AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article
*Corresponding Author: Mohammed Habib, Cardiology Department, Alshifa Hospital, Gaza, and Palestine.
Citation: Elshenat Majed., Balosha M., Habib M. (2019) Correlation of Coronary Artery Calcium and Invasive Coronary Angiographically in Patients with Atypical Angina Pectoris (CACICA - Trial). J Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, 2(4); DOI:10.31579/2641-0419/029
Copyright: © 2019 Mohammed Habib. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 08 October 2019 | Accepted: 25 November 2019 | Published: 29 November 2019
Keywords: myocardial infarction; primary PCI; pharmacoinvasive strategy
OBJECTIVES
This study correlated the multi - detector computed tomography (MDCT) calcium scores with the results of coronary angiography in diabatic and/or hypertensive patients with atypical angina pectoris in order to assess its value to predict or exclude significant coronary artery disease (CAD).
BACKGROUND
Muti-detector computed tomography is a sensitive method to detect coronary calcium. However, it is unclear whether it may play a role as a filter before invasive procedures in patients with atypical angina pectoris.
METHODS
A total of 150 patients (116 men and 34 women) with diabetic and/or hypertension for at least 5 years and atypical angina pectoris from a single center were included in our study. patients underwent calcium screening with MDCT and have calcium score more than 100 , then all patient underwent invasive coronary angiography.
RESULTS
The Mean age was 62±5.7 and 77.3% were male, 78% of men and 88.2 % of women revealed significant coronary stenoses (> 50% lumen narrowing of left main trunk stenosis and > 70% stenosis of any epicardial coronary artery). Significant correlation between calcium scoring and significant coronary artery stenosis was seen (P: 0001). A 70% were DM, 90% were hypertensive and 61.3% were HTN and DM. The LAD artery was the most stenotic artery by 53.3% followed by RCA (37.3%) and finally LCX (30.7%). one significant coronary artery was 42% followed by two significant CAD (26.7%), while 9.3% included three-vessel disease. The significant coronary artery diseases was increased with age ( P: 0003).
CONCLUSIONS
Coronary calcium proved to have good diagnostic performance for significant coronary artery stenosis in patient with atypical angina pectoris.
Coronary heart disease is the leading cause of mortality in the Palestine and worldwide. The current gold standard to evaluate coronary artery disease is invasive coronary angiography (ICA). In Gaza alone, between 2015 and 2018 about 5411 coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention procedures rose by 48 % over the last 4 years from a rate of 80 per 100,000 population in 2015 to 155 per 100,000 population in 2018. [1]
The significant coronary artery stenosis among patients underwent diagnostic coronary angiography were 54.3% of patients with stable ischemic heart disease, 66.7% in patients with unstable angina pectoris and 92.7% in patient with ST elevation myocardial infarction. [1]
There are two major concerns for the stable ischemic coronary artery disease patients: the first point: Coronary angiography is over-used and low-yield. And second point: Non-Stress imaging has improved diagnostic accuracy and can avoid invasive coronary angiography
Recent trials suggested the Coronary artery calcium (CAC) is highly specific feature of coronary atherosclerosis, and many CAD patients are asymptomatic, and early detection and treatment of CAD can reduce the incidence of acute coronary syndrome [2,3]
Studies have also shown that the coronary artery calcium score (CACS) is useful for refined risk stratification, particularly with high-risk patients and those with diabetes mellitus [4,5]
Our aim of this study to confirm correlation between computed tomographic calcium score with intermediate or high risk (Agatston score >100) and invasive coronary angiography (ICA) in patient with age more than 40 years and have diabetes and/or hypertension since at least 5 years with atypical angina pectoris.(Figure 1)
In CACICA Gaza trial we conducted a cross-sectional study enrolling atypical angina pectoris patients with diabetes and/or hypertension for at least 5 years referred for cardiac evaluation of coronary artery disease before invasive coronary angiography. The inclusion period was from June 2018 to August 2019.
Population of Patients:
A total of 150 consecutive patients with coronary Calcium scoring > 100 according to agatston score and age older than 40 years patient with atypical angina pectoris and the presence of at least 1 of the following characteristics:
The exclusion criteria were age younger than 40 years, acute coronary syndrome patients, Diabetes and hypertension treatment for less than 5 years . All patients regardless of calcium score and presence of stents. All patient with previous documented CAD by invasive coronary angiography, All patient with previous Coronary artery by-pass grafting. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients.
Definition of Atypical angina pectoris (6)
Meets two of the following characteristics.
(i) Constricting discomfort in the front of the chest or in the neck, jaw, shoulder, or arm;
(ii) Precipitated by physical exertion;
(iii) Relieved by rest or nitrates within 5 min.
The amount of calcium in the coronary arteries was assessed with a Multi Detector-Row CT (MDCT) scanner (IDT 124, Philips Medical Systems, and The Netherlands). Subjects were positioned within the gantry of the MDCT scanner in supine position. During a single breath hold, images of the heart, from the level of the tracheal bifurcation to below the base of the heart, were acquired using prospective ECG triggering at 50–80% of the RR-interval, depending on the heart rate. Scan parameters were 16x1.5 mm collimation, 205 mm field of view(FOV), 0.42 s rotation time, 0.28 s scan time per table position, 120 kVp and 40–70 mAs (patient weight <70 kg: 40 mAs; 70–90 kg: 55 mAs; >90 kg: 70 mAs). Scan duration was approximately 10 s, depending on heart rate and patient size. After completing a the study, one scan reader manually selected the calcifications within one of the coronary arteries (left main, left anterior descending, left circumflex, right coronary artery, and PDA),three-dimensional connected components above the standard threshold of 130 Hounsfield Units (HU) were considered candidate calcifications. Each patient was assigned to one of five CVD risk categories based on Agatston score : low(0),fair(1–10),moderate(11–100),intermediate(101–400),high(>400), if patient have intermediate or high agatston score coronary angiography is recommended.
Coronary angiography: The Judkin’s technique was used with at least four views of the left coronary artery and two views of the right coronary artery. Analysis of the coronary angiograms was done by an independent, experienced observer who was unaware of the coronary calcium score. The decision to perform angiography was not influenced by the calcium score. Angiography was performed within 30 days after the MDCT. Significant stenosis was defined as > 50% lumen narrowing of left main trunk stenosis and > 70% stenosis of any epicardial coronary artery.
Statistical analysis:
All data was analyzed by SPSS (version 23, IBM Corporation), For continuous variables that were not normally distributed (p< 0.1 [Shapiro-Wilks test]), the testing for differences was done using the nonparametric Wilcoxon test. For normally distributed variables, the Student t test was employed. Categorical data were compared using the Fisher exact test or the Pearson chi-square test. The distributions of continuous variables were presented with their median and range (if not normally distributed), respectively, with their mean and SD. Categorical data were presented with absolute frequencies and percentages. A spearman correlation coefficient between CTCS and Coronary angiography, results of the statistical tests are presented with two-tailed P value of < 0.05 were considered significant.
The total number of cases in this study was 150 with mean age 62±5.7, the majority of participants 77.3% were male, 70% were DM, 90% were hypertensive and 61.3% were HTN and DM. Table 1
Distribution of calcium deposit in coronary artery regards to agatston score
The quantification of calcium deposit in each coronary artery and total calcium score. The LAD artery got the largest quantity of calcium followed by RCA artery and finally LCX artery.
Number and percent of diseased coronary artery regards to Coronary angiography
Most coronary angiography result included one significant coronary artery by 42% followed by two significant CAD (26.7%), while 9.3% included three-vessel disease.
Number and percent of significant stenosis in every coronary artery
Table 4.3 shows that the LAD artery was the most stenostic artery by 53.3% followed by RCA (37.3%) and finally LCX (30.7%).
Comparison between coronary angiography and CT calcium scoring results: no difference between significant coronary artery stenosis in patient group with total Calcium score > 400 and in patient group with calcium score <400. But the major group of significant number of coronary arteries was one vessel comparison between 2 and 3 significant coronary artery stenosis (P :0.018)
Correlation between cath lab. and CT calcium scoring results
A sperman correlation coefficient between CTCS and Coronary angiography. was done and revealed that there was a direct intermediate relationship between CTCS and Cath Lab except the LCX, where the relationship was weak direct relationship.
No statistical significant differences at level (P- value < 0.05) between number of diseased coronary artery and sex, DM and HTN. While there was statistical significant differences at level (P- value < 0.05) between number of diseased coronary artery and age.
This study describes the value of MDCT calcium screening in patients with atypical angina pectoris with diabetes and/or hypertension for at least 5 years who were referred to our center with suspected CAD to be proven or excluded by coronary angiography.
The strength of this study is that all the patients were evaluated in a single center with the same technology; MDCT scans and angiography were performed within a 30 days of each other and were read by independent observers in a blinded manner.
There was no significant difference in coronary calcium between men and women however, the reliability of calcium testing in predicting significant stenosis was equally effective in men and women. Finally, the diagnostic benefit of calcium screening is maintained for all age groups.
The calcium score percentiles adjusted for age and gender are significantly higher in symptomatic versus asymptomatic patients with risk factors [7].
There is no agreement on what score cut point should be used in the clinical setting. Some studies solely used exclusion of any calcium [8 –12]. Other studies used a fixed score of 100 (13). In our study, significant coronary stenosis diagnosed by coronary angiography was found in 78% of the patient who had calcium score > 100.
In CONFIRM trial, comparison between calcium scoring versus computed tomography coronary angiography. The patient with calcium score 100-400 and > 50% coronary artery stenosis were 35%, and patients with calcium score > 400 had 60% significant coronary artery stenosis. In our study comparison between calcium scoring versus invasive coronary angiography. The significant coronary artery stenosis was 78%, In CONFIRM trial the diabetic patient was 18% but in our trial the diabetic patient was 90%. In CONFIRM trial the hypertension was 59% and in our trial 70%. This difference may be related multiple risk factors: First, High risk patient group in our trial compared with confirm trial. Second, patient group in our trial all patient was atypical angina pectoris, CONFIRM trial the patient group involved typical angina, atypical angina, non-cardiac chest pain and dyspnea. Third, coronary artery stenosis confirmed by invasive coronary angiography but in CONFIRM trial computed tomography coronary angiography (14)
In the PROMISE Study, about 78% was atypical angina pectoris, 65% hypertensive and 21% diabetic, the significant coronary artery stenosis was 36% in patient with calcium score > 400 and 20% in patients with calcium score 100- 400. [15] in our trial 100% of patient was atypical angina pectoris, and 90% was diabetic.
In our trial patient with diabetic and/or hypertensive for at least 5 years and Calcium scoring 100-400 need coronary angiography, also supports the sequential testing algorithm evaluated in the CRESCENT trial (Calcium Imaging and Selective CT Angiography in Comparison to Functional Testing for Suspected Coronary Artery Disease) a prospective randomized trial that used CAC as a first-line test, advancing to CTA when CAC scores were 1 to 400. [16]
Clinical implications. On the basis of our results, we see an indication for calcium screening in patients with atypical angina pectoris and had diabetic and/or hypertension for at least 5 years, especially if noninvasive tests are not feasible or inconclusive. Calcium screening with MDCT has the potential as a filter in atypical symptomatic patients to reduce the number of invasive procedures which do not lead to intervention.
Potential Conflict of Interest
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
This article is part of the Cardiology Board thesis. Palestinian Cardiology Board -AL Shifa Hospital – Gaza - Palestine
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
