Diabetes and Cholecystectomy: Is There a Relation?

Research Article

Diabetes and Cholecystectomy: Is There a Relation?

  • Fatemeh Mohammadyari 1
  • Morteza Biabani 2
  • Sara Faaliat 2
  • Atiyeh Ahmadi 3
  • Shaghaiegh Jabraeili-Siahroud 4
  • Faezeh Tarighat 4
  • Helia Karami 5
  • Sepehr Olangian-Tehrani 6,7*

*Corresponding Author: Sepehr Olangian-Tehrani, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Citation: Mohammadyari F., Biabani M., Faaliat S., Ahmadi A., Sepehr O. Tehrani, et al, (2023), Diabetes and Cholecystectomy: Is there a Relation? J Clinical Surgery and Research, 4(2); DOI:10.31579/2768-2757/075

Copyright: © 2023, Sepehr Olangian-Tehrani. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: 14 April 2023 | Accepted: 24 April 2023 | Published: 02 May 2023

Keywords: cholecystectomy; diabetes; gallstone disease; laparoscopic cholecystectomy; gallbladder

Abstract

The association between diabetes and cholecystectomy is debatable, as diabetes or cholecystectomy may be risk factors for each other. In this review, we look at the incidence rate, mechanisms, and complications of cholecystectomy in diabetic individuals and healthy ones and we also compare cholecystectomy in both to see whether diabetes is a risk factor for cholecystectomy or diabetes might lead to cholecystectomy, or both are contributed.

Introduction

Over 1500 BC, Hindu scholars recorded the first description of diabetes in their writings [1]. According to the World Health Organization, the number of people with diabetes is increasing day by day; it has increased from 108 million people in 1980 to 422 million people. The increase in the prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) increases the awareness of biliary conditions in diabetic patients and thus leads to early diagnosis and improved outcomes.[2]. In fact, diabetes predisposes to the formation of gallstones, and surgery in diabetic patients is riskier than in nondiabetic patients.[3]. There are many diabetic factors that contribute to the formation of gallstones, such as obesity-related diabetes, insulin resistance, high triglyceride levels, and autonomic neuropathy [4]. Another common disease is gallstone disease (GSD), which increases with the increase in the prevalence of obesity [5]. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is recognized as the gold standard for all symptomatic gallstone disease (GSD) and is more common in diabetic patients than in nondiabetic patients. Diabetics are more prone to infections due to high blood sugar, and this can weaken the patient's immune system and disrupt natural healing mechanisms [3]. Cholecystectomy has long been known as a safe procedure with no harmful effects on the body. However, recent studies show evidence of cholecystectomy with a high risk of metabolic syndrome (MetS) [6] and Also complications in diabetics are significantly higher than nondiabetics [7]. In general, cholecystectomy in diabetic patients shows a higher prevalence than non-diabetic patients[8].

Cholelithiasis and diabetes mellitus have an effect on each other's clinical course, and this led researchers to conduct more research in this regard in the past few decades [5].

Considering the increase in the incidence of gallstones and the use of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, as well as the mutual effects of diabetes and laparoscopic cholecystectomy, more studies should be conducted on postoperative complications in diabetic and non-diabetic patients. As a result, we decided to investigate the risk factors, postoperative complications and the mechanism of action of this treatment method.

Cholecystectomy

Cholecystectomy, the surgical excision of the gallbladder, is a common procedure all over the world with about 1.5 million incidences per year in the US. It is the treatment of choice for cholelithiasis with symptoms mostly biliary colic, acute cholecystitis, obstructive jaundice, or gallstone pancreatitis [9]. Other indications of cholecystectomy are complications of gallstone, that is acute calculus cholecystitis, gallstone in common bile duct, pancreatitis caused by gallstones, biliary dyskinesia, gall bladder polyps larger than 10 mm, cancer probability (calcified gallbladder) [10, 11].

In patients who are considered high risk for general anesthesia, being old or have cardiopulmonary diseases [12], coagulopathy problems, progressive cirrhotic liver or other hepatic diseases, or more risk factors that need open cholecystectomy, and who need extra attention because of the probability of the gallbladder cancer, cholecystectomy is considered as relatively contraindicated. In patients with respiratory or cardiac disease the preferred procedure is laparoscopic cholecystectomy [13], nevertheless if the patient is unable to bear CO2 in peritoneum or suffers from diffuse peritonitis or is hemodynamically unstable absolutely can't have LC [10]. 

There are two main classes of cholecystectomy: 1) open cholecystectomy: considered when laparoscopic procedure is not applicable for example due to anatomical reasons or cancers or concurrent surgeries on other organs [14] and 2) the minimally-invasive procedures such as the laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) which include 80% of surgeries because of fewer complications and the robotic surgery which needs much cost and time [10].

LC has similar morbidity and mortality to open surgery. But it has rapid recovery and less time spent in hospital [14]. New techniques of reduced port or single-port surgery or hybrid NOTES (natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery) which is different in earlier return of patient to day-to-day life, are the results of the attempts to reduce injury to the abdominal wall; although they haven’t been approved as they are applicable or safe in comparison to the routine 4-port technique of laparoscopic cholecystectomy [15]. The same consequences of the single-port and the 4-port approach make some authors suggest single-incision cholecystectomy over the traditional one as it has better cosmetic results in short-term [16, 17]; while others suggest the opposite due to lack of significant positive points and higher rate of late incisional hernia [13, 18, 19].

Complications of cholecystectomy include bleeding, surgical site infection, damage to colon or duodenum in surgery, peritonitis, and leak of bile which is rare but can be dangerous [20].

Diabetes

Diabetes implies "to pass through” and there are different types of diabetes such as type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, gestational diabetes, maturity onset diabetes of the young (MODY), neonatal diabetes, wolfram syndrome, alstrom syndrome, latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA), and Diabetes insipidus (DI) which is an endocrine disorder including the antidiuretic hormone and the posterior pituitary peptide hormone (ADH) [21, 22].

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a gathering of metabolic disarranges that hyperglycemia is its common sign. the eyes, nerves, kidneys, blood vessels and heart can be damaged by Chronic hyperglycemia. “mellitus” comes from the Latin word for nectar or honey (pertain to sweet. Patients with DM are more likely to develop gallstone disease than general population. These maladies are categorized by pathology as gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and some other types. The group “other” made up of plenty complications yet account for 1% or less of the diabetes. Diabetes mellitus type 2 is our main emphasis [21, 23-25].

T2DM is a hereditary condition. Many genes are implicated, the majority of which have yet to be recognized. These genes regulate various chemical processes in β cell activity in pancreas. For each stage in the procedure, a distinct gene is in charge of enzyme manufacturing. A mutation in any of them can impair enzyme synthesis and inhibit insulin action. This inhibition can elevate glucose synthesis in the liver, disrupt glucose consumption by cells, promote triglyceride breakdown, impede fatty acid and glucose penetration to fat cells, and cause a variety of other metabolic problems. Insulin resistance is the most common problem in T2DM, and it develops several years before symptoms appear or growing a blood glucose level high enough to diagnose the disease. Insulin resistance develops in the body's peripheral cells (mostly fat cells and muscle) as well as the liver in obese people [24, 26, 27].

This disease regularly is pertained to as a noiseless executioner cause every year around 18% of all passing’s in the United States within 25-year-old sufferers and older [28].

Mechanism 

Cholecystectomy is the most appropriate treatment option for gallstone disease (GD), while this treatment can cause metabolic syndrome through unknown mechanisms [29].

A study by Chen et al to investigate the main role of gallbladder in metabolic homeostasis has shown that the prevalence of metabolic disorders (for example NAFLD, diabetes, etc.) is due to its effect on glucose concentration, lipids, blood pressure and cardiovascular disease is more common in people who have had a cholecystectomy. After this surgery, a significant number of impaired GD functions, reduced intestinal trans-flow, and eventually rapid recirculation of the hepatic intestinal tract BAs, which act as signal molecules, will interfere with the expression of the BAs / FXR and BA / GPBAR-1 axis genes. Also, GPBAR-1 destroys the gallbladder [30].

Another study by Cortés V et al on non-obese Spanish patients with gallstones undergoing cholecystectomy showed that two years after surgery, there was a significant increase in serum insulin levels, the HOMA index. -IR, serum apoB levels and liver fat content were seen. Another study noted that after cholecystectomy, we saw decreased postprandial blood sugar control, increased serum and liver triglyceride levels, and LDL production. In these patients, we see a decrease in the concentration of duodenal BA after food intake, while serum levels of the hormone incretin, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) remain constant. Also, the metabolic effects of cholecystectomy increase the concentration and probability of tissue exposure to BAs and the rate of basal metabolism, which can affect glucose and lipid homeostasis and increase the risk of hypertension and cardiovascular disease [31].

Gallbladder (GB) is a physiological pacemaker of BA hepatic circulation [30]. And the main function of the gallbladder (GB) is to absorb water and ions by epithelial cells and store bile. [29] This function is controlled by neuro-hormonal mechanisms [30].

Higher hepatic bile concentration than GB increases the digestibility of hepatic bile. GB also has motor function, which plays an important role in regulating BA flow in the intestinal circulation. This current affects the regulation of body homeostasis, BAs, cholesterol and TGs. After cholecystectomy, hepatic bile is secreted frequently in the duodenal lumen and BA circulates more rapidly, exposing most of the body's organs to this flow [29].

Cholecystectomy also prevents inhibition of cytochrome P450 1A1, an enzyme that limits the rate of bile acid synthesis, and increases the expression of ileal apical sodium-dependent bile acid transporter (ASBT) [31].

BA can act as a hormonal signal by interacting with a variety of enteropathic and peripheral receptors. One of these receptors is the X farnesoid receptor (FXR), a ligand-activated transcription factor that responds to BA and is involved in glucose homeostasis. It is also a BA receptor with G protein (GPBAR1 / TGR5) that is expressed in human tissues (especially brown fat and skeletal muscle cells) to increase energy expenditure. BAs regulate glucose homeostasis by modulating this receptor in the small intestine and modulate insulin sensitivity. Activation of FXR protein, which improves insulin sensitivity, decreases PG concentration by decreasing gluconeogenesis, and increases glycogen synthesis, is involved in regulating energy intake, lipid metabolism, and glucose homeostasis [29].

In a study by Amigo L et al, it was shown that increasing the activity of the receptors mentioned above does not help human metabolism. A large part of the BA pool in the fasting person is divided into GB. In people who have undergone cholecystectomy, rapid release of BA into the duodenum does not occur after receiving food, whereas if GB is healthy, it can increase the concentration of BA in the duodenum up to 10 times after a meal. People with cholecystectomy can’t develop an immediate response to control lipid and glucose levels after eating compared to healthy people [29].

Fibroblast growth factor 19 (FGF19) is secreted in high concentrations in bile, which plays a significant role in lipid metabolism, glucose, and regulation of fasting energy levels. It also reduces the concentration of TGs and cholesterol, increases glycogen synthesis and suppresses insulin-induced fatty acid synthesis in the liver. GB mucosa is the site for enterohepatuliary expression of this factor. Studies show that ablation of GB reduces the serum concentration of this factor and increases the risk of metabolic disorders. GB ablation also suppresses Gpbar1 / TGR5 signals on the epithelial bilayer and GB smooth muscle, affecting and disrupting metabolic homeostasis [29].

Incidence

Around 10% to 15% of population of western countries have gallstones. 18.65% of cholecystectomy in diabetic patients in return of 17.15% in non-diabetics shows that diabetes mellitus increases the risk of gallstone diseases and at last the number of cholecystectomies in countries.[8] the result of case-control study with 161 diabetic persons in case and 166 non-diabetic persons for control in Benghazi Libya showed that 40% of diabetic patients have gallstone in return of 17.5% in non-diabetic patients.[32]

 In the population of China 9.9% of men and 11.6% of women are suffer from gallstone [33]. In Kashmir, India, 6.5 percent of people have diabetes and 5.7 percent have gallstones but diabetes increase the risk of having gallstone disease and 17.7 percent of diabetic patients have gallstone disease. The research of Chapman et al. [34] showed that diabetic people have higher risk of affection of Gallstone Disease. 32.7% of diabetics and 20.8% of non-diabetics have gallstone in population under test.

Comorbidities and risk factors

In a study by Ruhl et al. [35] it has been shown that without age consideration, diabetic-related death was over 2.5 times more common in patients with gallstone disease. Also, gallstones were related to diabetes when has been distinguished. In another study it is reported that diabetic patients had a higher risk of disease of bile duct in comparison to non-diabetic patients [36].

While Gallbladder disease has a high risk of developing in patients with higher level of serum insulin after fasting, it can increase the risk of developing diabetes mellitus type 2 [37, 38].

Many studies have demonstrated a relation between cardiovascular disease (CVD) and gallstone disease (GSD). Construction of atherosclerosis plaques is boosted in diabetic patients and patients with lower level of HDL in blood. This procedure may be an important role in CVD and GSD [39-41].

Sludge is another risk factor for gallstone formation. It is demonstrated that higher level of bile cholesterol saturation index and lower level of bile salts can cause gallstone formation. Synthesis of bile salts in liver decreases when HDL level in blood drops. Thus, causing stone formation on gallbladder. HDL and LDL-cholesterol level is associated with type 2 diabetes [38, 41-43].

Lu et al. [44] demonstrated that despite of previous studies which has shown the positive correlation between non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and cholecystectomy, NAFLD is a risk factor for cholecystectomy instead of being a result. Insulin resistance is a description for the link between NAFLD and T2DM [45].

obesity is another risk factor that rises the incidence of GSD and diabetes. It is associated with high level of insulin, resistance to insulin, over secretion of cholesterol in bile, and gallbladder hypomobility [46, 47].

in a study by shabanzadeh et al. [48] several risk factors have been examined. In male’s high free testosterone increase the occurrence of GSD. In other study it is shown that therapy with testosterone decreases insulin resistance and risk of diabetes type 2 [48, 49]. 

Vitamin D is necessary for function of smooth muscles in gastrointestinal system. Abnormal gallbladder muscle contraction increases the bile immobility and formation of cholesterol gallstones. In a study conducted by shabanzadeh et al. [50] it is shown that there is no notable relation between gallstone disease and 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OH-D).

Estrogen is known to have a great impact on formation of gallbladder stones thus there is a higher risk of GSD incidence in women. This is due to the studies that showed higher stone formation during pregnancy and estrogen therapy. Also, it is shown that aging is another risk factor while there are few reports on stone formation in children and infants and higher prevalence above the age 20. Estrogen is known to have a protective effect in the development of diabetes. Estradiol can increase the insulin level which is stimulated by glucose therefore having an impact on glucose metabolism [51-53].

GSD and diabetes are linked to a variety of abdominal symptoms, including cirrhosis, cystic fibrosis, cholangitis, Crohn's disease, and Caroli's disease. These accompanying symptoms have been linked Unconjugated bilirubin calcium salts. For example, in chronic haemolytic diseases secretion of bilirubin can be associated to an elevated chance of calcium bilirubin ate sedimentation. GSD development can also be aided by chronic bacterial infections that effect the bile ducts. This can rise the mixture of calcium and bilirubin which is unconjugated. Bilirubin in an antioxidant which can protect the body from stresses causes by increased level of glucose in blood or diabetes. It also can increase the sensitivity of cells to insulin. [54, 55].

Complication

It is expected that diabetics are more likely to have some abnormal post-operative complications than those who don’t suffer from diabetes melitus [56]. According to Monika Lacka et al. [57] in 2020 the association between diabetes and the acute cholecystitis is independent and diabetic patients experience more frequent complications after cholecystectomy [57]. Of course, it should be noted that some studies have come to the opposite conclusion. A prospective study conducted in 2010 expresses patients with and without diabetes will have similar outcomes following laparoscopic cholecystectomy if careful preoperative preparation, rigorous intraoperative surgical technique, and careful postoperative care be done. Both groups did not experience major complications during the cholecystectomy or pneumoperitoneum procedures. In addition, the study mentions that the only difference between the diabetic and non-diabetic groups was the length of hospital stay, which was 5.6 days for the diabetics and 2.4 days for the non-diabetics [58]. Various studies have been conducted which result in different outcomes. One of discussed complications is about surgical site infection (SSI). An increased risk of SSI was associated with poorly controlled diabetes before surgery [59]. In 2014, a retrospective analysis revealed the probability of developing a surgical site infection is significantly higher in patients with diabetes who delayed their cholecystectomy for more than 24 hours following admission, but not systemic infections, and it was not reported in the non-diabetics [60]. Longer surgery time due to long hospital stays and more frequent complications including more SSI, more norepinephrine need in-hospital time due to cardiac deficiency, more requiring transfer to the ICU because of cardiac arrest in the diabetic are observed [57]. A history of diabetes increases the risk of renal failure, cardiovascular events, and even mortality following cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. These consequences and poor outcomes are more at insulin-treated diabetic patients [61]. In addition, increasing risk for pancreatic cancer in diabetics in comparing with without diabetes were noted as cholecystectomy complication at a population-based cohort study [62]. Another issue that has been discussed is postoperative pain. The time to onset postoperative pain was reported about 35 minutes in both groups. Furthermore, 60% of the diabetics experience intense pain while 20% of non-diabetics had it but beginning the post-operative pain was same for both (35minutes) [63]. Regarding the difficulty of surgery, a study in Iran which conducted by Sarmadi et al. [64] demonstrates laparoscopic technique has been more difficult for patients with diabetes [64]. It has been identified as a cause of conversion from the laparoscopic to the open surgery cholecystectomy in some researches and not in others [57]. Generally, most of studies have mentioned different postoperative outcomes between diabetics and non-diabetics and more and severe complications in diabetics for example SSI. But comparison among studies and data shows that results are contradictory. So, more analysis is required for proving definite and more probable complications.

Conclusion

The focus of this study is to understand the risk of developing diabetes after cholecystectomy in patients with gallbladder disease and the need for cholecystectomy because of gallstone disease in patients with diabetes mellitus. Results indicate that patients with diabetes mellitus have a great chance of developing gallstone disease which consequently might need surgical treatments. while some research shows that metabolic disorders like diabetes mellitus are more common in patients who have received cholecystectomy, others suggest that there is no relation between developing DM after cholecystectomy. Due to these contradictory results, more research is needed to show the relation between DM and cholecystectomy. 

 

Declarations

Ethical Approval and Consent to participate

Cause all data was acquired from clinical records and imaging

systems for normal follow up, us

institution was exempt from institutional review board approval.

Consent for publication

Not Applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Funding

This study has received no financial support.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Authors' information

Not applicable.

Author contribution

F.M. and S.O. designed the study. F.M. organized the manuscript and wrote the manuscript. M.B., S.F., F.T., A.A., H.K., S.J., A.T. and S.O. wrote the manuscript. F.M. revised the final manuscript.

The final manuscript has been read and approved and reviewed by all authors.

References

Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.

img

Virginia E. Koenig

Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.

img

Delcio G Silva Junior

Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.

img

Ziemlé Clément Méda

Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.

img

Mina Sherif Soliman Georgy

We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.

img

Layla Shojaie

The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.

img

Sing-yung Wu

Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.

img

Orlando Villarreal

Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.

img

Katarzyna Byczkowska

Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.

img

Anthony Kodzo-Grey Venyo

Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.

img

Pedro Marques Gomes

Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.

img

Bernard Terkimbi Utoo

This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.

img

Prof Sherif W Mansour

Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.

img

Hao Jiang

As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.

img

Dr Shiming Tang

Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.

img

Raed Mualem

International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.

img

Andreas Filippaios

Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.

img

Dr Suramya Dhamija

Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.

img

Bruno Chauffert

I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!

img

Baheci Selen

"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".

img

Jesus Simal-Gandara

I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.

img

Douglas Miyazaki

We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.

img

Dr Griffith

I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.

img

Dr Tong Ming Liu

I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.

img

Husain Taha Radhi

I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.

img

S Munshi

Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.

img

Tania Munoz

“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.

img

George Varvatsoulias

Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.

img

Rui Tao

Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.

img

Khurram Arshad

Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.

img

Gomez Barriga Maria Dolores

The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.

img

Lin Shaw Chin

Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.

img

Maria Dolores Gomez Barriga

Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.

img

Dr Maria Dolores Gomez Barriga