AUCTORES
Review Article
*Corresponding Author: Sayed Mahmood Alqalaf Department of Pharmacy, pharmacology, School of Pharmacy Bahrain.
Citation: : Sayed Mahmood Alqalaf, Asthma & COPD. J Pharmaceutics and Pharmacology Research, 5(8). DOI: 10.31579/2693-7247/092
Copyright: © 2022 Sayed Mahmood Alqalaf, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 10 June 2022 | Accepted: 27 June 2022 | Published: 18 July 2022
Keywords: asthma; copd; low effective dose
Asthma & COPD are the 2 major respiratory diseases that are widespread globally, though big differences between them exist in regard to their pathophysiology and treatment. The main treatment modalities for the two diseases are the inhalation routes of administration. The use of the inhalational routes of administration for the drugs used for the management of asthma and COPD is justified by many advantages such as the low effective dose, faster onset of action and lower systemic side effects. However, some advantages for these routes also exist. The major disadvantage is the technique of use, which many patients do not master even with repeated sessions of teaching by the healthcare providers. Difficulty in applying and following the correct inhalers use was found to be a major reason for patients’ non-adherence and consequently failure of the treatment plan.
1.1 Asthma and COPD definition
Respiratory diseases are widespread among the population due to many factors including lifestyle and heredity. Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are among the most common respiratory diseases that afflict millions of people worldwide and cause significant morbidity and mortality
The World Health Organization (WHO) has predicted that 235 million people suffer from asthma and more than 3 million people die from COPD each year [43]. Both diseases are characterized by obstructive airway limitation and inflammation, but they differ in the inflammatory cells, pathophysiology, and signs & symptoms [45].
Asthma is a chronic heterogeneous disease that attacks the lungs causing inflammation that result in exaggerated airway narrowing which is fully reversible. Asthma affects all ages, but often occurs during childhood [29]. The most common symptoms of asthma are chest tightness, shortness of breath, coughing and wheezing sound during breathing. However, these symptoms occur in different degrees according to the severity of the disease [31]. These symptoms are not very specific for the disease, so their availability does not confirm the disease. Hence, diagnosis of asthma should be done thorough medical history, physical examination and evaluation of lung function. There is no obvious cause of asthma, but there are some environmental and genetic factors that increases the risk of developing asthma and precipitating its attacks. The most common triggering agents that could cause allergy and precipitate asthmatic attacks are house dust mites, cockroaches, animal fur, mold and pollens and non-allergic causes include cigarette smoke, exercise and cold air [29]. Additionally, genetic factors are a major risk to developing asthma in children if one or both parents have a history of atopic disease [7].
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a progressive airway limitation that is irreversibly characterized by an abnormal inflammation response caused by significant exposure to noxious particles or gases leading to narrowing in small airways that result in hyperinflation of the lungs. COPD could present in two major types, which are chronic bronchitis and emphysema[45]. It affects adults and the elderly, but it is more prevalent in the elderly according to national data that shows the prevalence in the adult-only 1% while it is much more in people aged ≥40[10]. Smoking is the major risk factor for the development and progression of COPD and up to 90% of all death from COPD are because of cigarette smoking. However, environmental exposure, genetic predisposition and history of asthma also increase the risk of developing COPD. The major symptoms of COPD is chronic cough that could be accompanied with sputum, dyspnea and exercise intolerance. These symptoms are worsened by exacerbation and lead to wheezing, chest tightness, tachycardia and fever. As COPD progresses it is associated with different comorbidities such as cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis, lung cancer and sleep disorders [45].
Although asthma and COPD have similar clinical manifestations, they differ in their characteristics. Example of this is the cough that is usually dry and mostly worse at night in asthma, this could occur in COPD only after many years of smoking. On the other hand, in asthma paroxysmal dyspnea is characterized by shortness of breath, while in COPD this occurs early in this disease with physical exercise, but at rest later. In addition, the release of inflammatory mediators is broader in asthma than COPD. In asthma the elevated level of T-helper cell type-2 in the airways releases certain cytokines, including interleukin (IL-4, IL-5, IL-9 and IL-13) that result in eosinophilic inflammation and immunoglobulin E (IgE) production. While inflammasome, T1 and T17 are activated by neutrophils in COPD [29][5].
However, there is no cure for both diseases other than avoiding triggering agents, but the pharmacological treatment can ameliorate the quality of life, reduce the number and severity of exacerbations and manage the symptoms [44] [45].
1.2 Inhalational therapy advantages and challenges
Administration of drugs into the body can be via various routes like oral, intravenous, inhalational, transdermal. Each route of these has its special features, advantages and disadvantages [38]. The selection of the route of administration is taking into account the characteristics of the health problems treated and the properties of the drug [38].
In relation to the chronic respiratory diseases such as asthma and COPD, the ideal route of drug administration is the inhalational route or sometimes called the aerosol route. The preference of the inhalational route here is due to the plentiful advantages which are gained in the inhalational treatment compared to the other routes of administration [3][4][30].
The goal of inhalational therapy in respiratory diseases is to provide a localized treatment that potentially achieves several benefits and overcomes some disadvantages [3]. By delivering the drug directly to the lung, which is the target organ, this affords a higher drug concentration at the target organ compared with that reaching the circulatory system. This is in contrast to the drug administered orally or parenterally, and hence lower drug doses is required in inhalation dosage forms to produce the same therapeutic effect or even better compared with the systemic routes of administration. Additionally, administering the dose directly results in less systemic absorption thus reducing the risk of adverse side effects [9][30]. In summary, inhaled drugs produces the high pulmonary efficacy with lower doses and fewer systemic side effects [4][9]. In addition, inhaled drugs are rapidly absorbed due to the lung's large surface area (about 80- 140 m2) and the alveolar epithelium's low thickness (about 0.1 and 0.5 mm). Hence, inhalation of the drugs provides a rapid onset of action, like what is seen in inhaled salbutamol which takes a few minutes to give its relief effect [4].In contrast to the oral administration, inhalational rout of administration provides the opportunity for the drug to bypass the first-pass hepatic metabolism and to be exposed less to the degradation enzymes[38]. By excluding the IV administration and for the drugs with small molecules, inhalation is the quickest route of administration[3].
However, there are hurdles to inhalational therapy to give its best. One of the challenges in the delivery of drugs by inhalational route is the defense approaches of the respiratory system, which are represented in mechanical, chemical, and immunological barriers. These barriers prevent the drug particles from reaching the target, which is mainly the pulmonary epithelium, by either expelling them out of the respiratory system or inactivating them [21]. Another important challenge which is related to the patient's behavior is the proper use of the inhalation device, where improper inhaler technique can prevent the successful delivery of the drug to the lung and prevent getting the full benefit from the inhalation route [21]. In addition, the good adherence to inhaled therapies by patients is another challenging [21]. Regarding financial issues, experts found that the expense of inhalation therapies also poses a challenge [30].
There are numerous drugs available for the management of asthma, COPD, and other respiratory diseases like pulmonary fibrosis, acute pneumonia, seasonal allergy, cystic fibrosis, and Bronchiectasis. These drugs are classified into several pharmacological classes depending on their mechanism of action such as bronchodilators, anti-leukotriens, muscarinic antagonist, corticosteroid and anti-IgE antibodies.
The bronchodilators are the most commonly used drugs for the management of asthma and COPD. They work by dilating the bronchial airways and relaxing the liner muscles. They are divided into four categories looking at their onset of action and duration: short-acting B2 adrenergic agonists (SABAs), long-acting B2 adrenergic agonists (LABAs), anticholinergics, and xanthine derivatives. SABAs have rapid onset of action which takes seconds to minutes, reaching the maximum action within approximately 30 minutes and lasts for 4 to 6 hours. This sort of medications are used on as-needed basis for the relief of acute asthma. The foremost common and useful drug of this category is Salbutamol (Albuterol). Conversely, Salmeterol and formoterol are examples of LABA medications that afford an extended duration of action of approximately 12 hours and need to be used regularly. It may be accustomed to treating chronic asthma, COPD patient and reducing moderate and severe COPD relapses. additionally, inhaled ipratropium is that the most popular example of the anticholinergics, which works by blocking the muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. It has around 45 minutes onset of action, with a maximum impact within 60 to 90 minutes and a half-life of 6 to 8 hours[35]. Furthermore, ipratropium is used as an alternate therapy for patients who are intolerant or can’t use SABA.
Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are the most widely used drugs for the management of asthma and COPD. They may be used alone or in combination with other pharmacological classes. It acts by reducing the potent inflammatory mediator and diminishing airway inflammation[25]. As the disease progresses, the utilization of two or more drugs may be more effective in the management of the disease. Nowadays, there are combination inhaler devices that contain two or more drugs from different pharmacological classes and thus improve the patient’s medication adherence. Inhaled corticosteroid and long-acting beta- 2 adrenergic agonist or short-acting beta -2 adrenergic agonist (ICS / LABA or ICS / SABA) combinations are often used. Moreover, the short-acting beta-2 adrenergic agonists (SABA) and short-acting anti-muscarinic antagonists (SAMA) combination can be used. Additionally, long-acting beta-2 adrenergic agonists (LABA) with Long-acting anti-muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) can also be used to treat COPD and severe asthma patients[24].
Drugs used for the management of respiratory disorders can be administered via many types of inhalational devices. So, respiratory physicians must be careful in choosing the correct inhaler for the patient taking into consideration the patient ability to use the device correctly and also the device efficacy for every patient condition as there's no specific inhaler device that suits all patients[32]. Studies have shown that the most commonly used inhalational devices are pressurized metered-dose inhalers (pMDI) and dry powder inhalers(40). By applying pressure, a pressurized metered-dose inhaler converts the drug from a solution or suspension formulation into liquid[19]. pMDIs exist in two categories: extra-fine aerosols and also general pMDI. General pMDI consists of a container, actuator, and a metering valve. These are usually multi-dose, portable, and compact devices and available for treatment of many respiratory illness because of their advantages that include straightforward use, high accuracy and affordable cost[23][40]. Extra-fine aerosol devices are often used for low-dose drugs which have a smaller particle size because side effects increase as the particle size increases[40].
Dry powder inhaler devices contain drugs in powder form[19]. They are available in four main types; First, the single-dose devices that have the drug within a hard gelatine capsule form that should be inserted in the device before each dose. Second type are the DPI disposable devices that contain pre-metered doses that are discarded after use. Third are the multiunit devices that have individual doses pre-metered in the replaceable blisters, disks, dimples, or tubes. Fourth DPI inhalers are those with multiple-dose reservoirs that contain a bulk amount of medication powder with a built-in mechanism that measures a single dose when actuated, and individual doses are delivered when the device is actuated. A multi-unit inhaler should ensure more precision dosage control as well as chemical stability of the formulation than a multiple-dose type, but it is more expensive [16]. The use of the DPIs is quite common among respiratory diseases patients because it has minimal drug sedimentation and requires less coordination compared to pMDI, so it’s the foremost preferred device for elderly, children, and patients with poor inhalation techniques[11]. However, a dry powder inhaler requires extra care regarding storage because it encompasses a high sensitivity to humidity.
Soft mist inhalers (SMIs) are the new form of inhalers that include the drug in the form of propellant-free liquid that’s moved slowly through a nozzle system [13]. They are compact, multi-dose devices that have high fine particle fraction and lung deposition, but they may not be preferred to use by patients since it is hard to prepare the first doe, has fewer drug doses compared to other inhaler devices, and require significant breathing coordination[12][6].
1.4 Correct inhaler technique and errors
In order to maintain the disease control, achieve maximal clinical benefit, enhance disease outcome and improve quality of life, it is necessary to use the inhaler correctly. Mastering the inhaler technique would reduce the drug’s adverse effects, disease exacerbations, treatment costs, morbidity, and mortality rates(18)(25)(33)(37)(39). Pressurized metered dose inhaler (MDI), dry powder inhaler (DPI) and soft mist inhaler (SMI), which are the three main inhaler types, have similar administration techniques despite the differences in design and shape. The standard technique for use starts from device preparation to inhalation until completion. For MDI, it is recommended that the patient stand or sit up straight with head titled back little initially, remove the inhaler cap and shake it subsequently. Then, the patient should exhale comfortably and completely. After that, he/she should put the inhaler’s mouthpiece in the mouth, between teeth and lips closed around, ensuring that the inhaler is upright or at a correct position. Thereafter, he/she should inhale deeply and slowly while pressing down the inhaler canister. Afterward, he/she should hold the breath as much as possible or for 5-10 seconds and next, exhale slowly. Finally, the mouthpiece should be replaced straight away. The patient should note to keep a gap between repeated doses with shaking the inhaler repetitively. These steps are also utilized for MDI if used via a spacer, and also for the DPIs, and SMIs; however, slight differences exist. As per MDI with a spacer no need for coordination between pressing the inhaler and inhaling, there can be 1-2 seconds apart between the actuation and the inspiration. For SMI, an additional step is needed before starting the treatment to prepare the inhaler for use, which is holding the inhaler upright and turn the base in the orientation of the arrows until it clicks. In contrast, DPIs are available in different models which differs in the preparation process and drug administration. However, the administration technique is standard for all DPI designs. Both MDI and SMI require loading before their first use and if they are not used for a long period, one puff need to be sprayed in the air to prepare the inhaler for use. However, DPI and SMI don’t require shaking or waiting between repeated doses and they are not used with a spacer [25].
A high portion of inhalers users are making errors regardless of the device type. These were found to be approximately 90 % of patients[39]. Studies have shown some discrepancies in the classification of errors. Some categorize the errors into critical and non-critical errors, while others classify them according to the inhalation technique and device-related errors. Critical errors are the errors that impede drug deposition in the lungs, resulting in little or no medication delivery, thus reducing the effectiveness in the disease management[18][33][39]. Whereas non-critical errors are the errors that might lead to inadequate drug delivery to the lungs[39]. On the other hand, inhalation technique errors are the patient’s wrong action to transfer the drug from the device to the target organ beginning with complete exhalation before inhalation until breath holds on. Whereas device-related errors encompass handling the device wrongly before and after inhalation as preparing the device, dose, or handling completion[18]. In COPD patients, studies found that 45% made at least one error when using their inhaler, 50% were related to the device, 31% were related to the inhalation technique, and 19% were related to both [18]. In asthma patients, the most common errors in MDI users are device-related, particularly coordination; meanwhile, in DPI users, inhalation-related errors are the most common errors, particularly insufficient inspiration[33][37].
1.5 Factors affecting the inhaler technique
For effective management of asthma and COPD three vital components must be considered. These are patient, drug, and device, as there is a relationship between each component, the suitability of the drug to the patient, the patient and technique of using the device, the device and drug delivery. These components complement each other to achieve maximum efficacy and stability to the patient (34). There are many factors that can influence the technique and its validity among inhaler users, such as patient’s age (as seen in elderly and children), gender, number of inhalers used, adequate information and education received about the inhalers , patient self-inhalational technique, and bronchodilator response rate (41). Of these, patient’s age, gender, educational level, number of devices prescribed, and instructions given about inhalers are the most common factors contributing to 36% of inhaler error frequency [27].
Dust, chemical agents, air pollution, biomass fuel, and wood burning are among the factors that influence the development of COPD, but smoking is the most common factor affecting the stability of COPD patients [8]. Smoking has a negative impact on the stability of the patients with asthma and other respiratory diseases. Approximately 36% of emergency department patients with asthma exacerbations are current smokers. There is also a possibility of negative effects of smoking on asthmatic patients even after smoking cessation [15]. Additionally, body mass index (BMI) is one of the factors that might affect the patient condition and proper inhalation technique, as patients with a BMI of 35 who are considered obese are more likely to make one or more inhalation errors than patients with a normal BMI of less than 30 [2]. The type of inhaler plays a role in the inhalation process, and errors have been observed in patients who use metered dose inhalers (MDI) more frequently than in dry powder inhalers (DPI)[26]. To prove this, a study was conducted to evaluate the handling of COPD patients with 6 common inhalers to know the percentage of errors in inhalation technique for each inhaler. This study showed that MDI has the highest error rate while DPI has the lowest error rate [27].
Frequent educational sessions help to develop skills in the technique of inhalers use, with approximately 90% of patients gaining good skills after two educational sessions, regardless of the type of inhaler. In addition, elderly patients require more educational sessions than other patients to ensure that the inhaler is used correctly[14]. Nurses as well as all health care providers have a significant and visible impact on disease stabilization and control by providing adequate patient education, counseling, and awareness [34]. In addition, proper education, and training on how to use the inhaler is an important factor in increasing patient awareness and decreasing errors, as the error rate at the first patient assessment visit in a study was high, but after the second and third visits the error rate decreased very clearly, and this indicates the importance and role of education in improving inhaler use, reducing errors, and providing more effective medications[1].
1.6 Adherence to inhalers use
Adherence refers to patient's willingness to follow a treatment plan. Adherence to an inhaler prescription necessitates obtaining the prescription swiftly and using the inhalers exactly as prescribed, including dose, dosing interval, treatment duration, and any additional instructions given by the physician and pharmacist. Patients should be instructed to inform their physician if they stop using their inhaler or modified their usage, but this is rarely done by patients which could lead to losing control of the condition. According to several studies, COPD therapy regimens have failed to deliver optimal results, with drug non-adherence and poor inhaler technique cited as the major reasons[20][28]. According to World Health Organization (WHO) non-adherence to asthma medications is caused by a variety of reasons. These reasons may be classified into five main categories: socioeconomic, condition-related, treatment-related, healthcare system-related, and patient-related factors [42].
Adherence to the treatment plan could fail at any time. The three distinct temporal phases of non-adherence include failure to begin treatment, failure to administer therapy appropriately, and non-persistence with treatment. In most circumstances, initiating dose is a binary occurrence, with patients either starting or not starting to take their medication. The degree to which a patient's follows their prescribed dosing plan over time, from start to finish, is the second step and called implementation. This means adhering to the medication's instructions, which in the case of asthma includes using an inhaler. Persistence - the last stage - is defined as the continuation in using the drug from the time between the start of therapy and the end of treatment. Following this, there may be a period of non-persistence until the targeted prescription duration is completed[17]. As a solution for the inadequate control of respiratory disorders, a number of novel treatments are now accessible for patients suffering from severe uncontrolled conditions. According to practice recommendations, clinicians should address medication adherence and inhaler technique before initiating one of these treatments, in addition to profiling the asthma condition. As a result, before prescribing any additional drugs for the patient, physician need a clear means to identify those with poor asthma control related to trouble with adherence or inhaler technique[36].
In contrast to asthma, COPD patients were reported to have a very high rate of non-adherence. A study done at the Respiratory Center of Bach Mai hospital, a major hospital in Northern Vietnam Showed that large computerized axial tomography (CAT) scores, short COPD durations, low modified medical research council (mMRC) grades, extended hospital admissions, and a high number of exacerbations have all been connected to incorrect inhaler usage and poor drug-adherence [22]. Non-adherence to COPD medications has been shown in other studies to impair clinical and financial results, making non-adherent patients a focus for cost-effective treatment. To improve adherence, physicians should discuss therapeutic decisions with patients and consider lifestyle factors, demographic characteristics, co-morbidities, physical limitations, psychological and cognitive status, and pharmacological factors (polypharmacy issues) when choosing the best inhaler device. As a result, the therapy and equipment may be adjusted to the specific needs and preferences of each patient [11].
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.