AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article
*Corresponding Author: Docteur Diallo Boubacar Siddi, Gynecologist- Obstetrician. Lecturer at Conakry University Teaching Hospital.
Citation: Boubacar S. Diallo, Boubacar A. Diallo, Mamadou S. Camara Diallo A., Leno D., Ibrahima S. Balde, Telly Sy, Hyjazi Y., Keita N., (2021) Impact of an Educational Program on Sexual Issues among Cervical Cancer Survivors' Women in Northern Upper Egypt. J. Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences 5(6); DOI: 10.31579/2578-8965/061
Copyright: © 2021, Boubacar Siddi Diallo, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 10 August 2021 | Accepted: 27 August 2021 | Published: 06 September 2021
Keywords: diagnosis; fibromyomas; labé; CMC; FU; gynaecological pathologies
Objectives: To calculate the frequency of uterine fibromyomas, to describe the epidemiological profile, to describe the management and to establish the prognosis of women with uterine fibromyomas in the gynaecology-obstetrics department of the Regional Hospital of Labé.
Methodology: This was a retrospective descriptive study lasting three (3) years from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2019. All patients admitted and operated on in the department for uterine fibromyomas during the study period were included. Patients who were not operated for uterine fibromyomas in the department and incomplete records were not included. Our data were collected and analysed using Epi-Info software version 7.2.2.6. Word, Excel and Power point software from Pack office 2016 were used for data entry and presentation. The study involved a continuous series of 115 anaemic pregnant women. We proceeded with an exhaustive recruitment of pregnant women according to the criteria defined above.
Results: The frequency of uterine fibromyomas among gynaecological pathologies was 44.75%. The epidemiological profile was that of a 30-39% (40.87%), housewife (53.91%) and nulliparous (40%) woman. Pelvic pain was the dominant reason for consultation (75.65%) and 46.08% of patients had no particular history. Intramural or interstitial uterine fibromyomas were the most common (49.57%) and ultrasound was performed in all patients. The surgical indications were dominated by large polymyomatous uterus 37.39%, followed by haemorrhagic fibroid 26.09%. Myomectomy was performed in 75.65% of cases, exclusively via the abdominal route (100%), while hysterectomy was performed via the abdominal route in 17.39% of cases and vaginal route in 6.96%. The postoperative course was simple in 75.65% of cases and complicated in 24.35%. Complications were dominated by anaemia (13.04). The average length of stay was 6.05 days with extremes of 3 and 13 days.
Conclusion: The frequency of the uterine fibromyomas is raised in the region of Labé and the hold in charge is often surgical
Uterine fibromyomas (UF) are benign tumours that correspond to a degenerative proliferation of the connective tissue and smooth muscle of the uterus that condense into a pseudo-capsule [1].They represent a major problem for women of reproductive age, as they are often responsible for infertility, after eliminating all other causes [2].UF is most often asymptomatic. However, the location and size of the myomatous nucleus (es) may determine the occurrence of various clinical manifestations such as menometrorrhagia, pelvic pain, constipation, dysuria and infertility warranting treatment [3]. They may be isolated or multiple and may be interstitial, subserosal or submucosal, sessile or pedunculated. They are usually corporal and rarely cervical. They can range in size from a grain of rice to a full term uterus [4]. Currently, the diagnosis of FU is made by ultrasound and diagnostic hysteroscopy. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is used as a second line of treatment and allows precise pre-treatment mapping from 5 fibroids or more or in the case of associated uterine pathology such as adenomyosis [5]. FU can thus cause serious obstetric complications (spontaneous miscarriage, premature delivery, prævia obstacles, postpartum haemorrhage, dynamic dystocia, and endometritis) and non-obstetric complications (acute torsion; bladder, urethral, rectal and intestinal compressions; anaemia; aseptic necrobiosis) [2].
In Canada, FU is common (with an incidence of 70% at age 50). Between 20% and 50% of these fibroids are symptomatic and have considerable social and economic impact [6].In France, FU is a common condition and is the leading cause of hysterectomy [7]. In Africa, uterine fibroid disease is very common and represents a real public health problem. Indeed, myomas develop in 20 to 25% of women over 30 years of age and can affect up to 60% of black women from the age of 35 [8]. [9] In 2020 reported in her study 25.78% of the impact and management of FU in Mali, Coulibaly A. et al. [In Guinea, Diallo M.H et al. In Guinea, Diallo M.H et al [11] in 2020 reported 51.92% of FU operated on at the Ratoma CMC. Baldé I.S et al. [12] in 2014 reported that the most frequently encountered operative indication for hysterectomy at Conakry University Hospital was FU (39.6%).
The objectives of this study were to calculate the frequency of uterine fibromyomas, to describe the epidemiological profile, to describe the management and to establish the prognosis of women with uterine fibromyomas in the gynaecology-obstetrics department of the regional hospital of Labé.
This was a retrospective descriptive study lasting three (3) years from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2019. All the records of patients admitted and operated in the department for uterine fibromyomas during the study period were included. All the cases recorded without operation for uterine fibromyomas in the department and incomplete records were not included. Our data were collected and analysed using Epi-Info software version 7.2.2.6. Word, Excel and Power point software from 2016 Pack office were used for data entry and presentation. The study involved a continuous series of 115 anaemic pregnant women. We proceeded to an exhaustive recruitment of pregnant women according to the criteria defined above. The variables studied were: epidemiological (frequency, age, socio-professional strata and parity), clinical and paraclinical (reasons for consultation, history, location, associated pathologies and ultrasound), therapeutic (operative indications, type of approach and operative procedure), prognostic (duration of hospitalisation and postoperative follow-up).
1-Frequency: out of 257 gynaecological conditions, we recorded 115 cases of operated uterine fibromyomas, i.e. a frequency of 44.75%.
2-Epidemiological profile
-Age: the 30-39 age group was the most concerned (40.87%). The average age was 37.74 years with extremes of 20 and 65 years.
- Occupation: housewives were the most affected 53.91%, followed by professional women 25.22%.
-Parity: we recorded 40% nulliparous, 23.48% primiparous, 13.91% pauciparous, 13.04% multiparous and 9.56% grand multiparous.
3-Clinical
-Reasons for consultation: pelvic pain was the dominant reason for consultation with 75.65%, followed by genital haemorrhage 55.65% against 12.17% of urinary and digestive disorders.
-Previous history: 15.65% of the women operated on had already undergone a myomectomy and 17.39% of them complained of infertility.
-Location of myomas: Intramural or interstitial uterine fibromyomas were the most common, 49.57%, followed by submucosal uterine fibromyomas (20.87%).
-Associated pathologies: the association with ovarian cyst was the most frequent 15.65% followed by hydrosalpinx 8.70%, cervical cancer 4.35% and prolapse 0.87%.
-Ultrasound: it was performed in all patients (100%).
4-Therapeutics
-Operative indications: were dominated by polymyomatous large uterus 37.39%, followed by bleeding fibroid 26.09%. The combination of uterine fibromyomas and infertility represented 17.39%.
-Type of approach and surgical procedure: myomectomy was the dominant procedure, i.e. 75.65%, exclusively via the abdominal route (100%), while hysterectomy was performed in 24.35%: abdominal route (laparotomy) 17.39% and vaginal route 6.96%.
5-Pronosis
-Duration of hospitalization: we found that 48.70% of patients were hospitalized between 3 and 5 days. The average length of stay was 6.05 days with extremes of 3 and 13 days.
Postoperative follow-up: The postoperative follow-up was simple in 75.65% and complicated in 24.35%. Complications were dominated by anaemia in 13.04%, which myomectomy was haemorrhagic, requiring a blood transfusion in 6.09%. We also recorded 5.22% of parietal suppurationHowever, there were no cases of postoperative death.
1-Frequency: out of 257 gynaecological conditions, we recorded 115 cases of operated uterine fibromyomas, i.e. a frequency of 44.75%. This result is comparable to that found by Baldé I.S et al. [13] in 2015 at Conakry University Hospital, i.e. 42.4%, but lower than the 51.92% reported by Diallo M.H et al. [11] in 2020 at the Ratoma CMC. This high frequency could be explained by the fact that our study took place in a structure that is at the top of the health pyramid in the Labé region.
2-Epidemiological profile
-Age: the 30-39 age group was the most concerned (40.87%). The average age was 37.74 years with extremes of 20 and 65 years. Our results corroborate those of Diallo M.H. et al. [11] at the Ratoma CMC in 2020 reporting an average age of 37 years with a frequency of occurrence between 30-39 years (49.63%). [9] In 2020 in Morocco ______ reported an average age of 42.7 years with a predominance between 40-50 years. This frequency observed in our series could be explained by the fact that FU is a pathology of the woman in full genital activity and that because of a relative hyperoestrogenism. However, a rate of 19.13% was recorded for the 20-29 age group, which reinforces the idea that in black women, uterine fibromyomas are increasingly found in young women. [13].
- Profession: housewives were the most affected 53.91%, followed by women in the careers 25.22%.This result is close to the 57.14% of housewives reported by Onikoyamou F. This result is close to the 57.14% of housewives reported by Onikoyamou F. [14] at Kamsar hospital.
This predominance could be explained by the fact that housewives constitute the highest percentage of the female population in Guinea in general, but also in the Labé region.
- Parity: we recorded 40% nulliparous, 23.48% primiparous, 13.91% pauciparous, 13.04% multiparous and 9.56% large multiparous. We note that the increase in parity is inversely proportional to the frequency of appearance of uterine fibromyoma. The same observation was made by Diallo M.H. et al. [11] who found: 45.18% nulliparous, 24.44% primiparous, 15.60% pauciparous, 13.33% multiparous and 1.48% large multiparous. This observation is in line with the theory of Marshall L.M. and Parazzini F., who state that the reduction in the risk of fibromyomas is linked to parity and that this risk decreases with the number of births [15].
3-Clinical
-Reasons for consultation: pelvic pain was the dominant reason for consultation with 75.65%, followed by genital haemorrhage 55.65% against 12.17% of urinary and digestive disorders. Magassouba D. [16] reported that 39% of patients consulted for genital haemorrhage and 27.5% for pelvic pain. The associated infertility assessment was a circumstance for the discovery of fibromyomas in 17.39% of patients.
- Antecedents: we recorded that 15.65% of the women operated on had already undergone a myomectomy and that 17.39% of them complained of infertility. This result is relatively higher than the 13.13% of myomectomies reported by Traoré D.V [2] at the regional hospital of N'Zérékoré. However, 46.08% of the patients had no particular antecedents. In the medium term, the main complication after myomectomy is recurrence. [2]
- Location of myomas: intra mural or interstitial uterine fibromyomas were the most common, 49.57%, followed by submucosal uterine fibromyomas (20.87%).Our results are comparable to those found by Baldé I.S et al. Our results are comparable to those found by Baldé I.S et al [13], i.e. 48.8% of intra-mural uterine fibromyomas and 32.3% of submucosal uterine fibromyomas. Knowledge of the topography of uterine myomas is important in the choice of treatment.
- Associated pathologies: the association with ovarian cyst was the most common 15.65% followed by hydrosalpinx 8.70%, cervical cancer 4.35% and prolapse 0.87%. Baldé I.S et al. [13] report an association of 11% ovarian cyst and 2.32% hydrosalpinx. Fofana M.S. [17] found a 0.74% association with cervical cancer in his study at the Ratoma CMC.
- Ultrasound: it was performed in all patients (100%). Our result is identical to that of Laghzaoui M. et al [18] in Morocco.
4-Therapeutics
-Operative indications: were dominated by polymyomatous large uterus 37.39%, followed by haemorrhagic fibroid 26.09%. The association of uterine fibromyomas and infertility represented 17.39%.Our observation is shared by Diallo M.H. et al. Our observation is shared with Diallo M.H. et al [11] at the Ratoma CMC, who reported in their series that the indications for surgery were dominated by large polymyomatous uterus, i.e. 64.44%, followed by haemorrhagic fibromyoma, i.e. 18.52%, and infertility, which represented 17.04%.
Therapeutic intervention must be motivated by the existence of a troublesome symptom and only clinical monitoring is necessary in the case of an asymptomatic fibroid. A possible future desire for pregnancy must be taken into account as well as the age of onset of the menopause
- Type of approach and surgical procedure: myomectomy was the dominant procedure, i.e. 75.65%, exclusively by the abdominal route (100%), while hysterectomy was performed in 24.35%: abdominal route (laparotomy) 17.39% and vaginal route 6.96%. Traoré D.V [2] in his series at the regional hospital of N'Zérékoré reported: 81.82% of myomectomies all performed by abdominal route, and 18.18% of hysterectomies of which: 13.13% were performed by abdominal route and 5.05% by vaginal route. Baldé I.S et al. [13] at the CHU of Conakry and Diallo M.H et al. [11] at the Ratoma CMC reported conservative surgical treatment in the majority of cases with 70% and 92.60% respectively.
The exclusivity of the abdominal approach can be explained by the fact that the fibroids were generally of large size.
5-Pronosis
-Duration of hospitalization: we found that 48.70% of patients were hospitalized between 3 and 5 days. The average length of stay was 6.05 days with extremes of 3 and 13 days. In the series by Traoré D.V. [2] at the regional hospital of N'Zérékoré, the hospital stay was 8.31 days. This relatively short stay in our series is due to the fact that the postoperative care was usually simple.
- Post-operative care: The post-operative care was simple in 75.65% and complicated in 24.35%. Complications were dominated by anaemia in 13.04%, of which the myomectomy was haemorrhagic and required a blood transfusion in 6.09%. We also recorded 5.22% of parietal suppuration.
However, there were no cases of postoperative death. Diallo M.H. et al. [11] reported 34.82% of postoperative complications, represented mainly by anaemia with 23.70%, resulting in a fatality rate of 1.48%.
The frequency of the uterine fibromyomas is raised in the region of Labé and the hold in charge is often surgical.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
