AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article
*Corresponding Author: Cruz García Lirios, Department of Universidad Autónoma de la Ciudad de México.
Citation: Cruz G Lirios., Gerardo A L Domínguez., (2024), Decriminalization of Abortion in the era of COVID-19, Journal of Clinical Surgery and Research, 5(2); DOI:10.31579/2768-2757/105
Copyright: © 2024, Cruz García Lirios. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 03 January 2024 | Accepted: 16 January 2024 | Published: 02 February 2024
Keywords: fertility; abortion; beliefs; attitudes; intentions; behaviors
Reproductive health policies, focused on the decriminalization of abortion, have effects on the beliefs, attitudes, intentions and behaviors of termination of pregnancy. As women get older, more educated and more income, they rationally choose an abortion, but they move away from the ideal age for procreation of 22 years. The objective of the present work is to establish the exploratory factor structure of scales that measure four factors and 28 indicators (seven for each factor) related to the termination of pregnancy. Consequently, a non-experimental, cross-sectional and exploratory study was carried out with a non-probabilistic selection of 100 students. From a structural model the intentions determined the behaviors, but the factor solution was explained by beliefs. However, the context, sample selection, and type of analysis precludes generalizing the data to other settings. It is recommended to carry out a confirmatory factor analysis with a probabilistic selection of the sample in the local population.
The theology of public administration is a legal figure derived from the governance of religious associations. Its legal essence consists of protecting lives and reducing the impact of risk events on the exposure of human beings (Baidowi et al., 2021). Faced with social and medical dilemmas where people's lives are at risk, the theology of public administration seeks the preservation of life or at least the preservation of the greatest number of lives (Venter, 2021). In this sense, when a pandemic exposes people's lives, the theology of public administration seeks to resolve the dilemma of who to prioritize in a risk scenario (Turner, 2021). In this way, jurisprudence dictates that life must be preserved, even when the imminent risk is the total or partial loss of a human being.
In the case of technological advances related to automation, the theology of public administration in its section on jurisprudence and resolution of dilemmas suggests the programming of the automata based on the principle of preservation of life or reduction of the impact of human losses (Hampton, 2020). In this way, faced with the dilemma of who to attend to in the face of the health crisis, the theological principle indicates that the greatest number of lives must be attended to regardless of their economic, political, social, labor, educational or health condition. The relevant question is not to confuse the means with the end, because if this occurs, a hegemony of instrumental reason occurs (Horkheimer, 2002).
Regarding the request for termination of pregnancy, the theology of public administration will seek the preservation of life in a condition of risk. In a scenario of exposure to contagion, illness and death from COVID-19, the theology of public administration will insist on safeguarding and protecting life (Pakpahan, 2020). Therefore, this type of theology develops from an axiology of absolute values, not relative ones. The most important value that a person possesses is to be a person, because the person is a value in itself from its original conception (Mansilla, 2008).
If the request for termination of pregnancy was made before, during or after the health crisis of the SARS CoV-2 coronavirus, then the principle of caring for the greatest number of lives will prevail, even when hospitals are organized to provide specialized care for the COVID-19 versus other diseases.
More specifically, if the dilemma consists of protecting the applicant for the termination of pregnancy against a carrier of the SARS CoV-2 coronavirus, then the theology of public administration will seek to attend to both cases, but if it is necessary to prioritize care (Duque Silva & Del Prado Higuera, 2021). The imperative will be to reduce the impact of the pandemic on human lives (De Beer, 2020). Therefore, priority attention to an applicant for termination of pregnancy will be priority over an applicant for coronavirus care.
The pandemic and with it the SARS CoV-2 coronavirus care centers, as the number of infections, illnesses and deaths from COVID-19 increased, were subjected to a stigma of carrying the virus. Health professionals were stigmatized as sources of infection (Przywara et al., 2021). Once the population is immunized, stigma reduces its impact on social distrust and a new theology of health service administration emerges. Consequently, the measurement of the determining variables of trust in the public health administration will anticipate risk aversion scenarios.
The termination of pregnancy is the result of a deliberate, planned and systematic process; therefore, intention, request and curettage are determined by a system of representations, beliefs, attitudes and perceptions regarding assisted abortion (Garcia, 2020). Such a process begins with the dissemination of information concerning sexuality, fertility, the decriminalization of abortion and the consequences of abortion on health. It is known that the fertility cycle established in a 28-day period involves four periods; menstruation –the mucosa or endometrium is detached and is driven by the blood–, fertility –pre-ovulatory proliferation–, ovulation –the endometrium is reconstructed thanks to estrogens– and secretion –the uterine mucosa presents the maximum thickness facilitating fertilization– (Bustos, 2019).
However, even though the fertility or fertilization cycle is widespread in the basic education system, the media reduce the biochemical process to allusive messages about freedom of choice for women and freedom of procreation. in the case of couples (Leal et al., 2012). Consequently, the probability of procreation with respect to age intensifies in the 22 years and decreases dramatically as the age elapses. About 25% of attempts at procreation end in pregnancy, but less than 5% of cases after the age of forty are observed (Pérez, 2019). In other words, the procreation cycle, the probability of fertilization and age seem to correspond to a risk scenario in which curettage and abortion are instruments of freedom of choice in women and couples (Nagel, 1998). The cure is to tear the lining of the uterus (RAE, 2014). The word pregnancy (scrape the surface to separate the membrane that covers it) comes from "pregnancy" and this from the Latin ligula = "teaspoon and also various instruments and blades similar to a teaspoon" (Anders, 2014). the abortion is the termination of the pregnancy due to natural or caused causes (RAE, 2014). The word "abortion" comes from the Latin abortus, formed from the prefix ab- (deprivation, separation from the outside of a limit) and (birth) so we understand it as "deprivation of birth (Anders, 2014). A safe abortion is defined as those that meet the legal requirements in the countries where abortion is legally permitted under a wide range of criteria (Sedgh, Henshaw, Singh, Ahman and Shah, 2007). Clinical abortion is the abortion of a clinical pregnancy that takes place between the diagnosis of pregnancy and the gestational age of 20 full weeks. Retained abortion is a clinical abortion in which the products of conception are not spontaneously expelled from the uterus. Preclinical abortion is the abortion that takes place before clinical evidence or an ultrasound of the pregnancy. Spontaneous abortion is the spontaneous loss of a clinical pregnancy before the full 20 weeks of gestation or, if the gestational age is unknown, a weight of 500 g or less (Pandya, Snijders, Psara, Hilbert, and Nicolaides, 1996; Zegers, 2006; Hochschild et al., 2006).
The World Health Organization (WHO) describes unsafe abortion as a procedure to end an unwanted pregnancy (Cook, Dickens, & Horga, 2004; Singh, 2006), carried out by both people lacking the necessary skills or in an environment that does not meet minimum medical standards, or both (Ǻhman and Shah, 2011; Sedgh et al., 2012). Clearly, abortion has received considerable attention, yet it continues to generate controversy. In Mexico, the relationship between abortion decriminalization policies and the age of those requesting the termination of pregnancy seems to explain the trend of case by entity. Mexico City leads the cases of request and termination of pregnancy (100,784 cases), followed by the State of Mexico (33,386), entity with the highest youth population and birth rate (Velez, 2018).
Regarding age and cause of interruption pregnancy, rape is a likely cause for abortion in 60% of cases in women aged 23 to 25 years; the risks of pregnancy are more approved in women from 17 to 19 years of age in more than 40%; But the economic factor is more incisive in those who are between 23 and 25 years old in more than 20% of cases. Finally, the freedom to abort is more exercised in women between 23 and 25 years of age than in women under that age range in more than 10% of cases (Aldana, 2019).
Therefore, the wielded data seem to show that there are social representations of freedom of choice around sexuality, procreation and termination of pregnancy that are disseminated in the media and generate attitudes in favor of abortion approval in women between 17 and 25 years old, age where the probability of fertility is greater than in other age ranges (Quintero, 2018). The social representations of freedom of choice about sexuality and interruption of pregnancy explains a flexible process in making decisions, the statistics seem to refute, since the policies of decriminalization of the abortion. The rational choice that is more observed in women with ages close to 25 years (Parrish, 2012). In this sense, the freedom of rational choice - deliberate, planned and systematic - could be generating attitudes - dispositions in favor of sexuality and the interruption of pregnancy - as women approach the age of 25, an instance in which they should have ended She is studying pre - grade and have developed a prospective life (Garcia, 2016). In the health and human behavior sciences, the explanatory models of planned procreation and abortion warn that it is the socioeconomic factors that determine attitudes and perceptions in the first instance, which in turn influence intentions and the latter in pregnancy or in its termination (Garcia, 2018).
However, studies related to pregnancy and its interruption maintain that such actions are not exclusively determined by the rational choice of women, but also in such a decision socio- cultural factors - values, norms, customs and customs, local traditions - affect (Kariman et al., 2016). In this socio-cultural sense, the relationship of a couple - stable without commitment, stable with commitment, unstable without commitment and unstable with commitment - influences the decision of pregnancy and / or interruption of procreation (Biglar and Amin, 2012). In this way, couples who maintain stable and committed relationships choose pregnancy or the termination of the same, but in other couple relationships it is the man who delegates to the woman's family the decision to procreate or terminate the pregnancy. In this sense, parental parenting styles - authoritative, permissive or assertive - will influence procreation or the termination of pregnancy. In this way, assertive parenting styles are those that favor and support the woman's decision and if she has a partner, the choice of both (Dickings, Johns & Chipman, 2012).
However, if parenting styles are rather authoritarian or permissive, then a dominant actor will make the decision to abort or procreate. The cases presented not only reduce women's freedom of choice, but also highlight the sociocultural context; family norms or relationships determine the procreation or termination of pregnancy. Even though the styles of parenting and the types of couple relationships are depositories of a culture in which the female body is an instrument of social reproduction, more than personal satisfaction, the planned fertility model warns that at an older age, education and income, the woman's choice prevails over any norm or value (Enaker, 2013). That is, a high educational level corresponds to a higher income, but it also supposes a deliberate, planned and systematic lifestyle that is contrary to the probability of optimal fertility in the 22 years (Adamsoms, 2013). It is a dilemma that involves exercising freedom of sexuality and termination of pregnancy as age, education and income increase, but fertility d is less and less likely (Kreuter, Siosten & Biering, 2008). In the case of couple relationships, psychological studies of abortion warn that the type of relationship - time, dedication, commitment, jealousy - determines the expectations of the couple relationship. In this way, couples who have a meaningful, prolonged, committed and violence-free coexistence make decisions to procreate a child.
However, the influence of beliefs has not been established, since in deliberate and planned models they are determinants of attitudes. Therefore, a study about beliefs, in relation to the other variables of the planned pregnancy model, would clarify the exposed dilemma (Garcia, 2019). The specified model of dependency relationships explains the effects of the abortion decriminalization propaganda, considering three assumptions regarding 1) beliefs è attitudes; 2) beliefs è attitudes è intentions and 3) beliefs è attitudes è intentions è behaviors.
The objective of this study is to weigh the exploratory factor structure of planned abortion in adolescent couples.
What are the differences between the relations of explanatory dependence on the planned pregnancy - sex, age, income, beliefs, attitude, intentions and behaviors - regarding dependency ratios weighted?
Hypothesis: On a general level of policies, diffusion and audiences, l a d decriminalizing abortion, widespread in the media, creates provisions against and in favor of pregnancy and its interruption depending on the information; causes and effects of reproductive health policy. In a more specific sense around the rational choice of women, the information on the decriminalization of abortion not only generates negative or positive dispositions, but also provides estimates based on costs and benefits about the causes and consequences of carrying out a birth, cesarean section or abortion, considering age, income and education. It is a process in which the more specific the information about the pregnancy and its interruption increases the probabilities of making decisions and carrying out such actions. In a personal sphere, the effect of the information on the causes and consequences of the termination of pregnancy is processed and assimilated into provisions in such a way that they determine the decisions and strategies, provided that it is the product of the deliberation, planning and systematization of said information, corresponding to abortion. The theoretical dependency relationships between indicators and factors related to the termination of pregnancy are adjusted to the weighted dependency relationships. The theoretical relationships and the weighted relationships are different.
Variables.
Sex. Refers to the identity of the couple that can be female or male.
Age. Refers to the period of life from birth.
Income. Refers to the sum of wages, scholarships or economic and financial supports.
Beliefs. It refers to the processing of information –religious, academic, daily– related to the termination of pregnancy.
Attitudes. It refers to the provisions against or in favor of the termination of pregnancy.
Intentions. Refers to the probability of deciding to terminate the pregnancy.
Behaviors. It refers to the fidelity, documentation, financing and request regarding the termination of the pregnancy.
Design. A non-experimental, cross-sectional and exploratory study was carried out.
Sample. A non-probability selection of 100 students from a public university in Xochimilco, Mexico City was carried out. 43% are women and 57% are men; 21% are under 18 years old (M = 17.24 and SD = 1.24), 35% are between 18 and 22 years old (M = 20.35 and SD = 1.27) and the remaining 47% are over 22 years (M 22.46 and SD = 2.36); 40% pay less than 3,000 pesos per month (M = 2'97 3 and SD = 124.35), 25% pay between 3'000 pesos per month and 7'500 pesos per month (M = 6'245 and DE = 135 , 25) and the remaining 35% pay more than 7'500 monthly (M = 7'821 and SD = 135.26).
Instrument. The Variable Scales related to the Termination of Pregnancy were used.
Belief’s scale. It measures the processing of religious, academic, or everyday information regarding the termination of pregnancy. It includes two response options ranging from 0 = "false" and 1 = "true". For example: " Having a child is beyond my will."
Attitude Scale. It measures the provisions against and in favor of the termination of pregnancy. It includes five response options ranging from 0 = "not at all agree" to 5 = "strongly agree", "The decision to have a child is the parents."
Scale of Intentions. It measures the couple's expectations regarding the termination of the pregnancy. It includes five response options ranging from 0 = "not at all likely" to 5 = "very likely". For example: "I would have a child even if my partner abandons me."
Scale of Behavior. It measures the frequency of actions related to fidelity, documentation, financing, and requesting termination of pregnancy. It includes five response options ranging from 0 = "never" to 5 = "always". For example: "Before deciding childbirth I have documented in the matter."
Process. The Delphi technique was used to homogenize the meanings of the words used in the reagents. Confidentiality was guaranteed in writing and it was reported that the results would not affect the academic status of the students. The surveys were carried out in the lobby of the public university library. The information was processed in the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) and Structural Moment Analysis (AMOS) version 21.
Analysis. The internal consistency was established with param and alpha Cronbach. Adequacy and sphericity were estimated with the KMO parameters and the Bartlett test. The Exploratory Factor Analysis was performed with the method of extraction of main axes, promax rotation and oblique criteria. Factor weights greater than 0.300 were required to interpret the factors. The fit of the dependency relationship model was established with fit and residual statistics.
The reliability of the belief scales (alpha = 0.752), attitudes (alpha = 0.760), intentions (alpha = 0.783) and behaviors (alpha = 0.775) reached values higher than the minimum required. Extraction method: main axes, promax rotation, skew criterion. Sphericity and adequacy ⌠χ2 = 146.20 (45gl) p = 0.000; KMO 0.645⌡. Beliefs (35% of the total variance explained), Attitudes 26% of the total variance explained), Intentions (16% of the total variance explained), Behaviors (8% of the total variance explained). Alpha values correspond to the internal consistency of the scale excluding the item.
The adequacy and sphericity ⌠χ2 = 146.20 (45gl) p = 0.000; KMO 0.645⌡ allowed to establish the validity of the construct was established from the total percentage of the explained variance; beliefs (23%), attitudes (20%), intentions (17%) and behaviors (14%). In order to observe the structure of relationships between the factors, the correlations and covariances were estimated, considering the specification of the model that proposes linear trajectories between beliefs, attitudes, intentions, and behaviors. The structural model of dependency relationships established the path of beliefs, attitudes, intentions and behaviors as the one with the highest explanatory plausibility, since it is the intentions that determine the behaviors. In turn, attitudes have a greater impact on intentions, although they seem to reduce the effect of beliefs on dispositions.
The values of the adjustment and residual parameters ⌠χ 2 = 256,26 (41df) p > 0.05; CFI = 0.997; GFI = 0.990; RMSEA = 0.008⌡ allowed us to accept the null hypothesis regarding the similarities between the theoretical dependency relationships and the weighted dependency relationships.
The contribution of the present study to the state of knowledge lies in the establishment of an exploratory factor structure of the planned termination of pregnancy. It is a main axis polychoric factorial solution, with obliqueness and promax rotation criteria that is consistent in each of its factors and indicators.
However, the context of the study, the selection of the sample and the exploratory factor analysis prevent generalizing the data to other study areas, since a randomized and stratified sampling, as well as a study in a non-university population, would allow a confirmatory factor analysis of established dependency relationships. This is so because, unlike exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis weighs measurement errors and establishes the incidence of factors not included in the dependency relationship model. This is the case of homoscedasticity –constant measurement errors in indicators and factors– that in the exploratory factor analysis seems to have no influence, but in the confirmatory factor analysis it would modify the structure and factor solution. Therefore, a study with the characteristics and recommendations put forward would explain the effects of reproductive health policies in general and the decriminalization of abortion specifically, on the beliefs, attitudes, intentions and behaviors of women and their partners in the face of childbirth- caesarean section or abortion.
The objective of the present work was to specify a model for the study of pregnancy termination, although the design limited the findings to the sample, positive relationships were established between beliefs, attitudes and intentions regarding behaviors, suggesting the extension of this I work in other settings of reproductive health and sexuality. Future lines of research regarding factors explaining abortion intentions will allow anticipating demographic growth scenarios. The public policies that emerge from these results show that the population between 18 and 22 years of age is prone to plan their termination of pregnancy and based on this finding, it is possible to anticipate risk scenarios, as well as prevention, self-care and self-efficacy in vulnerable populations.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
