AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Review Article
*Corresponding Author: William David Strain, Diabetes and Vascular Research Centre University of Exeter Medical School Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital Barrack Road Exeter EX2 5AX.
Citation: William D Strain (2021) Diabetes through transitions in life; from fit to frail J. Endo and Dis; 5(2); DOI:10.31579/2640-1045/064
Copyright: © 2021, William David Strain, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 08 February 2021 | Accepted: 19 March 2021 | Published: 22 March 2021
Keywords: diabetes; geriatric phenotype; sarcopaenia; glycaemic
The accelerated ageing that occurs in diabetes results in earlier appearance of the geriatric phenotype, including frailty. Recent guidelines have stressed the need for assessing frailty in the evaluation of older adults living with diabetes. Once evaluated and identified, however, the presence of frailty marks a significant change for the individual. Treatments that have been continued and encouraged often for many years, may be discontinued. Life-prolonging medications such GLP-1 analogues, and SGLT-2 inhibitors are replaced with therapies designed to improve quality of life, reduce glycaemic variability and stabilise the sarcopaenia that characterises frailty, such as insulin. With this, however, comes new problems, such as the risk of hypoglycaemia, the need to for capillary glucose monitoring and sub cutaneous administration. Additionally, new diagnoses that are more common in people in diabetes, such as stroke, heart disease, dementia, falls and fractures will result in further changes, with the need for care and possibly even institutionalisation.
This review will provide a framework to navigate the changes that occur as an individual transitions through the stages of frailty, and how best to approach the multiple challenges that will occur en route, including the approaches that may be required to actively de-prescribe drugs to improve the quality of life for those living with diabetes.
As an adult living with diabetes ages, they will go through many transitions, however, none has a greater impact on their life than becoming frail. Frailty is a dynamic and complex state of physiological decline, characterized by impaired strength, fatigue, weight loss, slowed motor processing and performance, social withdrawal, decreased balance, impaired cognition, and diminished physical functioning[1]. It is a result of increased vulnerability to stressors resulting from multisystem decline in reserve and function. A key precipitant is muscle loss (sarcopaenia), which is a recognized complication of diabetic microangiopathy, and thus poorly controlled diabetes is an important risk factor with a mechanistic link, rather than a simple shared risk association [2-4]. Frailty adds a clinical value in prognosis and decision-making because frail adults are vulnerable to many adverse outcomes such as impairment of function, infection, falls, and institutionalization. Further, frail older adults have adverse pathophysiologic or functional changes not captured fully by comorbidity and disability definitions, leading to increased mortality, even after adjusting for disease diagnoses and other factors[2].
Recent guidelines have stressed the need for assessing frailty in the evaluation of older adults living with diabetes [5]. Once evaluated, frailty-specific individualized glycaemic targets are agreed and treatment regimen may be amended. From an individual’s perspective, however, presence of frailty marks a significant change not just in their targets or medication, but the interaction with the health care providers.
Complications of diabetes in the frail older adult
Like any other person living with diabetes, the risk of micro and macrovascular events is increased in the frail population, however diabetes contributes to several other components of the frailty syndrome. Diabetes is an independent predictor of depression, functional disability, falls and fractures [6]. The latter of these presents a very interesting paradox. People with diabetes tend to have a higher BMI, which, in turn, is associated with higher bone mineral density (BMD). Thus, one would anticipate a lower fracture risk. There are competing hypotheses for the observation. It may represent impairment in microarchitecture of the bone, specifically in the loadbearing trabeculae, due to underlying microvascular disease. Alternatively, it simply be a product of the increased falls risk mediated through hypoglycaemia, sarcopaenia, neuropathy or any other component of the frailty syndrome.
Cognitive decline and dementia, however, are recognized complications of diabetes in frail older adult[7]. Indeed, the rate of cognitive decline is doubled in those with diabetes compared to those without, giving rise to both Alzheimer’s type and vascular dementia[8]. Predictive factors include genetic elements, such as absence of the APO E4 allele, insulin resistance and the accompanying hyperinsulinaemia, reduced C-peptide, previous cerebral ischaemia, chronic hyperglycaemia and intercurrent hypoglycaemia. The interplay between risk of hyperglycaemia and hypoglycaemia is complex. In those without diabetes, there is a clear association between higher average glucose and cognitive decline. In those with diabetes, however, a high average glucose is associated with a higher risk of dementia, however the risk also rises as average glucose falls into a physiological range. This is thought to be due to the increased glycaemic variability seen in those with failing alpha and beta cells, and resultant hypos. Indeed, in a large population-based study, the risk of dementia increased by 26% after a single major hypoglycaemic episode, and almost doubled after 3 or more episodes in a year after adjustment for potential confounders such as duration of diabetes, insulin use, HbA1c and ethnicity[9].
Individualising treatment targets
As a result of the different demands and risks, treatment targets are amended as older adults become more frail. There is growing global consensus that glycaemic targets should be relaxed in older adults. However, in the only study to date that has attempted to individualise targets for older adults, after appropriate training a group of health care professionals was asked to set individualized targets for their elderly patients. In this study, a population of aged between 70 and 97, approximately 10% of whom were very frail had an average “individualized” target set of 7.0% (53mmol/mol) aligned with local and national guidance for a younger population[10]. When exploring the decisions behind the targets were established, frailty did not appear to be considered[11]. Although the concept of “individualized” is well accepted, the authors concluded that health care practitioners are not adept at choosing targets without a clear guidance. The recent UK consensus statement aims to address this by recommending stratification of older adults based on their frailty, into three groups; healthy older adults, moderately frail and severely frail [5]. Once stratified, HbA1c targets are allocated according to a simple chart (table 1). This also gives guidelines for choices of medications at each stage. For the fit older adult, they should be treated the same as any other adult, with metformin as first line, and choice for second agent based on co-morbidity, including the use of GLP-1 analogues for those with atherosclerotic disease and the consideration of SGLT-2 inhibitors for those with, or at high risk of future heart failure. It is important to remember that pharmacological weight loss has not been demonstrated to impart the same benefit in older adults that it has in younger patients, indeed mortality appears to be inversely associated such that after the age of 65 there is no association between obesity and mortality, and beyond 80 years greater obesity is associated with better prognosis.
In the moderately frail population, the target should be set around 8.0%, there is a role for SGLT-2 inhibitors in the setting of heart failure, and consideration should be given to GLP-1 analogues in proven atherosclerosis, particularly in the setting of stroke. However, for the patient who has not experienced an event the role of these agents may be limited given the propensity towards weight loss and the uncertainty whether this is loss of metabolically unhealthy fat or healthy muscle in the frail older adult at risk of sarcopaenia. For these patients often the weight neutral DPP-4 inhibitors can achieve target control without weight gain or loss, and have been tested in frail older adults.
For the severely frail, a target of. 8.5% (70mmol/mol) is established in order to minimize the risk of hypoglycaemia whilst reducing the osmotic symptoms that may lead to reduced quality of life and contribute to urinary incontinence and an increased infection risk. Given the accompanying sarcopaenia and weight loss that accompanies this degree of frailty, often these patients are best controlled with a small dose of basal insulin. The frailty induced weight loss is contributes to the phenomenon of insulin resistance burnout, characterized by the loss of insulin resistant fat tissue, and corresponding dramatic increase in insulin sensitivity. For insulin naïve patients this results in dramatic reductions in HbA1c from very modest doses of insulin. When initiating insulin in these patients, it is important to choose an insulin with the lowest risk of hypoglycaemia, such as the newer ultra-long acting analogues, as the consequences of hypoglycaemia can be devastating. The phenomenon of insulin resistance burnout, can present with significant clinical impact in people who have been taking stable doses of insulin with good glycaemic control over many years[12]. In this case, there is a rapid reduction in requirements precipitating severe hypoglycaemia without any apparent precipitant. Reducing insulin doses in these patients, however, presents a different challenge, that of reverse inertia around medication deprescribing.
De-escalation of therapy
The UK Consensus statement on the management of diabetes in frail older adults established clear guidance for de-escalation of drugs. It establishes thresholds, based on an individual’s frailty for consideration of the suitability of their pharmacotherapy. These values are defined to balance the risk of hypoglycaemia and need for achieving sufficient glycaemic control to minimize complications. However, the need for de-escalation is beyond glycaemia alone. As a person becomes frail, the changes in basic physiology can result in therapies that have been well tolerated and effective for many years having different effects.
Risk of polypharmacy
Passive absorption of drugs in the stomach and ileum alter little with age, however the impact of many of many drugs on gastric motility is exaggerated in older adults. This in turn may result in increased absorption as agents spend longer passing through the lower intestine. This increased absorption is exacerbated by the reduced lean body mass and protein-binding of circulating albumin causing increased bio-availability. Additionally, reduced hepatic metabolism and glomerular filtration contribute to impaired excretion and further increased exposure. The increased exposure is compounded by the polypharmacy of older adults with multiple co-morbidities. A simple strategy of managing diabetes alone with 5 medications offers the opportunity for 10 1:1 drug-drug interactions. Include a second disease state with a further 5 medications raises the possibility of 45 interactions, a third disease with another 5 agents increases the potential to 105[13]. Although new agents are carefully evaluated for potential interactions with existing therapies within the disease they are intended for, it is very rare for potential interactions in other disease states to be tested. For example, a new drug designed to treat hyperglycaemia would be tested with existing antihyperglycaemics, and in combination with the common co-prescriptions for people living with diabetes, such as statins and ACE-inhibitors. However, there is no mandate to explore potential interactions with agents used to manage different disease states, such as rheumatoid arthritis or Parkinson’s disease. In practice, the risk of interactions in older adults is approximately 13% for people on 2 agents, raising to 82% at 6 medications and almost 100% once a person is on 8 medications. These interactions are responsible for approximately 10% of hospital admissions in frail older adults, up to half of which are preventable. Once an individual is on 5 or more medications, the risk of hospitalization due to adverse drug reaction rises to approximately 30% per year, one quarter of which are preventable[14].
With this overwhelming evidence of potential harm from polypharmacy, and older adults with frailty adults and diabetes being at particularly prescribed multiple agents the need for an active deprescribing policy is apparent. There are multiple steps to be taken. The first element is to determine the needs of the individual. The UK stakeholders statement provided clear guidance as to for agents to consider discontinuing as the person with diabetes transitions from healthy to moderately to severely frail. This includes considering the suitability of sulfonylureas due to the risk of hypoglycaemia and thiazolidindiones due to the fluid retention that may exacerbate heart failure and the risk of fractures. The use of GLP-1 receptor antagonists differs as patients transition into frailty, given that there is proven benefit in fit older adults by reducing the risk of atherosclerotic events whereas may exacerbate the sarcopaenia of frailty through weight loss and reduced appetite. Similarly the SgLT-2 inhibitors are probably of benefit to those with heart failure irrespective of frailty, although this has not formally been tested, but otherwise may contribute to sarcopaenia through weight loss and exacerbate the symptoms of hyperglyceamia due to increased micturition (increasing the potential for urinary incontinence) and the risk of genital infections. When considering insulin use, often twice daily biphasic insulin is used to optimize control whilst minimizing injections. However, as individuals develop frailty the need for aggressive post prandial regulation wanes, but rather simplicity takes priority. Therefore, a once daily insulin injection is often all that is required, particularly as renal function declines causing each injection to remain biologically active for longer. When external help is required to administer insulin, the use of ultra-long acting insulins such as insulin degludec or glargine u300 as they give increased flexibility for the carer who is required to attend the patient. Again, in these individuals, dosing needs to be carefully monitored, as often only a very low dose is required with renal impairment and the reduction in body fat causing a resolution of insulin resistance. There may be a temptation to discontinue insulin completely as doses are reduced, however caution should be exercised, as with long term diabetes the individual may reach a stage of insulin depletion rendering the patient prone to ketoacidosis.
Deprescribing in practice
Once a patient has transitioned into frailty and it has been decided to re-evaluate their medication in order reduce the potential complications there are still multiple steps that must be accomplished. We must consider all medicines the patient is taking and identify potential risks vs benefits according to the best evidence and patient perspective and determine how these fit in with or impact on the patient’s overall health goals. The most difficult element, however, is communicating these decisions to the individual. After decades of reinforcing the importance of regular medication adherence, good glycaemic control and tight blood pressure targets, to be suddenly told that medications are being discontinued can be disconcerting to a person living with diabetes. It may be perceived as rationing, cost cutting or that the health care system has given up hope for the individual and simply wishes to expedite death. Focus on the potential harm of agents and the time window to benefit, which may include candid conversations regarding the mortality of the individual. Often the compromise is that medications are held for a defined period, with an agreement in place for review and measures that will be taken in the event of symptoms recurring.
In summary one of the most significant transitions in an older adult’s life is the point at which they become frail. Once recognized, the priority for treatment becomes about improving quality of life rather than prolonging it. This includes adjusting criteria, on which interventions are chosen, to tolerability and safety rather than long term risk. De-escalation of drugs also plays a major role in reducing the risk of iatrogenic complications. This, however, requires working together with the older adult living with diabetes and their families and carers in order to achieve the goal of putting life into the remaining years.
Acknowledgement:
WDS is part funded by the NIHR Exeter Clinical Research Facility. This manuscript does not necessarily reflect the views of the NIHR Exeter Clinical Research Facility, the NHS or the UK Department of Health.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
