AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article
*Corresponding Author: Kravchenko I.V., Interdistrict Center for Medical Rehabilitation at Polyclinic N38, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Citation: Kravchenko I.V., Chizhikov I.I., Lvov N.N., (2023), Comparative Analysis of Combination Therapy Regimens in Patients with Paranoid Schizophrenia with Non-Suicidal Auto aggression and Identified Signs of Resistance to Ongoing Neuroleptic Monotherapy, J. Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, 13(2); DOI:10.31579/2578-8868/273
Copyright: © 2023 Kravchenko I.V, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of The Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited
Received: 09 September 2022 | Accepted: 24 February 2023 | Published: 03 April 2023
Keywords: giant intracranial aneurysm; bypass; trapping; pediatric neurosurgery
A comparative analysis of combination therapy regimens was carried out in patients with paranoid schizophrenia with NSAA and identified signs of resistance to ongoing neuroleptic monotherapy. In total, in the period from 2015 to 2022, 155 patients with paranoid schizophrenia with NSAA were studied as part of a multicenter randomized longitudinal study. It has been established that the first-line therapy regimen in this group of patients is a combined regimen of clozapine with haloperidol.Introduction. The increase in the number of therapeutically resistant patients with paranoid schizophrenia with auto aggression remains one of the most pressing problems in psychiatry remains as the most common nosological unit [1,2,3]. At the same time, a large amount of research material has been accumulated on the factors and conditions that affect the formation of the state of resistance in such patients [4,5,6,7]. First of all, these include: a debut at an early age, an "erased" beginning, a continuous course, the dominance of negative symptoms in the structure of the pathological process, and the fading of the affective component. A special place among the clinical predictors of therapeutic resistance is occupied by psychopathic disorders with auto aggressive tendencies, traditionally considered within the framework of heboid states. At the same time, until recently, the main drug from the group of neuroleptics used to overcome resistance was clozapine [8,9,10,11,12,13]. In practice, up to 30% of patients remain intact to its action, which dictates the need for combination therapy [14,15,16]. This predetermines the search for new schemes for the use of medicinal drugs to solve this problem.
A total of 155 patients with paranoid schizophrenia with NSAA were studied in the period from 2015 to 2022 as part of a multicenter randomized longitudinal study. All patients were under inpatient treatment at the St. Petersburg Psychiatric Hospital of a specialized type with intensive observation, and the multidisciplinary medical center "Profimed" in St. Petersburg. Consent to participate in the study was confirmed either by the subjects themselves or by their legal representatives in writing. Consent obtained from the ethical committees of both institutions where the studies took place. All subjects were men and women aged 25 to 45 years. The average age of the subjects was 33.3±2.1 years. The average duration of a procedural disease was 17.5 ± 1.6 years. The type of flow of the schizophrenic process is continuous-progressive. Inclusion criteria are:
1) compliance of the diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenia with the criteria of the ICD-10 revision (F20.0);
2) the state of drug remission of schizophrenia itself, with signs of an increasing procedural personality defect;
3) the frequency of non-suicidal self-harm at least 5 times a month for three months prior to inclusion in the study;
4) the ineffectiveness of monotherapy with antipsychotics of different pharmacological groups, prescribed in an amount of at least two, with a duration of admission of three months each.
This condition was regarded as a manifestation of resistance to ongoing therapy. Non-inclusion criteria were:
1) the psychotic level of disorders before the moment of inclusion in the study;
2) auto-aggressive actions in the form of self-suffocation as a means of obtaining sexual satisfaction (asphyxiophilia); The article uses the terminology inherent in the domestic (Russian) school of psychiatry.
The definition of “non-suicidal auto-aggressive actions or “NSAA” included a variety of actions directed against one’s health and accompanied by a violation of the integrity (functions) of organs or organ systems. At the same time, there was no demonstration of the intention to commit suicide. The main research method was clinical observation, the results of which were formulated in accordance with the national recommendations adopted in the Russian Federation and the criteria set out in the 10th revision of the International Classification of Diseases.
All patients were randomly distributed into 5 groups (Table1). The choice of preparations corresponded to the principle of their greatest distribution in practical work.
Distribution of subjects by comparison groups (number of patients). Table 1
| International non-proprietary name of the medicinal product | Quantity sick |
| Clozapine | 30 |
| Haloperidol | 30 |
| Olanzapine | 29 |
| Clozapine + haloperiodol | 35 |
| Olanzapine + haloperiodol | 31 |
The choice of dosages of drugs in the examined persons was carried out taking into account the severity of clinical and psychopathological experiences (Table 2)
Distribution of subjects by comparison groups (average daily doses, mg.) Table
| International non-proprietary name of the medicinal product | Average daily doses (mg)
|
| Clozapine | 465±1,8 |
| Haloperidol | 6,7±0,8
|
| Olanzapine | 8,0±2,5 |
| Clozapine + haloperiodol | 425±2,8 г+ 5,4±1,0
|
| Olanzapine + haloperiodol | 8,6 ±0,6+ 5,4±1,0
|
Also, all subjects received 2 mg of clonazepam per day for a month. Additionally, 1000 mg per day of valproic acid was taken for a period of three months. The assessment of the mental state of the survey was carried out by clinical assessment at the time of inclusion in the study (week 1), at 12 and 24 weeks of the study. The clinical efficacy of therapy was determined by a comparative analysis of the frequency of committed acts of non-suicidal auto-aggression for a period of 24 weeks before and after inclusion in the study. To objectify the data obtained, a brief psychiatric assessment scale and a scale for assessing social functioning were used. For statistical evaluation, Fisher's test and ANOVA analysis of variance were used. Clinical and psychopathological characteristics of the subjects were the following data. Heredity was psycho pathologically burdened in 98% of the subjects. Early development was distinguished by a tendency to excitable, hysteron form manifestations. The premorbid background was formed by hysteroid, emotionally unstable, excitable features at the level of accentuations. The period of initial manifestations fell on the age of 10-12 years, with the growth of protest forms of behavior, opposition. In the future, the clinical picture lost the features inherent in the pubertal crisis, supplemented by rudeness, unmotivated aggression against others, slovenliness, untidiness, in the absence of the possibility of any behavior correction. A distinctive feature of the subjects was a tendency to sexual deviations, the perverse nature of which was directed at close relatives. Outbursts of aggression were transformed into demonstratively blackmailing auto-aggressive behavior. If at first the patients showed suicidal tendencies at the verbal level, then the nature of self-harm took on the form of complete non-suicidal self-harm (there were no tendencies associated with the desire to take one's own life; the choice of the method of application and localization of self-harm was of the most sparing nature). Patients sought to spend more time in asocial companies, massively became alcoholic, consumed drugs, and committed delinquent acts. The combination of emotional coldness, cruelty, disturbance of desires, episodes of massive consumption of surfactants contributed to the diagnosis of "heboid syndrome", "heboidophrenia", "protracted atypical pubertal crisis", "mixed disorder of behavior and emotions", psychopathic syndrome of residual organic origin, "organic personality disorder." In the prodromal period, anxiety, insomnia, suspicion, transient perceptual delusions, fragmentary delusions of persecution, and relationships increased, which coincided with the opinion of Russian studies on the stage-by-stage formation of paranoid schizophrenia with a psychopathic onset [17]. Clinical pathomorphosis consisted in slowing down the growth of deficient changes after 2-3 years from the moment of the steady nature of the course of the disease, consisting of stages of exacerbation of psychotic symptoms with reduced manifestations of the Kandinsky-Clerambault syndrome, followed by periods of unstable remission. The structure of the latter was dominated by persistent behavioral disorders with aggressive, auto-aggressive tendencies. At the same time, the patients were distinguished by unilateral activity, not revealing pronounced apato-abulic disorders under the usual conditions. Such changes met the criteria for procedural changes in the personality level or a psychopathic form of the defect [17]. The NSAA itself had a distinctly demonstratively blackmailing pattern, they were distinguished by careful planning, repetition and lack of criticism of their behavior, reflecting the pseudo-adaptation of the individual. In some patients, non-suicidal self-harm was of an autochthonous nature. In this case, NSAA was accompanied by short-term changes in the mental state, in which asthenia, apathy, disorganization of thinking, irritability, conflict, sleep disturbances increased for a period of two to three weeks, and protopathic anxiety appeared.
In this case, NSAA were applied without prior preparation, impulsively, once, without criticism of their behavior. The following could serve as the outcome of such states:
1) return to the initial state;
2) an increase in psychopathic manifestations that serve as a “facade” of an extended psychotic episode;
3) subacute course with a wave-like increase in psychopathic forms of response, fragmentary delusional ideas, transient perceptual deceptions, lasting up to 2-3 months. Thus, the consideration of NSAA took place in an integral connection with the leading psychopathological manifestations in this group of patients.
It was established that all neuroleptics declared in the study had a positive effect on the general mental state (Table N3). It was established that changes in the mental state, at the level of trends, according to the scale of the same name at the level of trends, occurred at the 12th week of the study in all comparison groups. and clozapine. Among the latest changes in the general mental state were statistically significant by the end of the study (24-week study)
Comparative analysis of the effectiveness of therapy according to the short assessment psychiatric scale (in points) Table 3
| International non-proprietary name of the medicinal product | Stages of therapy evaluation | ||
| 1- week | 12- week | 24- week | |
| Clozapine | 72,0 | 60,2 (F 1.2) | 49,0 (F 1.47) |
| Haloperidol | 69,1 | 63,0 (F 1.1) | 51.4 F 1.34 |
| Olanzapine | 72.7 | 64.1(F F 1.13) | 51.4 F 1.41 |
| Clozapine + haloperiodol | 73.9 | 59.4 (F1.24) | 46.1(F 1.6) * |
| Olanzapine + haloperiodol | 72,3 | 60.1 (F1.2) | 48.4 (F1.49) |
* p≤0,05
It was established that all antipsychotics declared in the study showed a positive effect on the level of social functioning (Table N 4). It was established that changes in the level of social functioning, at the level of trends, according to the scale of the same name at the level of trends, occurred at the 12th week of the study in all comparison groups. These positive changes in the level of social functioning remained at the level of trends until the end of the study in all subjects, except for the group receiving combined therapy with haloperidol and clozapine.
Comparative analysis of the effectiveness of therapy according to the social functioning assessment scale (in points). Table 4
| International non-proprietary name of the medicinal product | Stages of therapy evaluation | ||
| 1- week | 12- week | 24- week | |
| Clozapine | 24,5 | 32.3 (F 0.76) | 40.1 (F 0.61) |
| Haloperidol | 23,3 | 30.1 (F 0.77) | 37.8 ( F 0.62) |
| Olanzapine | 24,1 | 31,2 (F 0.77) | 36,4 (F 0.66) |
| Clozapine + haloperiodol | 24.2 | 33,2 (F 1.25) | 41.4 (F 1.71) * |
| Olanzapine + haloperiodol | 24,8 | 33.7 (F 0.74) | 39.2 (F 0.63) |
* p≤0,05
Comparative analysis of effectiveness in relation to the frequency of NSAA Table 5
International non-proprietary name of the medicinal product | Stages of therapy evaluation (Frequency of NSAA per subject) | |
24 weeks - until the time of the study | 24 weeks - after the moment of the study | |
| Clozapine | 6,6 | 3,6 (F 1.83) * |
| Haloperidol | 6,8 | 3,9(F1.74) * |
| Olanzapine | 5,8 | 4,1 (F1.41) |
| Clozapine + haloperiodol | 6,7 | 2,1 (F3.19) ** |
| Olanzapine + haloperiodol | 6,3 | 3,2 (F .97) * |
* p≤0,05*, **p≤0,01
A positive correlation was found between changes in the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale and the frequency of NSAA in the control groups at the end of the study. In patients taking clozapine, the f-ratio value is 5.9751. Thep-value is 0.025031. In patients treated with haloperidol, the f-ratio value is 992.41037.
As part of a comparative analysis, all the claimed therapy regimens have confirmed their effectiveness. At the same time, differences in the effectiveness of therapy for different elements of the clinical picture of the studied individuals were revealed. It was found that the drugs of all comparison groups contributed to a decrease in the overall score on the Brief Psychiatric Evaluation Scale, the effectiveness of which decreased in the following order: “clozapine + haloperidol” < “olanzapine + haloperidol” < “clozapine < haloperidol>1). The identified behavioral disorders are more related to the rank of positive disorders, emphasizing negative (deficit) disorders, forming a separate syndrome complex; 2). Positive disorders are most often associated with an increased level of dopamine, which is also involved in the motivational component of behavioral disorders, reinforcing the existing behavior pattern - in this case, non-suicidal auto-aggressive behavior; 3) the combined use of clozapine with haloperidol has the maximum synergy in relation to the normalization of dopamine levels in the examined patients, contributing to the effect of overcoming resistance.
The first-line therapy regimen in patients with paranoid schizophrenia with NSAA and identified signs of resistance to ongoing neuroleptic monotherapy is a combined regimen of clozapine with haloperidol.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
