AUCTORES
Review Article
*Corresponding Author: Giulio Perrotta, Director of the Department of Criminal and Investigative Psychology UNIFEDER, Italy
Citation: Giulio Perrotta (2019), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: definition, contexts, neural correlates and clinical strategies, Addiction Research and Adolescent Behaviour 2(2) Doi: 10.31579/2688-7517/011
Copyright: © 2019 Giulio Perrotta This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of The Creative Commons. Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 20 August 2021 | Accepted: 28 September 2021 | Published: 18 October 2019
Keywords: psychology; neuroscience; prefrontal cortex; frontal lobe; temporal lobe; limbic system; attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; hyperactivity; attention; ADHD; psychotherapy; psychopharmacology; benzodiazepines; antidepressants; mood stabilizers
Starting from the definition of "Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorder" (ADHD), we proceeded to list the individual forms envisaged by the DSM-V, with a series of focus on clinical, neuropsychological and therapeutic profiles, concluding the analysis on the context resolution of the problems deriving from the disturbance in question
1.Definition and clinical context of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is, according to the DSM-V [1], a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by problems in maintaining attention, hyperactivity and / or difficulty in controlling one's behavior (due to the impulsiveness), which does not appear to be appropriate to the age of the person [2].
The first description known to date of symptoms attributable to an attention deficit disorder was made in 1775 by Melchior Adam Weikard, the German physician and philosopher. [3] Sir Alexander Crichton, in 1798, called it "mental restlessness" [11]. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) was also described in 1902 by George Still [4]. The terminology used to describe the condition has changed over time: in the first edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders [DSM-I] (1952) "minimum brain dysfunction" was defined, in DSM-II (1968) it took the name instead of "hyperkinetic reaction in childhood", DSM-III (1980) called it "attention deficit disorder, with or without hyperactivity". This terminology was changed in 1987 with the DSM-III while the DSM-IV in 1994 divided the diagnosis into three subtypes: inattentive type, hyperactive/impulsive type and the combined type. [5] [6] [7]
Due to its typical characteristics, ADHD leads to a higher rate of school and work abandonment than the average; other consequences of this disorder can be anxiety-depressive disorders, oppositional-provocative disorders, conduct disorders, sleep and circadian rhythm disorders, more frequent divorces, higher risk of road accidents and pathological addictions. [8]
Controversial instead is the theme that correlates the disorder in question and the high IQ. Most studies found similar changes regardless of IQ, with high repetition rates and social difficulties. Furthermore, more than half of people with high IQ who have ADHD have also developed a major depressive disorder or an oppositional defiant disorder at some point in their lives. Generalized anxiety disorder, separation anxiety disorder and social phobia are further common conditions. There is some evidence that individuals with high IQ and ADHD have a reduced risk of substance abuse and antisocial behaviour than children with low or medium IQ and ADHD. Children, adolescents and adults with high IQ can have an incorrect measure of their level of intelligence during a standard assessment and therefore may require complete analysis. [9]
In general, the clinical symptoms generally appear before the age of twelve, must have persisted for at least six months and must cause problems in at least two socio-environmental and cultural contexts of the subject affected by the disorder [10].
Based on the DSM-5 criteria, which we will analyze later in detail, we can distinguish three typical ADHD manifestations:
a) ADHD with predominant inattention (typical features are being easily distracted, poor memory, daydreaming, disorganization, inability to sustain attention, and difficulty in completing activities - procrastination);
b) ADHD with predominant hyperactivity/impulsivity (typical features are excessive restlessness and agitation, hyperactivity, difficulty in waiting and sitting and listening or paying attention to a topic of no primary interest);
c) combined ADHD (between the forms "a" and "b").
Therefore, ADHD can present itself in three distinct forms that often have very different characteristics. For example, in those who present the variant with a predominance of inattention that has few or no symptoms of hyperactivity, restlessness and impulsiveness, ADHD may not be noticed [11]; however, however, it is possible that over the years the diagnosis of ADHD evolves and moves from one event to another [12], as several researches over the decades have shown that at least half of people with ADHD in childhood and pre-adolescent age continue to suffer even in adolescence and adulthood, with a percentage that varies from two to five (especially in adulthood) [13] [14], instead children who present an ADHD with characteristics of hyperactivity tend to show less marked symptoms, for example, internal restlessness, tension, nervousness, during adolescence and adulthood, or no longer showing these symptoms, but often continuing to have inattentive and / or impulsive symptoms; these are the most significant symptoms of ADHD in adulthood [15].
It is, therefore, necessary to identify a persistent pattern of inattention and/or hyperactivity-impulsivity that interferes with functioning or development, as characterized by (1) and/or (2):
1. Inattention. Six (or more) of the following symptoms have persisted for at least six months with an intensity incompatible with the level of development and which has a direct negative impact on social and educational / work activities:
2. Hyperactivity and impulsivity. Six (or more) of the following symptoms persist for at least months with an intensity that is incompatible with the level of development, and that has a direct negative impact on social and educational / work activities (for older adolescents and adults - age of seventeen and beyond - at least five symptoms are required):
In short, it must be clear that the symptoms are not only a manifestation of oppositional behaviour, or challenge, hostility or inability to understand tasks or instructions, but a complex disorder with a precise persistent and debilitating symptomatology. Not surprisingly, associated with the disorder in question, we often find problems in interpersonal relationships. [16] [17] [18]
Another central issue of clinical interest is comorbidity. Other disorders such as anxiety or depression may be associated with ADHD, and such psychopathological circumstances can greatly complicate diagnosis and treatment. Several studies suggest that depression in ADHD appears to increase in children in parallel with their growth, with a higher rate of growth in girls than in boys. When a mood disorder complicates ADHD, it would be more desirable to treat the mood disorder earlier even if the parents of children who have ADHD often want ADHD treated first, since the response to treatment is faster. [19]
Inattention and hyperactive behaviour are not the only problems in those with ADHD. ADHD exists alone, with no other pathology, in about one-third of people. Many coexisting conditions require other types of treatment and should be diagnosed separately instead of being grouped into the diagnosis of ADHD. [20] Some of the conditions often associated are:
The etiopathology of ADHD is unclear, as there are currently several competing explanations [46]; however, the neurobiological matrix [57] [58] [59] and traumatic [60] are evident. It has been observed that in children with ADHD there is a general reduction in the volume of the brain, with a proportionally more significant decrease in the left side of the prefrontal cortex: it seems that brain pathways connecting the prefrontal cortex and the striatum are also involved in the condition. [47]. This suggests that inattention, hyperactivity and impulsivity may reflect a frontal lobe dysfunction with additional regions, such as the cerebellum, that may be implicated. [48] Other attention-related brain structures were found to be different between people with and without ADHD. [49] [50] Previously, it was thought that the high number of dopamine transporters in subjects with ADHD was part of its pathophysiology, but it appears that these are caused by adaptation to exposure to stimulants. [51] People with ADHD may have a low excitation threshold and compensate for this with more stimulation, a condition that in turn causes loss of attention and increases hyperactive behaviour: the reason for this is due to anomalies in the way the dopamine system responds to stimulation. [52] There may also be anomalies in the adrenergic, serotoninergic and cholinergic or nicotinic pathways. [53] [54] Another theory suggests that the symptoms derive from a deficit in executive functions: these alterations affect above all the brain areas used for attention functions, such as the prefrontal cortex, the cerebellum and the basal ganglia. [55]
Barkley (1998), to complete the etiological picture, proposed a list of risk factors, sorted by level of importance, associated with the genesis of ADHD:
1) presence of psychological disorders in family members, in particular, ADHD;
2) abuse of cigarettes and alcohol of the mother during pregnancy;
3) absence of a parent or inadequate education;
4) health problems or developmental delays of the child;
5) early onset of high levels of motor activity;
6) critical and/or managerial attitudes of the mother during the early years of the child.
Contrasted to the risk factors (Campbell, 1990), however, a list of factors that we could define protective was built, as they help the boy to limit the negative results of ADHD, among these we remember:
1) good health of the child shortly after birth;
2) excellent cognitive abilities of the child (in particular linguistic);
3) family stability.
Then in 1990, Zametkin conducted a study on glucose metabolism in the brains of adult ADHD patients and compared it to healthy individuals. The PET scan shows cerebral glucose consumption in a given activity, left in a person without ADHD and right in one with. The study was the first major functional neuroimaging study in ADHD and formed the basis for many other studies. The specific results, however, were only partially reproduced. [61] [62]
Recently, a research conducted by over eighty scholars on over twenty-five thousand patients has fueled the hypothesis, already travelled by other researchers in previous years, of a probable genetic matrix [63] in the aetiology of the disorder in question, to be added to the other causes already set out. Therefore the idea that ADHD is a disorder with a solid biological basis, in which genetics has a large part, is undeniable. In essence, twelve DNA sequences, whose common genetic variants represent as many as twenty-one per cent of the risk of ADHD, are strongly correlated with the risk of developing attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Some of these fragments coincide with specific genes, including the FOXP2, DUSP6 and SEMA6D genes. FOXP2, one of the most studied genes due to its involvement in language development and already suspected of contributing to ADHD, encodes a protein with a central role in the formation of synapses between neurons and in learning. DUSP6 is instead involved in the control of communication between dopaminergic neurons (i.e. which use dopamine as the primary messenger): the dopaminergic system is precisely the target of the most common ADHD drug therapies. Finally, the SEMA6D gene, expressed in the brain during embryonic development, could play a significant role in the creation of neural connections.
For over a decade the thesis that establishes the best method for treating ADHD is peaceful: a clever combination of behavioural therapies, lifestyle changes, clinical-psychological interventions and drugs [64], although treatment can improve the condition in the long term but is unable to eliminate adverse pathological outcomes. [65]
Concerning psychological and behavioural interventions, always for a decade, the effectiveness of therapies centred on cognitive and behavioural profiles has been demonstrated [66]. The psychological therapies used to treat ADHD include psychoeducational interventions, coaching techniques, psychotherapy with a cognitive-behavioural approach, mindfulness, family and systemic therapies, interpersonal psychotherapies, training or implementation of social skills and neurofeedback [67]. Family therapy has also been shown to be usefully used in the treatment of ADHD [68], although such an approach may be difficult in reality, familiar with divorced parents [69]. It has been shown that parental training and patient education interventions can lead to short-term benefits [70]. Few high-quality studies prove the efficacy of family therapy for ADHD, but the evidence shows that such interventions have better results than placebo [71].
Compared to drugs, the first-choice drug treatment is implemented through the use of stimulant drugs, as they act to improve the neurotransmission of dopamine and norepinephrine, neurotransmitters which are associated with essential functions of inhibition and brain modulation, in essence, the brakes of the brain; however "non-stimulants" such as atomoxetine (Strattera), clonidine, guanfacine and bupropion (Wellbutrin) can be used as an alternative [72]. The stimulant drugs used are: methylphenidate, amphetamine, dextroamphetamine and lisdestro amphetamine [73]. The use of psychostimulants to treat the condition was first described in 1937 [74] where the mixture of benzedrine and amphetamine was the first drug therapy suggested and approved for the treatment of ADHD in the United States. The use of prescription drugs is not recommended for preschool children since the long-term effects of this therapy are not known in this age group [75]. Atomoxetine, due to the lack of the risk of abusing it, may be preferable in those who are at risk of making excessive use of stimulants [76]. However, drug therapy is not applied alone but is accompanied by other interventions on the person and the family.
Dietary changes may also be beneficial [77], with evidence supporting the use of free fatty acids and reduced exposure to food colouring [78]. Further suggested integration refers to zinc, as a shortage of this mineral has often been found [79]. Iron, magnesium and iodine deficiency may also affect ADHD symptoms [80] [81]. Finally, there is compelling evidence about the benefit of taking, as a dietary supplement, omega 3, 6 and 9 [82] [83].
Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is one of the most frequent chronic neuropsychiatric disorders of onset in the developmental age, characterized by inattention, impulsivity and motor hyperactivity which compromises many stages of development and social integration of children. It is a heterogeneous and complex, multifactorial disorder that coexists with another or other disorders in 70-80% of cases, a factor that aggravates the symptoms, making both diagnosis and therapy complex. Those most frequently associated are the oppositional-provocative disorder and conduct disorders, specific learning disabilities (dyslexia, dysgraphia, etc.), anxiety disorders and, less frequently, depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder, tic disorder, bipolar disorder.
Through neuroimaging techniques (Functional Magnetic Resonance and Positron Emission Tomography) and molecular genetic studies, it was possible to highlight that ADHD is a disorder of biological origin of the prefrontal cortex and of the nuclei of the base that involves an alteration in the elaboration of responses to environmental stimuli and concentration skills.
The last decades of research of this disorder have led to the consideration and study of numerous factors at its origin (in fact it is a multifactorial disorder) and among these genetic factors (since it is a polygenic disorder with an inheritance factor of over 75%, many are the candidate genes that are the subject of studies of the dopamine and noradrenaline neurotransmission system which are associated with essential functions of inhibition and cerebral modulation), cerebral morphological factors (frontal cortex, caudate nucleus and pale globe are smaller in ADHD children), prenatal and perinatal factors and traumatic factors. In this various complex of causes, there is still to be considered that the activation of the predisposition to the disorder is probably also modulated by environmental factors (family, education, social contexts, etc.). Therefore, it can be excluded that ADHD is a disorder linked exclusively to childhood and pre-adolescent age.
Precisely because it is a multifactorial disorder, the treatment will necessarily consist of the simultaneous use of psychological therapy, educational treatment and targeted pharmacotherapy.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.