AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Review Article
*Corresponding Author: Ahmed N. Ghanem, MD (Urology), FRCS Ed, Mansoura University, Faculty of Medicine, Egypt.
Citation: Ahmed N. Ghanem. (2021) Covid-19 pandemic ARDS lockdown will end within <2 months: Depends on cooperation of scholars of doctors and researchers. Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports 3(3); DOI: 10.31579/2690-8794/069
Copyright: © 2021 Ahmed N. Ghanem, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 19 February 2021 | Accepted: 06 March 2021 | Published: 18 March 2021
Keywords: shock; cardiopulmonary arrest; ARDS; covid-19; coma; AKI; multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), fluid therapy complications
Coronavirus is here to stay
In January, Nature asked more than 100 immunologists, infectious-disease researchers and virologists working on SARS-CoV-2 whether it could be eradicated. Almost 90% of respondents think that the coronavirus will become endemic — meaning that it will continue to circulate in pockets of the global population for years to come. But failure to eradicate the virus does not mean that death, illness and social isolation will continue on the scales seen so far. The future will depend heavily on the type of immunity people acquire and how the virus evolves.
A different opinion: A minority report of one:
Coronavirus may not go completely away but will be reduced in size and severity and its mortality greatly reduced: An optimistic hopeful minority report, Covid-19 pandemic war lockdown will end triumphantly before the start of May.
The opinion of Nature is based on a survey that is concluded in this pessimistic depressive title of “Corona virus is here to stay”. I wish to express and report my opinion that Corona virous will go away and life returns to normal when Covid-19 will remain dormant and harmless like all serious viral infections of the past that have been prevented by active immunization by vaccination. Furthermore, I wish to express my opinion that the lockdown state of the UK and many countries will end before the start of May. The solid scientific evidence to support this minority report of one is given here. The only problem with validating this theory is that it depends on the collaboration of other scholars of researchers, scientists and doctors and their willingness to collaborate in an immediate study to validate the theory that will be proposed below. I am optimistic that at least two researchers will oblige and perform the validating study as much as I hope will attempt to save the currently acutely ill patients with a concentrated salt solution.
Here I shall report the scientific basis for this hopeful, optimistic minority report that Coronal virous will go away before the start of May. The reason for giving that date is the need for a study to validate the theory that requires a minimum of one month to conclusion and reporting. I also have a vested interest on deciding the start of May to end triumphantly the war of Covid-19 pandemic on humanity before that day. I want to celebrate my 71st-birthday with my family outside our house in the UK when this lockdown must end before that. This will be my first time ever to celebrate a birthday of mine. I hope the whole world will join the celebration and rejoice.
Editorial/Brief Communication/Mini review/ Opinion/ LTE or it may be considered as original research article (It is left to the Editor’s discretion and choice of one article type then delete others on acceptance, please)
There is currently substantial evidence that reports the research of my ongoing 40-years investigation to precise the patho-aetiology and therapy of the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Five books document my 14 new scientific discoveries reported in >100 articles and 8 books of which 5 have been published recently [2-6]. I have demonstrated that ARDS [5] is caused by volumetric overload shocks (VOS) [2] induced by excessive fluid gain that complicates fluid therapy of shocks in hospitals [3, 5] because of an error that is not the treating physician’s fault. The question whether this well-established ARDS is related to that caused by Covid-19 that also kills its victims by causing ARDS was raised [7, 8].
It is well documented now that the wrong Staling’s law dictates the faulty rules on fluid therapy that mislead physicians into giving too much fluid therapy during the resuscitation of shock of trauma, haemorrhage and sepsis, acutely ill patients, and prolonged major surgery. This professional research has established that VOS is induced by excessive infusion of fluids during the management of shock [2,4,6] and cause ARDS [5] from which sepsis has proved to be as innocent as the Wolf in Josef’ story.
It has been just realized that there is a link between this common type of ARDS, seen in the usual clinical practice but usually attributed to sepsis and septic shock, with ARDS of Covid-19. The reader is most likely to have heard this theory for the first time here in this Journal [6] because all my >100 articles on the subject reported over the last 4 years do not turn up on searching PubMed! This is because PubMed does not list articles reported in Open Access Journals (OAJ). All my articles, however, do appear on Google Scholars’ search with citations and probably in other search engines. There is probably a stupid money cause for PubMed not referencing OAJ which qualifies them for stupidity [7]. Let us hope it is temporary curable stupidity by repenting and rectifying the error by listing OAJ that survived >2 years and referencing my articles reported over the last 4 years, not the permanent utter stupidity that is a problem without solution and malady without a cure [7].
I have also been obstructed by top journals of the World by putting a great high and thick fire wall that prevent my articles from penetrating it to inform their readers. These journals have rejected my articles without sending to peer reviewers. This is a deliberate obstruction that is shared by all the top journals in the World and has resulted in delayed recognition of my new 14 discoveries in physics, physiology, and medicine [3] that has clear benefit to science, medicine, and humanity. The editor responsible for each and all these journals must be investigated for inability to recognize genuine new discoveries and scientific advances of articles he received and evaluated.
The Editor-in-Chief of such journals must have the primary responsibility and both him and the publisher should accept resignation or sacking of the responsible sub-editor as he is unfit for the job he is doing. The Editors-in-Chief of these top-rated journals of the World must be held responsible and accountable for rejecting these landmark impactful articles of mine that represent 14 new scientific discoveries in physics, physiology, and medicine [2-6]. They have the right to defend themselves using whatever excuses and proofs on their stand they might have.
The war on Covid-19 pandemic of ARDS has been going on for over a year now. It kills hundreds of thousands of patients every day all over the word and has caused great loss in humans’ lives and billions of dollars. I have reasons to believe that this war shall and must end triumphantly soon [8, 9]. To be precise I predict this lockdown will end before the start of May. This end shall be due to a combination of the eradication of the vicious Covid-19 virus by active immunization that will take longer time to work. Patients of today and tomorrow who are currently critically ill patients dying with ARDS caused by Covid-19 seen every day now deserve an immediate specific therapy that may help saving their lives. This therapy is available now [5].
The therapy has not been tested in Covid-19 induced ARDS yet. I suggested an immediate prospective comparative cohort study of 100 patients to start now. The study should compare the conservative currently practiced therapy for Covid-19 ARDS of one group of 50 patients to another similar randomised group who should get the added hypertonic sodium therapy (HST) to the standard treatment. This should be akin to or better than our prospective cohort study reported in 1990 [9]. The results should compare the two groups with regards to the morbidity and mortality of ARDS on its onset and on the patient’s discharge or death.
Such study can be done at any hospital or research centre that receive Covid-19 cases, specifically intensive care units run by consultants of anaesthesia and intensive care. It does not require extra money or much time and should be written up, concluded, and reported within a month. If drug companies have been allowed to reduce the research time of producing a vaccine from 4-5 years to less than one year, the Ethical Committees would kindly allow physicians researchers to reduce prospective studies from a high number of thousands to 100 patients or less particularly as it maintains the statistical power of the study results- as statisticians should testify. You only need to investigate 100 patients, 50 for each group, and you may not even need to complete the study! I anticipate a clear superiority of HST that will ethically compel the treating physician to switch all patients to HST group that saves their lives.
Treatment using concentrated salt solution of 5%NaCl and/or 8.4%NaCo3 is professionally researched and established by me to save the lives of ARDS patients induced by sodium-free fluid overload that cause the transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) syndrome known in urology to present with acute dilutional hyponatraemia (DH). This causes VOS which is a shock that complicates other types of shocks hence commonly mistaken for one of the recognized shocks being treated and gets wrongly treated by further volume expansion using crystalloids, colloids and/or blood fluids. This complicates VOS1 into VOS2 and both causes ARDS. VOS occur seamlessly and unnoticed particularly VOS type 2 of sodium-based fluid that has little or no serological markers.
Thus, VOS 2 is an almost impossible to recognize that complicates fluid therapy of other known type of shocks, cause ARDS, and occur seamlessly and unnoticed without a clear serological marker such as hyponatraemia of VOS 1. Validation of the volume of retained fluids in a patient can be done in two ways: The volumetric method in litres and the gravimetric method in Kg, and both should be recorded every day during hospital stay, done and compared at hospital admission and at the onset of ARDS as well as the time of hospital discharge or death. The maximum volume of HST used in a single patient is one litre- if it does not work consider the treatment as failure. This may occur in patients with permanent AKI who should go on haemodialysis setting the machine to negative fluid balance to get rid of the retained volume of fluid in the patient’s body- they may recover their renal function.
Availability and choice of HST for the trial is summarized here. The concentrated salt solutions of 5%NaCl and/or 8.4%NaCo3 are available in every hospital now or should be made adequately available before the start of the suggested trial. Sodium bicarbonate is already available in every resuscitation trolley in 200 ml bags of 8.4%NaCo3 that is known to be used during the resuscitation of shock. The 5%NaCl can be made available by any hospital pharmacist in bags of 500 ml or 1000 ml on the doctors’ request or readily provided by intravenous fluid manufacturers.
Why use these two fluids concentrations in particular? Because they have been tested and validated previously by me to be absolutely 100% safe without any complications. The HST of 5%NaCl and/or %NaCo3 does not cause thrombophlebitis like fluids of higher concentrations. Fluid of lower concentrations are less effective, and its use are a hit or miss experience. A combination of both fluids should be used in every patient treated with it to induce the maximum desired effect of inducing massive diuresis of 4-5 litres of urine by the end of the 1-hour treatment. It is observed that the immediate diuresis that should start during the 1-hour therapy of ARDS producing this massive diuresis SHOULD NOT BE REPLACED by further intravenous fluid therapy as it defeats the objective of therapy.
The diuresed volume of urine must get out of the patient’s body and not to be replaced for the immediate recovery of the patient from his coma, ARDS, acute kidney injury (AKI), and cardiovascular and haematological manifestations as well as other hepatic and gastro-intestinal manifestations of the multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) usually seen in such cases though one system may predominate (Table 1). If the patient is on dialysis, the machine should be set to negative fluid balance. This HST is a magical lifesaving therapy of ARDS or MODS induced by any cause or predisposed by any condition to remove any excess fluid volume retained in the patient’s body. It is 100% safe and most effective in saving the lives of the patients that brings patients back from the dead. Please, stay by the patient’s bed side and watch him recover from coma and asks for a drink. It is the best hour you spend in your career life. It is quite simply magical.
Table Abbreviations
SBB1 Sudden bilateral blindness
COC2 Clouding of consciousness
PMBCI3 Paralysis mimicking bizarre cerebral infarctions, but is recoverable on instant use of HST of 5%NaCl and/or NaCo3, and so is coma and AKI
FAM4 Frothing around the mouth
APO5 Acute pulmonary oedema
RA6 Respiratory arrest
CPA7 Cardiopulmonary arrest
ARDS $ Manifests later, on ICU
AKI9 Acute kidney injury
DGR10 Delayed gut recovery
CV Shock* Cardiovascular shock of VOS reported here as VOS 1 and VOS2.
Annuria8 That is unresponsive to diuretics but responds to HST of 5%Ncl and/or 8.4%NaCo3
AKI8 Acute kidney injury
Also occurs the excessive bleeding at the surgical site and Leukocytosis occurred in the absence of sepsis and septic shock.
(P.S. Please be prepared by inserting a urinary catheter, if one is not already there, and get two buckets placed next to the patient’s bed. When the patient recovers and asks for a drink, both you and your patient may celebrate your success with a drink each on me- just let me know)
I have NOT invented HST myself. The HST was first introduced in 1946 by Danowski TS, Winkler AW, Elkington JR [11] for treating dilutional hyponatraemic (DH) shock induced experimentally in dogs by large intravenous administration of sodium-free fluids that caused DH that characterizes volumetric overload shock type one (VOS 1) which cause the first type of ARDS. Harrison, R.H., Boren, J.S. and Robinson, J.R. in 1956 [12] were the first to use HST in treating DH of the TURP syndrome in urological practice and clinical practice.
Decades after that HST was considered contraindicated by the authority even in the therapy of DH until 1987 when Ghanem AN, Wojtulewski JA and Penny MD [13] rejuvenated it and reported its successful lifesaving use in the therapy of DH and the TURP syndrome as anecdotal evidence at Br Med Jour. Ghanem AN and Ward JP reported the first term using VOS in an MD thesis in 1988 and an article in 1990 [10]. In the later prospective cohort study of 100 patients of whom 10% developed the TURP syndrome, it was established that volumetric overload (VO) is the most highly significant cause for the TURP syndrome (p=0007) (Table 2 and Figure 1). Also (Table 3 and Figure 2) were taken from another study of 23 patients case series who suffered the TURP syndrome demonstrating VO of 7 litres cause death by ARDS (Figure 2)., while patients who were saved from certain death by HST validated its effective use of lifesaving value (Table 3).
The inflow pressure pushes fluid through the orifice
Creating fluid jet in the lumen of the G tube**.
The fluid jet creates negative side pressure gradient causing suction maximal over the
Proximal part of the G tube near the inlet that sucks fluid into lumen.
The side pressure gradient turns positive pushing fluid out of lumen over the distal
Part maximally near the outlet.
Thus, the fluid around G tube inside C moves in magnetic field-like circulation (5)
Taking an opposite direction to lumen flow of G tube.
The inflow pressure 1 and orifice 2 induce the negative side pressure creating the dynamic G-C circulation phenomenon that is rapid, autonomous, and efficient in moving fluid and particles out from the G tube lumen at 4, irrigating C at 5, then sucking it back again at 3,
Maintaining net negative energy pressure inside chamber C.
**Note the shape of the fluid jet inside the G tube (Cone shaped), having a diameter of the inlet on right hand side and the diameter of the exit at left hand side (G tube diameter). I lost the photo on which the fluid jet was drawn, using tea leaves of fine and coarse sizes that runs in the center of G tube leaving the outer zone near the wall of G tube clear. This may explain the finding in real capillary of the protein-free (and erythrocyte-free) sub-endothelial zone in the Glycocalyx paradigm. It was also noted that fine tea leaves exit the distal pores in small amount maintaining a higher concentration in the circulatory system than that in the C chamber- akin to plasma proteins.
After that Ghanem has continued alone to identify VOS 2 induced by sodium-based fluids as the patho-aetiology of ARDS and validate HST in its successful lifesaving therapy [5]. Ghanem and Ward introduced the concept of volumetric overload in the patho-aetiology of TURP syndrome reported in a prospective randomized cohort study in 1990 [10], reported in the British Journal of Urology- now International. Ghanem also investigated the underlying faulty physiological law of Starling for the capillary interstitial fluid transfer proving it wrong on both forces that should be replaced by the hydrodynamic of the porous orifice (G) tube (Figure 3). Every word, sentence, statement, references and figures and tables mentioned here are reproduced from reference [6}.
Drug companies have been working hard with enormous amount of money to develop a safe and effective vaccine for Covid-19- this is for future prevention that is uncertain to predict after how long time it can protect people. I have been working equally hard from my home in Egypt in complete isolation and confinement quarantine since Covid-19 started its war against humanity a year or so ago. I shall continue to do so at home in the UK until the war is over. I work 20 hours per day and sleep only 4 interrupted noncontinuous hours per 24-hours a day. During my long sleepless nights and days, I do not feel a moment of boredom or dullness at all and there is nothing that I need that does not come to me with the help of family members, my wife Nannah Abdullatif and daughter Sarah, and a dear friend of mine Mr. Ahmed Awad. I do not miss seeing the streets or shops but miss seeing my friends once weekly every Friday at a local social club. This quarantine period of isolation and confinement at home of approximately one year was spent most productively and usefully in authoring approximately >75 articles and 8 books.
In the passenger allocation form that all passengers entering the UK must fill by law 48 hours before landing, it asked whether I wish to shorten the 10-days period of quarantine at home. There was not a question whether I wish to voluntarily extend it for as long as the Covid-19 pandemic lasts. I would have answered yes because I am on a voluntary mission to end this pandemic war lockdown against Covid-19 triumphantly within <2 months- if other scholars researchers co-operated with me and conducted the required suggested study [7,8] that I cannot do myself being retired without access to work and research facilities. I anticipated the cooperation of journals in reporting this article immediately.
I work without any external financial help at all to help in the research that validate both the aetiology of ARDS and the effective therapy of concentrated salt solution of 5%NaCl and/or 8.4%NaCo3 in treating VOS that causes ARDS. I have fallen in debt to my bank for the first ever time in my life to finance my research and pay APC in OAJ because I believe it worthwhile investment and a good value for my money.
This HST is a definitive lifesaving therapy for patients who have developed ARDS and usually die in hundreds of thousands all over the world, so it should work on that caused by Covid-19 and sepsis [6] as well as the acutely ill patients and patients undergoing prolonged major surgery who suffer from ARDS and present during their hospital stay.
I know that the challenge and the stake or risk is extremely high, and I am taking a huge gamble, but it is only my reputation being at a vulnerable stake here, and it is only my money that is being invested. HST will not cost anybody but me any money and will not put your patients at any risk and will not cause any side effects- it is 100% guaranteed. To make it easy for every doctor managing ARDS cases of Covid-19 particularly Intensivists and anaesthetists running ICU I shall go absolutely daring to say try a pilot study on 5 patients and report your conclusion fast. It is perfectly acceptable to me for validating my theory so it should be accepted by the journal of your choice as valid evidence in support of the theory and on my responsibility.
During a war emergency law apply and overrules the usual rules and regulations, and even may put some laws on hold. I shall accept your verdict and you will be my witness and alibi. During a war rules and regulations may be over-ruled and even laws may be made temporarily redundant. We are at war against Covid-19 and its ARDS. This is an instant positive success for you that would delight me and the rest of the World. This is my fascinating true story of 40-years ongoing research that has many starts: the one of relevance hear is the writing of my first essay to the Lancet after obtaining my MD Thesis in Nov. 1988. This amazing success story has not ended yet and I may write it up some day either in Arabic or English if I find the time or leave it to a professional story writer that may interest film makers later. Of all the movies I have seen in cinemas and on TV Amadeus remains my best favorite film so far.
The rewards of my endeavor might be equal or greater than the gamble on the theory of using HST for treating ARDS of Covin-19. It is a calculated risk. I trust my observations, scientific acuity, and the results and conclusions of my 40-years professional research that would not let me down now. Please trust me and have faith in me as I can do what I say I can. Egypt no longer needs my help as there is no lockdown there now except some limit on the opening times of shops and cafes and people are enjoying perfectly normal life despite high rate of Covid-19 mortality. Furthermore, to Egypt and perhaps the whole Arabic World I am like petrol available under their feet, but it only has value when discovered by the West professional expertise. The UK and USA do need my help and would appreciate it to end their current state of lockdown and to save the lives of their patients. This explains why I am here in the UK now. The whole world shall appreciate my help to reduce or prevent mortality of ARDS due to Covid-19 as well as sepsis and other predisposing factors. This is how I put my money where my mouth is. The race is on. Prove me wrong if you dare! Just kidding I should say please if you care.
The author is available to all interested researchers 24/7 (++44) (0) 7306321589) to answer any questions or provide any clarification on the suggested trial and HST. If you do not get an answer this is because I am on one of my interrupted irregular sleep break of 1-h every 3-5 hours. Please call again after one hour or send me an email on: anmghanem1@gmail.com Communication may be in English or Arabic, if you cannot speak and write in these languages please use your own that will be automatically translated for me by Google.
None.
None.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
