AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article
*Corresponding Author: González- Correa Clara Helena, Department of Basic Health Sciences, Universidad de Caldas, Manizales, Colombia.
Citation: G-C Clara Helena. (2020) Body Composition, Functional Status and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Biomedical Research and Clinical Reviews. 2(1); DOI: 10.31579/2692-9406/025
Copyright: © 2020 González- Correa Clara Helena, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 29 September 2020 | Accepted: 18 November 2020 | Published: 18 December 2020
Keywords: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; muscle function; pulmonary function; symptoms; exacerbations
Objective: To define the correlation between the Fat Free Mass Index (FFMI), the muscle function, degree of airflow obstruction, the respiratory symptoms and the number of exacerbations during the last year in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD).
Methods: Prospective and cross-sectional study of subjects older than 40 years with a clinical diagnosis of COPD who underwent measurement of the FFMI and muscular function to determine if these were correlated with the variables of severe COPD.
Results: 55 patients Participated in the study. The FFMI was below 32.7% (n=18) and the strength diminished in 56.4% (n=31). In the sample, we found a direct and significant correlation between the FFMI and the FEV1* (predicted %), (p= 0,045). When analyzed by sex, men had a direct correlation between FFMI and the FEV1*(predicted %), (p=0,019), an inverse correlation between FFMI and the spirometric classification of the Global Initiative Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) (p=0,008) and between the muscular function and the symptoms (p=0, 03). In women no significant correlation was found.
Conclusions: The conditions in mass and the muscular function were correlated with clinical variables and pulmonary function in men, but not in women. We did not find a correlation between corporal composition and the number of exacerbations.
COPD is a respiratory pathology with a persistent limitation of the air flow. It is in the fourth place as a cause of mortality and the first of chronic mortality in the world. Due to the increase in life expectancy, the tobacco use and the increase in environmental factors, for 2020 it will become the third world cause of death [2]. Latin America reported a prevalence between 7, 8 and 19,7% [1] and for 2008 Colombia reported 8,9% [3].
Additional to the impact at a pulmonary level, the COPD can cause significant systemic effects like dysfunction and a loss of skeletal muscle mass.
Approximately 25 % of patients with a moderate to acute disease and 35% of patients with an extremely serious disease show a reduced FFMI. There are several factors that contribute to this reduction, such as insufficient energy intake due to the loss of appetite, an increase in energy expenditure secondary to increased respiratory work and a systemic inflammatory state with increased production of inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin (IL) -6, IL-8 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α) [4.5]. It is proposed that the etiology of musculoskeletal dysfunction is due to hypoxia and chronic hypercapnia, the use of steroids, oxidative stress and physical deconditioning [6], although there are studies that have shown muscle atrophy as its major determinant [7].This dysfunction is characterized by reduced muscle strength (6) and physical performance [8].
Alterations in FFM and muscle function have been associated with variables that determine the severity of COPD, such as limitation to exercise performance, decrease in quality of life, increase in the frequency of exacerbations and the level of obstruction of the airway [8, 9, 10, 11]. This is why multidimensional COPD rating systems have been developed that include functional and nutritional assessment in addition to the evaluation of respiratory function such as the BODE Index [12].
In Latin America there have been no studies that evaluate the nutritional status, muscle functionality and its correlation with COPD severity variables according to GOLD [1]. The present study used the fat free mass index (FFMI) to analyze the nutritional status. Hand grip strength and walking speed were used to evaluate the muscle functionality of people with stable COPD who had different degrees of severity. This is how the objective of this study was to define the correlation between FFMI, muscle function, respiratory symptoms, exacerbations and degree of obstruction in the airway.
Design of the study and subjects
It is a prospective and cross-sectional study. A sample of 47 patients was calculated that allowed to detect correlation coefficients higher than 0.4 with a 95% safety and a statistical power of 80% according to findings in previous studies with similar characteristics [13, 14, 15]. The study population included subjects with a clinical diagnosis of COPD, managed by ambulatory services of pulmonology or internal medicine of the city of Manizales, during January 1st to November 30th, 2018. Subjects were included according to the following criteria: age over 40 years, clinical diagnosis of COPD and acceptance to participate in the study. Once included, they were called in for evaluation in the nutritional assessment laboratory of the University of Caldas, and FFM was measured using Electrical Bioimpedance Analysis (EBA), pulmonary function assessment by spirometry, evaluation of muscle function by manual dynamometry, anthropometry and survey of symptoms and quality of life, according to the COPD assessment test (CAT).
Subjects with exacerbations in the last month who did not comply with spirometric criteria for COPD according to GOLD (1), as well as those with active pulmonary infections or disability that prevented any of the measurements necessary for the study were also excluded (Annex 1). The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Caldas and all patients were informed of the proposed procedures, after which they gave their written informed consent.
COPD Severity
The COPD severity was evaluated according to the GOLD (1) guidelines by measuring the degree of airflow obstruction according to FEV1 (predicted %), the CAT and the frequency of exacerbations during the past year. With these variables we generated the following four groups:
Group A: low risk, little symptomatic;
Group B: low risk, very symptomatic;
Group C: high risk, little symptomatic;
Group D: High risk, very symptomatic.
Pulmonary function
Spirometry was performed with the equipment to measure lung function Quark PFT-2 (± 0.01 L COSMED, Italy) calibrated daily before starting the evaluation, according to the standards of the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society [30]. Patients were examined in a sitting position and they had to complete a basal spirometry with three forced vital capacity maneuvers (FVC) acceptable and repeatable for FVC and FEV1 (difference between the two highest values of FVC or FEV1<0.15 L).
The FEV1, FVC and the relation between FEV1/FVC were measured before and 15 minutes after a bronchodilator test with 400 mcg dose of salbutamol. The FEV1 and FVC value are expressed in liters and the predicted percentage for the patients of the same genre and age. The relationship between FEV1/FVC was calculated with the highest values of each of the parameters in at least 3 spirometry maneuvers with an acceptable technical curve. For the COPD diagnosis, a relation between FEV1/FVC < 0.7 post-bronchodilator was considered as a cutting point (1). The obstruction degree in the air way was stratified in four groups: GOLD 1≥80%, GOLD 2 50-79%, GOLD 3 30-49% y GOLD 4 <30% according to the post-bronchodilator FEV1 (of the predicted %).
Symptoms and Exacerbations:
The CAT (an 8 item unidimensional questionnaire format) specific for COPD and validated in Spanish, was used to determine the symptomatology. The score goes from, 0 to 40. It has an adequate correlation with the St George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) [23, 24] and is easier to interpret, which allows it a higher reproducibility in the test-retest procedure [25]. The results were expressed as discrete variables and the highest values represent the patients with the most symptoms and the worst quality of life and as a dichotomous variable using a lower value than 10 as little symptomatic according to the GOLD guides [1]. An exacerbation was defined as the acute worsening of the respiratory symptoms that took the patient to an additional treatment and needed or not of being hospitalized for its management. As a frequent exacerbator, we defined those who presented one or more exacerbations in the last year that required of hospital admission, or two or more exacerbations that did not require hospitalization [1].
Muscular function
The muscular function was evaluated by means of hand grip with manual dynamometry and walking speed in 4 meters. For the manual dynamometry, we used a digital Baseline® dynamometer, (±1 kg, Fabrication Enterprises Inc, USA) following the recommendations given by the American Therapeutic Society [16]. Three measurements were taken at the 0, 35 and 70 seconds mark taking as a result the highest of the three measurements expressed in Kg/force [16]. The reference values used were according Mathiowetz and Cols. in 1985, for the different age groups and sex [17]. We used the gait speed test in 4 meters, due to the easy application in the clinical and research settings. It has a good inter-observer and reproducibility correlation [18], being considered normal values as those equal to or higher than 0.8 m / sec.
FFM and FFMI
The FFM was calculated using a
Xitron Technologies 4200®bioimpedance meter with a constant alternating current at a frequency of 50 kHz (U.S.A).
The patients were placed in supine position with four surface electrodes on the wrist and near the ankle, according to the criteria of the European Society of Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism [19]. The validated formula by Schols et al in 1991 was used as a calculation formula in patients with COPD [20]. The FFMI (kg/m2) was determined according to the FFM/ height2 equation.
A low FFMI was defined as less than 15 kg / m2 in women and less than 16 kg / m2 in men for patients with COPD (21.22).
For the statistical analysis, the SPSS program, version 15, licensed for the University of Caldas, was used.
C The characteristics of the population were presented as %. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the association between the variables.
The Bioethics Committee of the University of Caldas approved the study and all the participants signed the informed consent.
Results
From the outpatient department of internal medicine and pneumology, 142 patients who met the inclusion criteria were recruited, of whom 19 were excluded because they presented clinical conditions that limited the performance of the tests necessary for the study (5 paraplegia, 7 osteosynthesis material 3 chronic use of oral steroids, 2 hemodialysis, 2 exacerbations in the last week) leaving a total of 123 patients who were examined. After carrying out the tests, 68 patients who did not comply with the diagnosis of COPD with post-bronchodilator spirometry confirmation were excluded, resulting in a total of 55 patients for the statistical analysis, a number that exceeded the calculated sample of n = 47 to find significant correlations (Figure 1).
The average age population was 69 years, all had a risk factor for COPD, 88% had a positive history of smoking, 49% had exposure to wood smoke and 40% had a positive history of smoking plus exposure to firewood smoke (Table 1).
The body mass index (BMI) and the FFMI were low in 7.3% (n = 4) and 32.7% (n = 18) respectively (Table 1). Muscle dysfunction was observed in the majority of the population, with decrease in strength in 56.4% (n = 31) and walking speed in 52.7% (n = 29) (Table 2).
In this study, 37% of patients presented a low FFMI. It was a percentage slightly higher than those observed by Vermeren et al in 2006 (26) who described a low FFMI in 27% of the population and of Norden et al, in 2015 who found 36% [27].
It is noteworthy in this study that only 7% of patients were underweight, while 44% were overweight or obese, different from the results of other studies such as those of Hallin et al in 2006, which show percentages of low weight up to 26% and only 29% with overweight and obesity [10].
It is interesting to highlight the functional commitment of more than 50% of the patients, which could be indicating a deterioration of the muscular composition and its function, with risk of loss of autonomy, quality of life and that of the immune function, as different studies related to outcomes of sarcopenia show it. Jones et al in 2015, determined that up to 14.5% of patients with COPD have sarcopenia, and this is associated with reduced exercise capacity, functional performance, physical activity and health status, in comparison with patients without sarcopenia [28].
It is notable that the average of exacerbations was reduced and is below what other studies show, with the possible explanation that, perhaps, the phenotype of the patients, as it seems to be seen in the BMI, may be different from other populations studied or that patients have not accurately reported the retrospective self-report of exacerbations. Zhenchao et al in 2018 conducted a retrospective study with 744 patients with COPD finding an average of 3.8 exacerbations per patient / year [29]. In contrast, Hallin et al in 2006 followed up a total of 42 patients with COPD for 12 months and found an average of 0.58 severe exacerbations per patient / year with a requirement for hospital admission [10].
The positive correlation found between the FFMI and lung function in the subgroup of men, which confirms findings from similar studies such as those of Ischaki et al in 2007 [15], should be emphasized.
Additionally, the direct correlation between manual dynamometry and the clinical condition and quality of life evaluated by CAT confirms previous results of studies such as those of Bernad et al. In support of the importance of muscle function in patients with COPD [7].
Unlike what was reported by Hallin et al in 2006 [10] and Zhenchao et al in 2018 [29], correlation between body composition and number of exacerbations was not observed in this study, which could depend on the low degree of exacerbations reported in these patients.
It is necessary to point out the lack of correlation in women, between FFMI, muscle function and the severity of COPD, while other investigations such as those of Ischaki and cols in 2007 did observe it (15). It would be worthwhile to get a bigger sample in former studies and differentiate different COPD phenotypes to specify if there is any gender inequality or is it a kind of COPD that marks the difference.
In conclusion, it is very important to evaluate fat-free mass and muscle function in patients with COPD, in order to improve the care of these patients.
Acknowledgments
We want to acknowledge the volunteers who responded to the call. We also want to make a special recognition to the working team of the Nutrition, Metabolism and Food Safety group, which actively collaborated in the realization of this research.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
