AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article
*Corresponding Author: Abhishek Gupta, Vani Gupta, Department of Physiology, King George’s Medical University, Lucknow, UP, India. Indian Institute of Public Health Gandhinagar (IIPHG), Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India
Citation: Abhishek Gupta, Arun Kumar Singh, Priyanka Gupta, Komal Shah, Vani Gupta, (2024), Association of Interleukin-6 gene (rs1800795) variant with waist-hip-ratio and Insulin resistance: A cross-sectional study in adult women, J. Endocrinology and Disorders, 8(4): DOI:10.31579/2640-1045/187
Copyright: © 2024, Abhishek Gupta. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 05 June 2024 | Accepted: 12 June 2024 | Published: 21 June 2024
Keywords: interleukin-6; whr; homa-ir; obesity; adult women
Obesity is a major contributing factor to metabolic disorders and public health problems worldwide. The goal of the current study was to determine if the Interleukin-6 gene rs1800795 variant is linked to waist-hip-ratio (WHR) and insulin resistance (IR) in North Indian adult women. The WHO guidelines were followed by 37 women who had a WHR >0.85 and 35 women who had a WHR <0.85, out of the 72 women who took part in the study. Every adult woman underwent anthropometric measures. Fasting blood glucose, serum Insulin, lipid levels, and IL-6 levels were measured, and IR was computed. The RFLP technique was used to polymorphise the IL-6 gene (174 G>C) variant. The study group's Insulin, HOMA-IR, BMI, lipid profile, TC/HDL ratio, HDL/LDL ratio, and serum IL-6 level were shown to differ significantly from the control. The percentage frequency of the IL-6 mutant genotype GC+CC (89.19%) and mutant allele C (75.68%) was higher in the study group (WHR >0.85). According to the findings, WHR, TC, TG, and HOMA-IR were substantially correlated (all p <0.05) with the mutant genotype GC+CC of the IL-6 174 G>C gene. This study indicates that the IL-6 rs1800795 gene (174 G>C) variant was substantially linked with metabolic risk variables, such as WHR and HOMA-IR.
Globally, obesity is a significant contributing factor to metabolic diseases and issues with public health. It is characterized by poor lifestyle choices, high calorie fat foods, and minimal physical activity. Obesity is a risk factor for diabetes that is associated with insulin resistance (IR). Type II diabetes (T2), hypertension, and cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) may be triggered by this (1). It is an increase in the quantity of adipose tissue (AT), and the production of components by AT that makes some people more IR than others is one explanation for obesity-related IR. As both increase waist-hip-ratio (WHR) and IR are emerging risk factors associated with abdominal obesity and said to be more genetically predisposed for the same in Indians. All classifications including EGIR, WHO, and NCEP-ATP III 2001, recognize the importance of abdominal obesity (2). Conversely, the WHO definition suggests use the waist-hip ratio (WHR) in place of waist circumferences (WC), and the NCEP definition provides the loosest criteria for WC.
Increase in hormonal level, pro-inflammatory cytokine, and non-esterified fatty acid levels are released by AT in centrally obese individuals, and these factors may play a role in the emergence of IR. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is a cytokine that affects the immune system and inflammation. Evidence for genetic control of human body weight and composition is well established. So far single gene mutations have only been identified as the cause of morbid obesity in young individuals in about 5% of the cases (3-5). Moreover, little is known about susceptibility genes contributing to modest obesity although knowledge is accumulating. There has been research on the relationship between many health issues and polymorphisms in the IL-6 location i.e., 174 G>C in the promoter region (6-9), including risk factors including IR and abdominal obesity in an estimated sample size study. However, no such data are available in the smaller study on IL-6 adipokines gene status and its correlation with abdominal obesity, which justify the effect of IL-6 variant on risk factors in an Indian adult woman. There is a conflicting body of research about the potential association between IR and the IL-6 174 G>C gene.
In the present study, we proposed that abdominal obesity is more likely among people with a WHR of greater than 0.85 who also had hypertriglyceridemia, lower HDL cholesterol, and higher IR. Abdominal obesity is more common among women who have polymorphism in the IL-6 promoter region. The primary aim of the study was to evaluate the IR status of obese (study group; WHR >0.85) women using the homeostatic model assessment index (HOMA-index) and compare them to non-obese (control group; WHR <0>C gene's frequency distribution pattern and correlation with anthropometric variables and metabolic risk factors in adult women who are obese and non-obese.
2.1. Study population
A total of 72 women (37 study group women who had a WHR >0.85 and 35 control group women who had a WHR <0>0.85 were designated obese (control).
A questionnaire was used to collect data on menstruation history, diet, family history, and medical conditions. Each woman participating in the study was without any kind of metabolic, endocrine, inflammatory, cardiac, and respiratory disorders. All the women were also neither an alcoholic or diabetic. The study excluded women who were nursing, pregnant, or experiencing any type of obstetrical or gynecological issue, as well as those who were taking medication. The study was approved by the ethical committee of KGMU, Lucknow. Written informed consent was obtained from all the participants women.
2.2. Blood collection and biochemical analysis
A total of 6 ml of venous blood was taken in the morning following an overnight fast from each adult women participated in the study. Plasma and serum were extracted from each blood samples which were used in the determination of biochemical, blood glucose and lipid profiles. Remaining of that were taken and placed in EDTA vials to extract DNA using a commercial kit (Qiagen, USA). The GOD-POD method was used to estimate the plasma glucose (Randox Laboratories Ltd., Antrim, UK), lipid profile by enzymatic method (Randox Laboratories Ltd., Antrim, UK), and serum insulin was assessed by immuno-radiometric assay method (Immunotech Radiova, Prague). Serum IL-6 level was determined by a sandwich ELISA method (Diaclone, France). By using the HOMA-Index, IR was calculated using the equation: HOMA Index = [fasting Insulin (μU/I) x fasting glucose (mmol/l)/ 22.5] (12). The HOMA-index 3.6 was used to make a laboratory diagnosis of IR in people who did not meet the clinical and biological criteria for the condition.
2.3. IL-6 174 G>C promoter gene analysis by PCR
DNA was extracted from cellular blood components by the salting out method. Genotyping procedure for the detection of the IL-6 174 G>C gene was examined (13). All mutant and heterozygous samples of women were re-genotyped in order to increase the genotyping quality and validation, and only the results for reproducible and error-free samples were documented. IL-6 174 G>C gene was detected by PCR on the Thermo Cycler instrument (Bio-Rad Inc. Hercules, CA, USA) with subsequent restriction analysis of PCR products (RFLP). SfaN1 restricted fragment were visualized using a 2.0% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide.
2.4. Statistical analysis
All data was statistically analyzed by using ‘unpaired student t test’ and multiple logistic regression and Fisher- exact test. Where appropriate, χ 2 analysis was performed. Odds ratios and 95% confidence interval are given accordingly. Data were summarized as means ± standard deviation (SD). P values of <0>
3.1. Anthropometric variables and biochemical profile in study and control group women
The anthropometric variables and biochemical profile of the adult women in the study (obese) and control group (non-obese) are displayed in Table 1.
| S. No. | Parameters | Control group (WHR <0 n=35)> | Study group (WHR >0.85, n=37) | p value |
| 1. | Age (years) | 27.77 ± 4.45 | 25.68 ± 5.58 | NS |
| 2. | WHR | 0.79 ± 0.04 | 0.89 ± 0.02 | *** |
| 3. | BMI (kg/m2) | 21.81 ± 3.11 | 25.46 ± 5.72 | * |
| 4. | Blood glucose (mg/dl) | 97.57 ± 18.29 | 96.38 ± 12.91 | NS |
| 5. | TC (mg/dl) | 155.26 ± 29.90 | 173.87 ± 37.24 | * |
| 6. | TG (mg/dl) | 126.47 ± 34.64 | 123.29 ± 34.98 | NS |
| 7. | HDL (mg/dl) | 51.16 ± 16.18 | 44.62 ± 8.34 | * |
| 8. | LDL (mg/dl) | 82.29 ± 30.83 | 107.70 ± 31.91 | * |
| 9. | VLDL (mg/dl) | 25.23 ± 6.84 | 24.37 ± 6.60 | NS |
| 10. | TC / HDL | 3.35 ± 1.41 | 4.04 ± 1.23 | * |
| 11. | HDL/ LDL | 0.76 ± 0.49 | 0.45 ± 0.16 | * |
| 12. | Insulin (ml) | 7.43 ± 3.57 | 15.44 ± 7.48 | *** |
| 13. | HOMA-IR | 1.80 ± 0.97 | 3.74 ± 1.77 | ** |
| 14. | IL-6 (pg/ml) | 3.30 ± 2.12 | 6.02 ± 3.62 | ** |
Table 1: Anthropometric and biochemical profile in control and study group women Values shown as mean ± SD. p value ***<0>
WHR, waist-hip-ratio; BMI, body mass index; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; HDL, high density lipoprotein; LDL, low density lipoprotein; VLDL, very low-density lipoprotein; HOMA-IR, homeostatic model assessment-insulin resistance; IL-6, Interleukin-6
In the study group women, there were varying degrees of changes to the following data: WHR (0.89 ± 0.02), blood glucose (96.38 ± 12.91), TG (123.29 ± 34.98), HDL/LDL ratio (0.45 ± 0.16), Insulin (15.44 ± 7.48), IR (HOMA-IR) (3.74 ± 1.77) and serum IL-6 level (6.02 ± 3.62). In
contrast, in the control group women, there were varying degrees of changes to WHR (0.79 ± 0.04), blood glucose (97.57 ± 18.29), TG (126.47 ± 34.64), HDL/LDL ratio (0.76 ± 0.49), Insulin (7.43 ± 3.57), IR (HOMA-IR) (1.80 ± 0.97) and serum IL-6 level (3.30 ± 2.12). In the study group women, highly significant p values were discovered such as WHR, insulin, and IR (calculated HOMA-IR) (all p <0>(Figure 1 & Figure 2).
Figure 1: Metabolic risk factors (WHR, BMI, Insulin, IR and TC/HDL ratio) in study and control group women. WHR, waist-hip-ratio; BMI, body mass index; IR, insulin resistance; TC/HDL, total cholesterol/ high-density lipoprotein
Figure 2. Lipid profile (TC, TG, LDL, HDL and VLDL) in study and control group women.TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; HDL, high density lipoprotein; VLDL, very low-density lipoprotein
3.2. Frequency distribution pattern of genotypes and alleles in IL-6 gene variant
On the other hand, allele and genotype frequencies of IL-6 174 G>C gene variant in study and control group are displayed in Table 2.
Frequency distribution | Groups | Control group n=35 | Study group n=37 | OR (95% CI) | p value
|
| Genotype | GG* | 8 (22.86%) | 4 (10.81%) | - | reference |
| GC | 8 (22.86%) | 10 (27.03%) | 2.50 (0.55-11.41) | 0.284 | |
| CC | 19 (54.28%) | 23 (62.16%) | 2.42 (0.63-9.30) | 0.326 | |
| GC+CC | 27 (77.14%) | 33 (89.19%) | 2.44 (0.66-9.00) | 0.214 | |
| Allele | G** | 24 (34.29%) | 18 (24.32%) | - | reference |
| C | 46 (65.71%) | 56 (75.68%) | 1.62 (0.79-3.35) | 0.204 |
Table 2: Allele and genotypes frequencies of IL-6 174 G>C gene polymorphism among control (WHR <0>0.85) group women
Values expressed as a number (percentage); OR, odd ratio; CI, Confidence Interval.
Number of genotypes; Control group (n=35) and Study group (n=37)
Number of alleles; Control group (n=70) and Study group (n=74)
In comparison with wildtype genotype GG* and wildtype alleles G**; taken as reference
The frequency for the wild type G allele was 24.32% and 34.29%, and for the mutant C allele was 75.68% and 65.71%, in study and control group, respectively. In the study group (WHR >0.85), there was a greater percentage frequency of the IL-6 mutant genotype GC+CC (89.19%) and mutant allele C (75.68%) than control group.
3.3. Association of IL-6 gene variant and metabolic risk factors
Women in the obese group with a WHR >0.85, the relationship between metabolic risk factors and the IL-6 gene variant are shown in Table 3.
| Metabolic risk factors | GG | GC + CC | OR (95% CI) | p value |
| WHR >0.85 | 4 | 33 | 0.784 (0.638-0.929) | *** |
| HOMA Index > 3.6 | 1 | 16 | 0.406 (0.232-0.579) | *** |
| TC/HDL > 3.8 | 2 | 18 | 0.433 (0.250-0.615) | *** |
| TG> 150 (mg/dl) | 1 | 6 | 0.135 (0.002-0.269) | * |
Table 3: Association of IL-6 174 G>C gene and metabolic risk factors in study group women (WHR >0.85, n=37)
OR, odd ratio; CI, Confidence Interval. p value <0>
WHR, waist-hip-ratio; HOMA, homeostatic model assessment; TC, total cholesterol; HDL, high density lipoprotein; TG, triglyceride
GG- wild type genotype, GC+CC- combined mutant genotype
Significant association was observed between at least one mutant G allele of the IL-6 gene variant (174 G>C) and high WHR >0.85 (p=0.0001), HOMA-index >3.6 (p=0.0001), serum TC/HDL >3.8 (p=0.0001), and serum TG >150 mg/dl (p=0.047) were noted.
The current study's findings have a significant influence on creating a healthy environment. One of the most hazardous aspects of an unhealthy body is obesity. Individuals that suffer with this metabolic disorder don't live their lives to the fullest. The current research indicates that adipokine synthesis and release occur primarily in human AT in obese individuals. It has been demonstrated that abdominal obesity raises the risk of metabolic diseases (14,15) including diabetes (16) as well as coronary heart disease (17). What causes the higher risk of fat storage in the abdominal area compared to general adiposity is yet unknown, though?
There are also notable variations in serum TC, LDL, HDL levels, HDL/LDL and TC/HDL, as well as in the levels of insulin, and IR in control and study women. This observation implies that one possible role for the linked variations may be in the development and cause of metabolic syndrome. The body's actual fat deposition will be aided by the results of the HDL/LDL ratio. The WHR is a significant contributor to obesity and a key indicator of the disease's progression. The accumulation of body fat that results in abdominal obesity is measured by taking measurements of the waist and hip circumferences. The correlation between rising adiposity and the development of IR implies that adipocyte products may play a significant role in IR.
Up to 30% of the total circulation concentration of IL-6 is secreted by AT (18,19), which may disrupt insulin signaling and cause IR in healthy individuals. Adipocyte-produced adipokine IL-6 is overexpressed in obese individuals with IR, and there is a link between the adipokine release. The results will encourage more research on the relationship between IR and IL-6 with WHR >0.85 in adult women, which implies that IR is the root cause of obesity. Additionally, obesity has been clearly linked to increased levels of circulating IL-6, body fat tissue, WC, and BMI. Higher levels of diabetes are correlated with higher levels of insulin sensitivity, and elevated levels of circulating IL-6 are linked to aberrant circulating lipid levels.
Polymorphism of adipokine gene at promoter region may suggest the alteration in transcription level, which may be led to metabolic changes and pathophysiology of IR. Several single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and repeat polymorphisms have been described in the IL-6 gene region, but there are few known in the coding region or of intron/ exon boundaries of the IL-6 gene (20). IL-6 gene transcription was found to be influenced by the C-174G polymorphism within the IL-6 promoter region (13,21). However, data about the effects of IL-6 gene variants on its IL-6 levels in humans are contradictory (22,23). The biallelic 174 IL-6 G>C SNP, which is located within the negative regulative domain of the IL-6 gene promoter, has been found to affect transcriptional regulation. It has been discovered that the IL-6 174 G>C gene affects transcription, leading to elevated IL-6 production in peripheral blood cells (24,25). The present study findings showed that combined mutant genotype GC+CC of the IL-6 gene was a high-risk genotype for the development of metabolic risk in comparison to their control counterpart. In line with the findings (26), we also observed a higher % frequency distribution of IL-6 gene in study women compared to control women. Additionally, we showed that women with mutant GC+CC genotypes had a significantly higher WHR than women with the wild GG genotype.
5. Conclusion
The study's primary findings indicate that the obese group (WHR >0.85) had a significantly higher p values for metabolic factors such as WHR, TC, Insulin, HOMA-IR and serum IL-6 level. Thus, this study concluded that risk factors including WHR and HOMA-IR have strong correlation with the IL-6 rs1800795 gene (174G > C) variant. However, further research with larger sample sizes and addressing the identified limitations is warranted to validate and build upon these initial findings.
Acknowledgements: The authors would like to thank the women participants who participated in this study. We extend our gratitude to the medical professionals and residents of King George's Medical University (KGMU), Lucknow, India, for their kind assistance with this research.
Funding: An intramural grant of one year from King George's Medical University (KGMU), Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India, financed this research.
Conflict of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
