AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article
*Corresponding Author: Jose Luis Turabian. Turabian Health Center Santa Maria de Benquerencia Toledo, Spain.
Citation: Jose Luis Turabian, (2024), Differentiation of Cardialgia, J. General Medicine and Clinical Practice, 7(9); DOI:10.31579/2639-4162/174
Copyright: © 2024, Jose Luis Turabian. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 10 April 2024 | Accepted: 26 April 2024 | Published: 08 May 2024
Keywords: covid-19; sars-cov-2; covid-19 testing; covid-19 self-testing; point of care testing; epidemiology; general practice
Background: Since the disappearance of the health alarm in many countries covid-19 tests are carried out in health services only in certain situations, so people with symptoms in the community frequently choose to be tested at home.
Objective: To compare the cases of covid-19 with a positive test carried out in health services with at home and subsequently communicated to the General Practitioner.
Methodology: An observational, longitudinal and prospective case series study of adult patients with covid-19 infections in general medicine from October 1, 2022 to October 1, 2023
Results :76 cases of covid-19 were included: 18 cases of covid-19 with a test 19 performed in health services, and 58 cases of covid-19 with a test performed at home. The cases with testing at home versus the cases with testing in health services were younger, with more female, were milder and had less risk; There were no significant differences in symptoms or chronic diseases. They only differed significantly in that there were fewer health care workers, and in that they were vaccinated with 3 doses in a higher percentage. Cases with home testing were more frequent throughout the year, except in the summer of 2023 during the largest wave of cases.
Conclusion: In the general practice setting in Toledo, Spain, from October 1, 2022 to October 1, 2023, covid-19 cases were diagnosed 3 times more with tests at home than in health services. If the official statistics only collect tests in health services, these data should be multiplied by 3 to get closer to the real number of cases.
The evolution towards an endemic phase of coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19) is usually described as "favourable." Many people are becoming comfortable living alongside covid-19, even though the average number of daily deaths is still two to four times the long-term average for influenza, and higher on a seasonally adjusted basis [1-3]. But it is difficult to estimate the true magnitude of the current situation and to understand what the transition from the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) to an endemic virus will look like. Many countries are now transitioning to strategies to manage covid-19 as an endemic disease (when it exists at a predictable level that does not require special socio-sanitary interventions) [4]. Unfortunately, in the current phase, many of the community surveillance studies that track infection levels have ended. In many countries, such as Spain [5], they no longer publish their covid-19 case counts, it is not clear how many people are infected, nor can the evolution of new waves be evaluated. Thus, it is not known exactly how many real infections there are now. And the virus circulates confused between allergies and other mild viruses. In this scenario, in many places, there could be an "under-reporting" of cases [6]. Additionally, covid-19 testing has increasingly shifted toward an at-home model. So it is difficult to estimate the true magnitude of the current situation [4]. In this “dark” situation, it is problematic to predict how covid-19 will develop in the coming months [4]. However, having a good surveillance system to monitor and track emerging variants of the virus is very important, as cycles of infection will continue to occur [7]. In this context, a possible set of alternative indicators, in addition to the number of hospitalizations, have been suggested to provide early warning of future waves: 1) SARS-CoV-2 levels in wastewater; 2] consumer purchases of home tests [4]; 3) the frequency of visits to the general practitioner (GP) for upper respiratory tract infection and/or to report a positive covid-19 test at home [8]; 4] the estimation of the community risk, which at any time is a function of the immunity of its members (although the level of immunity of each individual cannot be measured in real time, estimates of the level of risk in the community can be based on what is known about vaccination rates and previous infections) [9, 10]. In this scenario, where official figures probably imply significant under-reporting and the incidence of covid-19 and its evolution over time in the community is truly unknown, frequently people with a positive test at home do communicate this circumstance to their general practitioner, to seek treatment and/or sick leave. In this way, knowing the incidence of covid-19 cases with a positive test at home that is reported to the GP, allows the official under-reporting to be corrected (although it will still represent a minimal incidence, since could have sick people who do not take a test at home and who, even if they are positive at home, they do not report it to the GP) [11]. We present a longitudinal and prospective study of covid-19 re-infections was conducted from October 1, 2022 to October 1, 2023 in a general medicine office, with the objective of comparing a set of selected clinical-epidemiological variables of covid-19 cases with a positive test carried out in health services with the covid-19 cases with a positive test at home and subsequently communicated to the GP.
Design and emplacement
An observational, longitudinal and prospective study of covid-19 re-infections was conducted from October 1, 2020 to October 1, 2023 in a general medicine office in the Santa Maria de Benquerencia Health Center, Toledo, Spain, which has a list of 2,000 patients > 14 years of age (in Spain, GPs care for people > 14 years of age, except for exceptions requested by the child's family and accepted by the GP).
Outcome of interest
To compare the cases of covid-19 with a positive test carried out in health services with cases of covid-19 with a positive test at home and subsequently communicated to the GP
Collected variables
The following variables were collected:
-Age and sex
-Chronic diseases (defined as "any alteration or deviation from normal that has one or more of the following characteristics: is permanent, leaves residual impairment, is caused by a non-reversible pathological alteration, requires special training of the patient for rehabilitation, and / or can be expected to require a long period of control, observation or treatment” [12], classified according to the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Health-Related Problems, CD-10 Version: 2019 [13]
-If they were Health Care Workers
-Social-occupancy class (according to the Registrar General's classification of occupations and social status code) [14, 15]
-Problems in the family context and low-income household based on the genogram and in the experience of the GP for their continuity of care and knowledge of the family (genogram is a schematic model of the structure and processes of a family, which included the family structure, life cycle and family relational patterns. It was understood that "complex" genograms present families with psychosocial problems) [16, 17]
-Ethnic minority (defined as a “human group with cultural, linguistic, racial values and geographical origin, numerically inferior compared to the majority group”) [18]
-Disease severity (classified according to: 1. mild cases: clinical symptoms are mild and no manifestation of pneumonia can be found on images; 2. moderate cases: with symptoms such as fever and respiratory tract symptoms and the manifestation of pneumonia can be seen on the imaging tests; and 3. severe cases: respiratory distress, respiratory rate ≥ 30 breaths / min., pulse oxygen saturation ≤ 93% with room air at rest, arterial partial pressure of oxygen / oxygen concentration ≤ 300 mmHg.) [19]; to simplify comparison, moderate and severe cases were counted together;
-Date of covid-19 infection diagnosis
-Presence of re-infection (defined as a documented infection occurring at least 90 days after a previous infection) [20-22]
-Vaccination status against covid-19 at the date of acute infection: vaccinated with 2 doses of vaccine [23], vaccinated with first booster [24], vaccinated with fourth dose (second booster) for fall-winter 2022 [25]
Diagnosis of covid-19
The diagnosis was performed with reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (PCR) oropharyngeal swab tests or antigen testing [26]
Sample size
All patients who met the criteria for covid-19 infection from October 1, 2022 to October 1, 2023 and who were treated in the general medicine consultation object of the study, were included.
Statistical analysis
The bivariate comparisons were performed using the Chi Square test (X2) with Yates correction or Fisher Exact Test, when necessary, (according to the number the expected cell totals) for percentages, and the student test for the mean.
Ethical issues
No personal data of the patients were used, but only group results, which were taken from the clinical history.
76 cases of covid-19 were included: 18 cases of covid-19 with a test performed in Health Services, and 58 cases of covid-19 with a test performed at home. This means that a proportion of 3 tests at home for every test in health services were found. The cases with testing at home versus the cases with testing in health services only differed significantly in that there were fewer socio-health care workers [X2 with Yates correction= 10.0348. p= .001536. Significant at p < .05], and in that a higher percentage were vaccinated with 3 doses [X2= 4.588. p= .032196. Significant at p < .05]. The Covid-19 cases with testing at home versus testing in health services were younger, there were more women, they had a lower level of labour specialization, they had milder severity, fewer chronic diseases, and fewer problems in the family context, but with less vaccinated with 4 doses, and had fewer re-infections; but none of these comparisons were statistically significant (TABLE1).
Table 1- (): Denotes percentages; NS: Not significant
Comparison Of Variables Between Covid-19 Infections with Test Performed in Health Services and Test Performed at Home in The Period from October 2022 to October 2023
According to the seasonal distribution, cases with home testing were more frequent in autumn, winter and spring, but statistically significantly less frequent in summer 2023, where the main wave of cases occurred [X2= 4,131. p= .042105. Significant at p < .05] (TABLE 2).
| SEASONAL DISTRIBUTION OF COVID-19 CASES | TEST PERFORMED IN HEALTH SERVICES N=18 | TEST PERFORMED AT HOME N=58 | STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE |
| October 2022-December 2023-AUTUMN | 5 (28) | 19 (33) | X2= 0.1577. p= .691258. NS |
| January 2023-March 2023-WINTER | 2 (11) | 15 (26) | X2 with Yates correction= 0.9766. p= .323033. NS |
| April 2023-June 2023-SPRING | 1 (5) | 7 (12) | Fisher exact test= 0.6716. NS |
| July 2023-September 2023-SUMMER | 10 (56) | 17 (29) | X2= 4.131. p= .042105. Significant at p < .05. |
| Total | 18 (100) | 58 (100) | --- |
Table 2- (): Denotes percentages
Comparison Of Covid-19 Infections with Test Performed in Health Services and Test Performed at Home According to Seasons of The Year from October 2022 to October 2023
There were no significant differences in symptoms or chronic diseases between covid-19 infections with covid-19 test performed in health services and covid-19 test performed at home (TABLE 3, TABLE 4).
SYMPTOMS COVID-19 INFECTION* ACCORDING TO WHO, ICD-10 GROUPS
| TEST PERFORMED IN HEALTH SERVICES N=18 | TEST PERFORMED AT HOME N=58 | STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE |
| General (discomfort, asthenia, myalgia, fever, artralgias) | 24 (40) | 71 (37) | X2= 0.1551. p= .693669. NS |
| Respiratory (cough, dyspnea, chest pain) | 19 (32) | 50 (26) | X2= 0.69. p= .406153. NS |
| ENT (anosmia / ageusia, odynophagia, aphonia, rhinorrhea, pharyngeal dryness-mucus, ear pain) | 11 (18) | 53 (28) | X2= 2.1306. p= .14438. NS |
| Digestive (anorexia, nausea / vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal pain) | 0 | 6 (3) | Fisher exact test= 1. NS |
| Neurological (headache, dizziness, photopsia, dysarthria, syncope) | 5 (8)
| 9 (5) | X2= 0.5532. p= .456999. NS |
| Psychiatric (anxiety, insomnia) | 0 | 1 (0.5) | Fisher exact test= 1. NS |
| Skin (chilblains, flictenas, rash) | 0 | 0 | Fisher exact test= 1. NS |
| Urological ( dysuria, frequency) | 1 (2) | 1 (0.5) | Fisher exact test= 0.4217. NS |
| Total symptoms* | 60 (100) | 191 (100) | --- |
Table-3: Denotes percentages; NS: Not significant; * Patients could have more than one symptom. The percentages are over the total of symptomsComparison Of Symptoms Between Covid-19 Infections with Test Performed in Health Services and Test Performed At Home In the Period from October 2022 to October 2023
CHRONIC DISEASES* ACCORDING TO WHO, ICD-10 GROUPS | TEST PERFORMED IN HEALTH SERVICES N=18 | TEST PERFORMED AT HOME N=58 | STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE |
| -I Infectious | 0 | 1 (1) [VIH] | Fisher exact test= 1. NS |
| -II Neoplasms | 1 (2) | 3 (3) | Fisher exact test= 1. NS |
| -III Diseases of the blood | 1 (2) | 2 (3) | Fisher exact test= 1. NS |
| -IV Endocrine | 9 (21) | 19 (16) | X2= 0.5055. p= .477103. NS |
| -V Mental | 4 (10) | 11 (9) | X2 with Yates correction= 0.0893. p= .765057. NS |
| -VI-VIII Nervous and Senses | 2 (5) | 11 (9) | X2 with Yates correction= 0.4091. p= .52241. NS |
| -IX Circulatory system | 12 (29) | 18 (15) | X2= 3.322. p= .06836. NS |
| -X Respiratory system | 0 | 6 (5) | Fisher exact test0 0.1933. NS |
| -XI Digestive system | 4 (10) | 18 (16) | X2= 0.9589. p= .327461. NS |
| -XII Diseases of the skin | 1 (2) | 2 (2) | Fisher exact test= 1. NS |
| -XIII Musculo-skeletal | 1 (2) | 7 (6) | Fisher exact test= 0.6828. NS |
| -XIV Genitourinary | 7 (17) | 17 (15) | X2 0.0843. p= .771516. NS |
| TOTAL chronic diseases* | 42 )100) | 115 (100) | --- |
Table-4: Denotes percentages; NS: Not significant; *Patients could have more than one chronic disease. The percentages of chronic diseases are over the total of chronic diseases
Comparison Of Chronic Diseases Between Covid-19 Infections with Test Performed In Health Services And Test Performed At Home In The Period From October 2022 To October 2023
1. Main findings
Our study has 3 main results:
2. Comparison with other studies
The emergency of the covid-19 pandemic is over, but the virus continues to circulate. And it won't stop doing so in the near future. Therefore, periods of increased infections can be expected. However, the measurement is no longer as comprehensive as in the first two years and, since the summer of 2022, the up and down oscillations of the transmission were no longer listed in many places, so there is no data to base on when predicting how covid-19 will develop in the coming months [27]. In Spain, since March 2022, cases were no longer measured in the general population and monitoring was restricted to those over 60 years of age. On June 2023, the Health Minister decided that the mask would go from mandatory to only recommended in pharmacies, health centres and social health centres, and it stopped publishing reports on all detected cases, to focus on the same method that has been used for the flu for years. It is calculated with an estimate made with data reported by selected health centres and hospitals. Furthermore, the number of tests sold in pharmacies has been multiplying week after week during the summer, although their results are not officially recorded or made public [28]. Our study indicates that women, young people, milder patients and those with lower risk, perform (and report it to the GP) covid-19 tests at home more frequently. In this way, cases of covid-19 are estimated with tests carried out in health services. But, frequently (although predictably not 100%), people with a positive test at home do communicate this circumstance to their GP, to seek treatment and/or sick leave. In this way, knowing the incidence of covid-19 cases with a positive test at home that is reported to the GP, allows the official under-reporting to be corrected (although it will still represent a minimal incidence since some sick people do not take a test or they do not report it to the GP). In fact, the sales data for antigen tests for Covid-19 has been proposed as an indicator of the variation in incidence in the community [29]. The predominant variants in Spain during the period of our study were those of the XBB family. The XBB.1.5 lineage became dominant globally in February 2023 and in March in Spain. “Eris” variant (EG.5) descendant of omicron, also from the XBB family, spread rapidly since the end of July 2023 in the United States, Europe (including Spain) and Asia. And, in a very small proportion, there is currently another variant that is advancing in the world, the BA.2.86, which has been named as Pirola [1, 28, 30-34]. None of these variants have been shown to cause greater severity or greater escape from vaccines and symptoms remain largely similar to previous omicron variants [35, 36].
The extension of the Eris variant during the summer of 2023 has led to an increase in cases in Spain. In the Community of Madrid (Spain), in mid-August 2023, cases of covid-19 had increased by 20% among the population over 60 years of age; but they also increased in all age groups throughout Europe especially since August 2023. In Spain, some communities reported a significant increase in hospitalizations due to SARS-CoV-2 among the vulnerable population. However, the figures are very far from the great explosion (the second of Omicron) in the summer of 2022. However, it is possible that many of the current infections are occurring with few symptoms or confused with those of other mild conditions. In this scenario, sales of antigen tests increased [28, 32]. Our study shows that home testing was more frequent in autumn, winter and spring, but statistically significantly less frequent in the summer of 2023, where the main wave of cases occurred. Possibly, this higher incidence could have led to more consultation in health services. Furthermore, in that wave there were predictably more serious cases and it affected socio-health workers more who performed their test in health services.
Although severe covid-19 is rare, populations remain vulnerable to future waves of reinfection with emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants despite high vaccination and infection rates [37]. Scientists say that having a good surveillance system to monitor and track emerging variants of the virus is very important, as cycles of infection will continue to occur [7]. However, it seems that political decisions are going in the opposite direction[5, 7]. Policymakers, governments and individuals need data on incidence rates in vaccinated people, to assess the impact of additional doses of vaccines (38, 39). In our study cases with testing at home were more vaccinated with 3 doses, but not with 4 doses. Four doses were mainly given to older and more at-risk people, and so they could be more frequent tested in health services.
In short, public health authorities may need to look at a broader range of indicators to support their disease planning and management efforts. Because in some countries, such as Spain, GPs are the gateway for all patients to the system, and each person is assigned a family doctor (40), an indicator could be the frequency of reporting to GP a positive covid-19 test at home [8, 33]. This data can correct current statistics and give a more realistic view of the number of covid-19 cases in the community.
Limitations and strengths of the study
In the general practice setting in Toledo, Spain, from October 1, 2022 to October 1, 2023, covid-19 cases were diagnosed 3 times more with tests at home than in health services. If the official statistics only collect tests in health services, these data should be multiplied by 3 to get closer to the real number of cases. The cases with testing at home were younger, female, with less severity, vaccinated with 3 doses, but not with 4 doses, and were more frequent than those tested in health services throughout the entire year, except in the largest wave of cases.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
