AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article
*Corresponding Author: Caitlin Lemmons, Department of Pharmaceutical and Nutrition Care, Nebraska Medicine, Omaha, NE.
Citation: Caitlin Lemmons, Brent Beckner, Sara Kjerengtroen, (2024), C1 esterase inhibitor (C1-INH) for the off-label treatment of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor induced angioedema, Dermatology and Dermatitis, 9(6); DOI:10.31579/2578-8949/168
Copyright: © 2024, Caitlin Lemmons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of The Creative Commons. Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 09 July 2024 | Accepted: 08 August 2024 | Published: 20 August 2024
Keywords: C1 esterase inhibitor; ACE inhibitor–induced angioedema; angioedema; adverse drug reaction; Berinert; ACE inhibitors
Introduction: Currently, C1 esterase inhibitor (C1-INH) is indicated for hereditary angioedema (HAE) but is utilized off-label for angiotensin- converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) induced angioedema (AAE). There is no standard of care for the treatment of AAE, however patients may receive a combination of epinephrine, corticosteroids, fresh frozen plasma (FFP), tranexamic acid (TXA), and histamine 1 and 2 receptor antagonists (H1RA, H2RA). C1-INH place is therapy is not well defined.
Materials & Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted from patients at a large academic medical center who received C1-INH for AAE between January 2012 and May 2022. Variables and outcomes of interest were receipt of alternative angioedema treatment prior to C1-INH, time of C1-INH administration, dose of C1-INH, need for intubation or surgical airway placement, duration of intubation, and hospital length of stay.
Results: All patients received additional medications for angioedema prior to C1-INH administration. Steroids and H1RAs were most common. The dose of C1-INH ranged from 11.7 IU/kg to 23.2 IU/kg with an average dose of 19.3 IU/kg. Five patients required airway support with four requiring intubation (30.8%) and one requiring a surgical airway.
Conclusions: This retrospective review of 13 patients showed mixed results for C1-INH to prevent intubation in AAE. Providers should consider limiting the use of C1-INH to patients who remain symptomatic after administering a combination of other therapies when there is an ongoing risk for airway compromise and adequate time for preparation, administration, and effect.
Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) may cause rare, but serious and potentially life-threatening angioedema in approximately 1% of patients [1,2]. ACEi-induced angioedema (AAE) may occur at any time during treatment, and the risk may even persist years after ACEi discontinuation [2]. The pathophysiology of AAE is not completely understood, but it is thought to be due to an excessive accumulation of bradykinin as a result of impaired breakdown of bradykinin [1-3]. There is no standard of care therapy for AAE. However, a clinical practice statement from the American Academy of Emergency Medicine stated: “In the absence of high-quality evidence, no specific medication therapy is recommended for its treatment [4].” A French Guideline published in 2013 recommends icatabant 30 mg subcutaneously as a first line option and C1-INH dosed at 20 IU/kg as a second line option [5]. Patients may receive some combination of epinephrine, corticosteroids, fresh frozen plasma (FFP), tranexamic acid (TXA), and histamine 1 receptor antagonists (H1RA) and histamine 2 receptor antagonists (H2RA) as pharmacologic therapies [5,6].
Alternative treatment options for AAE have been proposed and investigated, including agents indicated for the treatment of hereditary angioedema (HAE) such as C1 esterase inhibitors (C1-INH), ecallantide, and icatabant [2,3]. The off-label treatment of severe ACEi-induced angioedema (AAE) with C1-INH addresses the underlying pathophysiology leading many to hypothesize that C1 esterase inhibitors may offer some benefit for AAE [2,3]. Several case reports, case series, and review articles have evaluated the off-label use of C1-INH for ACEi angioedema, however, the evidence of clinical efficacy is conflicting [2-4, 6-14].
This case series' main objective was to evaluate the incidence of intubation for AAE in patients receiving C1-INH. Secondary outcomes included hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay.
A retrospective chart review was conducted at a large academic medical center examining all patients with AAE who received C1-INH treatment between January 2012 and May 2022. Patients were included if they were at least 18 years of age, current or recent use of ACEi, administration of C1-INH for acute AAE of the head and/or neck region. Patients were excluded if they did not meet inclusion criteria, received C1-INH for hereditary angioedema prophylaxis or treatment, or were pregnant or incarcerated. Data collected included patient demographics, alternative angioedema treatment prior to C1-INH, time of C1-INH administration, dose of C1-INH, need for intubation or surgical airway placement, duration of intubation, and hospital length of stay.
Thirteen patients were identified as receiving C1-INH for AAE in the emergency department at this academic medical center from January 2012 to May 2022. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate the results of this case series. The majority of patients (n = 9) were male and of African American ethnicity (n = 8). Most patients were currently or had recently received lisinopril or lisinopril-hydrochlorothiazide (n = 12) with the exception of one patient who was taking ramipril. The offending agent was discontinued for all patients, and an allergy was added to the electronic health record. All patients received additional medications for angioedema prior to C1-INH administration. Intravenous steroids were administered in nearly all patients (n = 11). Additional therapies included H1RA (n = 10), H2RA (n = 7), FFP (n = 6), IV/IM epinephrine (n = 3), and tranexamic acid (n = 1). The average dosing weight was 109.6 kg (IQR 75-115.9 kg), and 7 patients (53.8%) eight at least 100 kg. The dose of C1-INH ranged from 11.7 IU/kg to 23.2 IU/kg with an average dose of 19.3 IU/kg. A total of five patients required airway support with four requiring intubation (30.8%) and one requiring the placement of a surgical airway (7.7%). Of the five patients who required airway support, two patients received C1-INH after intubation occurred. The median hospital length of stay was 1.81 days (median IQR 1.28-4.7 days). The median ICU length of stay was 1.34 days (median IQR 0.93-2.27). The summary of these patient demographics and outcomes can be found in Table 1. This case series identified no difference in ACEi length of use before AAE occurred and no difference in incidence of intubation, duration of intubation, and ICU or hospital length of stay.
Patient (Age/Sex) | Time symptom onset to C1-INH, hr | C1-INH dose, IU (IU/kg) | Other Medications | Intubation | Time C1-INH to intubation |
| 51/M | >10 | 2000 (16) | Steroid, H1RA, H2RA, FFP | No | - |
| 38/M | 6-8 | 2000 (11.7) | Steroid | Yesa | 80 min before |
| 63/M | 4-6 | 2500 (20) | Steroid, H1RA, H2RA, Epi | No | - |
| 62/M | 2-4 | 1500 (21.6) | Steroid, H1RA, H2RA, tranexamic acid | No | - |
| 59/F | >10 | 1500 (20) | Steroid, H1RA, H2RA, FFP | Yes | 10 min before |
| 63/M | >10 | 2000 (17.8) | Steroid, H1RA | Yes | 3 min after |
| 60/M | < 2> | 2000 (18.2) | Steroid, H1RA, Epi | Yes | 37 min after |
| 67/M | 2-4 | 1500 (24.7) | FFP | Yes | 50 min before |
| 50/M | < 2> | 2000 (23.2) | Steroid, H1RA, H2RA, FFP | No | - |
| 47/M | 4-6 | 2000 (17.3) | Steroid, H1RA, H2RA, FFP, Epi | No | - |
| 66/M | >10 | 2000 (20) | FFP | No | - |
| 77/F | 2-4 | 1180 (20) | Steroid, H1RA | No | - |
| 62/F | 2-4 | 2000 (18.2) | Steroid, H1RA, H2RA | No | - |
Table 1: C1-INH dosing and administration timing, other medications, and intubation instance and timing
H1RA, histamine 1 receptor antagonist
H2RA, histamine 2 receptor antagonist
Epi, epinephrine
FFP, fresh frozen plasma
IU, international unit
a. Patient required a surgical airway
The only current treatments that have consensus for management of AAE are discontinuation of the offending agent and appropriate supportive care with specific emphasis on airway management [6]. Thus, the investigation of other treatment modalities to effect outcomes is paramount. The pathophysiologic similarities between HAE and AAE warrant further studies into using medications targeting the bradykinin pathway such as C1-INH. In our cohort, the incidence of intubation was higher than the incidence seen in other studies including the retrospective reviews by Mohorn and Greeve [4,12]. The propensity-matched study by Mohorn et al. revealed a 13.6% incidence in intubation (n = 3/22) in the C1-INH group versus 9.1% incidence (n = 2/22) after propensity score matching (P >0.999), which was not statistically significant [4]. Another retrospective chart review by Kovaltchouk et al. demonstrated a 77.8% incidence of intubation (n = 8/9) [7]. Other case reports and series have demonstrated a relatively rapid improvement in upper airway swelling that prevented the need for airway support [11,13,15].
Of the five patients in this cohort that required advanced airway support, two patients received C1-INH after intubation. This study, like the study from Perza et al., contains multiple cases in which C1-INH was administered after intubation with similar durations of intubation between the two groups [2]. In our case series, the median duration of intubation was 1.86 days (IQR 1.1-2.53 days), and the surgical airway was utilized for 1.36 days. In the Perza et al study, 4 of 7 patients were intubated for a mean duration of 2 days, and of the 4 intubated patients, 3 received C1-INH after intubation [2].
A variation in C1-INH dosing was seen between patients, with weight-based dosing ranging from 11.7 to 24.7 IU/kg and administered single dose ranging from 1,180 IU to 2,000 IU. No patients received a second dose. This variation in dosing strategy is seen in the published literature with doses ranging from 500 IU to 2,500 IU as a single dose [2,7,12]. Repeated dosing was not shown to benefit symptom resolution in a previous study [7]. The proof-of-concept case series by Greve and et al. noted that the fixed dose regimen of C1-INH 1,000 IU was too low of a dose to meet the recommended 20 IU/kg dosing approved in HAE [12]. Kovaltchouk et al. did utilize 20 IU/kg with continued ambivalence of the efficacy and role of C1-INH in the treatment of AAE [7].
The strength of this case series includes the focus of the research question and relevant outcomes. This case series has several limitations. As a retrospective chart review, this introduces the potential for information bias, and there was a lack of consistent documentation regarding symptom resolution following medication administration. Providers were inconsistent about the dosing strategy chosen, and some patients received a dose of 2000 IU while others received weight-based dosing at 20 IU/kg. There was a large variation in timing of C1-INH administration with two patients receiving C1-INH after intubation. The use of other medications, such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, that can potentially cause angioedema were not assessed. The potential efficacy of C1-INH is confounded by the administration of multiple other agents targeted at treating undifferentiated angioedema prior to C1-INH administration. Furthermore, the timing between administration of other agents and C1-INH was not collected and likely variable.
This retrospective case review of C1-INH use for AAE presented mixed results. The aforementioned limitations and discussion highlight the variability in the use of other agents targeted at treating undifferentiated angioedema, dose of C1-INH, and timing of C1-INH administration. Providers should limit the This case series demonstrates an ongoing interest in the clinical application of C1-INH in AAE despite a lack of evidence and defined role in therapy, therefore, we the authors recommend C1_INH administration for patients who remain symptomatic after the administration of other medications for edema including H1RA, H2RA, tranexamic acid, FFP, and epinephrine that are at risk of airway compromise. C1-INH should be used when there is a continued risk for airway compromise and there is adequate time for preparation and administration. Consideration should also be given to imminence of intubation; given the significant cost and unclear benefit, C1-INH should not be administered following placement of endotracheal tube or surgical airway.
The data underlying this article are available in the article.
The findings from this case series show inconsistent and mixed results for the use of C1- esterase inhibitor (C1-INH) for the management of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor induced angioedema. Other medications given before C1-INH were not consistent which limits comparison,
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
