AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article
*Corresponding Author: Mesbah Uddin Ahmed, MS in Microbiology, Bangladesh University of Health Sciences.
Citation: S Nahar, S Ferdousi, M M A Bhuiyan, Amit K Pramanik, Mesbah U Ahmed, et al. (2021) Association of Serum Prolactin Level with Preeclampsia. Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Research. 3(5); DOI:10.31579/2768-0487/051
Copyright: © 2021 Mesbah Uddin Ahmed. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 19 September 2021 | Accepted: 15 October 2021 | Published: 20 October 2021
Keywords: prolactin; preeclampsia; hypertensive disorders of pregnancy; proteinuria
Introduction:Preeclampsia is a potentially fatal disorderof pregnant women; it remains an important cause of maternal mortality throughout the world. More than 50,000 maternal deaths occur worldwideeach year. Various researchers of different countries suggested an association of increase level of serumprolactin in preeclamptic patient. Estimation of serum prolactin level in pregnancy may be helpful in diagnosis of preeclampsia.
Objective: Theobjective of the study is to observe the association of serum prolactin level with severity of preeclampsia.
Materials and Methods: This cross-sectionalstudy was conducted from March 2020 to February 2021 in the Department of Laboratory Medicine, Department of Fetomaternal Medicine and Obstetrics and Gynecology, BSMMU and Dhaka Medical College Hospital, Dhaka. Fifty diagnosed patients of preeclampsia who fulfilled the inclusion and exclusioncriteria were selected as study population. At the same time 50 normal pregnant women were taken in another group. In both groups gestational age was calculated from last Menstrual date and confirmed by early ultrasound which wasdone at <14 weeks. Then serum prolactin level was calculated.
Results: The mean serum prolactin level was 226.56±81.23 µg/L in mild and 394.53±78.75 µg/L in severe preeclampsia. The difference was statistically significant (p=0.001) between two groups.In ROC analysis cut off value of serum prolactin level was 118 μg/L.The area under curve (AUC) of serum prolactin was 0.923 (95% CI; 0.869-0.978). Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient test showed significant positive correlation (r=0.719,p=0.001) between serum prolactin level with severity of preeclampsia. This finding of the study revealed that serum prolactin level was increased with preeclampsia and was positive correlation with severity.
Conclusion: Because of significantsensitivity and specificity, serum prolactin level maybe used as an important tool to diagnose preeclampsia and its severity.
The global incidence of preeclampsia has been estimated at 5-14 % of all pregnancies (Lim, 2011). Preeclampsia is one of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy occur in about 10% of all pregnant women around the world. Preeclampsia affects 3-5% of pregnancies and a leading cause of maternal and perinatal mortality (Kishwara et al., 2011). World Health Organization (WHO) estimates incidence of preeclampsia, seven times higher in developing countries (2.4% live birth) than in developed countries (0.4%) (WHO, 2005). In Asia, nearly one tenth of all maternal deaths are associated with hypertensive disorder of pregnancy (WHO, 2011). In India the incidence of preeclampsia is 4.0% (Bilano et al., 2014), in Nepal is 1.8% (Thapa and Jha, 2008). In developing countries, the incidence of the disease has been reported as 4-18%. 20-80% maternal death occurs in developing countries due to preeclampsia (Baruah et al., 2015). In Bangladesh, the incidence of preeclampsia is 4.3% (Ayesha et al., 2020). Serum prolactin level increases in preeclampsia. Estimation of serum prolactin may be helpful in diagnosis of preeclampsia. This parameter is less time consuming and less hazardous. So far my knowledge, no such study has been done to determine the association of serum prolactin level with preeclampsia. As such this study was designed to evaluate the association of serum prolactin level with preeclampsia. The result of the study carries valuable information about diagnosis of preeclampsia, which is beneficial for the patients and the physician.
Study design: Cross sectional study(comparative design)
Study duration: From March 2020 to February 2021
Place of study: This study was conducted at the Department of Laboratory Medicine, Department of Fetomaternal Medicine and Obstetrics and Gynecology, BSMMU and Dhaka Medical College Hospital.
Study population: Patients with diagnosed case of preeclampsia more than 20 weeks attending outpatient and admitted inpatient Department of Fetomaternal Medicine, BSMMU and Dhaka Medical College Hospital, Dhaka was considered as case. At the same time normal pregnant women collected from outpatient and in inpatient Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, BSMMU and Dhaka Medical College Hospital, Dhaka, more than 20 weeks was considered as control. In both groups gestational age was calculated from last menstrual date and confirmed by early ultrasound i.e., Done at <14>
Grouping of the subjects
Group (preeclampsia group): Diagnosed case of preeclampsia with gestational age more than 20 weeks was considered as Group (preeclampsia group).
Group (control group): Normal pregnancy with duration of more than 20 weeks was considered as Group (control group).
Sample size: Sample size was 100 among them 50 were preeclamptic patients and 50 were normal pregnant women.
Sample Technique: Purposive sampling was followed.
Specimen collection: The blood sample was collected from median cubital vein after asepsis with 0.5% chlorhexidine Gluconate. Freshly drawn blood was done by standard venipuncture procedure. Total 2 ml of fasting blood was collected.
For prolactin: About 2.0 ml fasting venous blood was collected into plastic red screw-capped plain tube without anticoagulant. Vial was labeled with the patient’s identification number.
Storage of sample:
For prolactin: Store in -20-degree centigrade temperature until analysis.
Test procedure
Serum prolactin: Prolactin is measured by immunochemistry auto-analyzer (Cobas e411) using the Electrochemiluminescence Immunoassay (ECLIA) with commercially available cartridge (PRL-11). Normal prolactin level is 12-17μg/L in non-pregnant women, 16μg/L in first trimester,49μg/L in second trimester,113μg/L in third trimester (Tritos, Kilbanski,2019).
Procedure of data collection
Patient was selected from outpatient and inpatient Department of Fetomaternal Medicine and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, BSMMU and Dhaka Medical College Hospital, Dhaka, who was fulfilling the selection criteria. A semi-structured questionnaire was developed in English and Bengali. Patients were informed about the purpose of the study and ethical issues. Before proceeding to data collection, the details of the study were explained to each patient and informed verbal and written consent from the respondents was obtained. Data collection procedure was initiated by the researcher himself through face-to-face interview. Physical examination was done properly. About 30-35 minutes was taken to collect data from each patient. From each subject, 2 ml of whole blood was drawn. The serum prolactin level was measured by immunochemistry auto-analyzer (Cobas e411) using the Electrochemiluminescence Immunoassay (ECLIA) with commercially available cartridge (PRL-11). Serum prolactin report was collected from Department of Laboratory Medicine, BSMMU, Dhaka. After getting reports, the laboratory data was recorded in the data sheet.
Table 1 shows the distribution of serum prolactin level of the study patients. It was observed that 2(4.0%) patients had normal serum prolactin in group I and 7(14.0%) in group II. The mean serum prolactin was found 334.06±113.34 μg/L in group I and 121.2±77.29 μg/L in group II. The difference was statistically significant between two groups.
Table 2 shows the association between serum prolactin with severity of preeclampsia. It was observed that 2(11.1%) patients had normal serum prolactin in mild preeclampsia 7(14.0%) in normal pregnancy. The mean serum prolactin was 226.56±81.23 in mild, 394.53±78.75 in severe and 121.2±77.29 in normal pregnancy. The difference was statistically significant between two groups.
Figure 1 shows that there is a positive correlation between serum prolactin level and severity of preeclampsia (r=0.719). It was observed that the Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient statistically significant (p=0.001).
The AUC of serum prolactin was 0.923 (95% CI; 0.869-0.978). The best cut off point of serum prolactin for predicting preeclampsia was 118 μg/L.
In spite of improvement of antenatal checkup, preeclampsia is still a major obstetrics problem in developing countries like Bangladesh and also in developed countries. It is the most important cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality worldwide. This cross-sectional study was carried out with an aim to evaluate the association of serum prolactin level with preeclampsia in the Department of Laboratory Medicine, BSMMU, Shahbag, Dhaka. Total 100 pregnant women more than 20 weeks of gestation attending outpatient and admitted in inpatient Department of Fetomaternal Medicine and Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU) and Dhaka Medical College Hospital, Dhaka were enrolled, 50 of them were diagnosed case of preeclampsia and 50 normal pregnant women were considered as case and control respectively. In this current study, it was observed that the mean serum prolactin was found 334.06±113.34 μg/L in group I and 121.2±77.29 μg/L in group II. The difference was statistically significant between two groups. Prolactin naturally elevated in normal pregnancy found to be raised more in preeclampsia. Malarvizhi et al. (2018) study found the mean serum prolactin level in preeclampsia was 297.46±86.43 and the mean serum prolactin level in normal pregnant women was 139.60± 26.12. The difference was statistically significant between two groups. In another study Al-Maiahy et al. (2019) demonstrated that serum prolactin level was significantly higher in patients with preeclampsia. These findings were in accordance with the findings of current study. The present study demonstrated that the mean serum prolactin level was 226.56±81.23 in mild, 394.53±78.75 μg/L in severe preeclampsia and 121.2±77.29μg/L in normal pregnancy. The mean serum prolactin was significantly higher in severe preeclampsia than mild preeclampsia and normal pregnancy. Leaños-Miranda et al. (2013) study also found that mean serum prolactin level was 184.6 μg/L to 36.7–697.1 μg/L in mild and 210.8 μg/L to 50.5–1598.8 μg/L in severe preeclamptic patient. The mean serum prolactin level was significantly higher in severe preeclampsia. Similar study done by Leonos-Miranda et al (2008) observed higher serum prolactin level in mild (162.6 μg/L) and severe in preeclamptic patients (190.5 μg/L) Compared to normal pregnant women (139 μg/L). The current study was supported by these previous studies. On the other hand, in this study there was a positive significant Spearman’s rank correlation was found between serum prolactin levels with severity of preeclampsia. Correlation between serum prolactin levels with preeclampsia was done for the first time. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves for serum prolactin level was depicted in present study. The area under curve (AUC) was 0.923 (95%CI; 0.869-0.978). This ROC curves showed that the cut off value for serum prolactin was 118 μg/L had 96.0% sensitivity and 84.0% specificity for prediction of preeclampsia. Malarvizhi et al. (2018) study found that cut off value of serum prolactin was 196μg/L had 82.9% sensitivity and 100.0% specificity. Their results were nearly consistent with our study may be due to enrolled 35 case of preeclampsia and 70 case of normal pregnant women and their average prolactin level was around 300 μg/L in preeclampsia and 150 μg/L in normal pregnant women. According to this study, it was demonstrated that a significant difference of serum prolactin level in preeclamptic patient compared to normal pregnant women. Serum prolactin levels increased more in severe cases. Our data indicate that serum prolactin level correlate with the severity of preeclampsia.
Serum prolactin level is significantly higher in patients with preeclampsia than normal pregnant women. There was positive correlation of serum prolactin level with severity of the preeclampsia. Because of significant sensitivity and specificity, serum prolactin level may be used as an important tool to diagnose preeclampsia and its severity.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
