AUCTORES
Review Article
*Corresponding Author: Gian Maria Pacifici, Professor of Pharmacology, via Sant’ Andrea 32, 56127 Pisa, Italy.
Citation: Gian Maria Pacifici, (2023), Clinical Pharmacology of Ciprofloxacin in Infants and Children, Archives of Medical Case Reports and Case Study, 7(6); DOI:10.31579/2692-9392/192
Copyright: © 2023, Gian Maria Pacifici. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 20 October 2023 | Accepted: 29 November 2023 | Published: 11 December 2023
Keywords: cerebrospinal-fluid; ciprofloxacin; dosing; efficacy-safely; drug-interaction; meningitis; pharmacokinetics; prophylaxis; and treatment
Ciprofloxacin is a fluoroquinolone and targets bacterial DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV. For many gram-positive bacteria topoisomerase IV is the primary target. In contrast, DNA gyrase is the primary quinolone target for many gram-negative bacteria. Ciprofloxacin inhibits gyrase-mediated DNA supercoiling at concentrations that correlate with those required to inhibit bacterial growth (0.1 to 10 μg/ml). Ciprofloxacin is active against Proteus, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella, Salmonella, Shigella, Enterobacter, Campylobacter, Chlamydia, Mycoplasma, Legionella, Brucella, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Mycobacterium fortuitum, and Mycobacterium kansasii. Ciprofloxacin is rapidly absorbed following oral administration and the mean elimination half-life of ciprofloxacin is 16.6, 6.2, 4.2, and 3.3 hours in newborns, infants, children, and adolescents, respectively. Ciprofloxacin is eliminated mainly by renal route and the renal function increases with infant maturation and child development. Ciprofloxacin has been found efficacy and safe in infants and children but can cause adverse-effects and the major adverse-effect is arthropathy which resolves with therapy. Ciprofloxacin interacts with drugs. Prophylaxis with ciprofloxacin prevents bacterial infections and ciprofloxacin treats bacterial infections in infants and children. Ciprofloxacin penetrates into the cerebrospinal fluid in significant amounts and successfully treats bacterial meningitis in infants and children and ciprofloxacin poorly crosses the human placenta and poorly penetrates into the beast-milk. The aim of this study is to review published data on ciprofloxacin dosing, efficacy and safely, adverse-effects, pharmacokinetics, interaction with drugs, prophylaxis, treatment, penetration into the cerebrospinal fluid, treatment of meningitis in infants and children and ciprofloxacin transfer across the human placental, and migration into the breast-milk.
Ciprofloxacin
The introduction of ciprofloxacin in the clinical use represents a particularly important therapeutic advance. Ciprofloxacin has a broad antimicrobial activity and is effective after oral administration for the treatment of a wide variety of infectious diseases [1].
Mechanism of action of ciprofloxacin
Ciprofloxacin targets bacterial DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV. For many gram-positive bacteria, topoisomerase IV, which separates interlinked (catenated) daughter DNA molecules that are the product of DNA replication, is the primary target. In contrast, DNA gyrase is the primary quinolone target in many gram-negative microbes. The gyrase introduces negative supercoils into the DNA to combat excessive positive supercoiling that can occur during DNA replication. Ciprofloxacin inhibits gyrase-mediated DNA supercoiling at concentrations that correlate well with those required to inhibit bacterial growth (0.1 to 10 μg/ml). Mutation of the gene that encodes the A subunit of the gyrase can confer resistance to ciprofloxacin. Eukaryotic cells do not contain DNA gyrase. They do contain a conceptually and mechanistically similar type II DNA topoisomerase, but ciprofloxacin inhibits it only at concentrations (100 to 1,000 µg/ml) much higher than those needed to inhibit the bacterial enzyme [1].
Antimicrobial activity of ciprofloxacin
Ciprofloxacin is a potent bactericidal agent against most gram-negative pathogens when first introduced, including Proteus, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella, and various species of Salmonella, Shigella, Enterobacter and Campylobacter. Ciprofloxacin has sufficient activity against Pseudomonas species for use in systemic infections. Fluoroquinolones have good in-vitro activity against staphylococci, but they are less active against methicillin-resistant strains, and there is concern over development of resistance during therapy. Several intracellular bacteria are inhibited by ciprofloxacin at concentrations that can be achieved in plasma; these include species of Chlamydia, Mycoplasma, Legionella, Brucella, and Mycobacterium (including Mycobacterium tuberculosis). Ciprofloxacin has activity against Mycobacterium fortuitum, Mycobacterium kansasii, and Mycobacterium tuberculosis [1].
Absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion of ciprofloxacin
Ciprofloxacin’s bioavailability is approximately 70%. Typically oral doses are 250 to 750 mg and intravenous doses are 200 to 400 mg twice-daily. The elimination half-life of ciprofloxacin is about 5 hours, and the drug is typically dosed twice-daily, with the exception an extended-release formulation, which can be doses once-daily. Most quinolones, thus ciprofloxacin, are well absorbed after oral administration. Peak serum concentrations of fluoroquinolones are obtained with 1 to 3 hours after oral dose. The distribution volume of quinolones is high, with concentration in urine, kidney, lung, and prostate tissue and stool, bile, and macrophages and neutrophils higher than in serum concentrations. Ciprofloxacin has been detected in breast-milk because of its excellent bioavailability; the potential exists for substantial exposure of nursing infant. Ciprofloxacin is cleared predominantly by the kidney, and dosages must be adjusted in renal failure [1].
Molecular structure of ciprofloxacin (molecular weight = 331.35 grams/mole)
The literature search was performed electronically using PubMed database as search engine. The following key words were used: “ciprofloxacin dosing infants, children”, “ciprofloxacin efficacy, safely infants, children”, “ciprofloxacin adverse-effects infants, children”, “ciprofloxacin pharmacokinetics infants, children”, “ciprofloxacin drug interaction”, “ciprofloxacin prophylaxis infants, children”, “ciprofloxacin treatment infants, children”, “ciprofloxacin CSF”, “ciprofloxacin meningitis infants, children”, “ciprofloxacin placental transfer”, and “ciprofloxacin breast-milk”. In addition, the books: The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics [1] and the British National Formulary for Children [2] have been consulted.
Administration schedules of ciprofloxacin to infants and children [2]
Oral or intravenous administration of ciprofloxacin to infants
Oral treatment of infants with severe respiratory-tract infections and gastrointestinal infections
Infants. Give: 15 mg/kg twice-daily.
Intravenous treatment of infants with severe respiratory-tract infections and gastrointestinal infections
Infants. Give: 10 mg/kg twice-daily, to be given over 60 min of infusion.
Oral treatment of complicated urinary-tract infections
Infants. Give: 10 mg/kg twice-daily.
Intravenous treatment of complicated urinary-tract infections
Infants. Give: 6 mg/kg twice-daily to be given over 60 min of infusion.
Oral prevention of secondary case of meningococcal meningitis
Infants. Give: 30 mg/kg (maximum per dose = 125 mg) for 1 dose.
Oral or intravenous administration of ciprofloxacin to children
Oral treatment for Fistulating Crohn’s disease
Children. Give: 5 mg/kg twice-daily.
Oral treatment of severe respiratory-tract infections and gastrointestinal infections
Children. Give: 20 mg twice-daily (maximum per dose = 750 mg).
Oral treatment of pseudomonal lower respiratory-tract infection in cystic fibrosis
Children. Give: 20 mg/kg twice-daily (maximum per dose = 750 mg).
Intravenous treatment of pseudomonal lower respiratory-tract infection in cystic fibrosis
Children. Give: 10 mg/kg thrice-daily (maximum per dose = 450 mg) to be given over 60 min of infusion.
Intravenous treatment of children with severe respiratory-tract infections and gastrointestinal infections
Children. Give: 10 mg/kg thrice-daily (maximum per dose = 750 mg).
Oral treatment of acute exacerbation of bronchiectasis
Children aged 1 to 17 years. Give: 20 mg/kg twice-daily (maximum per dose = 750 mg).
Intravenous treatment of acute exacerbation of bronchiectasis
Children aged 1 to 17 years. Give: 10 mg/kg thrice-daily (maximum per dose = 400 mg) to be given over 60 min of infusion.
Oral treatment for complicated urinary-tract infections
Children. Give: 10 mg/kg twice-daily, the dose should be doubled in severe infection (maximum per dose = 750 mg twice-daily).
Intravenous treatment for complicated urinary-tract infections
Children. Give: 6 mg/kg thrice-daily, increase the dose to 10 mg/kg thrice-daily in severe infection (maximum per dose = 400 mg twice-daily).
Oral treatment of uncomplicated gonorrhoea (when sensitivity is confirmed in combination with azithromycin).
Children aged 13 to 15 years. Give: 500 mg for 1 dose.
Oral treatment of uncomplicated gonorrhoea (genital and pharyngeal infection, when the sensitivity is confirmed).
Children aged 16 to 17 years. Give: 500 mg for 1 dose.
Intravenous treatment of disseminated gonococcal infection (when the sensitivity is confirmed)
Children aged 16 to 17 years. Give: 500 mg twice-daily for 7 days, the treatment may be switched for 24 to 48 hours after symptoms improve to a suitable oral antibacterial.
Oral treatment of anthrax (treatment and post-exposure prophylaxis)
Children. Give: 15 mg/kg twice-daily (maximum per dose = 500 mg).
Intravenous treatment of anthrax (treatment and post-exposure prophylaxis)
Children. Give: 10 mg/kg twice-daily (maximum per dose = 400 mg).
Oral prevention of secondary case of meningococcal meningitis
Children aged 1 month to 4 years. Give: 30 mg/kg (maximum per dose = 125 mg) for 1 dose.
Children aged 5 to 11 years. Give: 250 mg for 1 dose.
Children aged 12 to 17 years. Give: 500 mg for 1 dose.
Oral treatment of acute pyelonephritis or urinary-tract infection (catheter associated)
Children aged 16 to 17 years. Give: 500 mg twice-daily for 7 days.
Intravenous treatment of acute pyelonephritis or urinary-tract infection (catheter associated)
Children aged 16 to 17 years. Give: 400 mg thrice-daily or twice-daily for 7 days.
Efficacy and safely of ciprofloxacin in infants and children
Ciprofloxacin was administered orally at a daily dose of 15 mg/kg for 10 days to newborns with sepsis and this treatment effectively and safely treats the sepsis [3]. Ciprofloxacin was administered orally at a daily dose of 10 to 20 mg/kg for 12 days to 9 children with bacterial infection and this treatment effectively and safely treats the bacterial infection [4]. Ciprofloxacin administered orally at a daily dose of 20 mg/kg for 14 days to 56 burn children with bacterial infection effectively and safely treats the bacterial infection and does not cause arthropathy [5]. Ciprofloxacin administered orally at a daily dose of 15 to 25 mg/kg for 9 to 16 days to 58 children, aged 8 months to 13 years, with bacterial infection effectively and safely treats the bacterial infection and does not cause arthropathy [6]. Ciprofloxacin administered orally at a daily dose of 15 mg/kg for 10 days to children with bacterial infection effectively and safely treats the bacterial infection and the adverse-effects were noted in only 5% to 15% of children. The most common adverse-effects were: gastrointestinal, skin, and central nervous system reactions, and reversible arthralgia occurred in only 36 out of 1,113 children (3.2%) with cystic fibrosis, and no cartilage damage was demonstrated by radiographic procedures [7]. Six-hundred-thirty infants and children, aged 3 days to 17 years, with respiratory-tract infection and acute pulmonary acerbation received ciprofloxacin orally at a median daily dose of 25.2 mg/kg and the median duration of therapy was 22.8 days. This treatment effectively and safely treats infants and children and reversible arthralgia occurred in only 8 infants and children (1.3%) which resolved after cessation of treatment [8].
Adverse-effects caused by ciprofloxacin in infants and children
One-hundred-eight-four paediatric patients, aged ≤ 17 years, were treated with ciprofloxacin orally at a daily dose ranging from 3.1 to 93.8 mg/kg or intravenously at a daily dose ranging from 3.2 to 76.9 mg/kg. The most common adverse-effects were: musculoskeletal adverse-effects, abnormal liver function tests, nausea, changes in white blood cell counts and vomiting. Musculoskeletal adverse-effects occurred in only 1.4% of children and arthralgia accounted for 50% of the musculoskeletal adverse-effects and all cases of arthropathy resolved or improved with management [9]. A single oral dose of 500 mg of ciprofloxacin was administered to 5,236 infants, children, and adolescents, aged 5 days to 24 years, and the only adverse-effect noted is reversible cartilage toxicity [10]. Choonara [11] reviewed the adverse-effects caused by ciprofloxacin in children aged ≤ 17 years. One-hundred-five articles were reviewed and involved 16,184 paediatric patients. There were 1,065 adverse-effects (risk 7%, 95% confidence interval = 3.2% to 14.0%) and the most common adverse-effects were: musculoskeletal, abnormal liver function test, nausea, change in white cell count, and vomiting. Ciprofloxacin related death occurred in only a newborn infant. The musculoskeletal adverse-effects were 258 which occurred in 232 paediatric patients (1.4%). Arthralgia accounted for 50% of the musculoskeletal adverse-effects and the age of occurrence of arthropathy ranged from 7 months to 17 years (median, 10 years) and all cases of arthropathy resolved or improved with management.
Pharmacokinetics of ciprofloxacin in infants
Zhao et al. [12] studied the pharmacokinetics of ciprofloxacin in 60 infants with a median postmenstrual age of 36.5 weeks (range, 24.9 to 47.9), a postnatal age of 27.0 days (range, 5.0 to 121), and a body-weight of 1,115 grams (range, 540 to 3,850). Ciprofloxacin was administered intravenously at a dose of 7.5 mg/kg twice-daily to infants with a postmenstrual age ≥ 34 weeks (84%) and at a dose of 12.5 mg/kg twice-daily to infants with longer postmenstrual age (16%). The median dose was 9.7 mg/kg (range, 9.7 to 11.0) and the median duration of treatment was 5 days (range, 1 to 17). Ciprofloxacin was administered to infants infected by Enterobacter species resistant to standard treatment and also to infants at risk of meningitis. Table 1 summarizes the pharmacokinetic parameters of ciprofloxacin.
Central DV = central distribution volume. Peripheral DV = peripheral distribution volume. Q = intercompartmental clearance. TBC = total body clearance. F inotrope = scaling factor applied for infants co-administered with inotropic agents.
Table 1. Pharmacokinetic parameters of ciprofloxacin which have been obtained in 60 infants with median postmenstrual, postnatal ages, body-weight and serum creatinine of 27.9 weeks, 27.0 days, 1,955 grams, and 42 µmol/L, respectively. Ciprofloxacin was administered intravenously at a dose of 7.5 mg/kg twice-daily to infants with a postmenstrual age ≥ 34 weeks (84%) and at a dose of 12.5 mg/kg (16%) in infants with longer postmenstrual age. Values are by Zhao et al. [12].
This table shows that the central distribution volume is higher than the water volume and is similar to the peripheral volume indicating that ciprofloxacin distributes into the whole body and there is a remarkable interindividual variability in the pharmacokinetic parameters. This variability is accounted by the wide variation in postmenstrual age, postnatal age, and body-weight of infants included in the study.
Pharmacokinetics of ciprofloxacin in infants and young children
Peltola et al. [13] studied the pharmacokinetics of ciprofloxacin in 7 infants, aged 5 to 14 weeks, and in 9 children aged 1 to 5 years. A single oral dose of 15 mg/kg of ciprofloxacin was administered to all subjects who were infected by Salmonella typhi. Table 2 summarizes the pharmacokinetic parameters of ciprofloxacin.
*Student t test for unimpaired data. AUC = area under the concentration-time curve.
Table 2. Pharmacokinetic parameters of ciprofloxacin which have been obtained in 7 infants and in 9 young children. A single oral dose of 15 mg/kg of ciprofloxacin was administered to all subjects. Values are the mean+SD, by Peltola et al. [13].
This table shows that the peak concentration, the time to reach the peak concentration, and the absorption half-life of ciprofloxacin are similar in infants and in young children. In contrast, the elimination half-life, the area under the concentration-time curve, and the mean residence time of ciprofloxacin are higher in infants suggesting that ciprofloxacin is more slowly eliminated in infants than in young children. Ciprofloxacin is eliminated mainly by renal route and the renal function increases with infant maturation and child maturation thus the elimination half-life of ciprofloxacin is longer in infants than in young children and consequently
the area under the concentration-time curve and the mean residence time of ciprofloxacin are higher in infants than in young children.
Pharmacokinetics of ciprofloxacin in infants, children, and adolescents
Payen et al. [14] investigated the pharmacokinetics of ciprofloxacin in 3 newborns aged 1.4 days (range, 1.1 to 2.2) and weighing 2.1 kg (range, 1.7 to 3.5), in 17 infants aged 0.5 years (range, 28 days to 23 months) and weighing 5.5 kg (range, 0.75 to 9.2), in 27 children, aged 5.6 years (range, 2
to 11) and weighing 18.6 kg (range 8 to 13), and in 8 adolescents, aged 16.4 years (range, 12 to 24) and weighing 42.3 kg (range, 28 to 58). Thirteen children (48.1%) and 7 adolescents (87.5%) were suffering from cystic fibrosis. Fifteen children (63.0%) had dysuria or polyuria and the strains isolated were: Pseudomonas aeruginosa, group D streptococci, Enterobacter cloacae, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella species, Pseudomonas pickettii, and Enterococcus faecalis. The fever was caused by Klebsiella species, Pseudomonas cepacia, Serratia, and Escherichia coli. A single intravenous infusion of 10 mg/kg of ciprofloxacin was administered to all subjects and it was followed by ciprofloxacin administered orally at a dose of 15 mg/kg twice-daily to subjects with cystic fibrosis, a second group of subjects, aged 2 days to 8 years, received 5 to 17 mg/kg of ciprofloxacin intravenously twice-daily, a third group of subjects, aged 1 to 13 years, received ciprofloxacin intravenously at a dose 7.5 to 30 mg/kg twice-daily, and the fourth group of subjects, aged 1 day to 4 years, received ciprofloxacin intravenously at a dose of 8 to 15 mg/kg twice-daily. Table 3 summarizes the pharmacokinetic of ciprofloxacin obtained in infants, children, and adolescents.
Table 3. Pharmacokinetic parameters of ciprofloxacin which have been obtained in 3 newborns, 17 infants, 27 children, and 8 adolescents. Values are the minimum, the maximum, and the %coefficient of variation, by Payen et al. [14].
This table shows that the total body clearance and the distribution volume of ciprofloxacin increase with increasing the subject age whereas the elimination half-life of ciprofloxacin decreases with increasing the subject age. Ciprofloxacin is eliminated mainly by renal route and the renal function increases with infant maturation and child development thus the elimination half-life of ciprofloxacin decreases with increasing the subject age. Ciprofloxacin distributes in the whole body (see table 1) thus the distribution volume of ciprofloxacin increases with increasing the body-weight. In addition, there is a remarkable interindividual variability in the pharmacokinetic parameters and this variability is accounted by the wide variability in subject age and body-weight.
Interaction of ciprofloxacin with drugs
Ciprofloxacin interacts with mycophenolate mofetil and ciprofloxacin reduces the area under the concentration-time curve of mycophenolate mofetil as ciprofloxacin improves the elimination of mycophenolate mofetil [15]. Ciprofloxacin interacts with diclofenac and reduces the availability of diclofenac drops at ocular level [16]. The co-administration of atorvastatin with ciprofloxacin leads to the formation of a charge-transfer complex which depletes the binding of these drugs to their respective receptors [17]. The co-administration of ciprofloxacin with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs reduces the binding of the neurotransmitter GABA in brain causing an epileptogenic effect [18]. Ciprofloxacin inhibits the metabolism of caffeine, theophylline and antipyrine [19]. Ciprofloxacin interacts with theophylline and ciprofloxacin reduces the clearance of theophylline [20]. Ciprofloxacin interacts with theophylline and ciprofloxacin increases the blood concentration of theophylline [21]. Probenecid reduces the renal elimination of ciprofloxacin by inhibiting the tubular secretion of ciprofloxacin [22]. The absorption of ciprofloxacin is significantly reduced when ciprofloxacin is co-administered with antacids containing magnesium and/or aluminium and this concomitant administration must be avoided [23].
Prophylaxis with ciprofloxacin in children
The prophylaxis with ciprofloxacin reduces pneumonia, lung exacerbations, length of hospital stay and mortality in high-risk children [24]. The prophylaxis with ciprofloxacin reduces the occurrence of fever in children with leukaemia and lymphoma [25]. The prophylaxis with ciprofloxacin is particularly helpful in preventing multidrug-resistant infections which do not respond to standard antibiotic therapy in immunocompromised children [26]. The prophylaxis with ciprofloxacin administered orally at a dose of 10 mg/kg thrice-daily prevents sepsis in severely malnourished children [27]. The prophylaxis with ciprofloxacin reduces the length of hospital stay in children with gam-negative bacteraemia [28].
Treatment of bacterial infections with ciprofloxacin in infants and children
Kaguelidou et al. [29] reviewed the literature about the treatment of bacterial infection with ciprofloxacin in infants and children. A study showed that the bacterial infection was treated with ciprofloxacin in 64% of infants, another study showed that ciprofloxacin treats bacterial infection in 91% of infants, and another study showed that ciprofloxacin treats bacterial infections in 83% of infants. Fourteen reports indicate that ciprofloxacin treats bacterial infections in infants and no serious adverse-effects, particularly joint toxicity, were observed. Thirty infants developed nosocomial infection caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and were treated with ciprofloxacin intravenously at an initial dose of 10 mg/kg and the daily dose was increased to 40 mg/kg according to the clinical response. Two infants (6.6%) died due to the infection and in the remaining 28 infants (93.4%) the infective agent was eradicated. No laboratory abnormality related to ciprofloxacin was observed after one week of follow-up. Ciprofloxacin administered orally at a dose of 15 mg/kg twice-daily for 10 days effectively treats life-threatening infections caused by a multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in infants [30]. Forty-one children with cystic fibrosis, aged 2 to 14 years, were treated with ciprofloxacin orally at a dose of 20 mg/kg twice-daily for 10 days to treat an infection caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and this treatment eradicated the infective agent [31]. Ciprofloxacin is the drug recommended by WHO for treatment of dysentery. Ciprofloxacin administered intravenously at a dose of 20 mg/kg twice-daily for 10 days successfully treats dysentery in children reducing the clinical and bacteriological signs and symptom of dysentery thus ciprofloxacin decreases the mortality due to dysentery [32]. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends a single oral dose of ciprofloxacin for the treatment of gonorrhoea. Adolescents, aged 15 to 19 years, were treated with a single oral dose of 500 mg ciprofloxacin for the treatment of uncomplicated gonorrhoea which was cured but irreversible cartilage toxicity was observed [33]. Twenty-one children, aged 6 months to 10 years, were suffering from acute diarrhoea and were treated with ciprofloxacin intramuscularly at a dose of 10 mg/kg twice-daily for 10 days. Stool cultures revealed the presence of Shigella, Salmonella, Campylobacter species, and diarrheagenic Escherichia coly and ciprofloxacin cures or improves all children [34]. Eighteen children had positive cultures for Salmonella typhi and 3 children had positive cultures for Salmonella paratyphi A and all children received ciprofloxacin intravenously at a median daily dose of 15 mg/kg and the treatment lasted 10 days. Ciprofloxacin was well-tolerated and effectively treats of typhoid fever and the few adverse-effects that were recorded left no permanent sequelae and were likely to be caused by the disease itself [35]. Ciprofloxacin administered intravenously at a dose of 20 mg/kg twice-daily for 15 days has been found to be a safe and efficacious treatment of shigellosis cholera and Escherichia coli gastroenteritis in children living in developing countries [36].
Penetration of ciprofloxacin into the human cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)
A patient with meningitis caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa was treated with ciprofloxacin intravenously at a dose of 400 mg thrice-daily for 12 days. At the end of therapy, the peak concentration of ciprofloxacin was 10.3 µg/ml in plasma and 0.9 µg/ml in the CSF. After one week of treatment the microorganism was eradicated from the CSF and this treatment was found effective [37]. The penetration of ciprofloxacin into the CSF has been investigated in 25 patients with non-inflamed meninges (group A) and in 9 patients with inflamed meninges (group B) and all patients received ciprofloxacin intravenously at a dose of 200 mg twice-daily for 10 days. In patients of group A, CSF specimens were sampled from 1 to 10 hours after the second dose of ciprofloxacin and in patients of group B specimens of CSF were sampled 1, 2, 3, 5, 7 and 9 hours after the second dose of ciprofloxacin. In patients of group A, ciprofloxacin concentrations in the CSF ranged from 0.073 to 0.106 µg/ml and in patients of group B, ciprofloxacin concentration ranged ranged from 0.089 to 0.260 µg/ml. These results indicate that ciprofloxacin penetrates into the CSF in concentration which exceeds the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of Neisseria meningitides and gram-negative aerobic bacilli which were the bacteria that cause the meningitis [38]. Nine patients with external ventriculostomy received ciprofloxacin by intravenous infusion at a dose of 200 mg twice-daily for 10 days. The CSF concentration of ciprofloxacin peaked at 60 to 120 min after the end of the infusion. Ciprofloxacin elimination half-life ranged from 260 to 430 min in the CSF and from 145 to 170 min in serum. At 60 min post-dose the ciprofloxacin concentration in CSF ranged from 0.042 to 0.223 μg/ml (median, 0.110). This concentration is lower than the MIC90 of bacteria involved in central nervous system infections (CNS) thus this concentration is inadequate to treat bacteria which cause infection in the CNS [39]. Of 23 hospitalized patients, 20 patients (86.9%) had purulent meningitis and 3 patients (13.1%) had ventriculitis and all patients and were treated with ciprofloxacin intravenously at a dose of 200 mg twice-daily for 14 days. Ciprofloxacin concentration in CSF was measured on four occasions ranging from 60 to 480 min after dosing and ranged from 0.35 to 0.56 µg/ml. These concentrations were equal or higher the MICs of enterobacteria causing the meningitis or the ventriculitis [40].
Treatment of bacterial meningitis with ciprofloxacin in infants and children
Three-hundred-sixty-seven infants, aged from 1 month to < 12>
In-vitro transfer of ciprofloxacin across the human placenta
In literature there is only one study on the transfer of ciprofloxacin across the human placenta and has been reported by Polachek et al. [49]. The ratio of the concentration of ciprofloxacin in the foetal compartment to that in the maternal compartment is only 3.2+0.7% indicating that ciprofloxacin is poorly transferred across the human placenta.
Penetration of ciprofloxacin into the beast-milk
Ten lactating women received 3 oral doses of 750 mg twice-daily of ciprofloxacin and the highest average concentration of ciprofloxacin in milk is 3.79 μg/ml at two hours after dosing. The concentration of ciprofloxacin in milk is 0.20 and 0.02 μg/ml 12 and 24 hours, respectively, after dosing [50]. A lactating woman received a single oral dose of 500 mg of ciprofloxacin and the concentration of ciprofloxacin in milk is: 9.1, 9.1, 9.1, and 6.0 µmol/L at 4, 8, 12, and 16 hours after dosing, respectively [51]. These results indicate that ciprofloxacin poorly migrates into the breast-milk.
Ciprofloxacin is a fluoroquinolone and its introduction in clinical use represents a particularly important therapeutic advance. Ciprofloxacin has a broad antimicrobial activity and is active after oral administration for treatment of a wide variety of infectious diseases. Ciprofloxacin targets bacterial DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV. For many gram-positive bacteria, topoisomerase IV, which separates interlinked (catenated) daughter DNA molecules that are the product of DNA replication, is the primary target. In contrast, DNA gyrase is the primary quinolone target in many gram-negative microbes. The gyrase introduces negative supercoils into the DNA to combat excessive positive supercoiling that can occur during DNA replication. Ciprofloxacin inhibits gyrase-mediated DNA supercoiling at concentrations that correlate well with those required to inhibit bacterial growth (0.1 to 10 μg/ml). Eukaryotic cells do not contain DNA gyrase. They do contain a conceptually and mechanistically similar type II DNA topoisomerase, but ciprofloxacin inhibits it only at concentrations (100 to 1,000 μg/ml) much higher than those needed to inhibit the bacterial enzymes. Ciprofloxacin is a potent bactericidal agent against most gram-negative pathogens including Proteus, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella, and various species of Salmonella, Shigella, Enterobacter, Campylobacter, and Pseudomonas. Several intracellular bacteria are inhibited by ciprofloxacin at concentrations that can be achieved in plasma; these include species of Chlamydia, Mycoplasma, Legionella, Brucella, and Mycobacterium (including Mycobacterium tuberculosis). Ciprofloxacin has activity against Mycobacterium fortuitum, Mycobacterium kansasii, and Mycobacterium tuberculosis [1]. The administration schedules of ciprofloxacin have been reported in infants and children, ciprofloxacin may be administered orally and intravenously, and following oral administration is rapidly absorbed. Ciprofloxacin is usually administered twice-daily or thrice-daily for the treatment of different infections whereas a single oral dose is used to prevent secondary case of meningococcal meningitis in infants and to treat uncomplicated gonorrhoea in children [2]. The efficacy and safely of ciprofloxacin have been reviewed in infants and children. Ciprofloxacin was administered orally at a daily dose of 15 mg/kg for 10 days to newborns with sepsis and this treatment effectively and safely treats the sepsis [3], ciprofloxacin was administered orally at a daily dose of 10 to 20 mg/kg for 12 days to 9 children with bacterial infection and this treatment effectively and safely treats the bacterial infection [4], ciprofloxacin administered orally at a daily dose of 20 mg/kg for 14 days to burn children with bacterial infection effectively and safely treats the bacterial infection and does not cause arthropathy [5], ciprofloxacin administered orally at a daily dose of 15 to 25 mg/kg for 9 to 16 days to children with bacterial infection effectively and safely treats the bacterial infection and does not cause arthropathy [6], ciprofloxacin administered orally at a daily dose of 15 mg/kg for 10 days to children with bacterial infection effectively and safely treats the bacterial infection and the adverse-effects were noted in only 5% to 15% of children. The most common adverse-effects are: gastrointestinal, skin, and central nervous system reactions and reversible arthralgia occurs in only 3.2% of children with cystic fibrosis and no cartilage damage is observed [7], infants and children, aged 3 days to 17 years, with respiratory-tract infection and acute pulmonary acerbation received ciprofloxacin orally at a median daily dose of 25.2 mg/kg for a median duration of 22.8 days. This treatment effectively and safely treats the children and reversible arthralgia occurs in only 1.3% of infants and children [8]. These results indicate that ciprofloxacin effectively and safely treats bacterial infections in infants and children and induces few adverse-effects. The adverse-effects caused by ciprofloxacin have been reviewed. Ciprofloxacin was administered orally at a daily dose ranging from 3.1 to 93.8 mg/kg or intravenously at a daily dose ranging from 3.2 to 76.9 mg/kg to children aged ≤ 17 years and the most common adverse-effects are: musculoskeletal adverse-effects, abnormal liver function tests, nausea, changes in white blood cell counts and vomiting. Musculoskeletal adverse-effects occurs in only 1.4% of children and arthralgia accounts for 50% of the musculoskeletal adverse-effects and all cases of arthropathy resolve or improve with management [9], a single oral dose of 500 mg of ciprofloxacin was administered to infants, children, and adolescents and the only adverse-effect noted is reversible cartilage toxicity [10]. Choonara [11] reviewed the adverse-effects caused by ciprofloxacin in children aged ≤ 17 years and the most common adverse-effects are: musculoskeletal, abnormal liver function test, nausea, change in white cell count, and vomiting. Death related to ciprofloxacin treatment occurred in only a newborn and musculoskeletal adverse-effects occur in only 1.4% of children. Arthralgia accounts for 50% of the musculoskeletal adverse-effects and the age of occurrence of arthropathy ranged from 7 months to 17 years (median, 10 years) and all cases of arthropathy resolve or improve with management. Zhao et al. [12] studied the pharmacokinetics of ciprofloxacin in 60 infants with a median postmenstrual age of 36.5 weeks, a postnatal age of 27.0 days and a body-weight of 1,115 grams and ciprofloxacin was administered intravenously at a dose of 7.5 mg/kg twice-daily to infants with a postmenstrual age ≥ 34 weeks (84%) and at a dose of 12.5 mg/kg twice-daily to infants with longer postmenstrual age (16%). Ciprofloxacin was administered to infants infected by Enterobacter species resistant to standard treatment and also to infants at risk of meningitis. The median central and peripheral distribution volume of ciprofloxacin is 1.82 and 1.97 L, respectively, indicating the ciprofloxacin distributes into the whole body. In addition, there is a remarkable interindividual variability in the pharmacokinetic parameters and this variability is accounted by the wide variation in postmenstrual age, postnatal age, and body-weight of infants included in the study. Peltola et al. [13] studied the pharmacokinetics of ciprofloxacin in 7 infants, aged 5 to 14 weeks, and in 9 children, aged 1 to 5 years, and a single oral dose of 15 mg/kg of ciprofloxacin was administered to all subjects who were infected by Salmonella typhi. Ciprofloxacin is rapidly absorbed following oral administration, the absorption half-life is 0.40 and 0.29 hours (P-value > 0.05) in infants and in young children, respectively, and ciprofloxacin is rapidly eliminated as the elimination half-life is 2.73 and 1.28 hours (P-value < 0>
In conclusion, ciprofloxacin is a fluoroquinolone and targets bacterial DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV. For many gram-positive bacteria, topoisomerase IV is the primary target. In contrast, DNA gyrase is the primary quinolone target for many gran-negative organisms. The gyrase introduces negative supercoils into the DNA to combat excessive positive supercoiling that can occur during DNA replication. Ciprofloxacin is active against Proteus, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella, Salmonella, Shigella, Enterobacter, Campylobacter, Chlamydia, Mycoplasma, Legionella, Brucella, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Mycobacterium fortuitum, and Mycobacterium kansasii. Ciprofloxacin may be administered orally and intravenously and following oral administration is rapidly absorbed. Following oral administration, the absorption half-life of ciprofloxacin is 0.40 and 0.29 hours (P-value > 0.05) in infants and children, respectively, and the elimination half-life of ciprofloxacin is 2.73 and 1.28 hours, (P-value < 0>
The authors declare no conflicts of financial interest in any product or service mentioned in the manuscript, including grants, equipment, medications, employments, gifts, and honoraria.
This article is a review and drugs have not been administered to men or animals.
The author thanks Dr. Patrizia Ciucci and Dr. Francesco Varricchio, of the Medical Library of the University of Pisa, for retrieving the scientific literature.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner