups of patients who underwent a scheduled caesarean section from 7th May to 4th September, 2020 in the obstetrics department of YOTH. Group 1 consisted of women benefiting from the early rehabilitation protocol (n=124) and group 2 consisted of non-rehabilitated women (n=124).
Results: The times of first getting up (p=0.01), walking (p<0.05), first drink (p=0.0001), removal of the urinary catheter (p<0.05), and urination (p<0.05) were significantly reduced in group 1. There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative pain. The mean time to first urination after removal of the urinary catheter was 18.8 ± 4.3 hours in the rehabilitated operated group versus 28 ± 10.5 hours in the non-rehabilitated group (p < 0.05). The first rise took place on average 7.2 ± 1.5 hours after the cesarean section in the rehabilitated group versus 8.1 ± 3.7 hours in the non-rehabilitated group (p=0.01). There was a significant reduction in length of stay (p < 0.05) and cost of treatment (p=0.)
Conclusion: The early rehabilitation protocol after caesarean allows a significant improvement in terms of functional recovery, length of stay and cost of treatment.
Any surgical procedure generates stress which can be responsible for profound modifications in the homeostasis of the human organism. Following this, comes convalescence, which is defined as a complex process specific to each patient [1].
The purpose of conventional perioperative care is to deal with the stress associated with the surgical act and to promote a smooth convalescence. The concept of "Fast track Surgery" or "enhanced recovery after surgery" which means "early, accelerated or improved rehabilitation" makes it possible to reduce the duration of hospitalization for patients while improving postoperative recovery, through a multidisciplinary approach. and multimodality of the perioperative period [2]. This early rehabilitation is also applicable after cesarean section. Indeed, caesarean section is increasingly considered a non-major intervention since nowadays it is possible for patients to return to normal physical activity after this intervention within a short to medium period of time [3].
The use of maternity services by women has increased significantly since the introduction of free maternal and child care by the government of Burkina Faso in 2016 [4]. This could explain the increase in the cesarean rate observed in hospitals. But the duration of hospitalization in most of these hospitals can reach three days or more. The number of hospital beds being limited in these hospitals, there is inevitably a problem of availability of beds. At the Yalgado Ouedraogo teaching hospital (YOTH), the occupancy rate of maternity beds was 120.5%, 114.2%, 116% respectively in 2016, 2017 and 2018 [5]. The overcrowding of hospital rooms leads some women to lie on the floor with negative consequences on the quality of care offered and an increase in the rate of morbidity and maternal and neonatal mortality. Early post-caesarean rehabilitation at the YOTH could therefore be an ideal alternative in terms of direct health savings for the parturient and indirect for the community. The aim of the work was to study the effects of early rehabilitation after caesarean section in women at the Yalgado Ouedraogo teaching hospital (YOTH).
The study took place in the obstetrics department of the Yalgado Ouedraogo teaching hospital (YOTH)). This was a cohort comparing two groups of patients who underwent a cesarean section between 7th May and 4th September, 2020. Group 1 had received the early postoperative rehabilitation protocol instituted during this study and group 2 the usual care protocol after caesarean section. We included in the study all the women who had undergone a planned caesarean section during which no pre- and intra-operative complication had occurred. We did not include women who underwent emergency caesarean section or those who presented a contraindication to one of the molecules of the postoperative management protocol or those who had an ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) score higher than 2. We carried out an exhaustive sampling of all the women admitted for scheduled caesarean section and who met the study criteria. The choice of patients from the two groups was made randomly without a matching criterion. We collected 248 patients including 124 from group 1 and 124 from group 2. The data were collected by semi-structured direct individual interviews and by a documentary review using a questionnaire including the variables of the study. The judgment criteria related to the postoperative length of stay, functional recovery (motor, sensory and cognitive), the occurrence of postoperative adverse effects, the overall cost of treatment and the management of postoperative pain operative. The data were collected by direct semi-structured individual interviews and by a documentary review using a questionnaire including the variables of the study. The judgment criteria related to the postoperative length of stay, functional recovery (motor, sensory and cognitive), the occurrence of postoperative adverse effects, the overall cost of treatment and the management of postoperative pain operative. The data were collected by direct semi-structured individual interviews and by a documentary review using a questionnaire including the variables of the study. The judgment criteria related to the postoperative length of stay, functional recovery (motor, sensory and cognitive), the occurrence of postoperative adverse effects, the overall cost of treatment and the management of postoperative pain operative.
Box 1: Joint care administered to the two study
Box 2: Usual post-operative care administered to group 2 (usual department protocol)
Box 3: Application of early postoperative rehabilitation to group 1
Microsoft Word and Excel 2019 computer software were used for word processing, tables, graphs and Epi info version 7.2.2 for data analysis. The central tendencies (mean) and dispersion (standard deviation, minimum, maximum, quantiles) parameters were calculated for the quantitative variables. For qualitative variables proportions were used. Tests (Chi², Fischer's and Student's exact test) were used to assess the association between the different variables at the 5% significance level. For ethical considerations, we obtained authorization from the national ethics committee in Burkina Faso under deliberation number 68 of 22th April, 2020. Also, patients were asked to give their free and informed consent to participate in the study.
Socio-demographic characteristics
The average age of the rehabilitated patients was 28.7 ± 6.7 years versus 27.6 ± 6.5 years for the non-rehabilitated patients (p= 0.15). Table 1 includes the distribution of patients according to Socio-demographic characteristics.
Table 1: Distribution of patients according to Socio-Demographic characteristics
Rehabilitation data
The average time taken to absorb the first drink was 6.9 hours ± 1.4 hours in the rehabilitated group versus 8.3 hours ± 3.7 hours in the non-rehabilitated group (p= 0.0001). The average time for removal of the urinary catheter was 7.7 ± 2.1 hours in the operated group. rehabilitated versus 10.5 hours ± 4.9 in that of the non-rehabilitated rehabilitated (p less than0.05). The mean time to ablation of the peripheral venous line was 24.3 hours ± 2.4 in the rehabilitated group versus 22.3 hours ± 5.6 in the non-rehabilitated group (p=0.0003). Table 2 includes the distribution of patients according to data from early rehabilitation.
Table 2: Distribution of patients according to data on early rehabilitation
Functional recovery
The mean time to first urination after removal of the urinary catheter was 18.8 ± 4.3 hours in the rehabilitated operated group versus 28 ± 10.5 hours in the non-rehabilitated group (p less than 0.05). Figure 1 illustrates the distribution of patients according to the time to occurrence of the first spontaneous micturition after removal of the urinary catheter.
Figure 1: Distribution of rehabilitated patients (n1=124) and not rehabilitated(n2=124) according to the delay of the first micturition after removal of the urinary catheter.
Figure 2: Distribution of rehabilitated patients (n1=124) and not rehabilitated (n2=124) according to the time to first get up after the caesarean section.
The first rise took place on average 7.2 ± 1.5 hours after the cesarean in the rehabilitated group versus 8.1 ± 3.7 hours in the non-rehabilitated group (p=0.01). Figure 2 illustrate the distribution of patients according to the time to first get up after caesarean section.
Figure 3: Distribution of rehabilitated (n=124) and non-rehabilitated (n=124) patients according to ambulation time after caesarean section.
The average time to return to walking was 16.4 ± 3.6 hours in the rehabilitated group vs.20.9 ± 8.5 hours in the non-rehabilitated group (p less than 0.05).
Table 3: Distribution of patients according to the mean of the visual analogue scales according to the effort of the patient at the 12th, 24th and 48th hour.
Postoperative pain
In Table 3 are presented the means of the visual analog scales at rest and during mobilization at the 12th, 24thand 48thhour.
Table 4: Distribution of rehabilitated and non-rehabilitated patients according to side effects
Scalable data
The usual protocol was significantly associated with discomfort on first rising (p less than 0.05). Table 4 presents the adverse effects occurring in the postoperative period according to the treatment groups. The average duration of hospitalization after the cesarean section was 2.9 days ± 0.2 in the rehabilitated group versus 3.5 days ± 0.9 days in the non-rehabilitated group (p less than 0.05). The average cost of care for patients in the early rehabilitation group was 89516.1 CFA money± 9699.1 vs 97612.9 CFA money ± 29070.1 in the non-rehabilitated group (i.e., respectively 179 USD±19.4 versus 195.23 USD±58.4). The difference was statistically significant with p=0.003.
Early rehabilitation data
The average time taken to absorb the first drink was 6.9 hours ± 1.4 in the group of rehabilitated patients versus 8.3 hours ± 3.7 in the group of non-rehabilitated women. The difference was statistically significant with p value equal to 0.0001. Huang and al. in 2016, reported that early oral rehydration would allow rapid resumption of intestinal transit and early ambulation. It would also reduce the risk of infection, the delay in breast-feeding and the duration of hospitalization [6]. Our results contrast with those of Mangesi and al who, in 2002, found no significant difference in the resumption of intestinal transit between early and late resumption of oral feeding [7].
In our study, on average, early rehabilitation reduced the time to removal of the urinary catheter by 3 hours. Indeed, the ablation of the probe was made within 24 hours after caesarean section in 95.2% of patients benefiting from early rehabilitation. This rate is close to that of Laronch and al in France which was 93% [8]. Ghoreishi and al found in 2003, in a study of indwelling urinary catheters in cesarean delivery, that the use of an indwelling urinary catheter is an unnecessary part of the cesarean delivery process. In addition, urinary retention was very rare [9]. Nevertheless, Pavlin and al found that it would be important to combine this strategy with a monitoring protocol for voiding [10].
The mean time to ablation of the peripheral venous line was 24.3 hours ± 2.4 in the group of rehabilitated women versus 22.3 hours ± 5.6 in the non-rehabilitated group (p=0.0003). The venous line was removed in all patients within 24 hours after surgery. This rate is similar to that found by Laronche and al in Paris in 2017, which was 98% [8]. However, it is superior to that found by Jacques and al in France which was 49% [11]. A practice survey of maternity wards in the Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur and Île-de-France regions in 2013 revealed that the venous line was maintained for 24 hours after the procedure in 70% of patients who received planned caesarean section [12]. Although maintaining the venous line is a brake on regaining autonomy, the need to administer oxytocics and intravenous analgesics would lead practitioners to keep the venous line for 24 hours. In our study, the absence of complications in the immediate postpartum in early rehabilitated patients justified the removal of the venous line within 24 hours after cesarean section.
Functional recovery
Early rehabilitation significantly reduced first rise time by nearly one hour (7.2 hours vs. 8.1). The difference was significant with p=0.01. Mazard and al in France in 2015 found an average delay close to 9 hours ± 4.2 [13]. Randriambololona in Antananarivo in 2018 was higher than ours (16.4 hours) [14]. Getting up early is a fundamental point of early rehabilitation. It allows patient autonomy and prevention of thromboembolic risk. The results of our study are much better since the first sunrise took place at the 12th hour in 99.2% in rehabilitated women compared to 78.9% in non-rehabilitated ones (p = 0.05). In fact, James and al in France had only 53.3% of women having their first birth the day after the cesarean section [11].
The mean walking time was 16.4 ± 3.6 hours in the group of rehabilitated women vs. 20.9 ± 8.5 hours in the group of non-rehabilitated ones (p less than 0.05).
Our study showed an increase in the rate of early ambulation in patients who had benefited from early rehabilitation. In fact, all the patients who had benefited from early rehabilitation had ambulated within 24 hours after the cesarean compared to 68.5% in patients who had benefited from the usual protocol. These figures corroborate those found by Lee and al who reported a significant increase (p=0.001) in early ambulation from 33 to 51
Postoperative pain
This study revealed to us that at the 12thhour there was no statistically significant difference in the pain experienced by the two groups of patients, both at rest (p=0.14) and during mobilization (p greater than0.99). This could be explained by the fact that the two groups of patients benefited from the same analgesia made of paracetamol 1gram associated with nefopam 20 micrograms until the 6th postoperative time.
In patients undergoing early rehabilitation at 24th hour the early rehabilitation protocol significantly reduced postoperative pain by 0.3 at rest (p=0.0000) and by 0.2 at mobilization (p=0.004). Similarly, at the 48th hour, there was a significant decrease in pain intensity of 0.3 at rest (p=0.00002) and 0.1 on mobilization (p=0.02). This difference could be explained by the fact that the diclofenac suppository had been systematically combined every 12 hours for 48 hours in the early rehabilitation protocol, which was not the case for the usual protocol.
In the literature, several authors have conducted comparative studies of the level of pain felt between two groups of patients benefiting from early postoperative rehabilitation and not. Elgohary and al in 2017 compared the intensity of pain between a group of patients benefiting from early rehabilitation and another from conventional rehabilitation as part of scheduled colorectal surgery and found a statistically significant difference (p less than 0.001) (16). As for Meyer and al. in 2018, they found no statistically significant difference for the same type of study conducted on two groups of patients who had undergone obstetric surgery (P= 0.80) [17]
Scalable data
Nausea/vomiting was at the forefront with 16.1% in the group of rehabilitated women and 14.5% in the group of those not rehabilitated. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups with p=0.7.
Our results are higher than the 6.6 and 8.7 found by Moris B and al in 2019 in Uganda respectively in the rehabilitated and non-rehabilitated groups [18]. On the other hand, in his series, Randriambololona in 2018 at the University Hospital of Befelatanana reported a higher rate with a percentage of nausea/vomiting complications of 21.43% [14]. As for infectious complications, he found no significant difference between the two groups p=0.3. During the first lift, 24.2% of patients rehabilitated in our study compared to 58.8% of those not rehabilitated had presented with discomfort. The difference was statistically significant between the two groups with p less than0.05 Moris B and al also found a statistically significant difference between the groups of rehabilitated (6.6%) and non-rehabilitated (30.4%) patients [18].
The patients who had benefited from the early rehabilitation protocol were authorized to leave the maternity ward earlier than the other patients (2.9 days versus 3.5 days, p less than0.05). The rehabilitation protocol had significantly (p less than 0.05) reduced the duration of hospitalization by an average of 12 hours. This reduction in hospital stay is similar to that reported by Rousseau et al in France in 2017 which was 10 hours [19]. The main fear of early discharge remains the risk of rehospitalization. But Wrench and al in England found that patients who were discharged on the first day after caesarean section using an early rehabilitation protocol were no more rehospitalized than those discharged on the second day after caesarean section [20]. Of course, the early discharge of patients implies a good city–hospital relay. A discharge on the third day after the caesarean section requires that the medical team has ensured that returning home is possible on the basis of the acquisition of various prerequisites by the mother (mother-child relationship,18
breastfeeding, newborn care). These prerequisites are achieved more quickly with the application of early rehabilitation since the mother can get up on her own, without being bothered by a urinary catheter or an infusion. As a result, the mother can be autonomous with her child before the 12th post cesarean hour. In our study, 99.2% of patients benefiting from early rehabilitation had made their first rise before the 12th hour, which would explain this reduction in hospital stay.
The average cost of care for patients in the early rehabilitation group was 89516.1 CFA money ± 9699.1 versus 97612.9 CFA money ± 29070.1 (i.e. respectively 179 USD±19.4 vs 195.23 USD±58, 14) in the group of unrehabilitated women (p= 0.003). The earlier authorization for patients to leave the hospital, made possible thanks to the application of this protocol, seems to have contributed to significant savings for the health system. Orji and al in Nigeria found that women in the rehabilitated group required less intravenous fluid than those in the non-rehabilitated group [21], which may explain the lower cost of treatment. Also our results are similar to those of Fay and al in the United States of America in 2019 who found that total postoperative direct costs decreased [22].
This study revealed to us that patients who benefit from early rehabilitation had faster empowerment. This empowerment was favored by adequate management of postoperative pain, faster removal of medical devices, early oral nutrition and early mobilization. The study also allowed us to observe a reduction in the duration of hospitalization and a significant drop in the cost of caesarean section management. Maternal satisfaction and the mother-child relationship were not addressed in the study. Further studies integrating these aspects should make it possible to refine the benefits of early rehabilitation in obstetrics at the Yalgado Ouedraogo teaching hospital or even beyond.
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Ethics statement
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the authorization of the ethics committee. Written informed consent to participate in this study was provided by the participants' legal guardian/next of kin.
SWCL and KBE prepared the manuscript, SWCL collected the data, SA analyzed the data, SDA, BT and DB provided a useful review of this manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
The authors would like to thank all patients for their consent obtained. The authors also thank all the staff who contributed to the care of the patients. They would also like to thank Meighan Mary for her contributions to the writing in English.
The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
