AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article
*Corresponding Author: Akio Goda, Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Kyoto Tachibana University.
Citation: Akio Goda, Takaki Shimura, Shin Murata, Teppei Abiko, Ryo Miyachi, Hironori Ohsugi, Eriko Okuyama (2023) Development of an Application for Assessment of Very Early Stage Cognitive Decline, J New Medical Innovations and Research, 4(1); DOI:10.31579/2767-7370/048
Copyright: © 2023, Akio Goda. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 14 February 2023 | Accepted: 22 February 2023 | Published: 03 March 2023
Keywords: electronic color kanji pick-out test; color words pick-out test; preclinical stage of dementia; screening test
Objective: We have developed the Color Kanji Pick-Out Test (CKPT), a questionnaire-based neuropsychological test, as a screening test for preclinical stage of dementia (PCSD), and have provided evidence based on large-scale data. In this study, we developed a new application, the electronic CKPT (eCKPT), which allows the CKPT to be administered on a tablet device. The purpose of this study was to test the reliability and validity of the eCKPT measurement in healthy adult subjects.
Methods: Forty staff members without physical or mental impairment working in Japanese nursing homes were included in the analysis. Measurements were performed on two separate occasions. The first assessment included the eCKPT, the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), and the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST). A second eCKPT was also administered to 24 of the participants 6 months after the first assessment.
Results: To verify the reliability of the eCKPT, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated from the two eCKPT measures and ICC = 0.50 (p< 0.01). To validate the eCKPT, correlation analysis with the WCST showed that the number of correct responses and the number of retention errors on the WCST were significantly correlated with the total score on the eCKPT (p < 0.05).
Consideration and Summery: Based on the results of this study, the eCKPT has moderate reliability and is a valid assessment index for detecting early cognitive decline.
The number of people with dementia continues to rise worldwide and has become a major social problem, imposing a burden on society in terms of medical and care costs. Therefore, the development of preventive intervention systems for dementia is urgently needed. For an effective preventive intervention, it is considered effective to start the intervention at the preclinical stage of dementia (PCSD), which is the first stage of the disease. However, existing methods for detecting PCSD (PET, MRI, cerebrospinal fluid tests, blood tests, etc.) are all highly invasive and specialized, making it difficult to screen subjects at the PCSD stage during health examinations of older people living in the community. There fore, Shimura et al. developed the Color Words Pick-Out Test (CWPT) [1], a neuropsychological test using a questionnaire, as a simple, non-invasive, and universally applicable screening test for PCSD. The CWPT is a neuropsychological test based on the Stroop effect. In the CWPT, subjects are first presented with a narrative text containing colored words, as shown in Figure 1 A. Subjects are asked to read the text while remembering the episodes of the story, and at the same time to write symbols on the colored words (circle the colored letters if they match, cross them if they do not), while identifying the match between the meaning of the word and the color printed on the page. After a certain amount of time, the subject stops identifying the colored letters of the story and answers a question (Figure 1 B) about the episode of the story he/she has memorized, without looking at the text. During scoring, the total score (Index_1) is calculated by multiplying the number of correct responses to the color word discrimination task by the percentage of correct responses to the story episode questions, and is used to determine the subject's level of cognitive functioning.
Figure 1A: Sample of story of CWPT
Figure 1B: Sample of questions of CWPT
Subsequently, Shimura et al. provided evidence using the Color Kanji Pick-out Test (CKPT) [2,3], a Japanese version of the CWPT, and established diagnostic criteria using large-scale data [4]. Existing neuropsychological tests (e.g., MMSE and CDR) cannot detect minor cognitive decline before the onset of dementia due to ceiling effects. In contrast, the CKPT shows a normal distribution of scores even in subjects at this level and may reflect mild cognitive decline, making it a promising screening test for subjects in early dementia prevention interventions [5] The CKPT also has the advantage that a small number of examiners (one narrator and several observers) can examine many subjects simultaneously. The CKPT also has the advantage that a small number of examiners (one narrator and several observers) can examine a large number of subjects simultaneously. However, it also has the disadvantage of requiring a great deal of time and effort for scoring and data entry after the test.
To overcome the disadvantages of CKPT, we developed Electronic CKPT (eCKPT), an application of CKPT that can be performed on a tablet device. eCKPT can automatically perform everything from test orientation, measurement time control, scoring, and result feedback. The eCKPT can automatically perform test orientation, measurement time control, scoring, and result feedback. Therefore, subjects can take the test individually at their own time and place, and the eCKPT is expected to be widely used throughout Japan. In addition, it is expected that by knowing the evolution of their cognitive status (change in eCKPT score over time), subjects will become interested in rehabilitation for dementia prevention, and this will lead them to take action to prevent dementia. In the future, it is expected to be translated into different languages and disseminated around the world.
It is not clear whether the newly developed eCKPT measure has the same clinical utility as the paper version of the CKPT. In general, when a new measurement index is developed, it is necessary to demonstrate the reliability and validity of its measures [6]. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of the newly developed eCKPT measures in healthy adult subjects.
Forty-three employees working in a nursing home in Japan who did not have any physical or mental disorder that interfered with their work performance were included in the study. Of the subjects, 40 were included in the analysis after excluding one who was color blind and two who had measurement deficits. Subjects were informed in advance, both verbally and in writing, of the nature of the study, and informed consent was obtained. This study was approved by the Institutional Research Ethics Committee (Approval No. 19-57).
Measurements were taken twice. At the first measurement, in addition to the eCKPT, the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), an index of general cognitive function, and the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), an index of frontal lobe function, were measured. In addition, 24 of the participants were given a second measurement of the eCKPT 6 months after the first measurement.
The eCKPT was measured by launching the application on a tablet device (iPad Pro 12.9 inch, Apple) placed on a stand and listening to an audio narration through headphones (Fig 2 A). Responses were made by touching the screen with a stylus (Fig 2 B).
The subject listens to the voice narration explaining the measurement procedure while looking at the application screen displayed on the tablet device, and then proceeds with the measurement as in (1) through (6) by touching the screen with a stylus in his hand.
Figure 2: Measurement scenery of eCKPT application
A: Tablet screen display
B: Measurement view
(1) Explain that the test consists of two tasks:
"Finding Kanji characters (traditional Japanese characters) that mean colors in the text and judging the correctness of the meaning of the characters and the colors of the description" and "Understanding the content of the story" while reading the text of the story.
(2) Explain how to answer the questions on the test.
Touching a character on the screen with the stylus once will put an "〇" on the character, touching it a second time will put an "×" on the character, and touching it a third time will make the character disappear.
(3) The following explains the method for judging the accuracy of color Kanji characters.
Kanji characters that mean colors are displayed in various colored fonts. If the meaning of the kanji character and the font color match (e.g., the kanji character for "red" is displayed in red font), the answer is "〇”. If there is a mismatch (e.g., the kanji character for "red" is displayed in blue font), the answer is "×".
(4) Take a short practice test to confirm the flow of the test and how to answer the questions.
(5) Read the actual question passage in 2 minutes, and write "〇" and "×" for each colored Kanji character in the passage, and judge whether it is correct or incorrect.
(6) Answer the questions (3 choices) about the content of the actual story sentences.
As the measurement results of the eCKPT, in addition to the number of correct answers for judging the accuracy of colored kanji characters, the percentage of correct answers to questions about the content of the story sentences, and the time required for inspection, an total score was calculated using the following formula as in the CKPT. A higher total score indicates better cognitive function.
Total score = Number of correct answers for judging the accuracy of colored kanji characters × Percent correct on questions about the content of the story sentences
The MMSE is a measure of global cognitive function. It is widely used internationally for efficient assessment of cognitive function and consists of 11 domains, including disorientation and short-term memory [7]. Results are scored on a 30-point scale, with higher scores indicating better cognitive function.
The WCST is a test of concept and sentence conversion deficits and is positioned as a frontal lobe function test [8]. In this study, we used the Keio version of the WCST, which corrects for problems in scoring the original method, using software modified to be administered on a personal computer [9]. Participants were asked to look at patterns on cards displayed on the computer screen and classify them into either color, shape, or number concepts. From the measurement data, the number of correct responses (number), the number of nonretentive errors (number), and the number of retentive errors (number) were tabulated
In the statistical analysis, the χ-square test, unpaired t-test, and Mann-Whitney's U test were used to compare the two groups based on the MMSE scores; Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was used to analyze the correlation between the eCKPT total score and the WCST (validity study). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were also obtained from the two eCKPT measures (reliability study). SPSS Statistic Version 24 (IBM Japan, Inc.) was used for all analyses, and the significance level of the analyses was 5%.
The MMSE scores of the subjects ranged from 29 to 30 points, and group comparisons between the 29- and 30-point groups based on MMSE scores revealed significant group differences (p < 0> MMSE score 30 point MMSE score 29pointMeasurement Index
（n = 29）
（n = 11）p-value Basic Attributes Age (Years) 52.7 ± 13.97 66.5 ± 5.70 < 0> Gender [Male / Female] (n) 7 / 22 3 / 8 1.00 eCKPT Total score 18.56 ± 5.60 10.45 ± 5.76 < 0> Number of correct answers for judging the accuracy of colored kanji characters (n) 25.45 ± 8.37 13.91 ± 7.34 < 0> Percent correct on questions about the content of the story sentences (%) 75.62 ± 16.33 78.43 ± 15.65 0.63 time required for inspection （sec） 650 ± 190 778 ± 110 0.07 WCST Number of correct answers (n) 101.45 ± 15.04 94.9 ± 12.81 0.04 Number of non-perseverative errors (n) 21.69 ± 8.41 23.73 ± 5.76 0.13 Number of perseverative errors (n) 4.79 ± 7.05 9.45 ± 9.05 0.03
Mean ± Standard Deviation
MMSE: Mini Mental State Examination, eCKPT: Electronic Color Kanji Pick-out Test, WCST: Wisconsin Card Sorting Test
Table 1: Results of Comparison of Basic Attributes and Measures by MMSE Scores
The ICC was calculated from the two eCKPT measurements and ICC = 0.50 (p<0>
To validate the eCKPT, a correlation analysis was performed with the WCST. The analysis showed that the number of correct answers [ρ=-0.377 (p=0.02)] and the number of perseverative errors [ρ=-0.375 (p=0.02)] on the WCST were significantly correlated with the total score on the eCKPT. On the other hand, there was no significant correlation between the number of non-perseverative errors on the WCST and the total score on the eCKPT [ρ=-0.290 (p=0.07)].
| 1st measurement | 2nd measurement | ICC | p-value | ||||||
| Total score of eCKPT | 14.56 | ± | 3.97 | 17.20 | ± | 5.16 | 0.50 | 0.01 | |
Mean ± Standard Deviation eCKPT: Electronic CKPT, ICC: Intraclass Correlation Coefficients
Table 2: Reliability testing of two CKPT application measurements
Based on the MMSE results, the subjects in this study maintained a high level of overall cognitive function. This may be due to the fact that the subjects were paid employees working in nursing homes, and personnel with appropriate cognitive function required for their duties were selected during the employment screening process. On the other hand, a comparison of MMSE scores between groups (30 vs. 29 points) showed that the total eCKPT score was significantly lower in the 29-point group, despite the slight difference in MMSE scores. These results suggest that eCKPT scores may reflect small cognitive declines that are not detectable on the MMSE due to the ceiling effect [10]. The ICC of the two eCKPT measurements taken over a 6-month period was 0.5. Based on the criteria of the previous studies [11], the reliability of the eCKPT measures is rated as moderate (ICC = 0.41-0.60). The increase in total score from the first to the second session suggests a practice effect. In the future, it will be necessary to provide sufficient explanation and practice prior to scoring to promote understanding of the test method and proficiency in using the device. A significant correlation was found between the total eCKPT score and the WCST (number of correct answers, number of perseverative errors). It has been reported that poor performance on the WCST is associated with the risk of developing preclinical Alzheimer's disease [12]. Perseverative errors on the WCST are also known to be an indicator of preclinical cognitive decline [13]. Therefore, the significant relationship of the eCKPT with the WCST, which reflects early cognitive impairment, suggests that the eCKPT total score is a valid assessment index for detecting early cognitive decline. As a future prospect, we are considering clarifying the sensitivity and specificity of PCSD determination by eCKPT by comparing it with the results of diagnosis by a dementia specialist.
Acknowledgment
We would like to thank the staff of Sousei Day Care Centers (Tomitsuka Club, Sanarudai Club, Irino Club, and Yamanote Club), Hamamatsu Institute for Human Sciences, Inc. and Home Care Support Office Megumi, and Mr. Junichi Takase of SoftUp J for their cooperation in this research. This research was supported by Mitsubishi Foundation.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
